05.12.2012 Views

Department of Transport Annual Report 2010 - 2011

Department of Transport Annual Report 2010 - 2011

Department of Transport Annual Report 2010 - 2011

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong><br />

<strong>2010</strong> - <strong>2011</strong>


<strong>Department</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Transport</strong> <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong><br />

<strong>2010</strong>-11<br />

version 2<br />

Our purpose<br />

To provide safe, accessible, sustainable and efficient transport services and systems<br />

which promote economic prosperity and enhance the lifestyles <strong>of</strong> all Western<br />

Australians.<br />

Our vision<br />

To be recognised for excellence in customer service in providing world class<br />

transport services and solutions.<br />

Our services<br />

The <strong>Department</strong> benefits the community in many ways through planning, development<br />

and regulation <strong>of</strong> transport operations and systems; licensing services; strategic<br />

transport policy and integrated transport planning.<br />

Our goals<br />

To provide effective and efficient transport systems and services to the economy <strong>of</strong><br />

Western Australia, and assist the well-being <strong>of</strong> all Western Australians.<br />

We will do this by:<br />

• Focussing on strategic transport policy and planning, regulation and operational<br />

transport functions across the range <strong>of</strong> public and commercial transport systems<br />

that service Western Australia;<br />

• Connecting people with goods and services through an intricate system <strong>of</strong><br />

roads, railways, airports, ports and waterways and educating and regulating to<br />

keep them safe within those networks; and<br />

• Planning, co-ordinating and prioritising the transport related infrastructure that<br />

allows our economy to grow.<br />

Our outcomes<br />

• <strong>Transport</strong> system and services development, planning, operation and regulation.<br />

• Motor vehicle and driver licensing services.<br />

• Strategic transport policy.<br />

• Integrated transport planning.<br />

Our values<br />

Teamwork<br />

We work together in the spirit <strong>of</strong> cooperation.<br />

Respect<br />

We welcome and accept differences and commonalities.<br />

Passion<br />

We embrace work with enthusiasm and energy.<br />

Learning and innovation<br />

We grow and seek better solutions.<br />

Commitment and pride<br />

We strive for excellence and do our best.<br />

Honesty and integrity<br />

We act ethically and fairly.<br />

Leadership<br />

We inspire and guide others.<br />

Understanding<br />

We listen and respond appropriately.


Contents<br />

Overview <strong>of</strong> agency ii<br />

Statement <strong>of</strong> compliance with the Financial Management Act 2006 ii<br />

Director General’s foreword 1<br />

Executive summary 2<br />

Financial summary 4<br />

Organisational structure 6<br />

Legislation priorities 8<br />

Outcome based management framework 10<br />

Goal 1: Outcome based service delivery 10<br />

Goal 2: State building – Major projects 12<br />

Agency performance 14<br />

Significant issues impacting the agency 30<br />

Financial targets 31<br />

Government policy requirements 32<br />

Policy statement 32<br />

Occupational health safety and wellbeing key performance indicators 32<br />

Disability access and inclusion plan outcomes 34<br />

Workers compensation and rehabilitation 35<br />

Substantive equality 36<br />

Peer support program 36<br />

Employee assistance 36<br />

Employment and industrial relations 37<br />

Internal audit reviews 37<br />

Audit and risk management committee (ARMC) 38<br />

Risk management 38<br />

Freedom <strong>of</strong> information 39<br />

Other legal requirements 40<br />

Advertising 40<br />

Better recordkeeping 40<br />

Governance disclosure 41<br />

Ministerial directives 41<br />

Financial disclosures 41<br />

Major capital projects 41<br />

Financial statements 42<br />

Auditor General independent audit opinion 42<br />

Certification <strong>of</strong> financial statements 44<br />

Financial statements 45<br />

Key performance indicators 94<br />

Certification <strong>of</strong> key performance indicators 94<br />

Key performance indicators 94<br />

Office locations 110<br />

i


Overview <strong>of</strong> agency<br />

ii<br />

Statement <strong>of</strong> compliance with the Financial<br />

Management Act 2006<br />

For the year ended 30 June <strong>2011</strong><br />

To the Minister<br />

Hon Troy Buswell BEc MLA<br />

Minister for <strong>Transport</strong><br />

In accordance with Section 61 <strong>of</strong> the Financial Management<br />

Act 2006, I hereby submit for your information and<br />

presentation to Parliament the <strong>Department</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Transport</strong>’s<br />

annual report for the financial year ended 30 June <strong>2011</strong>.<br />

The report has been prepared in accordance with the<br />

provisions <strong>of</strong> the Financial Management Act 2006 and fulfils<br />

the <strong>Department</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Transport</strong>’s reporting obligations under<br />

the Public Sector Management Act 1994, the Disability<br />

Services Act 1993 and the Electoral Act 1907.<br />

Reece Waldock<br />

Director General - <strong>Transport</strong><br />

Hon Troy Buswell BEc MLA<br />

Minister for <strong>Transport</strong>


Director General’s foreword<br />

The <strong>Department</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Transport</strong> (DoT) has made great strides towards becoming the<br />

leader in transport in Western Australia over the past two years.<br />

DoT’s Policy, Planning and Investment division has been extremely active and some<br />

<strong>of</strong> the projects it has been engaged in include the High Street upgrade in Fremantle,<br />

the Public <strong>Transport</strong> Network Plan, upgrades to the State’s grain freight network and<br />

securing the future <strong>of</strong> Fremantle Ports’ inner harbour.<br />

Similarly DoT’s operations division, <strong>Transport</strong> Services, also delivered some good<br />

outcomes in the past year.<br />

The division oversaw construction <strong>of</strong> a multi-million dollar public boat-launching<br />

facility at Port Kennedy, commencement <strong>of</strong> works at the Milligan Street Secure Taxi<br />

Rank and the $1.9 million demolition and reconstruction <strong>of</strong> D Jetty at Hillarys Boat<br />

Harbour.<br />

Aside from those things DoT also:<br />

• Successfully introduced a new demerit point system for novice (L and P plate)<br />

drivers.<br />

• Secured $7.74 million for the replacement <strong>of</strong> taxi camera units to make taxi travel<br />

safer.<br />

• Facilitated a record $8.4 million in regional airports funding.<br />

The <strong>Transport</strong> portfolio reached a significant milestone on 3 May <strong>2011</strong>, marking 12<br />

months since I took responsibility for the State’s three transport agencies – DoT,<br />

Public <strong>Transport</strong> Authority (PTA) and Main Roads WA (MRWA).<br />

In the past year I have taken a holistic view <strong>of</strong> the key role that transport plays in<br />

our State’s continued economic growth, and especially <strong>of</strong> the considerable benefits<br />

<strong>of</strong>fered by a cohesive, integrated approach to the planning, investment and operation<br />

<strong>of</strong> WA’s transport system.<br />

Together with the Minister for <strong>Transport</strong>, we are setting clear priorities and investing in<br />

our transport system, while planning for the next generation <strong>of</strong> transport users.<br />

In a year <strong>of</strong> changing priorities, the <strong>Transport</strong> portfolio has overcome challenges and<br />

accomplished significant goals, while demonstrating an integrated model that acts as<br />

a benchmark for other Government agencies.<br />

The formal appointment <strong>of</strong> Mark Burgess as Managing Director PTA and Menno<br />

Henneveld as Managing Director MRWA further strengthens the position <strong>of</strong> those<br />

two agencies as leaders in public transport and roads delivery and management.<br />

As Director General <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Transport</strong> portfolio, it is a<br />

privilege to lead such a strong team and I commend the<br />

many teams and individuals in DoT, PTA and MRWA for<br />

their efforts during <strong>2010</strong>-11.<br />

Reece Waldock<br />

Director General - <strong>Transport</strong><br />

Reece Waldock<br />

Director General, <strong>Transport</strong><br />

1


Executive summary<br />

The <strong>Department</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Transport</strong> (DoT) made major progress last year towards its vision <strong>of</strong><br />

being a leader in providing world-class transport services and solutions.<br />

This executive summary outlines some <strong>of</strong> the major achievements and milestones met<br />

by DoT during the <strong>2010</strong>-11 financial year.<br />

Driver and Vehicles Services (DVS, formerly known as Licensing) has continued to adapt<br />

and improve its business through use <strong>of</strong> new technologies.<br />

A major upgrade to the customer contact centre’s telecommunications systems and<br />

various other reform projects were completed in <strong>2010</strong>-11.<br />

The telecommunications system improvements provide customers with greater flexibility<br />

to make enquiries and payments using voice recognition, and in March <strong>2011</strong> the call<br />

centre achieved its highest service level in more than seven years.<br />

BPOINT, an internet and telephone credit card payment system, was introduced in<br />

December <strong>2010</strong> for the payment <strong>of</strong> traffic infringements, and provides customers with<br />

the ability to pay by credit card at any time.<br />

2<br />

Self-service web kiosks were installed in all nine metropolitan DVS centres to reduce the<br />

number <strong>of</strong> people waiting to be served by customer service <strong>of</strong>ficers.<br />

A new graduated demerit point system for novice drivers was introduced in <strong>2010</strong>-11. This<br />

initiative, which reduced the number <strong>of</strong> demerit points available to learner and P-plate<br />

drivers, was the result <strong>of</strong> recommendations from the Road Safety Council regarding the<br />

high number <strong>of</strong> novice drivers involved in road crashes.<br />

The DoT website was enhanced in <strong>2010</strong>-11, bolstering self-service initiatives such as<br />

demerit points enquiries, the optional plates enquiry tool, driver licence status, vehicle<br />

licence enquiry, account details enquiry and the introduction <strong>of</strong> smart forms.<br />

In the regions, a landmark agreement was forged between DoT and the Meekatharra<br />

Community Resource Centre to provide driver and vehicle licensing services to people<br />

in the Meekatharra area. This marked the first time a not-for-pr<strong>of</strong>it organisation was<br />

engaged to provide online licensing services.<br />

DVS business once again grew in <strong>2010</strong>-11, and approximately $1.6 billion was collected<br />

through fees and charges and 6.2 million transactions were processed.<br />

Driver and Vehicle Services: Customer receiving new plates


In the Passenger Services Business Unit (PSBU), DoT developed a new Taxi Camera<br />

Surveillance Unit (TCSU) standard and secured $7.7 million to fund camera upgrades in<br />

all metropolitan taxis.<br />

During the <strong>2010</strong>-11 financial year DoT approved 130 peak period, 58 restricted area and<br />

30 conventional taxi lease plates for release to meet increasing demand.<br />

DoT also started work on the Taxi Action Plan (TAP), which aims to achieve the State<br />

Government’s objective to improve metropolitan taxi services, specifically in the areas<br />

<strong>of</strong> availability, safety and standards.<br />

As part <strong>of</strong> the TAP, DoT has recruited additional staff and purchased new vehicles to<br />

improve taxi compliance.<br />

Coastal areas were again a focus for DoT. The construction <strong>of</strong> a land-backed wharf at<br />

the Kalbarri Maritime Facility was completed to meet the growing demands <strong>of</strong> the local<br />

fishing and charter boat industries.<br />

At Woodman Point, DoT upgraded the parking facilities to a total <strong>of</strong> 300 car and boat<br />

trailer bays, costing $1.25 million.<br />

In April <strong>2011</strong> work was completed on the latest stage <strong>of</strong> a major program to replace<br />

jetties at Hillarys Boat Harbour. The $1.9 million demolition and reconstruction <strong>of</strong> D<br />

Jetty delivered a modern floating pen system with increased capacity and improved<br />

safety.<br />

A $10 million upgrade at the Port <strong>of</strong> Wyndham started in <strong>2010</strong>-11 and is scheduled for<br />

completion at the end <strong>of</strong> <strong>2011</strong>. The works will allow larger vessels to access the port,<br />

providing a strategic transport link for the east Kimberley region, which services the<br />

mining, cattle and tourism industries.<br />

DoT also continued its work in the promotion <strong>of</strong> safe boating throughout WA.<br />

The Marine Education Boatshed was a finalist in the <strong>2011</strong> WA Outdoor Recreation<br />

Industry Awards for its successful Seatrek Program, which provides teenagers with<br />

the skills to undertake week long sailing or powerboat voyages. The program is just<br />

one <strong>of</strong> the many exciting marine education experiences boatshed staff delivered to<br />

9,235 primary and high school students in <strong>2010</strong>-11.<br />

The number <strong>of</strong> Recreational Skipper’s Tickets issued to boaters also grew in <strong>2010</strong>-11<br />

with 15,967 people joining the 141,000 already qualified, strongly reinforcing the success<br />

<strong>of</strong> the marine safety initiative.<br />

Marine Officer verifying current Recreational Skipper’s Ticket<br />

3


Financial summary<br />

In <strong>2010</strong>-11, the DoT recorded a net cost <strong>of</strong> services <strong>of</strong> $125.09 million. Expenditure<br />

on ordinary activities totalled $308.14 million.<br />

The DoT provided a highly diverse range <strong>of</strong> products and services to its numerous<br />

stakeholders, clients and customers, through:<br />

• <strong>Transport</strong> system planning and regulation;<br />

• Motor vehicle registration and driver licensing services;<br />

• Strategic transport policy; and<br />

• Integrated transport planning.<br />

4<br />

Expenditure by key activities<br />

$308.14 million<br />

151,063<br />

10,621<br />

13,316<br />

133,138<br />

<strong>Transport</strong> system planning<br />

and regulation<br />

Motor vehicle registration and<br />

driver licensing services<br />

Strategic <strong>Transport</strong> Policy<br />

Integrated <strong>Transport</strong> Planning<br />

Operating expenses by category<br />

$308.14 million<br />

8,605<br />

11,120<br />

73,534<br />

96,976<br />

47<br />

8,179<br />

As the graph illustrates, the major expense categories were<br />

• Employee expenses (35.6%)<br />

• Supplies and services (31.5%)<br />

• Grants and subsidies (23.9%)<br />

109,676<br />

Employee expenses<br />

Supplies and services<br />

Depreciation and amortisation<br />

expense<br />

Accommodation expenses<br />

Grants and subsidies<br />

Loss on Disposal <strong>of</strong> Non-Current<br />

Assets<br />

Other expenses from ordinary<br />

activites


1,815<br />

23,241<br />

Income by category<br />

$183.04 million<br />

38,278<br />

231<br />

Operating revenues <strong>of</strong> $183.04 million were raised in <strong>2010</strong>-11. The revenue was<br />

derived from a range <strong>of</strong> services including:<br />

• Boat registrations;<br />

• Small boat harbour fees;<br />

• Motor vehicle and driver licences; and<br />

• Perth parking fees.<br />

The accompanying chart shows the distribution by the main revenue categories.<br />

