COMPARATIVE EFFECTIVENESS RESEARCH AND SOCIAL WORK FINAL REPORTRecommendations to Promote Practice-Research Linkages• Further develop researcher/practitioner/client linkages as a standard of practice by buildingsupport from administrators, universities, and advocacy organizations for such linkages.• Train current practitioners about how research can be used to inform practice, includingstrategies for adopting and adapting interventions.• Expand practitioners’ knowledge of research to foster collaborations for more research inreal world settings.• Encourage practitioners to pursue publishing results of evaluations and outcomes ofpractice. Many practitioners evaluate the outcomes of practice, but do not disseminate theresearch. Dissemination of practice research could enhance the knowledge base needed tobuild or establish an intervention’s effectiveness.• Integrate research skills into clinical training programs within universities and agencies sothat practitioners can be taught to use and produce research.• Encourage organizations to support practitioners’ use of and production of research byallocating time and resources to establish research as a component of employment.Strategies could include adding research expectations in job descriptions and byrecognizing and rewarding research activities in annual employee evaluations.• Consider both cost and cost effectiveness in selecting and evaluating interventions. Lesseffective, yet cheaper interventions may end up costing the agency more money in the longrun in addition to the personal implications for patients when less effective interventionsare used.The social work profession and especially the social work research enterprise is well-positioned tobe fully engaged with Comparative Effectiveness Research efforts, based on the definitions,priorities, strategies and challenges laid out by the federal government. Attention needs to begiven to continuing to build social work effectiveness research; involving social workers as part ofinterdisciplinary research teams; ensuring that findings from social work research are included indata and research repositories and systematic reviews; encouraging participatory research effortsthat fully engage service providers and consumers; encouraging economic evaluation as an integralpart of research studies; facilitating innovative research dissemination strategies and strengtheningresearch/practice/policy linkages. Professional and scientific societies, universities, service provideragencies, consumers and funders of research and services all have important roles to play inensuring the health and well-being of our society, especially those at highest risk to experiencehealth disparities.SOCIAL WORK POLICY INSTITUTE 24
COMPARATIVE EFFECTIVENESS RESEARCH AND SOCIAL WORK FINAL REPORTREFERENCESAmerican Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009, Pub. L. No. 111-5 § 804, 123 Stat. 188 (2009).Community-Campus Partnerships for Health. (2008). Definition of community-based participatoryresearch. Retrieved August 31, 2008 from http://depts.washington.edu/ccph/commbas.htmlGorey, K. M., Thyer, B. A., & Pawluck, D. E. (1998). Differential effectiveness of prevalent socialwork practice models: A meta-analysis. <strong>Social</strong> <strong>Work</strong>, 43(3), 269-278<strong>Institute</strong> for the Advancement of <strong>Social</strong> <strong>Work</strong> Research (IASWR). (2009). Directory of <strong>Social</strong><strong>Work</strong> Research Grants Awarded by the National <strong>Institute</strong>s of Health: 1993-2009 Retrievedfrom INSERT WEB ADDRESS<strong>Institute</strong> for the Advancement of <strong>Social</strong> <strong>Work</strong> Research (IASWR). (2007). Partnerships to IntegrateEvidence-Based Mental Health Practices into <strong>Social</strong> <strong>Work</strong> Education and Research: <strong>Report</strong>from April 12, 2007 Symposium. Retrieved fromhttp://login.npwebsiteservices.com/iaswr/EvidenceBasedPractice<strong>Final</strong>.pdf<strong>Institute</strong> of Medicine [IOM]. (2009). Initial National Priorities for Comparative EffectivenessResearch. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. Retrieved fromhtt://books.nap.edu/openbook.php?record_id=12648&page=R1Mullen, E. J., Melly, J., Volland, P., & Shuluk, J. (2008, September 24). What Can Be Concludedfrom General Reviews of <strong>Social</strong> <strong>Work</strong> Effectiveness? Presentation presented at the 11thAnnual Inter-Centre Network for the Evaluation of <strong>Social</strong> <strong>Work</strong> Practice Meeting, Universityof Jyväskylä, Finland. Retrieved from http://socialworkleadership.org/nsw/cap/resources/<strong>Social</strong>_<strong>Work</strong>_Effectiveness_Findings.pdfNational Association of <strong>Social</strong> <strong>Work</strong>ers (1999). NASW Code of Ethics, PreambleNational Association of <strong>Social</strong> <strong>Work</strong>ers (2009). The NASW Shift Project: Suicide prevention foradolescent girls. National Association of <strong>Social</strong> <strong>Work</strong>ers: Washington DC. Retrieved from:http://socialworkers.org/practice/adolescent_health/shift/National <strong>Institute</strong>s of Health (2003). NIH Plan for <strong>Social</strong> <strong>Work</strong> Research. Bethesda, MD: Author.Retrieved from http://obssr.od.nih.gov/pdf/SWR_<strong>Report</strong>.pdfReid, W. J. (1997). Evaluating the dodo’s verdict: Do all interventions have equivalent outcomes?<strong>Social</strong> <strong>Work</strong> Research, 21(1), 5-16.Reid, W. J., Kenaley, B. D., & Colvin, J. (2004). Do some interventions work better than others? -A review of comparative social work experiments. <strong>Social</strong> <strong>Work</strong> Research, 28(2), 71-81Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration [SAMHSA]. (2002). Mental Health.Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.Shlonsky, A., Fuller-Thomson, E. and Baker, T. (n.d.). Avoiding the Avalanche: Improving SearchStrategies for Evidence through the Use of Methodological Filters. University of Toronto,Factor-Inwentash Faculty of <strong>Social</strong> <strong>Work</strong>.U.S. Department of Health and Human Services [DHHS]. (2009). Federal Coordinating Councilfor Comparative Effectiveness Research: <strong>Report</strong> to the President and the Congress.Washington, DC: Author. Retrieved fromwww.hhs.gov/recovery/programs/cer/cerannualrpt.pdfSOCIAL WORK POLICY INSTITUTE 25