-ry wL - Universitetet i Oslo

More documents

Recommendations

Info

140 young material with unripe spores. As seen from the right hand specimen on lnu 6noto in Gulden & al. (1985: 15), such young specimens are superficially very similar to cantharellus. This collection from Dovre has been chosen as neotype. ericetorrn. This epithet is often ueed for 0. umbellifera. In actual fact Fries sanctioned both names, but the Linneai-i?ifiFlGference according to the new Code. The author citation and typification has been under discussion. i""g"-(fSAi) cites it as (Fr. ex Fr.) M. Lange and designates Lundell & ll"nif"iat, iungi exs. Suec. 1751 as a neotype. He adds: "This specimen shall agree with the illustration Flora Danica Tab' 1015, quoted by Friee.and by Qt1€letu. Since this illustration is part of the original material, it takes preference over the neotype, and is 6y us regarded as the lectotype' likewise oointed out bY Lanqe. --- n"Jf,""A &'Kuyp6r (98': . tZ6-tZ9) cite (Pers.: Fr.) as authors and regard the name as typi'fied by the type of A. pseudoandrosggea Bull. They overlookt hor"u"", that'Fries (AZlz 1e5) only-Ef6Tis own-0bs' mycol' 1 p'-87' Persoonis A, ericetorum is synonymiled under Fries'forma "b' gPllg"' is therefoft-iffilEiETf forma eiicetorum. Lange's author citation is iherefore correct, and so is n:.Spi-fication. It is quite legal to ehoose any of the elements included by the sanctioning author' flava. Pil6t snd Nannfeldt (1954) dismiss this ePithet as a name available for their 0. luteovitellina, since they regard Mijller's combination as being basedonanomennuoum|-A.uqbe1111prgqvai.-1ravu9Cooke'However,they overlooked the fact tnlt-ef f en (ffilZS6-257) had given a short description of this name. Accoriing to the present Code Art. 33.2t Mtiller's basionym can be regarded as having an incorrect form of author citation (see i". g.i, and his c6mbination is therefore valid. Somrnerfelt apparently first "orp"""d his B flavus with A. niv61i8 VahI, and found it to be different_by the convex, umUTGiTe is according to the iflustration (VahI 1792, Iab.'1O7122) a species@ ""p.@ complex' No Sonrmerfelt material has been locatedl-End a-neotype from the same general region hae been selected. sriaella. This epithet was already used by Fries (1821:.,|65), and I'leinmann, (ft1e, gl), who is often regarded as the author, aPPears only to^follow Fries'treatment, also citing A. ericetorum Pets. as a synonym of'rb' orisellust,. However, Weinmann fr'a6-no-Elrect reference to Fries, end it is Tffi;fore best to attribute the name to him alone. This is, however, of Iittle consequence since Karsten (1890) when the.epithet.was firEt uaed on specific leveI, records it as 0mphalia qrisella (Weinm.?) Karst' n' sp' He describes it as a new species,GTif-iiT61-se-d on Weinmann or Fries. The combination 0mphaline qrieella (Weinm.) Moser is invalid since Moser fails to cite the basionym, laetevircns. D. Turner first used this epithet for the sterife squamules usually known as corisciurn viride, based on a specimen from England which he sent to Acharius.Tcfr:rGTT610-l 100) published it, however, under his own name, Endocarpon viride, basing it on Turner's specimen citing his unpuu1easasynonym.TUrner,sepitheL.was,however,1ater talen up and validly published by Borrer in Hooker (t810) as ]errucgria Iaetevirens, but as the valid Er:rdocaTpolr_viride Ach. is cited as a synonym' Ehe narne is illegitimate and not available. pseudoandrosacee. This epithet has been used for several different species of bmphalina. mostly because of uncertainty concerninq its typification' Redhead E-'iiiiFer (ts87: )29) leetotypified it on e Bulliard illustration' inteipreting it as the white form of L urleuifere, and have accordingly and