Administered revenues<br />

$1.57 billion<br />

532,754<br />

343,017<br />

7,667 40,424<br />

73,262<br />

119,479<br />

522,304<br />

6,856<br />

44,985<br />

User charges and fees<br />

Sales<br />

Grants and subsidies<br />

Interest Revenues<br />

Other revenues<br />

Motor drivers’ licences<br />

Motor vehicle registrations<br />

Plate and transfer infringements<br />

Recording fees<br />

Speed and red light infringement<br />

fines<br />

Stamp duty<br />

Third party motor vehicle<br />

insurance premiums<br />

Other<br />

The DoT also administered functions on behalf <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Department</strong> <strong>of</strong> Treasury and<br />

Finance and other Government agencies. The administered revenue from these<br />

functions totalled $1.57 billion in <strong>2010</strong>-11.<br />

Assets under management<br />

$329.73 million<br />

15,721<br />

119,227<br />

41,849<br />

152,937<br />

The DoT managed a diverse asset base totalling $329.73 million in the provision <strong>of</strong><br />

services.<br />

The accompanying chart shows the distribution by asset class.<br />

Property, plant, equipment<br />

and vessels<br />

Infrastructure<br />

Intangible Assets<br />

Construction in Progress<br />

The DoT’s equity at 30 June <strong>2011</strong> was $503.70 million, which comprises contributed<br />

equity ($431.48 million), reserves ($16.31 million) and accumulated surplus<br />

($55.91 million).<br />

Funding for the operations <strong>of</strong> the DoT was sourced from revenue from Government<br />

<strong>of</strong> $149.14 million (primarily appropriations $143.51 million) and retained revenues <strong>of</strong><br />

$183.04 million (as shown above under income by category).<br />

5


Organisational structure<br />

<strong>Transport</strong> Portfolio<br />

6<br />

Deputy Director General<br />

Policy Planning and Investment<br />

Sue McCarrey<br />

<strong>Department</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Transport</strong><br />

Managing Director<br />

<strong>Transport</strong> Services<br />

Nina Lyhne<br />

Director – O�ce <strong>of</strong><br />

Director General<br />

Richard Barrett<br />

Managing Director - MRWA<br />

Menno Henneveld<br />

Main Roads WA<br />

Minister<br />

for <strong>Transport</strong><br />

Director General -<br />

<strong>Transport</strong><br />

Reece Waldock<br />

Managing Director - PTA<br />

Mark Burgess<br />

Public <strong>Transport</strong> Authority<br />

Port Authority<br />

Boards<br />

Broome<br />

Port Authority<br />

Port Hedland<br />

Port Authority<br />

Dampier<br />

Port Authority<br />

Geraldton<br />

Port Authority<br />

Fremantle<br />

Port Authority<br />

Bunbury<br />

Port Authority<br />

Albany<br />

Port Authority<br />

Esperance<br />

Port Authority<br />

Port Authorities


<strong>Department</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Transport</strong><br />

Executive Director<br />

- <strong>Transport</strong> Policy<br />

& Systems<br />

Ben Harvey (A)<br />

• Strategic<br />

<strong>Transport</strong> Policy<br />

• Freight Policy<br />

• Maritime &<br />

Aviation Policy<br />

• Sustainable &<br />

Active <strong>Transport</strong><br />

Policy<br />

• Freight &<br />

Logistics Council<br />

Deputy Director General -<br />

Policy, Planning & Investment<br />

Sue McCarrey<br />

Executive Director<br />

- Integrated<br />

<strong>Transport</strong> Planning<br />

Steve Beyer (A)<br />

• Strategic Network<br />

Development<br />

• People Mobility<br />

Network<br />

Development<br />

• Travel Demand<br />

Management<br />

Executive Director<br />

- Major <strong>Transport</strong><br />

Projects<br />

Gary Player (A)<br />

• Major <strong>Transport</strong><br />

Project<br />

Development<br />

• Lead Agency<br />

Framework<br />

• Oakajee<br />

Infrastructure<br />

Project<br />

• Grain Network<br />

Project<br />

• Esperance Clean<br />

Up<br />

Executive Director<br />

- Investment &<br />

Finance Coordination<br />

Peter King (A)<br />

• Chief Financial<br />

O�cer<br />

• Portfolio<br />

Strategic<br />

Investment<br />

Coordination<br />

• Financial Services<br />

• Budget Planning<br />

• Review & Audit<br />

Director, O�ce <strong>of</strong> the<br />

Director General<br />

Richard Barrett<br />

• Portfolio<br />

Coordination<br />

• Communications<br />

• Ministerial and<br />

Government<br />

Business<br />

• Governance and<br />

Strategic Planning<br />

Executive Director<br />

– People and<br />

Organisational<br />

Development<br />

Fiona Knobel<br />

• Human Resources<br />

• Organisational<br />

Development<br />

• Occupational<br />

Health & Safety<br />

<strong>Department</strong>al Services<br />

Minister<br />

for <strong>Transport</strong><br />

Director General - <strong>Transport</strong><br />

Reece Waldock<br />

Executive Director<br />

– Corporate Support<br />

Bill Ielati (A)<br />

• Legal & Legislative<br />

Services<br />

• Accommodation<br />

Services<br />

• Procurement<br />

Services<br />

• Information<br />

Management<br />

• Strategic<br />

Information<br />

Technology<br />

Planning<br />

• Information<br />

Technology<br />

Support<br />

General Manager –<br />

Driver and Vehicle<br />

Services<br />

Michael D’souza<br />

• Licensing Services<br />

General Manager<br />

- Regional Services<br />

Peter Ollerenshaw<br />

• Regional Services<br />

Managing Director<br />

<strong>Transport</strong> Services<br />

Nina Lyhne<br />

General Manager<br />

- Coastal<br />

Infrastructure<br />

Steve Jenkins (A)<br />

• Coastal<br />

Infrastructure<br />

General Manager<br />

- Marine Safety<br />

David Harrod<br />

• Marine Safety<br />

General Manager<br />

- O�ce <strong>of</strong> Rail Safety<br />

Rob Burrows<br />

• Rail Safety<br />

July <strong>2011</strong><br />

(A) Denotes: Acting<br />

General Manager<br />

- Passenger Services<br />

Peter Ryan<br />

• Passenger<br />

Services<br />

7


Legislation priorities<br />

On behalf <strong>of</strong> the Minister for <strong>Transport</strong> during <strong>2010</strong>-11 the <strong>Department</strong> <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>Transport</strong> administered the following Acts:<br />

• Harbours and Jetties Act 1928<br />

• Jetties Act 1926<br />

• Lights (Navigation Protection) Act 1938<br />

• Marine and Harbours Act 1981<br />

• Marine Navigational Aids Act 1973<br />

• Maritime Fees and Charges (Taxing) Act 1999<br />

• Motor Vehicle Drivers Instructors Act 1963<br />

• Owner-Drivers (Contracts and Disputes) Act 2007<br />

• Perth Parking Management Act 1999<br />

• Perth Parking Management (Consequential Provisions) Act 1999<br />

• Perth Parking Management (Taxing) Act 1999<br />

• Pilots’ Limitation <strong>of</strong> Liability Act 1962<br />

• Pollution <strong>of</strong> Waters By Oil and Noxious Substances Act 1987<br />

• Port Authorities Act 1999<br />

• Rail Safety Act <strong>2010</strong><br />

• Railway Discontinuance Act 2006<br />

• Railway Discontinuance Act (No 2) 2006<br />

8<br />

• Railway (Butler to Brighton) Act <strong>2010</strong><br />

• Railway (Tilley to Karara) Act <strong>2010</strong><br />

• Road Traffic Act 1974<br />

• Road Traffic (Administration) Act 2008<br />

• Road Traffic Amendment (Dangerous Driving) Act 2004<br />

• Road Traffic (Authorisation to Drive) Act 2008<br />

• Road Traffic (Vehicle Licensing) (Taxing) Act 2001<br />

• Road Traffic (Vehicles) (Taxing) Act 2008<br />

• Sea Carriage <strong>of</strong> Goods Act 1909<br />

• Shipping and Pilotage Act 1967<br />

• Taxi Act 1994<br />

• Trans-Continental Railway Act 1911<br />

• <strong>Transport</strong> Co-ordination Act 1966<br />

• Western Australian Marine Act 1982<br />

• Western Australian Marine (Sea Dumping) Act 1981<br />

• Wire and Wire Netting Act 1926<br />

Source: Western Australian Government Gazette No 1, 4 January <strong>2011</strong>


Other legislation and regulations affecting the functions and operation <strong>of</strong> the<br />

<strong>Department</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Transport</strong> include:<br />

• State Records Act 2000<br />

• State Records (Consequential Provisions) Act 2000<br />

• State Trading Concerns Act 1916<br />

• Criminal Code 1913<br />

• Electronic Transactions Act 2003<br />

• Evidence Act 1906<br />

• Financial Management Act 2006<br />

• Freedom <strong>of</strong> Information Act 1992<br />

• Limitation Act 2005<br />

• Public Sector Management Act 1994<br />

• Disability Services Act 1993<br />

• Equal Opportunity Act 1984<br />

• Industrial Relations Act 1979<br />

• Interpretation Act 1984<br />

• Library Board <strong>of</strong> Western Australia Act 1951<br />

• Minimum Conditions <strong>of</strong> Employment Act 1993<br />

• Native Title Act (Commonwealth) 1993<br />

• Occupational Safety and Health Act 1984<br />

• Royal Commission (Custody <strong>of</strong> Records) Act 1992<br />

• State Supply Commission Act 1991<br />

9


Outcome based management framework<br />

Government goals<br />

1. Outcome based service<br />

delivery<br />

Greater focus on achieving<br />

results in key service delivery<br />

areas for the benefit <strong>of</strong> all<br />

Western Australians.<br />

2. State building - Major<br />

projects<br />

Building strategic infrastructure<br />

that will create jobs and<br />

underpin Western Australia’s<br />

long-term economic<br />

development.<br />

10<br />

<strong>Department</strong>al desired<br />

outcomes<br />

1. An accessible and safe<br />

transport system.<br />

2. Vehicles and road users<br />

that meet established<br />

vehicle standards and driver<br />

competencies.<br />

3. Integrated transport<br />

systems that facilitate<br />

economic development.<br />

<strong>Department</strong>al services<br />

1. <strong>Transport</strong> system and<br />

services development,<br />

planning, operation and<br />

regulation.<br />

2. Motor vehicle and driver<br />

licensing services.<br />

3. Strategic transport policy.<br />

4. Integrated transport<br />

planning.<br />

Goal 1 - Outcome based service delivery<br />

Greater focus on achieving results in key service delivery areas for the benefit <strong>of</strong> all<br />

Western Australians.<br />

Outcomes and key effectiveness indicators for Goal 1<br />

Outcome 1: An accessible and safe transport system<br />

Key effectiveness<br />

<strong>2010</strong>-11 <strong>2010</strong>-11<br />

Reasons for significant variance<br />

indicators<br />

target actual<br />

Percentage <strong>of</strong> standard<br />

metropolitan (non multipurpose)<br />

taxi jobs not covered.<br />

Percentage by which the<br />

waiting time standard for<br />

metropolitan area taxis is met.<br />

Percentage <strong>of</strong> time maritime<br />

infrastructure is fit for purpose<br />

when required.<br />

Percentage <strong>of</strong> regional airports<br />

receiving regular public<br />

transport air services.<br />

Rate <strong>of</strong> reported incidents<br />

(accidents) on the water<br />

per 100 commercial vessels<br />

surveyed under the Western<br />

Australian Marine Act 1982.<br />

Rate <strong>of</strong> reported incidents<br />

(accidents) on the water per<br />

10,000 registered recreational<br />

vessels.<br />

Rate <strong>of</strong> serious rail accidents<br />

per million train kilometres.<br />

1.00% 1.60%<br />

90.00% 91.90%<br />

99.65% 99.73%<br />

100% 96%<br />

4.00 5.95<br />

9.00 12.52<br />

3.30 2.38<br />

During the <strong>2010</strong>-11 year, the demand for<br />

metropolitan taxis increased by 9.4 per cent<br />

(peak and <strong>of</strong>f-peak period demand combined).<br />

As a consequence <strong>of</strong> this increase in demand,<br />

the percentage <strong>of</strong> jobs not covered also<br />

increased.<br />

The introduction <strong>of</strong> a penalty provision for nonreporting<br />

<strong>of</strong> incidents appears to have had an<br />

impact on incident numbers known to DoT. In<br />

turn, there has been a shift <strong>of</strong> fishing vessels<br />

now surveyed to operate as trading vessels in<br />

the North-West servicing the resource industry.<br />

Recreational vessel registrations increased by<br />

4.7 per cent and incident numbers increased<br />

by 38 per cent. It appears the introduction <strong>of</strong> a<br />

penalty provision for non-reporting <strong>of</strong> incidents<br />

has had a negative effect on this indicator.<br />

The reporting definition for Category A<br />

occurrences changed with the introduction <strong>of</strong><br />

the Rail Safety Act <strong>2010</strong> on 1 February <strong>2011</strong>.<br />

This resulted in 24 occurrences previously<br />

categorised as Category A to become Category<br />

B. Had all occurrences been classified<br />

according to the Rail Safety Act 1998 then the<br />

actual rate <strong>of</strong> serious accidents would be 2.998.


