30.07.2015 Views

booklet of abstracts - Oxford University Byzantine Society

booklet of abstracts - Oxford University Byzantine Society

booklet of abstracts - Oxford University Byzantine Society

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

the battle <strong>of</strong> Polybotes, Seljuks were defeatedby <strong>Byzantine</strong>s. Romanos Diogenes lost thebattle and was blinded. In the Alexiad, therole <strong>of</strong> the blinded loser is given to sultanShahanshah.In my presentation I intend to show thatone can interpret the last campaign <strong>of</strong> AlexiosKomnenos in Anatolia as a ‘mirror’ <strong>of</strong> the battle<strong>of</strong> Mantzikert. By inserting this episode intoher narrative, Anna Komnene built a circularnarrative structure: the biography <strong>of</strong> her fatherstarted with Mantzikert, and finished with it. In1071, Alexios was too young to fight; in 1116,Anna Komnene made her father defeat theSeljuks and ‘reverse’ the battle <strong>of</strong> 1071.Roman Shlyakhtin is writing his dissertationon the image <strong>of</strong> the Seljuk Turks in<strong>Byzantine</strong> historiography <strong>of</strong> the eleventh andtwelfth centuries. He is interested in the history<strong>of</strong> <strong>Byzantine</strong> literature and the history <strong>of</strong>images in general. He is also working on severalsmall projects in the area <strong>of</strong> military history;his dream is to write a book about the battleat Myriokephalon (1176), which he tried toreconstruct in his MA Thesis. He also takesinterest in the history <strong>of</strong> <strong>Byzantine</strong> diplomacy,with special attention to the relations between<strong>Byzantine</strong> Empire and Crusader States.‘In the world but not <strong>of</strong> it’: thecontribution <strong>of</strong> the monasticeconomy to the functioning <strong>of</strong>trading networks in the eleventhto the thirteenth centuriesGary Pitts<strong>University</strong> <strong>of</strong> London – Royal HollowayThe great monasteries <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Byzantine</strong> Empirewere <strong>of</strong>ten as well-resourced as the dynatoi andhad significant territorial and administrativereach, coupled with a robust infrastructure andtax privileges. They also had an internationaldimension involving some <strong>of</strong> the ‘diaspora’trading communities (e.g. the Amalfitans andthe Armenians). This paper examines the rolethat the trading infrastructure <strong>of</strong> the great<strong>Byzantine</strong> monasteries played in the broaderweb <strong>of</strong> trading networks. These networkslinked local and international trading networksand were a powerful force for commerce withinthe Empire and beyond. By examining thecases <strong>of</strong> key monastic communities and theirtrading activities, this paper aims to identifywhether there are any conclusions which canbe applied to less well-documented normalcommercial activity. The paper will use bothtextual and archaeological evidence.Gary Pitts is a part-time MPhil/PhD studentat Royal Holloway, <strong>University</strong> <strong>of</strong> London,working on a thesis on the functioning andinteraction <strong>of</strong> trading networks in the EasternMediterranean in the tenth to the thirteenthcenturies. He is interested in diaspora networksand the economic life <strong>of</strong> objects. Garyis Head <strong>of</strong> Compliance for Europe, Mid-Eastand Africa <strong>of</strong> an investment bank.The 2011 International Graduate Conference | 15

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!