141 hopefully stabilized the nomenclature. rugtica. This epithet has sometimes been used for the lichenized species we calt 0. velutina (Singer & Cl6mengon 197?). Ihe name has, however, particuTarly after Lange (193O2 12), been used for a non-lichenized, 4-spored species with dark grey gills and almost smooth stipe. l{e agree with Redheed & Kuyper (1987: IJB) that Fries (1818) distinguished between these two taxa, and that the lichenized 0. veLutina is treated as a form of A, umbelliferus. as it was already in 182Ti-TZfifre- awkward fact is, howeverlGT-Fffi-oon's illustration of A. ericetorum (t. +, fig. 12), which is the only original material teft ofTlGEl@and by FriJs called t'optime (contri texfumt)", in our opinion moEETG6if!-is 0. velutine. It is distinctly lichenized, the stipe, particularly on the specimen to the right appears to be hairy when studied under the lens and the gills are whitish grey, not dark grey as in A. rustica. There is no sign of discolouring, as claimed by Singer (961:23).- The whitish colour of other species on the plate is well preserved. Sinqer has selected a specimen collected by Persoon (L) as the lectotype of A. gricetolum Pers. This is 0. umbellifera, thus confirming the opinion 6? l-ries, that Persoon's illustration does not agree with the description. As this irrustration i.s also in conflict with Fries'concept and description of A. rusticus, it cannot be chosen as a lectotype for that name either, and a lgotyp: must be designated. We have chosen a specimen from Femsjii, obviously the only locality from where Fries (Fries 1949: ZB3) knew it when he nade the 91igin91 description: Sweden, Femsjii, Sl6ttagHrdsskogen, fotbollsplanen, )1. VIII.1949 S. Lundell & J. StordaL no 6O27 (UpS, neotype). tnis specimen is in accord with the concept of 0. rustica as correctly adopted by e.g. Lange (1910) and Gulden & Lange (ffitffiiras A-spored basidia, dirk incrusted, clamped hyphae and the spores are (5-)7-g(-,10) x 4-4,5 pm. udellifera, This is a Linnean epithet, taking preference over any later epithet. For further details see Jorgensen & fryman (1989). velutina. Arready Fries (1821: 165) used this epithet on form revel for this texon. It was, however, teken up by Qu6ret on species revel without reference to Fries both in the genus 0mphalia and 0mphaLina in works evidently both published in 1885. since tlEi,iFan aote-fr?ffithe Enchir. funq. citino the plates of the work in Ass. frang., the former is most probably the older] The author citation should therefore be (Qu6l.) Quet. No specinens have been traced at PC or UPS, and accordingly the irlustration is the onry original material. left and is here designated as the lectotype. It is typical ior the species traditionally called 0, verutina, except for a peculiai star-tike hyphal weft at the base of ttre sEipe.-WE- have, however, located similar specimens in Scandinavian collections (".g: Sweden, Blekinge, Riideby par., Kdstorp 17.rx.1946 5. Lundell no 2428 (up5), as 0mphalia qiisella),'verifying that this phenomenon does occur in 0. velutina viride. This epithet, given to the sterile squamules of 0. hudsoniana. should' aceording to Art. 59, have been taken up for thi@Ti6wever, there is. already en.0mphalilg viridis (Hornem.) Kuyper, a different species, so a combi.nat.ion into Onpharina of the Acharien name wourd only create a Later, iLlegitimate hofionyrn. Conclusion The above data and relevant discussions result in the adoption of the following nomenclature for the four lichenized Omphalina species in Scandinavia:
Page 1 and 2: I, hh rje, r b Vo[- z rrn, y oktolr
Page 3 and 4: OveAlmbornTS6r ove och jag triiffad
Page 5 and 6: 125 Graphis Scripta 22125-127, 1989
Page 7 and 8: 127 previously reported). It was la
Page 9 and 10: 129 chromatography (fLC; Culberson
Page 11 and 12: . 1__--1 I I t \ t f 0 ( t oo qa tt
Page 13 and 14: 133 Huovinen, K., Ahti, T. 6. stenr
Page 15 and 16: Betriiffande avgrd.nsningsproblem h
Page 17 and 18: 137 Mycket talar emellertid ftir at
Page 19: 139 alpina. Bresinsky & Stangl (197
Page 23 and 24: Literature 143 Acharius, E. 1810: L
Page 25 and 26: 145 and threatened by modern forest
Page 27 and 28: 147 bryophytes. Sorkapp Land. rare.
Page 29 and 30: 149 The lichen flora on the peak of
Page 31 and 32: 151 are presented in Table 3 and 4.
Page 33 and 34: L. insularis L. lapicida L. orosthe
Page 35 and 36: Beferences 155 Arup, U. & Ekman, S.
Page 37 and 38: 157 snabbt och var Ig48 uppe i unge
Page 39 and 40: afien ej {terfunnen nyfynd Figur 4.
Page 41 and 42: Graphis ScriPta 2: 161, 1989. 161 G
Page 43 and 44: n.11610, pe Fraxinus excelsior. Vii
Page 45 and 46: 165 Museum j-n Giiteborg (Naturhist
Page 47 and 48: 167 Lamb, I. M- 1977 z A' conspectu
Page 49 and 50: I ov , , . Qaloplaca brattiae belon
Page 51 and 52: 171 The species is for the present
Page 53 and 54: 173 forest which appeared to the ve
Page 55 and 56: Graphis Scripta 2: 175, 1 989 175 C

-ry wL - Universitetet i Oslo

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?