Outcome 2: Vehicles and road users that meet established vehicle<br />

standards and driver competencies<br />

Key effectiveness<br />

indicators<br />

Percentage <strong>of</strong> vehicle<br />

examinations completed in<br />

accordance with the Australian<br />

Design Rules assessed by<br />

independent audit.<br />

Percentage <strong>of</strong> driver licences<br />

issued that comply with the<br />

Graduated Driver Training and<br />

Licensing System assessed by<br />

independent audit.<br />

<strong>2010</strong>-11<br />

target<br />

<strong>2010</strong>-11<br />

actual<br />

100% 99.80%<br />

100% 84.50%<br />

Reasons for significant variance<br />

Records management practices associated<br />

with pro<strong>of</strong> <strong>of</strong> identity documentation and log<br />

books not meeting the mandatory 25 hours <strong>of</strong><br />

supervised driving are key contributors to the<br />

variance.<br />

Services and key efficiency indicators for Goal 1<br />

Service 1: <strong>Transport</strong> system and services development, planning, operation<br />

and regulation<br />

Key efficiency<br />

indicators<br />

Cost <strong>of</strong> regulation<br />

per taxi plate<br />

administered.<br />

Average cost per<br />

day per maritime<br />

infrastructure<br />

asset managed.<br />

Average survey<br />

cost per<br />

commercial vessel.<br />

Average cost per<br />

private recreational<br />

vessel registration.<br />

Cost to maintain<br />

marine pollution<br />

response<br />

preparedness per<br />

registered vessel.<br />

Average cost<br />

per household<br />

contacted under<br />

the ‘TravelSmart’<br />

scheme.<br />

<strong>2010</strong>-11<br />

target<br />

<strong>2010</strong>-11<br />

actual<br />

$4,135 $2,959<br />

$63.07 $58.28<br />

$3,210 $2,429<br />

$104.01 $113.26<br />

$29.08 $24.48<br />

$335.51 $182.42<br />

Reasons for significant variance<br />

This is the first year <strong>of</strong> reporting this key performance<br />

indicator (KPI) and further consideration has been<br />

given as to what costs constitute the regulation <strong>of</strong> the<br />

taxi industry. For example, costs more aligned with a<br />

customer service <strong>of</strong>ficer provision have been removed,<br />

as well as Taxi Industry Board expenditure (apart from<br />

board sitting fees). The changes have resulted in a<br />

decrease in the estimated cost <strong>of</strong> regulation per taxi<br />

plate administered.<br />

The variation between the <strong>2010</strong>-11 budget target<br />

and the <strong>2010</strong>-11 actual was due to lower staffing<br />

costs attributable to a lower than expected number<br />

<strong>of</strong> surveyed vessels and improved data collection for<br />

Regional Services and Corporate Support overhead<br />

costs resulting in a more accurate allocation <strong>of</strong> costs.<br />

The <strong>2010</strong>-11 actual is lower than the <strong>2010</strong>-11 budget<br />

due to the original estimate including additional<br />

costs <strong>of</strong> $250,000 for Oil Spill Mapping which did not<br />

eventuate.<br />

The method <strong>of</strong> calculation <strong>of</strong> the KPI has been<br />

changed to include only the nett cost to the State<br />

Government, excluding grants received during <strong>2010</strong>-11.<br />

The <strong>2010</strong>-11 actual is below the <strong>2010</strong>-11 budget target<br />

because the grant was secured after the KPI target<br />

was established and the program scale was doubled<br />

(from 5,000 to 10,000 households) at no extra cost.<br />

The cost effectiveness improved as a result <strong>of</strong> the<br />

grant income.<br />

11


Service 2: Motor vehicle and driver licensing services<br />

Key efficiency indicators<br />

Average cost per vehicle and<br />

driver transaction.<br />

Average cost per vehicle<br />

inspection.<br />

Average cost per driver<br />

assessment.<br />

Percentage <strong>of</strong> driver licence<br />

cards issued within 21 days<br />

<strong>of</strong> completed application.<br />

12<br />

<strong>2010</strong>-11<br />

target<br />

<strong>2010</strong>-11<br />

actual<br />

$17.57 $17.19<br />

$78.22 $81.22<br />

$66.25 $77.94<br />

99.00% 99.90%<br />

Reasons for significant variance<br />

Revised models have more accurately<br />

identified driver assessment costs<br />

associated with the regions that align directly<br />

to this measure.<br />

This along with a minor increase in the<br />

number <strong>of</strong> assessments undertaken for that<br />

period has resulted in a $11.69 increase per<br />

driver assessment compared to target.<br />

Goal 2 - State building – Major projects<br />

Building strategic infrastructure that will create jobs and underpin Western Australia’s<br />

long-term economic developement.<br />

Outcomes and key effectiveness indicators for Goal 2<br />

Outcome 3: Integrated transport systems that facilitate economic development<br />

Key effectiveness<br />

<strong>2010</strong>-11 <strong>2010</strong>-11<br />

Reasons for significant variance<br />

indicators<br />

target actual<br />

Percentage <strong>of</strong> containerised<br />

freight transported via rail in<br />

relation to total metropolitan<br />

container movements to and<br />

from Fremantle port.<br />

16.00% 11.50%<br />

The global economic downturn in trade has<br />

impacted significantly on rail volumes both<br />

through loss <strong>of</strong> certain trades and the intense<br />

competition from the road sector.


Services and key effectiveness indicators for Goal 2<br />

Service 3: Strategic transport policy<br />

Key efficiency indicators<br />

Average cost per policy hour<br />

for strategic transport policy<br />

development.<br />

<strong>2010</strong>-11<br />

target<br />

<strong>2010</strong>-11<br />

actual<br />

$118.25 $109.78<br />

Driver and Vehicle Services Centre<br />

Reasons for significant variance<br />

Service 4: Integrated transport planning<br />

Key efficiency indicators<br />

Average cost per planning<br />

hour for integrated transport<br />

planning development.<br />

<strong>2010</strong>-11<br />

target<br />

<strong>2010</strong>-11<br />

actual<br />

$121.05 $149.73<br />

Reasons for significant variance<br />

The variance reflects cost structures for multimodal<br />

planning activity and management <strong>of</strong><br />

the Perth Parking Fund (totalling $3.66 million)<br />

that were transferred to DoT during <strong>2010</strong>-11<br />

and not included in the budget target.<br />

Due to the split <strong>of</strong> DPI and the introduction<br />

<strong>of</strong> OSS, the <strong>2010</strong>-11 KPIs were remapped to<br />

include not only human resource costs (as<br />

was done in 2009-<strong>2010</strong>), but items such as<br />

consultancy fees and pr<strong>of</strong>essional services<br />

that are attributable to Integrated <strong>Transport</strong><br />

planning functions.<br />

13


Agency performance<br />

Government goals <strong>Department</strong>al desired<br />

outcomes<br />

1. Outcome based<br />

service delivery<br />

Greater focus on achieving<br />

results in key service delivery<br />

areas for the benefit <strong>of</strong> all<br />

Western Australians.<br />

2. State building –<br />

Major projects<br />

Building strategic<br />

infrastructure that will create<br />

jobs and underpin Western<br />

Australia’s long-term<br />

economic development.<br />

14<br />

1. An accessible and safe<br />

transport system.<br />

2. Vehicles and road users<br />

that meet established<br />

vehicle standards and driver<br />

competencies.<br />

3. Integrated transport systems<br />

that facilitate economic<br />

development.<br />

Passenger Services Compliance Officer with a taxi driver<br />

<strong>Department</strong>al services<br />

1. <strong>Transport</strong> system and<br />

services development,<br />

planning, operation and<br />

regulation.<br />

2. Motor vehicle and driver<br />

licensing services.<br />

3. Strategic transport policy<br />

4. Integrated transport planning<br />

<strong>Transport</strong> services<br />

Rail safety accreditations<br />

Twenty-nine rail transport operators are currently regulated by the Office <strong>of</strong> Rail<br />

Safety. An important addition was the accreditation <strong>of</strong> BHPB Iron Ore PL, which had<br />

previously been exempted from the Rail Safety Act <strong>2010</strong> and was being regulated<br />

under the Mines Safety and Inspection Act 1994.<br />

Taxi Action Plan<br />

The Taxi Action Plan (TAP) aims to achieve the State Government’s objective to<br />

improve metropolitan taxi services, specifically in the areas <strong>of</strong> availability, safety and<br />

standards.<br />

The TAP specifically targets strategies to improve taxi reliability through:<br />

• the release <strong>of</strong> additional taxi plates;<br />

• enhancements to taxi driver entry and training standards;<br />

• the introduction <strong>of</strong> mechanisms to manage non-compliant driver behaviour<br />

following entry to the industry;<br />

• initiatives to improve taxi driver and taxi vehicle identification;<br />

• an increased ‘on-road’ compliance presence; and<br />

• actions to address a number <strong>of</strong> other issues <strong>of</strong> importance to the taxi industry.


Milligan Street Secure Taxi Rank upgrade<br />

The Milligan Street Secure Taxi Rank upgrade is a joint initiative with the City <strong>of</strong><br />

Perth, designed to deliver safe and reliable transport and a safer Northbridge.<br />

The capital works, managed by the City <strong>of</strong> Perth, commenced in January <strong>2011</strong> and<br />

include changes to the road layout and the installation <strong>of</strong> lighting, CCTV and shelters<br />

to deliver a safer and more efficient taxi hub at Milligan Street. The upgrade will help<br />

minimise customer waiting times and reduce incidences <strong>of</strong> anti-social behaviour.<br />

The $1.87 million project is predominantly funded by Taxi Industry Development<br />

Account (TIDA), along with a contribution <strong>of</strong> $500,000 from the City <strong>of</strong> Perth.<br />

Taxi cameras<br />

The new Taxi Camera Surveillance Unit (TCSU) standard was approved on<br />

16 November <strong>2010</strong>. The new standard requires TCSUs to have an increased frame<br />

rate, with continuous recording and storage capacity <strong>of</strong> 288 hours. External cameras<br />

are also required to capture incidents that occur immediately outside the taxi. The<br />

Minister for <strong>Transport</strong> announced on 5 January <strong>2011</strong> that the State Government<br />

would undertake a TCSU replacement program over 30 months from 1 July <strong>2011</strong> to<br />

31 December 2013. A subsidy <strong>of</strong> up to 80 per cent <strong>of</strong> the cost <strong>of</strong> a new TCSU will be<br />

made available with funding from TIDA.<br />

Extensive preparatory work has been undertaken with new regulations gazetted,<br />

two new TCSU models approved and a third under consideration. From 1 July <strong>2011</strong><br />

all new taxis must comply with the requirement to have an approved TCSU installed<br />

and to prevent unauthorised tampering and downloading <strong>of</strong> the recorded material.<br />

Additional taxi plates<br />

During <strong>2010</strong>-11 DoT approved 130 peak period, 58 restricted area and 30 conventional<br />

taxi lease plates for release. Recent performance data had indicated that the taxi<br />

industry could not meet increasing demand and DoT is in the process <strong>of</strong> releasing<br />

the additional plates.<br />

Payment options<br />

For many years the Passenger Services Business Unit (PSBU) could only <strong>of</strong>fer the<br />

traditional payment options <strong>of</strong> cash or cheque to their clients. Following discussions<br />

with industry, PSBU worked with Driver and Vehicle Services (DVS) to provide new<br />

payment options.<br />

The new options were introduced in <strong>2010</strong>-11 and included the traditional options<br />

<strong>of</strong> cash and cheque, as well as the more favoured choices <strong>of</strong> EFTPOS and credit<br />

card, which could be taken at the PSBU counter or over the telephone. These new<br />

arrangements have been met with satisfaction from industry.<br />

Construction <strong>of</strong> a land-backed wharf at Kalbarri<br />

The construction <strong>of</strong> the land-backed wharf at the Kalbarri Maritime Facility has been<br />

completed. The new facility will meet the growing demands <strong>of</strong> the local fishing and<br />

charter boat industries.<br />

The wharf is located between the existing service jetty and boat pens, which will<br />

allow the local fishing fleet operators to directly load and unload consumables and<br />

catch, avoiding double handling and greatly improving efficiency and safety.<br />

Project planning and consultation occurred in conjunction with the Kalbarri<br />

Fishermen’s Association, Mid-West Development Commission, Shire <strong>of</strong> Northampton<br />

and the traditional land owners. Onsite construction <strong>of</strong> the facility was completed in<br />

June <strong>2011</strong> at a cost <strong>of</strong> $1.9 million.<br />

Kalbarri Maritime Facility<br />

15


Woodman Point Recreational Boating Precinct<br />

The Perth Recreational Boating Facility Study identified the Woodman Point<br />

Recreational Boating Precinct as a highly important site within the south metropolitan<br />

area to support the growth and future demand for boat launching, storage and a<br />

range <strong>of</strong> supplementary maritime service businesses.<br />

Four new public boat ramps built in 2008 brought the total to eight public and five<br />

private ramps, making Woodman Point the largest recreational boat launching facility<br />

in Western Australia. To cater for the increased patronage resulting from the new<br />

ramps, in May <strong>2010</strong> DoT opened upgraded parking facilities with a total <strong>of</strong> 300 car<br />

and boat trailer bays. The total cost <strong>of</strong> this project was $1.25 million.<br />

Funding has now been approved to upgrade the existing access road into the boat<br />

launching facility. This will include all existing and future services requirements along<br />

this section <strong>of</strong> road. Construction is planned to begin in 2012.<br />

Future planned improvements at Woodman Point include replacing the original four<br />

ramps with new structures, sealing the eastern parking area, constructing a new<br />

ablution block, building a new access way into the facility from Cockburn Road and<br />

lighting, landscaping and security improvements.<br />

Earthworks associated with the parking area construction also provided fill material<br />

for the adjacent land, bringing it to a level where it can be developed in the future as<br />

serviced lots that can be leased for marine related purposes.<br />

16<br />

Woodman Point Recreational Boating Precinct<br />

Recreational Boating Facilities Grant Scheme<br />

In June <strong>2011</strong> the Minister for <strong>Transport</strong> and the Minister for Regional Development<br />

and Lands announced that unprecedented funding <strong>of</strong> more than $8.93 million had<br />

been allocated in grants to successful applicants in Round 16 <strong>of</strong> the Recreational<br />

Boating Facilities Scheme (RBFS).<br />

The RBFS is directly funded from recreational boat registration fees and Royalties for<br />

Regions, and helps to improve recreational boating infrastructure by providing grants to<br />

eligible authorities throughout Western Australia.<br />

Each year the scheme <strong>of</strong>fers grants to assist planning and construction <strong>of</strong> public<br />

facilities for recreational boaters. Eligible projects include boat ramps, jetties,<br />

signage, moorings, lighting, trailer parking, toilets, universal access paths, design<br />

drawings, planning studies and fish cleaning facilities.<br />

Since its inception in 1998, the RBFS has allocated $20.1 million to 282 projects<br />

across Western Australia.<br />

Hillarys Boat Harbour development<br />

In April <strong>2011</strong> work was completed on the latest stage <strong>of</strong> a major program to replace<br />

jetties at Hillarys Boat Harbour. The $1.9 million demolition and reconstruction <strong>of</strong><br />

D Jetty delivered a new modern floating pen system with increased capacity and<br />

improved safety.<br />

As part <strong>of</strong> the ongoing pen replacement, contractors replaced the original 22 year old<br />

concrete and wood structure. The new system provided space for an additional four<br />

pens, catering for 20 metre vessels, bringing the number <strong>of</strong> vessels accommodated<br />

to 53.<br />

The work on D Jetty followed the construction <strong>of</strong> W-Z jetties to provide additional<br />

pens to meet growing demand in the metropolitan area.<br />

The $3.6 million construction project saw a total <strong>of</strong> 44 pens built <strong>of</strong> which 20 have<br />

been licensed and 24 made available for casual users and to accommodate the<br />

temporary relocation <strong>of</strong> vessels to allow future upgrades <strong>of</strong> pen facilities at Hillarys.<br />

Five <strong>of</strong> the pens constructed cater for the top end <strong>of</strong> the recreational market providing<br />

two 30 metre and three 35 metre pens. Pens <strong>of</strong> this size have not previously been<br />

available at Hillarys and there has been significant interest in these large pens, which<br />

provide boaters the opportunity to up-size their vessels.


New managing contractor agreement - relationship-based contracting<br />

DoT’s Coastal Infrastructure and Marine Safety business units are responsible for<br />

planning, designing, constructing and maintaining DoT’s maritime infrastructure,<br />

including navigational aids.<br />

Following a public tender process, DoT successfully awarded a new managing<br />

contractor agreement in November <strong>2010</strong>.<br />

This new long-term performance based agreement covers the delivery <strong>of</strong> asset<br />

management, maintenance and project delivery services with an estimated contract<br />

value <strong>of</strong> $88 million over the initial six year period.<br />

The new agreement will more effectively deliver services required for whole-<strong>of</strong>-life<br />

asset management and the delivery <strong>of</strong> maritime assets.<br />

Port <strong>of</strong> Wyndham upgrade<br />

Funding <strong>of</strong> $10 million to upgrade the Port <strong>of</strong> Wyndham has been made available<br />

through the Commonwealth Government under the East Kimberley Development<br />

Package.<br />

The port is a strategic transport link for the East Kimberley region servicing the<br />

mining, cattle and tourism industries, and will service future agricultural trade from<br />

the Ord Expansion Project.<br />

A strategic development plan is being produced in conjunction with industry, local<br />

government and State Government agencies. The plan will guide future development<br />

<strong>of</strong> the port including key infrastructure required to cater for future trade and port<br />

operations.<br />

Refurbishment <strong>of</strong> protective coatings to jetty piles is complete. Projects in progress<br />

include replacement <strong>of</strong> the jetty amenities building, construction <strong>of</strong> a new port<br />

amenities building, fendering to the jetty berth face, installation <strong>of</strong> a new cathodic<br />

protection system and reconstruction <strong>of</strong> the container hardstand pavement.<br />

Hydrographic surveying program<br />

DoT’s hydrographic survey crew carry out work across the State in support <strong>of</strong> its<br />

coastal management, dredging and facility management programs. Work is also<br />

performed for port authorities, other government agencies and local government.<br />

In <strong>2010</strong>-11 significant support was provided to the Fremantle Port Authority with<br />

its deepening and dredging program. This involved many surveys over dredged<br />

areas to ensure that project depths were achieved. A major survey was performed<br />

at Geraldton in collaboration with the Geraldton Port Authority and the University <strong>of</strong><br />

Western Australia’s centre for water research. Bathymetric and seismic data was<br />

collected as part <strong>of</strong> an extensive research project. Surveys were also carried out for<br />

the Bunbury and Broome port authorities.<br />

Another major achievement was the completion <strong>of</strong> a hydrographic survey in the<br />

northern reaches <strong>of</strong> Cambridge Gulf. This survey entailed significant logistic<br />

problems due to the remoteness <strong>of</strong> the area and technical difficulties due to huge<br />

tidal movements and lack <strong>of</strong> ground control. All issues were overcome, however,<br />

and the area was successfully surveyed. Two temporary tide gauges were installed<br />

and will remain in place for 12 months to collect a more complete record <strong>of</strong> the tidal<br />

constituents in the area.<br />

A new hydrographic survey vessel was delivered in November <strong>2010</strong>. The custom<br />

designed and built nine metre vessel provides excellent facilities for equipment and<br />

staff. The vessel itself delivers a more stable platform, which allows surveying to<br />

continue in previously unsuitable conditions.<br />

Geraldton Batavia Coast Marina<br />

Construction is complete on the refurbishment and expansion <strong>of</strong> boat trailer parking<br />

facilities at Geraldton Batavia Coast Marina in Geraldton. DoT has also awarded a<br />

$1.7 million contract to Engineered Water Systems to construct 42 new floating pens<br />

at the marina. This project is due for completion in July <strong>2011</strong>.<br />

17


New boat ramp at Carnarvon<br />

Work has commenced on a new boat ramp adjacent to the yacht club on Harbour<br />

Road in Carnarvon. The boat ramp consists <strong>of</strong> a two lane ramp complete with two<br />

holding jetties and parking for about 80 car and trailer units. These new additions<br />

will assist in the efficient use <strong>of</strong> the facility at peak times. The project has an<br />

estimated total cost <strong>of</strong> $3 million and will be carried out in three stages.<br />

The first stage marine works contract including ramp and jetties was completed<br />

in June <strong>2011</strong>. MRWA has been engaged to undertake the stage two car park<br />

construction works. The final stage <strong>of</strong> the project involves paving, installation<br />

<strong>of</strong> signage, construction <strong>of</strong> a toilet block and fish cleaning facility, which will be<br />

completed following completion <strong>of</strong> stage two. The project is funded from the<br />

Royalties for Regions program.<br />

Telecommunications technology<br />

The customer contact centres telecommunications systems upgrade project was<br />

completed in <strong>2010</strong>-11. The upgrades are providing customers with greater flexibility<br />

to make enquiries and payments to DVS. Upgrades include substantially increased<br />

capacity and a new interactive voice response system allowing for enquires utilising<br />

voice recognition. The current options also include demerit point information and<br />

associated <strong>of</strong>fences details, payment details and processing payments, all available<br />

at any time, without needing to speak to operators.<br />

Payment security<br />

BPOINT, an Internet and telephone credit card payment system, was introduced for<br />

the payment <strong>of</strong> traffic infringements. BPOINT provides customers with the ability to<br />

pay traffic infringements via credit card at any time and, in the first three months <strong>of</strong><br />

operation, more than $6 million was collected through 50,000 transactions using this<br />

payment channel.<br />

18<br />

Customer service<br />

DVS’s commitment to improve and refine customer service levels through enhanced<br />

frontline and online customer contact is illustrated by the following achievements.<br />

Improved workforce management in the DVS call centre as well as other initiatives to<br />

streamline services has produced the highest service level in more than seven years.<br />

This was achieved in the March <strong>2011</strong> quarter by meeting its target <strong>of</strong> 80 per cent <strong>of</strong><br />

calls answered by a consultant within 60 seconds. A marked improvement on the<br />

same period in the previous year when the average customer waited nearly seven<br />

minutes and only 13.1 per cent <strong>of</strong> calls were answered within 60 seconds.<br />

A new licensing service for Meekatharra residents was opened in March. DoT signed<br />

an agreement with the Meekatharra Community Resource Centre to become the<br />

new DoT agent to provide driver and vehicle licensing services for Meekatharra and<br />

surrounding areas. This landmark agreement not only provides a more convenient<br />

solution for everyone in the community but also allows for a not-for-pr<strong>of</strong>it organisation<br />

to provide online licensing services on behalf <strong>of</strong> DoT.<br />

A new enhanced website was rolled out in <strong>2010</strong>-11, with further improvements made<br />

throughout the year including self-service initiatives such as the online demerit<br />

points enquiry, designer plates enquiry tool, driver licence status, vehicle registration<br />

enquiry, account details enquiry and the introduction <strong>of</strong> smart forms. Further online<br />

initiatives giving customers greater choice will continue to be rolled out in <strong>2011</strong>-12.<br />

Self-service web kiosks were installed in all nine metropolitan DVS centres, with the<br />

aim to help reduce the number <strong>of</strong> people waiting to be served by a customer service<br />

<strong>of</strong>ficer. The kiosks encourage the use <strong>of</strong> online services by providing customers with<br />

the option <strong>of</strong> paying their account by credit card or making online enquiries such as<br />

checking vehicle or driver’s licence status without waiting to be served.<br />

A total <strong>of</strong> 16, 916 new Country Age Pensioner Fuel Cards (CAPFC) were issued<br />

in <strong>2010</strong>-11 as part <strong>of</strong> the expanded CAPFC scheme. The total number <strong>of</strong> cards<br />

currently issued is 43,187. Existing cards will expire 30 June <strong>2011</strong>, and on 1 July<br />

those existing cardholders who remain eligible will have their fuel card renewed for<br />

<strong>2011</strong>-12. Preparation for the renewal process has been completed and the cards will<br />

again carry a value <strong>of</strong> $500.


Driver safety<br />

The new novice driver graduated demerit point system was introduced in <strong>2010</strong>-11<br />

with a reduced number <strong>of</strong> demerit points available to learner and P-plate drivers. This<br />

initiative was a result <strong>of</strong> recommendations from the Road Safety Council and concerns<br />

about the high number <strong>of</strong> novice drivers involved in road crashes. Improving road user<br />

behaviour is critical in saving lives and preventing injuries. The reduction in the number<br />

<strong>of</strong> available demerit points is designed to encourage novice drivers to think about their<br />

driving habits and change their driving behaviour.<br />

A safe driving course has been developed by DoT to be delivered by WA Police<br />

or other suitably qualified facilitators. It is based on the defensive driving course<br />

used in the Ngaanyatjarra Lands pilot program. It <strong>of</strong>fers eligible customers aged 25<br />

and over, living in specified remote communities, an alternative to completing the 25<br />

hour supervised driving requirement <strong>of</strong> the Graduated Driver Training and Licensing<br />

System.<br />

Vehicle safety<br />

Commencing <strong>2010</strong>-11, certain vehicles are eligible for an exemption from an annual<br />

inspection for up to 39 months. Eligible vehicles are low risk factory-new rental<br />

industry vehicles. These vehicles are generally under a manufacturer’s warranty and<br />

are regularly maintained to comply with this warranty. In addition, these vehicles<br />

generally do not exceed 60,000 km over a three year period and most are situated<br />

at mine sites operating under stringent mine site regulations. This initiative involved<br />

close consultation with the Motor Trade Association, representing the rental vehicle<br />

industry, as well as drafting legislative changes to allow for the exemptions.<br />

Business efficiencies<br />

In <strong>2010</strong>-11 DVS formed a unique temporary partnership with the Motor Trade Association<br />

and RACWA that allowed authorised repairers belonging to either organisation to check<br />

hail damaged vehicles. The arrangement helped deliver more choice to consumers and<br />

allowed for the expedient processing <strong>of</strong> thousands <strong>of</strong> vehicles damaged by the March<br />

<strong>2010</strong> hail storm. It also assisted in mitigating the impact <strong>of</strong> the enormous demand<br />

placed on DVS vehicle examination centres.<br />

New training facilities have been built to increase capacity; integrating new technologies<br />

that help deliver improved training to new and existing DVS staff and agents.<br />

Legislation<br />

The Road Traffic Legislation Amendment (Information) Bill <strong>2010</strong> was passed by<br />

Parliament and the Governor has assented to the Bill. The amendments are currently<br />

awaiting proclamation allowing supporting regulatory changes to be completed.<br />

These amendments to the Road Traffic Act 1974 deal specifically with access to<br />

driver and vehicle licence information, the disclosure <strong>of</strong> driver’s licence photographs<br />

and the requirement for learner’s permit photographs.<br />

Implementation <strong>of</strong> Trade Plates (replacing Dealer Plates) occurred in late <strong>2010</strong>. This<br />

is part <strong>of</strong> the move to align Western Australia with other jurisdictions and provide<br />

a title more reflective <strong>of</strong> their wider usage. The transition to Trade Plates is marked<br />

by a new number plate design and amendments to the Road Traffic (Licensing)<br />

Regulations 1975 and Road Traffic (Charges & Fees) Regulations 2006.<br />

Navigational safety at the North West Shelf development<br />

DoT, in conjunction with the Commonwealth Government, has progressed the<br />

development <strong>of</strong> an integrated navigational management system for shipping in the<br />

North West.<br />

Due to the increase <strong>of</strong> mineral and petroleum developments and associated shipping,<br />

the North West was identified as an area that required management plans to mitigate<br />

risks that might impact on the economy and the environment. DoT and the Australian<br />

Maritime Safety Authority undertook a joint initiative to identify particular areas and<br />

locations that require risk mitigating plans to be developed.<br />

With all consultative processes with State, Commonwealth and industry stakeholders<br />

now complete, a set <strong>of</strong> recommendations, joint policies and project plans to risk<br />

manage the North West waterway have been agreed upon. It is anticipated that<br />

implementation will begin in November <strong>2011</strong><br />

19


State mooring control project<br />

The growing demand for moorings in the metropolitan area and coastal regions has<br />

been the catalyst for a review <strong>of</strong> the management <strong>of</strong> moorings throughout Western<br />

Australia and the initiation <strong>of</strong> a management strategy by DoT. The Swan and Canning<br />

rivers have reached capacity for mooring placements and there has been a proliferation<br />

<strong>of</strong> unauthorised moorings across the State, particularly in the Rockingham, Peel and<br />

South West regions. The rapid growth and high income <strong>of</strong> regional mining communities<br />

has also seen significant expansion in recreational boating activity. This, combined with<br />

ad hoc placement <strong>of</strong> moorings, has exacerbated the need for a State-wide moorings<br />

management plan supported by strengthened legislation.<br />

DoT has embarked on a project to enhance the management <strong>of</strong> moorings in<br />

its jurisdictional navigable waters in order to address the issue <strong>of</strong> unauthorised<br />

moorings, and minimise the adverse impact those moorings are having on public<br />

safety and the environment. Equity <strong>of</strong> access by boat users in locations suitable for<br />

vessel moorings is the desired outcome <strong>of</strong> this new regime.<br />

The formal application <strong>of</strong> the Shipping and Pilotage (Mooring Control Areas)<br />

Regulations 1983 in the Rockingham Mangles Bay Mooring Control Area commenced<br />

on 1 October <strong>2010</strong> bringing approximately 650 unauthorised moorings under a<br />

formal management regime. Certificates <strong>of</strong> Registration will be issued to successful<br />

applicants in Mangles Bay when the current processing is complete. Supplementary<br />

to the user pays moorings, DoT has also installed five courtesy moorings at Mangles<br />

Bay for casual use <strong>of</strong> up to 72 hours, and funds allocated from the RBFS will provide<br />

for another five to be installed.<br />

Progress is also continuing on proclaiming additional mooring control areas around<br />

the State. DoT has recently tagged a total <strong>of</strong> 72 moorings in the Carnarvon Fascine<br />

as a preliminary step towards proclaiming a mooring control area and ultimately<br />

alleviating the current demand for moorings.<br />

20<br />

Recreational boating community engagement education program:<br />

promotion <strong>of</strong> Junior Crew Certificate<br />

Supplementary to the Recreational Skipper’s Ticket, DoT has the Junior Crew Pack,<br />

an educational initiative that promotes marine safety and a safer boating community<br />

through a program focused at primary school students.<br />

The Junior Crew Pack, designed by DoT in partnership with the Western Australian<br />

Curriculum Council and the <strong>Department</strong> <strong>of</strong> Education, provides a marine safety<br />

educational package for Western Australian primary schools students in Years 3, 4 and 5.<br />

The program consists <strong>of</strong> five marine safety topics and a final task that uses these topics<br />

as a foundation to support the marine safety message. The program introduces students<br />

to marine safety, specifically the safe use <strong>of</strong> boats and how to ensure their own safety<br />

and that <strong>of</strong> others while boating. At the successful completion <strong>of</strong> the program, students<br />

are awarded a Junior Crew Certificate.<br />

The program was launched by the Minister for <strong>Transport</strong> on 10 February <strong>2010</strong> and<br />

received overwhelming and immediate success. To date 132 schools throughout<br />

the State have taken up the course and it is planned that DoT’s Regional <strong>Transport</strong><br />

Officers will attend schools to further enhance the delivery <strong>of</strong> the program and<br />

stimulate further interest. The enthusiastic take-up <strong>of</strong> the Junior Crew program by<br />

primary schools is beyond the anticipated outcomes <strong>of</strong> the initiative.<br />

In June <strong>2011</strong> a Junior Crew Program Education Officer was appointed to provide for<br />

further growth <strong>of</strong> the program. Concurrent to the promotion <strong>of</strong> the pack, the <strong>of</strong>ficer<br />

will conduct a review <strong>of</strong> the program’s effects and outcomes, and this information<br />

will be used in continual improvement <strong>of</strong> the pack.<br />

Swan River Mooring


Aquatic use review<br />

DoT, in partnership with the Swan River Trust, has commenced a comprehensive<br />

aquatic use review <strong>of</strong> the entire Swan Canning Riverpark. The aim <strong>of</strong> the review is to<br />

formulate and implement a new aquatic use plan to promote the safe, equitable and<br />

sustainable use <strong>of</strong> waterways within the riverpark.<br />

The review involved extensive consultation with key stakeholders and the community,<br />

and is anticipated to be completed for implementation in time for the commencement<br />

<strong>of</strong> the <strong>2011</strong>-12 summer.<br />

The outcomes <strong>of</strong> the first round <strong>of</strong> consultations (held in February <strong>2011</strong>) are currently<br />

being considered by the project team and the stakeholder engagement summary<br />

report will be released shortly. Once these deliberations have been concluded, a<br />

draft aquatic use plan will be released for an open comment period ahead <strong>of</strong> the<br />

final draft being presented jointly to the Minister for Environment and the Minister for<br />

<strong>Transport</strong> for approval.<br />

Opening <strong>of</strong> new Exmouth <strong>of</strong>fice<br />

DoT’s new centrally-located Exmouth <strong>of</strong>fice opened on 30 May <strong>2011</strong>.<br />

The <strong>of</strong>fice is co-located with the Gascoyne Development Commission, which will<br />

ensure a close working relationship between the Development Commission and DoT.<br />

Geraldton Port<br />

Policy, Planning and Investment<br />

Oakajee port and rail infrastructure<br />

The development <strong>of</strong> a deep water port, associated rail infrastructure and a purpose<br />

built industrial estate at Oakajee is one <strong>of</strong> Western Australia’s most important<br />

economic projects. When constructed, Oakajee will open up the Mid West as a<br />

major mineral resources region.<br />

While the <strong>Department</strong> <strong>of</strong> State Development is the lead agency for the Oakajee Port<br />

and Rail project, DoT has responsibility for setting the port specifications, approving<br />

the design, ensuring the technical proposals are sound and that the Government<br />

gets value for the $678 million set aside for the development <strong>of</strong> common use port<br />

infrastructure. In the past year, the port design has been refined, further technical<br />

studies carried out and due diligence conducted by DoT in conjunction with the<br />

Geraldton Port Authority.<br />

An Oakajee Port Master Plan has been developed by the Geraldton Port Authority<br />

with DoT’s assistance. The plan will allow staged development <strong>of</strong> the port and<br />

preserve the opportunity for Oakajee to eventually become a multi-user, multiproduct<br />

port. Particular attention has been given to land requirements and ensuring<br />

there are service corridors and appropriate access between the port and the Oakajee<br />

industrial estate.<br />

DoT has also been assisting the <strong>Department</strong> <strong>of</strong> State Development in developing<br />

elements <strong>of</strong> the Oakajee Implementation Agreement, and working with PTA in<br />

relation to the Oakajee Rail Corridor.<br />

21


Esperance Clean up and Recovery Project<br />

The town <strong>of</strong> Esperance was contaminated with lead dust during the handling and<br />

loading <strong>of</strong> lead carbonate from Magellan Metals at the Esperance port between April<br />

2005 and March 2007.<br />

Concerns were first raised in December 2006 when birds that had died in Esperance<br />

were found to have high lead levels. A Parliamentary inquiry tabled in September<br />

2007 showed that, as a result <strong>of</strong> lead emissions from the Esperance port, residential<br />

and commercial premises in the town <strong>of</strong> Esperance, as well as the environment,<br />

had been contaminated by lead dust with consequential impacts on the community<br />

including elevated blood lead levels in children.<br />

Following a Cabinet decision, the Esperance Clean up and Recovery Project (ECRP)<br />

was established in December 2008 with DoT as the responsible agency.<br />

The ECRP is proceeding systematically and has made good progress to date with<br />

the strong support <strong>of</strong> the local community. There is a high level <strong>of</strong> confidence from<br />

all stakeholders that this project will be completed successfully.<br />

During <strong>2010</strong>-11 $4 million was spent on the ECRP. Clean-up guidelines, sampling<br />

methodologies and cleaning procedures have been developed to ensure an effective<br />

clean up.<br />

The area <strong>of</strong> contamination has been identified, approximately 2,000 premises are<br />

affected and more than 88,000 samples have been collected and sent for testing and<br />

analysis. The ECRP has completed detailed sampling <strong>of</strong> approximately 1,950 premises<br />

for Magellan lead contamination and about 1,750 require some form <strong>of</strong> cleaning.<br />

Cleaning commenced in July <strong>2010</strong> under three major cleaning contracts and 820<br />

premises have been cleaned to date. Cleaning has included ro<strong>of</strong> surfaces, gutters,<br />

rainwater tanks, ro<strong>of</strong> spaces and internal and external areas, and is likely to be<br />

completed by the end <strong>of</strong> December <strong>2011</strong>.<br />

The ECRP, which has employed up to 80 mostly local people to conduct the sampling,<br />

data analysis and cleaning works, is a complex and highly sensitive project. All<br />

employees have received specialist training to ensure a safe and effective sampling<br />

and cleaning outcome.<br />

22<br />

A Deed <strong>of</strong> Settlement signed between the State <strong>of</strong> Western Australia, Magellan<br />

Metals and the Esperance Port Authority requires Magellan Metals to pay the State<br />

a total <strong>of</strong> $9 million in three yearly instalments <strong>of</strong> $3 million as compensation for<br />

the lead contamination. Magellan has paid $6 million <strong>of</strong> this amount with the final<br />

amount due on successful completion <strong>of</strong> the clean up project.<br />

Fremantle Inner and Outer Harbour<br />

Fremantle port is Western Australia’s principal trading gateway for general trade. To<br />

support long-term trade growth, DoT is working with the Fremantle Port Authority,<br />

other Government agencies and the private sector to optimise the use <strong>of</strong> existing<br />

port infrastructure, improve supply chain efficiencies, minimise community impacts<br />

and provide additional facilities in a timely way.<br />

The Fremantle Inner Harbour will continue to be a working harbour into the future,<br />

supporting Western Australia’s container trade. A three pronged plan is being<br />

pursued to enable the Inner Harbour to reach its optimal capacity. The plan comprises<br />

measures to:<br />

• enable rail to carry about 30 per cent <strong>of</strong> containers to and from the port;<br />

• improve the performance <strong>of</strong> the logistics chain; and<br />

• upgrade road and rail infrastructure on freight routes leading to and from the<br />

port.<br />

Joint funding <strong>of</strong> $53.5 million from the State Government and the Commonwealth’s<br />

Nation Building fund over the next three years will provide for:<br />

• extension <strong>of</strong> the North Quay rail terminal to accommodate longer trains and<br />

improve operating efficiencies at the port;<br />

• expansion <strong>of</strong> intermodal terminal capacity in the Kewdale/Forrestfield area; and<br />

• construction <strong>of</strong> a passing loop on the Fremantle to Kewdale line to improve rail<br />

line capacity into the Inner Harbour.<br />

The Inner Harbour is expected to reach its full potential in the next decade.<br />

Fremantle’s Outer Harbour in Cockburn Sound will play an important role in meeting<br />

future growth in the container trade. Retention <strong>of</strong> the Inner Harbour allows for an<br />

overall assessment <strong>of</strong> the environmental, transport, planning and community issues<br />

prior to the development <strong>of</strong> the Outer Harbour in 10 to 15 years.


Cycling infrastructure<br />

The Perth Bicycle Network comprises a network <strong>of</strong> cycling facilities to enable safe<br />

and enjoyable cycling in Perth. A number <strong>of</strong> regional towns also have specific facilities<br />

for cycling.<br />

In <strong>2010</strong>-11, the Government allocated $1.9 million to plan and construct shared paths<br />

and other cycling facilities. Forty-three metropolitan projects were completed during<br />

the year through the Local Government Grants Program, which involves matching<br />

funding between the State Government and local government authorities.<br />

In <strong>2010</strong>-11, the Regional Bicycle Network program allocated $750,000 to regional<br />

councils on a matching dollar for dollar basis, resulting in 29 completed projects in<br />

the year.<br />

Public <strong>Transport</strong> Network Plan<br />

A long term plan to guide future investment in public transport infrastructure was<br />

completed in <strong>2010</strong>-11 and endorsed by Cabinet for a three month public consultation<br />

period. It was prepared under the guidance <strong>of</strong> an independent panel <strong>of</strong> experts.<br />

The Public <strong>Transport</strong> Network Plan (PTNP) is based on a vision for public transport<br />

to become the preferred means <strong>of</strong> travel to the Perth CBD and strategic centres,<br />

and will be a key enabling factor in realising the Government’s Directions 2031 urban<br />

planning strategy.<br />

The PTNP highlights a number <strong>of</strong> potential strategies for public transport in Perth,<br />

including a $4 billion investment in new railcars and buses, extension <strong>of</strong> the Joondalup<br />

line to Yanchep, a spur line from the Midland Line to the airport, introduction <strong>of</strong><br />

a light rail network in the inner city area, new train stations and interchanges and<br />

180 kilometres <strong>of</strong> bus priority lanes.<br />

The Government allocated $5.8 million in the <strong>2011</strong>-12 budget to progress concept<br />

development and feasibility studies for a number <strong>of</strong> priority projects over the next<br />

two years.<br />

Regional Freight <strong>Transport</strong> Plan<br />

The rapidly expanding Western Australian economy is generating a significant freight<br />

task, especially for movements from Perth to regional areas where major resources<br />

projects are being developed or expanded. This requires large investment decisions<br />

in port facilities, railways and the road network by Government and the private sector.<br />

This project will define the principal freight network for regional Western Australia,<br />

investment priorities over the next two decades and a clear context for new policy<br />

decisions in relation to the role <strong>of</strong> Government and the private sector for infrastructure<br />

investment, regulation for the safe and efficient movement <strong>of</strong> freight and opportunities<br />

to change the way freight is moved. It largely focuses on ‘business unusual’ freight<br />

demands (i.e. non incremental activity), especially related to the resources sector.<br />

The project has involved extensive consultation with transport operators, rail, road<br />

and port infrastructure providers, industry and local governments. Major workshops<br />

were held in May <strong>2011</strong> at eight regional centres.<br />

The Regional Freight <strong>Transport</strong> Plan is a key element <strong>of</strong> the State-wide transport<br />

policy and planning framework, and is scheduled for completion by the end <strong>of</strong> <strong>2011</strong>.<br />

Integrated freight planning for Perth<br />

During the year, work commenced on the Moving Freight Network Plan for Perth and<br />

Peel. This project will define Perth’s primary and secondary freight network, identify<br />

investment priorities over the next two decades and provide a clear strategy for how<br />

road and rail freight operations can be optimised to provide efficient movement <strong>of</strong><br />

freight.<br />

A key element <strong>of</strong> the Moving Freight Network Plan has been an assessment <strong>of</strong> the<br />

capacity <strong>of</strong> the freight railway through the metropolitan area and the impact <strong>of</strong> rail<br />

freight on road level crossings. This work recognised the significant pressure for<br />

export <strong>of</strong> resource commodities through Cockburn Sound and identified the cost and<br />

timing for investment in grade separation.<br />

Work was also completed on a staging plan and selecting the most appropriate<br />

site for development <strong>of</strong> an intermodal freight terminal in Kewdale. Funding has been<br />

provided by the State and Commonwealth governments for this facility and other<br />

rail-related investments. The funding will underpin a strategy to increase transport<br />

<strong>of</strong> containers in the metropolitan area by rail.<br />

23


Port access – upgrading <strong>of</strong> High Street (Fremantle)<br />

A major project to identify the preferred option and alignment for upgrading High<br />

Street in Fremantle is nearing completion. This project is funded jointly by the State<br />

and Commonwealth governments and will address safety, efficiency and amenity<br />

issues in the area. DoT has been working closely with the City <strong>of</strong> Fremantle and the<br />

local community to reach consensus on the preferred option and ensure that the<br />

Nation Building 1 funding from the Commonwealth Government can be invested in<br />

the project by June 2014.<br />

Perth Parking Fund<br />

The Perth Parking Management Act 1999 requires all parking bays in central Perth,<br />

except residential parking bays, to be licensed and a licence fee paid, unless the<br />

bay falls into an exemption category. The licence revenue is held in the Perth<br />

Parking Fund and is to be spent on administering the scheme and on projects that<br />

encourage balanced transport outcomes in the central city by addressing road traffic<br />

congestion and associated environmental impacts, especially in the peak travel<br />

periods. Key funding priorities include the Central Area Transit (CAT) bus system<br />

and a contribution to the PTA for revenue foregone from the Free Transit Zone.<br />

<strong>2010</strong>-11 saw an increased allocation <strong>of</strong> funds from Perth Parking Fund for the staged<br />

implementation <strong>of</strong> CAT service improvements including an extension <strong>of</strong> operating<br />

hours and the addition <strong>of</strong> five extra buses to the fleet to provide increased frequency<br />

and capacity. The <strong>2011</strong>-12 budget provides funding for the continuation <strong>of</strong> these<br />

service improvements.<br />

Rail Safety Act <strong>2010</strong> and Rail Safety Regulations <strong>2011</strong><br />

As part <strong>of</strong> DoT’s commitment to deliver a safe transport system, the Rail Safety Act<br />

<strong>2010</strong> and Rail Safety Regulations <strong>2011</strong> were proclaimed on 1 February <strong>2011</strong>. A Rail<br />

Safety Regulator has been appointed and the Rail Safety Act 1998 was subsequently<br />

repealed. The Rail Safety Act <strong>2010</strong> allows for different transition periods for Rail<br />

<strong>Transport</strong> Operators to comply with the new legal requirements, and the ORS within<br />

DoT is currently working with rail transport operators to develop complying rail safety<br />

accreditations in the first 12 months.<br />

24<br />

Owner-Drivers (Contracts and Disputes) Act 2007<br />

The code <strong>of</strong> conduct and regulations to support the Owner-Drivers (Contracts and<br />

Disputes) Act 2007 were introduced on 1 July <strong>2010</strong> and a set <strong>of</strong> guideline rates for<br />

metropolitan and regional based owner-drivers was published in the Government<br />

Gazette <strong>of</strong> 30 July <strong>2010</strong>. The guideline rates were developed using a computer<br />

based cost calculator, which was developed for the industry and is freely available<br />

for individual owner-drivers to more accurately determine their costs <strong>of</strong> operation.<br />

The Road Freight <strong>Transport</strong> Industry Council, established under the legislation,<br />

oversees the code <strong>of</strong> conduct and monitors and maintains the cost calculator.<br />

The Road Freight <strong>Transport</strong> Tribunal, also established under the Act, has continued to<br />

meet regularly to hear and determine disputes. Most disputes have been in relation to<br />

payment practices and the Tribunal has been effective in providing redress to individual<br />

owner-drivers.<br />

National transport reform agenda<br />

DoT supported the Minister’s participation in the Australian <strong>Transport</strong> Council, which<br />

is responsible for the coordination and integration <strong>of</strong> all transport and road policy<br />

issues at the national level. The Australian <strong>Transport</strong> Council is supported by the<br />

Standing Committee on <strong>Transport</strong>, <strong>of</strong> which the Director General is a member.<br />

In <strong>2010</strong>-11 the focus <strong>of</strong> both bodies was on progressing towards a seamless,<br />

co-ordinated transport system through single national systems for heavy vehicle<br />

regulation, rail safety regulation and investigation, and maritime regulation, along<br />

with work on the Council <strong>of</strong> Australian Governments Road Reform Plan.<br />

Highlights <strong>of</strong> this ongoing work included DoT participating in national meetings,<br />

coordinating an interagency submission on the draft national heavy vehicle laws,<br />

making a significant contribution toward ongoing drafting <strong>of</strong> the National Rail Safety<br />

law, contributing to the Reform Plan Stage 3 Progress <strong>Report</strong> and contributing to<br />

work on the Inter-Governmental Agreements for all <strong>of</strong> the national regulator reforms.<br />

DoT also prepared submissions on behalf <strong>of</strong> the State to the National Ports Strategy<br />

and the National Freight Network Plan, and is working with other jurisdictions and<br />

Infrastructure Australia in relation to these reforms.


Implementation <strong>of</strong> rail and road investment in the Grain Freight Network<br />

In 2009, the State Government commissioned the Strategic Grain Network<br />

Committee (SGNC) to review the viability <strong>of</strong> the grain freight network. The SGNC<br />

was tasked to engage stakeholders and to recommend investment that provided<br />

a globally competitive and economically sustainable transport and logistics supply<br />

chain for grain.<br />

The SGNC reported back to Government in December 2009 that certain parts <strong>of</strong> the<br />

grain rail freight network were competitive with road and warranted investment (Tier<br />

1 and Tier 2 rail lines). Other parts <strong>of</strong> the network were deemed not competitive with<br />

road and did not warrant investment (Tier 3 rail lines). In replacement <strong>of</strong> the Tier 3<br />

lines, investment in the road network was warranted to transport the grain to viable<br />

rail lines for movement to port<br />

After receiving and assessing the SGNC report, the State and Commonwealth<br />

governments committed significant funding towards rail improvements on Tier 1 and<br />

Tier 2 rail lines and improvements to Wheatbelt roads affected by increased freight<br />

movements due to cessation <strong>of</strong> services on the non-competitive Tier 3 rail lines.<br />

The State Government also provided funds to maintain grain on rail on the Tier 3<br />

lines as an interim measure through the Transition Assistance Package as well as a<br />

study into the long-term feasibility <strong>of</strong> a new rail line from the Brookton vicinity to the<br />

west coast.<br />

The State Government has committed funding <strong>of</strong> $186.3 million towards the grain<br />

freight network (road and rail) and secured a Commonwealth Government contribution<br />

<strong>of</strong> $135 million through the Nation Building Program for a total investment <strong>of</strong> $321.3<br />

million.<br />

This funding will enable rail re-sleepering works and rail siding upgrades for the<br />

competitive Tier 1 and Tier 2 lines ($187.9 million), improvements to and ongoing<br />

maintenance <strong>of</strong> Wheatbelt roads ($118.3 million), the continuation <strong>of</strong> the Transition<br />

Assistance Package ($14.6 million) and for the rail study ($0.5 million).<br />

Investment in the road and rail network has commenced with the Avon to Albany rail<br />

line re-sleepering program projected to be completed in October <strong>2011</strong>. Re-sleepering <strong>of</strong><br />

the other Tier 1 and Tier 2 rail lines will be undertaken over the next three years. Road<br />

upgrades where the Tier 3 lines will cease rail haulage operations has begun and will be<br />

progressively undertaken in conjunction with local government over the next four years.<br />

North West shipping service<br />

Late in 2009, the State Government awarded the contract for the subsided North<br />

West shipping service to Norwegian shipping company Jebsens. The decision<br />

to support this service with public funds was based on the value <strong>of</strong> creating an<br />

alternative transport service for remote communities and industry, and on reducing<br />

the negative impacts <strong>of</strong> heavy vehicles by taking freight <strong>of</strong>f the road system.<br />

The service commenced in March <strong>2010</strong> and makes regular calls at the Kimberley ports<br />

<strong>of</strong> Broome and Wyndham. Pilbara ports are being added to the schedule in recognition<br />

<strong>of</strong> the burgeoning resources sector.<br />

The initial two year contract with Jebsens has been extended for a further three years with<br />

the agreement <strong>of</strong> the State Government and the operator. A similar extension is available<br />

at the conclusion <strong>of</strong> that period on the same basis. A joint management committee<br />

comprising State Government agencies and Jebsens’ representatives oversees the<br />

development <strong>of</strong> the service.<br />

Freight and Logistics Council <strong>of</strong> Western Australia<br />

The Freight and Logistics Council was formed early in 2009 and comprises senior<br />

decision makers from industry and Government. Its objective is to provide the<br />

Minister for <strong>Transport</strong> with independent strategic policy advice on key freight and<br />

logistics issues.<br />

In <strong>2010</strong>-11, the council worked on a wide range <strong>of</strong> issues including road user pricing,<br />

Kimberley supply chains, grain logistics, National Freight Strategy, local government<br />

land use planning, Chain <strong>of</strong> Responsibility legislation, out-<strong>of</strong>-gauge project cargoes,<br />

Principal Road Freight Networks, local governments’ appreciation <strong>of</strong> freight, and<br />

port dredging guidelines. A number <strong>of</strong> these issues will be carried into <strong>2011</strong>-12 as<br />

part <strong>of</strong> the council’s agenda and will be supplemented by new issues as they arise.<br />

25


Regional Airports Development Scheme<br />

The objective <strong>of</strong> the Regional Airports Development Scheme (RADS) is to ensure<br />

regional aviation infrastructure and airport services are developed and maintained to<br />

facilitate air access and enhance economic growth in Western Australia.<br />

RADS has played a significant role in the development <strong>of</strong> airport infrastructure in<br />

regional Western Australia since 1997, allocating approximately $40 million into more<br />

than 280 projects.<br />

The <strong>2010</strong>-11 RADS funding round allocated $7.08 million, including $5.51 million from<br />

the Royalties for Regions program, to 41 eligible projects at regional airports across<br />

Western Australia. Airport owners and operators <strong>of</strong> publicly accessible airstrips in<br />

regional Western Australia are eligible to apply for RADS financial assistance grants<br />

to develop runways, terminals, facilities, grounds, master plans and maintenance<br />

programs.<br />

Significant projects that advanced in the <strong>2010</strong>-11 funding round were Port Hedland<br />

airport, which received funding <strong>of</strong> $1.56 million for terminal, taxiway and runway<br />

lighting works, and Kununurra airport, which received $2.2 million for terminal works.<br />

Intrastate air services review<br />

In Western Australia there are regular public transport air services to 25 regional<br />

communities. Competition was previously permitted for air services to nine<br />

communities where passenger numbers were high. Services to the remaining 16<br />

communities remained regulated by the State Government.<br />

Following completion <strong>of</strong> a review <strong>of</strong> intrastate air services in Western Australia in<br />

early <strong>2011</strong>, changes were made to the previous structure including deregulating<br />

services to Geraldton, introducing partial competition into Learmonth (Exmouth) and<br />

including Derby in the subsidised Kimberley air services network. Busselton will<br />

now be included in some services between Perth and Albany, and Ravensthorpe will<br />

be included in some services between Perth and Esperance.<br />

Seven routes, some triangulated, were successfully tendered to implement the new<br />

structure.<br />

26<br />

National ports strategy<br />

With the growing role <strong>of</strong> ports in the State’s economy and the need for long-term port<br />

planning and investment, the Government has recognised the need to take a more<br />

strategic view <strong>of</strong> the State’s ports and their investment needs over the next decade<br />

and beyond. The Minister for <strong>Transport</strong> has requested DoT to take a more active role<br />

working with and assisting ports in coordinating and scrutinising ports planning and<br />

investment needs and provide the Minister for <strong>Transport</strong> in the key port areas <strong>of</strong>:<br />

• capital investment and financial management;<br />

• environmental monitoring and compliance;<br />

• port governance and strategic coordination and reporting; and<br />

• long-term port planning and the development <strong>of</strong> Western Australia’s port system.<br />

The Minister has also suggested that Ports WA, the association <strong>of</strong> Western<br />

Australian port authorities’ chairmen and chief executive <strong>of</strong>ficers, be given enhanced<br />

opportunities to assist in developing port and related transport policy. Ports WA will<br />

have a more active role, working with DoT and other transport portfolio partners,<br />

the departments <strong>of</strong> State Development and DTF, and operators in the port and<br />

related transport industries, in developing policies relevant to the efficient operation,<br />

planning and development <strong>of</strong> Western Australian ports and the port system.<br />

Ports review<br />

In August <strong>2010</strong>, the then Minister for <strong>Transport</strong>, Hon Simon O’Brien MLC, established<br />

an inter-agency steering committee to undertake a review <strong>of</strong> all ports in Western<br />

Australia. The review’s purpose was to develop appropriate recommendations to<br />

ensure that ports are able to and are suitably supported in delivering the Government’s<br />

policy objectives and effective and efficient outcomes for Western Australia.<br />

An issues paper was developed and circulated to a wide range <strong>of</strong> stakeholders and<br />

public comments were invited. Following consultation, a draft recommendations<br />

paper will be distributed to participating stakeholders as well as being made available<br />

for public comment. A final report is expected to be completed in August <strong>2011</strong>.


Development <strong>of</strong> new port capacity<br />

The unprecedented global demand for resources, in particular iron ore and liquefied<br />

natural gas (LNG), has placed increasing pressure on existing port capacity. This<br />

has resulted in the need to develop additional port infrastructure and facilities at<br />

both existing and green field port sites throughout Western Australia. DoT has been<br />

involved with various Government agencies, in particular, the <strong>Department</strong> <strong>of</strong> State<br />

Development as lead agency, in progressing the development <strong>of</strong> a number <strong>of</strong> port<br />

facilities and associated strategic industrial areas or resource processing precincts.<br />

These include Oakajee (primarily iron ore) in the Mid West region, Ashburton North<br />

(LNG) and Mount Anketell (primarily iron ore) in the Pilbara region, and James Price<br />

Point (LNG) in the Kimberley region.<br />

Wherever appropriate, the operational management <strong>of</strong> these new developments will<br />

be placed with the nearest port authority to benefit from the expertise and resources<br />

<strong>of</strong> existing port governance arrangements. While the time lines for the completion<br />

<strong>of</strong> these various projects span several years, the involvement <strong>of</strong> the DoT in these<br />

exciting developments will continue until the associated projects are completed and<br />

operating.<br />

School students participating in TravelSmart to School program<br />

TravelSmart<br />

Western Australia is a world leader in working with households to reduce car use as<br />

a strategic response to climate change, energy security and public health issues.<br />

The TravelSmart Household program has been <strong>of</strong>fered to 520,000 Perth residents<br />

to date, achieving estimated annual reductions <strong>of</strong> 37 million car trips, 370 million car<br />

kilometres and 109,000 tonnes <strong>of</strong> greenhouse gases.<br />

In <strong>2010</strong>-11, TravelSmart also worked with local governments, schools and<br />

workplaces. One regional and 14 metropolitan local governments participated in<br />

the TravelSmart Officer Network. The TravelSmart to School pilot program worked<br />

with local governments to support 10 schools to increase the number <strong>of</strong> students<br />

who walk, cycle or take public transport to school. TravelSmart’s workplace program<br />

supported employers to reduce car use including completion <strong>of</strong> travel plans for Arup<br />

and Parsons Brinckerh<strong>of</strong>f.<br />

Living Smart<br />

The Living Smart program, a world first initiative, builds on DoT’s TravelSmart<br />

expertise to help households reduce their energy use, water use, waste production<br />

and car trips. It provides Government and households with an efficient and effective<br />

response to the challenges <strong>of</strong> climate change, energy security and public health.<br />

In 2009-10 and <strong>2010</strong>-11 DoT <strong>of</strong>fered the Living Smart program to 10,000 target<br />

households in Perth’s eastern metropolitan area, as part <strong>of</strong> the Commonwealth<br />

Government’s Perth Solar City project. Early indicators show that the initiative is on<br />

track to achieve carbon dioxide reductions <strong>of</strong> one tonne per household across the<br />

project population. Project evaluation showed that 76 per cent <strong>of</strong> participants had<br />

reduced energy use, 68 per cent had reduced water use, 54 per cent had reduced<br />

waste and 31 per cent had reduced car use.<br />

27


Active transport<br />

DoT continues to promote alternative and active transport programs such as the<br />

Walking and Access project and the Cycle Instead initiatives as environmentally<br />

friendly, healthy, low cost and viable modes <strong>of</strong> transport to replace short car trips<br />

and help reduce traffic congestion and CO emissions. The programs also seek to<br />

2<br />

create a universally accessible transport system that considers the needs <strong>of</strong> people<br />

with disability and seniors.<br />

As part <strong>of</strong> the implementation <strong>of</strong> the recommendations in the Accessible Communities<br />

Study undertaken in <strong>2010</strong>, DoT developed a walkability audit tool for use by local<br />

governments to improve safety, accessibility and amenity for active travel. DoT<br />

is also developing a pedestrian infrastructure manual, with information reflecting<br />

national standards and best practice guidelines, for use as a reference tool by local<br />

government engineers, and transport and planning pr<strong>of</strong>essionals.<br />

Walk Week continued as an ongoing cross-Government collaboration to raise<br />

awareness <strong>of</strong> the transport, health, recreation and environmental benefits <strong>of</strong> regular<br />

walking. During Walk Week <strong>2010</strong>, more than 322 events with an estimated 67,000<br />

participants were held throughout the State. These included a Walk to School Day<br />

and local community walking events. DoT also supported a four-week Corporate<br />

Online Walking Challenge, which engaged more than 1400 participants from 61<br />

workplaces. More than 88 public information displays provided walking information<br />

and a Walk Week seminar showcasing current research in walking was attended by<br />

over 90 pr<strong>of</strong>essionals.<br />

28<br />

DoT also formed a Disability Network Group to provide strategic advice and act as<br />

forum for pr<strong>of</strong>essionals to share information and support the needs <strong>of</strong> people with<br />

disability with respect to the WA transport system.<br />

During <strong>2010</strong>-11, two annual Cycle Instead campaigns were held to encourage cycling<br />

in Western Australia. The ‘Cycle Instead in Spring’ campaign included a six-week<br />

Bike to Work Challenge, engaging a record 2,000 employees from 190 workplaces<br />

across the State. In March <strong>2011</strong> Cycle Instead Bikeweek attracted over 14,000 adults<br />

and 18,000 school children who cycled as part <strong>of</strong> more than 80 community and 160<br />

school events held throughout WA. Major events during the campaign included the<br />

HBF Freeway Bike Hike for Asthma with 8,700 participants, a Members <strong>of</strong> Parliament<br />

and Mayors’ Bike Ride and Cycle to School Day.<br />

The range <strong>of</strong> Bikewest maps and information brochures was expanded in response<br />

to community requests and the number <strong>of</strong> subscribers to DoT’s cycling electronic<br />

newsletter grew to over 2,000, allowing DoT to broadcast the latest cycling information<br />

and statistics.<br />

Active <strong>Transport</strong>


<strong>Transport</strong> energy<br />

Growing concerns about energy security and greenhouse gas emissions mean that<br />

it is prudent to take actions now that will reduce Western Australia’s dependence<br />

on oil to meet future transport and other energy needs. DoT is working closely with<br />

the Office <strong>of</strong> Energy to develop the Government’s Energy 2031: Strategic Energy<br />

Initiative (SEI). A directions paper that canvasses a range <strong>of</strong> possible measures to<br />

encourage the development and uptake <strong>of</strong> alternative transport fuels was released<br />

in March <strong>2011</strong>. The final SEI document is expected to be available towards the end<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>2011</strong>.<br />

DoT also participated in a number <strong>of</strong> activities aimed at identifying and addressing<br />

the technical, regulatory and policy issues associated with the introduction <strong>of</strong> electric<br />

vehicles. DoT is a partner in a three year electric vehicle recharging project, led by<br />

the University <strong>of</strong> Western Australia (UWA). The project involves installating a limited<br />

number <strong>of</strong> public fast recharging stations in the Perth metropolitan area, providing<br />

valuable information for estimating infrastructure requirements likely for the future<br />

introduction <strong>of</strong> electric vehicles in Perth.<br />

DoT is also participating in Australia’s first electric vehicle fleet trial, an initiative<br />

<strong>of</strong> local company CO2Smart and UWA, involving the conversion <strong>of</strong> eleven Ford<br />

Focus sedans to fully electric operation and their use in a range <strong>of</strong> Government and<br />

corporate fleets. DoT funded the first car to be converted, to ensure that the vehicle<br />

meets all safety, performance and other requirements. The car was handed over in<br />

November <strong>2010</strong> and is now being used as part <strong>of</strong> DoT’s fleet.<br />

DoT’s electric vehicle<br />

<strong>Transport</strong> investment<br />

In establishing the new DoT, the Government acted to integrate and enhance the<br />

co-ordination <strong>of</strong> the State’s transport operations, regulatory functions and policy<br />

development processes. As part <strong>of</strong> the restructure, a new Investment and Finance<br />

Coordination Division was established to provide leadership and oversight to the<br />

<strong>Transport</strong> portfolio in identifying transport priorities and securing investment.<br />

The <strong>Transport</strong> Investment Sub Committee was established to strategically<br />

drive investment decision-making across the <strong>Transport</strong> portfolio and contains<br />

representatives from all portfolio agencies. This body has initiated the development<br />

<strong>of</strong> program structures, prioritisation frameworks and policy advice with respect to<br />

alternative funding mechanisms consistent with Government policy and directions.<br />

During the year, the Investment Coordination branch facilitated the development<br />

<strong>of</strong> a transport portfolio business case template and assisted portfolio agencies<br />

develop specific business cases. The branch also developed a series <strong>of</strong> tailored<br />

small courses on business case development and cost estimating to improve the<br />

consistency and quality <strong>of</strong> investment planning practices.<br />

DoT continued to work with MRWA, the PTA and the Fremantle Port Authority to<br />

ensure the timely delivery <strong>of</strong> infrastructure projects as set out in the Nation Building<br />

Program Memorandum <strong>of</strong> Understanding. Preliminary discussions also commenced<br />

during the year with the Commonwealth <strong>Department</strong> <strong>of</strong> Infrastructure and <strong>Transport</strong><br />

to identify candidate projects for future Commonwealth funding programs.<br />

29


Significant issues impacting the agency<br />

Western Australia’s economic outlook requires the development <strong>of</strong> long-term<br />

strategies for managing the freight task across the State. DoT is developing strategic<br />

freight network plans for regional Western Australia and metropolitan Perth, with both<br />

scheduled for completion in 2012. The purpose <strong>of</strong> the strategies is to guide future<br />

development <strong>of</strong> the freight transport network so that it can successfully respond to<br />

the needs <strong>of</strong> Western Australia’s growing economy and population. The strategies<br />

will quantify significant future freight demands and long-term transport needs <strong>of</strong><br />

metropolitan and regional industries and communities. The strategies will also help<br />

prioritise appropriate policies, projects and programs to meet long-term freight<br />

network requirements to facilitate economic growth and ensure optimal network<br />

performance. This will include providing guidance about port developments in the<br />

Pilbara and the role <strong>of</strong> Government in major transport infrastructure investment.<br />

Perth’s growing population, together with urban sprawl and underlying car<br />

dependence, continues to result in a range <strong>of</strong> environmental, social and economic<br />

consequences including traffic congestion. A transport policy response for a more<br />

sustainable transport system characterised by a high quality integrated public<br />

transport network and well planned walking and cycling facilities to reduce car<br />

dependence is required. An example <strong>of</strong> this is the extension to CAT bus services<br />

provided for in the 2009-10 State Budget.<br />

Increasing demand is being placed on DoT in relation to the Council <strong>of</strong> Australian<br />

Governments (COAG) Road Reform Plan, the development <strong>of</strong> national systems for<br />

rail, maritime, and heavy vehicle regulation. DoT continues to develop several national<br />

policies including a National Ports Strategy and a National Land Freight Strategy, both<br />

<strong>of</strong> which will impact on the State’s funding applications to Infrastructure Australia for<br />

major transport infrastructure projects.<br />

30<br />

DoT is playing an increased role in strategic ports planning and the coordination<br />

<strong>of</strong> ports asset investment programs. Significantly increased North West shipping<br />

movements and volumes require a new and integrated management plan with the<br />

Commonwealth Government, to effectively enhance safety, mitigate marine pollution<br />

and achieve uninterrupted commerce.<br />

DoT has introduced the Minister for <strong>Transport</strong>’s Taxi Action Plan (TAP), which outlines<br />

how the metropolitan taxi industry can meet the challenges <strong>of</strong> substantial increases<br />

in demand. The taxi industry is facing a number <strong>of</strong> challenges as it attempts to meet<br />

the demands <strong>of</strong> a changing society, and future population and economic growth.<br />

The TAP addresses issues such as taxi availability and viability, service levels, driver<br />

and passenger security, new security measures and further fee regulation. Also, a<br />

new policy framework is required for driver training along with new competency and<br />

compliance assessment tools. An example <strong>of</strong> this is the $7.7 million upgrade and<br />

installation <strong>of</strong> security cameras in all taxis provided for in the <strong>2010</strong>-11 State Budget.<br />

Strategic planning and development <strong>of</strong> a number <strong>of</strong> regional maritime facilities is<br />

required in response to increased infrastructure demands from the resources sector,<br />

maritime support services, recreational users and the tourism industry.<br />

A State-wide mooring strategy will reinforce regulations to enable the effective<br />

management <strong>of</strong> moorings in navigable waters under State jurisdiction and address<br />

the proliferation <strong>of</strong> unauthorised moorings. The strategy will address the adverse<br />

impact unauthorised moorings are having on public safety and the environment and<br />

recommend ways to meet growing demands <strong>of</strong> industry and the recreational boating<br />

community, ensuring equity <strong>of</strong> access to suitable mooring locations.<br />

Changing economic conditions and a growing population have placed demands on<br />

DVS. A significant reform including driving program will deliver solutions to address<br />

this growing demand, innovative changes to customer service delivery, developing<br />

smarter online services to keep pace with technology and introducing a new range<br />

<strong>of</strong> policy initiatives to ensure improved road safety.


Financial targets:<br />

Actuals compared to budget targets<br />

The following table provides a comparison <strong>of</strong> the financial targets and outcomes<br />

against criteria included in the Resource Agreement between the Chief Executive<br />

Officer, the Minister for <strong>Transport</strong> and the Treasurer.<br />

<strong>2010</strong>-11<br />

Target<br />

$’000<br />

<strong>2010</strong>-11<br />

Actual<br />

$’000<br />

Variation<br />

$’000<br />

Total costs <strong>of</strong> services 312,981 308,138 4,843 Note 1<br />

Net cost <strong>of</strong> services 126,294 125,094 1,200 Note 2<br />

Total equity 498,414 503,696 5,282 Note 3<br />

Net increase/(decrease) in cash held 10,818 20,887 10,069 Note 4<br />

Approved full time equivalent 1,306 1,304 2<br />

Notes<br />

These notes should be read in conjunction with the Explanatory Statement to the<br />

Financial Statements.<br />

Note 1: Total cost <strong>of</strong> services<br />

The variation is primarily due to: $Million<br />

North West Shipping Subsidy (5.4)<br />

Recreational Boat Facilities (3.3)<br />

Regional Airport Development Scheme (3.1)<br />

Grain Freight Subsidy (2.2)<br />

Taxi User Subsidy Scheme 2.2<br />

Operational costs 7.1<br />

Note 2: Net cost <strong>of</strong> services<br />

The variation is primarily due to a $4.8 million decrease in expenses partly <strong>of</strong>fset by<br />

a $3.6 million decrease in revenue.<br />

Note 3: Total equity<br />

The variation is primarily due to an increase in the asset revaluation reserve.<br />

Note 4: Net increase in cash held<br />

The variation is primarily due to the deferral <strong>of</strong> expenditure on capital projects in<br />

<strong>2010</strong>-11.<br />

31


Government policy requirements<br />

Policy statement<br />

We value the health and wellbeing <strong>of</strong> our people<br />

DoT recognises that the most important element and input is that <strong>of</strong> its people.<br />

There is a strong commitment from the Director General and Corporate Executive<br />

to ensure that DoT employees are provided with a safe, healthy and desirable work<br />

environment, and where an inclusive and holistic approach to occupational health<br />

safety and wellbeing (OHS&W) is embraced.<br />

Principles<br />

In line with our policy statement, DoT applies the following principles to OHS&W in<br />

all we do:<br />

• Management commitment supports a high standard <strong>of</strong> OHS&W performance;<br />

• Well developed consultation mechanisms facilitate effective engagement<br />

between management and employees;<br />

• Hazard management is a key element in the development <strong>of</strong> OHS&W practice;<br />

• Effective training reduces the risk <strong>of</strong> work-related injury and disease;<br />

• Planning is essential for the establishment and maintenance <strong>of</strong> safety<br />

management systems designed to continuously improve OHS&W;<br />

• Wellbeing initiatives empower employees to take unique ownership and influence<br />

their own welfare; and<br />

• Accountability <strong>of</strong> OHS&W cannot be delegated.<br />

32<br />

DoT is committed to:<br />

• Creating a positive safety culture aspiring to zero harm;<br />

• Sustaining mechanisms for engagement between employees and management<br />

are developed and working effectively;<br />

• Openly communicating our OHS&W performance with our people;<br />

• OHS&W having equal status with other business objectives;<br />

• Employees having equal status in OHS&W objectives and initiatives regardless<br />

<strong>of</strong> location;<br />

• Applying and demonstrating a systematic approach to OHS&W to ensure<br />

compliance, review and achieve continuous performance improvement;<br />

• Empowering our people to make the choice to work safely and influence their<br />

own wellbeing;<br />

• Managers, employees and contractors undertaking continued training and<br />

development to carry out their duties in a safe manner; and<br />

• Clear OSH&W accountability at all levels.<br />

Occupational health safety and wellbeing key<br />

performance indicators <strong>2010</strong> – <strong>2011</strong><br />

Negative key performance indicators Target 2009-<strong>2010</strong> <strong>2010</strong>-<strong>2011</strong><br />

1. Number <strong>of</strong> fatalities 0<br />

0 or 10%<br />

0 0<br />

2. Loss time injury (LTI) incident rate***<br />

reduction on<br />

previous year<br />

0.58 1.39<br />

3. Loss time injury severity rate<br />

4. Percentage <strong>of</strong> managers trained in OSH and<br />

injury management responsibilities<br />

0 or 10%<br />

reduction on<br />

previous year<br />

0 5.26<br />

>60% 50% 62%<br />

5. Number <strong>of</strong> hazards reported* 100% 0 20<br />

6. Number <strong>of</strong> incidents reported 100% 15 54<br />

*Building/accommodation hazards have not been included.<br />

**Promotion <strong>of</strong> incident reporting has led to an increase in incidents reported in <strong>2010</strong>-<strong>2011</strong><br />

***Stress claims have contributed to significant loss time in <strong>2010</strong>-<strong>2011</strong>


Comparative industry benchmarks<br />

DoT consists <strong>of</strong> a range <strong>of</strong> diverse work locations.<br />

The following are the national average based lost time injuries and diseases in the<br />

following specific industries that can be used as benchmarks for DoT:<br />

• Government administration 0.4<br />

• All industries 1.0<br />

• Road transport 3.3<br />

• Rail transport 3.3<br />

• Water transport 0.7<br />

• Services to transport 2.4<br />

In comparison to the above benchmarks, DoT has demonstrated that its lost time<br />

injury rate is relatively lower than other organisations within similar industries.<br />

Data definitions<br />

Fatalities Number <strong>of</strong> compensated work fatalities.<br />

Lost time injury or disease (LTI/D)<br />

LTI/D incident rate<br />

Severe claims<br />

LTI/D severity rate<br />

The number <strong>of</strong> lost time injury/disease claims<br />

where one day/shift or more was estimated to be<br />

lost on claims lodged in the financial year.<br />

The increase rate is the number <strong>of</strong> lost time injuries<br />

and diseases for each one hundred workers<br />

employed.<br />

The number <strong>of</strong> severe injuries (estimated 60 days<br />

or more lost from work). An injury resulting in<br />

death is considered to have accounted for 60 days<br />

or more lost.<br />

The number <strong>of</strong> severe claims divided by the<br />

number <strong>of</strong> lost time injury/disease claims<br />

multiplied by 100.<br />

Positive key performance indicators Target Actual<br />

Participation rate;<br />

Corporate OHS&W Management Committee Marine<br />

House OHS&W Sub-Committees<br />

<strong>Transport</strong> House OHS&W Sub Committee<br />

DVS OHS&W Sub Committee<br />

100%<br />

100%<br />

100%<br />

100%<br />

93%<br />

88%<br />

59%<br />

56%<br />

2. Percentage <strong>of</strong> trained safety and health representatives. 100% 100%<br />

3. Percentage <strong>of</strong> investigations conducted to incidents/<br />

injury/near miss reported.<br />

4. Return to work rate (rehabilitation success rate)*.<br />

5. Ratio <strong>of</strong> hazards reported to actions closed out.<br />

100% 100%<br />

10% improvement<br />

on last year<br />

*A measure <strong>of</strong> DoT’s success and effectiveness in injury management practices and facilitation a<br />

sustainable return to work outcome.<br />

84%<br />

33


Disability access and inclusion plan outcomes<br />

Outcome 1: People with disability have the same opportunities as other<br />

people to access the services <strong>of</strong>, and any events organised by, the<br />

<strong>Department</strong>.<br />

DoT continues to provide for the needs <strong>of</strong> people with disability with access to all<br />

relevant information as well as access to existing facilities and premises. All services<br />

<strong>of</strong>fered by Passenger Services are accessible, and events continue to be conducted<br />

in accessible accommodation.<br />

Outcome 2: People with disability have the same opportunities as other<br />

people to access the buildings and other facilities <strong>of</strong> the department.<br />

DoT continues to work toward ensuring all <strong>of</strong>fice buildings and facilities are physically<br />

accessible to all people.<br />

140 William Street, Perth was built to comply with the Building Code <strong>of</strong> Australia. All<br />

areas are wheelchair accessible, there are automatic doors to work areas and each<br />

floor has a disabled toilet.<br />

Metropolitan DVS centres provide the following facilities:<br />

• Parking bays for people with disability;<br />

• Toilets for people with disability;<br />

• Hydraulic desks for centres with high level customer service counters;<br />

• Automatic doors; and<br />

• Ground-level entrance access or ramps.<br />

Outcome 3: People with disability can access information from the<br />

<strong>Department</strong> as readily as other people can access it.<br />

DoT continues to regularly conduct reviews <strong>of</strong> its website to ensure it complies<br />

with the Website Governance Framework. DoT’s website has been designed to be<br />

accessed by as many users as possible and includes an accessibility page which<br />

outlines and explains the site’s accessibility features. The <strong>Department</strong> is committed<br />

to providing information for people with disability in alternative formats upon request.<br />

34<br />

Outcome 4: People with disability receive the same level and quality <strong>of</strong><br />

service from staff as other people.<br />

DoT is committed to ensuring all stakeholders and customers are treated openly and<br />

honestly and dealt with equally and impartially.<br />

These issues will be addressed by a Disability and Access Inclusion Plan (DAIP)<br />

Working Group that is being formed. In dealing with these issues the Working Group<br />

will:<br />

• Provide a local point <strong>of</strong> contact for communication and advice on DAIP issues<br />

across the department;<br />

• Guide the development and implementation <strong>of</strong> DAIP initiatives on the six<br />

outcomes; and<br />

• Identify DAIP issues that need to be referred to the DoT corporate executive.<br />

Outcome 5: People with disability have the same opportunities as other<br />

people to make complaints to the department.<br />

DoT has a complaint management system that is customer friendly and flexible, where<br />

complaints can be made in person, by phone, fax, online or in writing. Complaints are<br />

properly investigated and addressed honestly and impartially. Customer feedback<br />

and complaints are seen as opportunities to not only resolve customer concerns, but<br />

also to build our knowledge and continuously improve our products and services.<br />

Outcome 6: People with disability have the same opportunities as other<br />

people to participate in any public consultation by the department.<br />

DoT strives to include a broad representation <strong>of</strong> people, including those with disability,<br />

in public consultation processes. This approach recognises the importance <strong>of</strong><br />

engaging people <strong>of</strong> varying backgrounds, skills, talents and perspectives being<br />

valuable in the consultation process.


Compliance with public sector standard and ethical codes<br />

DoT is committed to ensuring the highest standards <strong>of</strong> probity and accountability in<br />

all interactions.<br />

Corporate induction<br />

People and Organisational Development has developed a training program to<br />

support DoT’s misconduct management framework and the Premier’s requirement<br />

that all public sector employees participate in accountable and ethical decision<br />

making workshops and attend an agency induction.<br />

This program provides new DoT employees with the opportunity to learn about the<br />

<strong>Department</strong>’s business, the role <strong>of</strong> each division and the way we work together to<br />

achieve positive results for the Western Australian community. The sessions allow<br />

new employees to meet key people from the organisation, including the Director<br />

General and senior management, and to gain practical insight about working for the<br />

department.<br />

The corporate induction is compulsory for all new employees and includes the<br />

accountable and ethical decision making presentation.<br />

This session is held monthly and runs for a full day.<br />

In <strong>2010</strong>-11 107 employees attended the corporate induction.<br />

The DoT has been undergoing significant structural change with a large focus <strong>of</strong> this<br />

being in the area <strong>of</strong> human resources and staff behaviours. As such a new Code <strong>of</strong><br />

Conduct was developed in March <strong>2011</strong>.<br />

The Code <strong>of</strong> Conduct clarifies the standards <strong>of</strong> behaviour that are expected <strong>of</strong> DoT<br />

staff in the performance <strong>of</strong> their duties. It gives guidance in areas where staff need<br />

to make personal and ethical decisions.<br />

The Code <strong>of</strong> Conduct relates directly to the <strong>Department</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Transport</strong>’s Strategic<br />

Plan <strong>2010</strong>-2014 and the department’s values, which specifically state that we “act<br />

ethically and fairly.”<br />

Occupational safety, health and injury management<br />

DoT acknowledges occupational health, safety and wellbeing (OHS&W) is an<br />

important business driver. DoT is committed to provide a safe and healthy work<br />

environment for its people.<br />

Workers compensation and rehabilitation<br />

DoT is committed to providing injury management support to all workers that sustain<br />

a work-related injury or illness with a focus on safe and early return to meaningful<br />

work and in accordance with the Workers Compensation and Injury Management<br />

Act 1981.<br />

The OHS&W branch is responsible for effectively coordinating and case managing<br />

workers compensation claims, including early intervention in injury management in<br />

consultation with line managers and supervisors to assist claimants return to work<br />

as soon as practicable,<br />

The injury management system adopted has been developed with the goal to have<br />

our employees;<br />

• return to the same position with DoT; and if this is not possible<br />

• return to a new position with DoT; and if this is not possible<br />

• return to a position with another organisation.<br />

DoT OHS&W representatives<br />

35


Substantive equality<br />

In meeting and satisfying the State Government’s substantive equality requirements,<br />

DoT has commenced a number <strong>of</strong> activities including:<br />

Youth employment<br />

DoT strongly supports youth employment and continues to promote initiatives to<br />

that effect. The department continues to provide traineeships for young people<br />

and school based students as well as work experience placements. One business<br />

trainee successfully completed her traineeship and is now permanently employed<br />

by DoT. The department is working on a specific traineeship within Marine Safety.<br />

Scholarship program<br />

The scholarship program reinforces DoT as a learning organisation through valuing<br />

formal study. The program aims at developing competencies that will assist the<br />

department to meet its business objectives. The program also complements other<br />

learning programs addressing specific individual and organisational needs. Eight<br />

scholarships were awarded in <strong>2011</strong>.<br />

Graduate program<br />

DoT has established its new graduate program for 2012. The program is part <strong>of</strong><br />

the department’s strategy to attract youth and develop future management and<br />

leadership capability. Five placements have been allocated to the functional areas<br />

<strong>of</strong> coastal engineering, transport planning, transport economics and modelling,<br />

information technology and customer service. The graduates will be exposed to<br />

DoT’s diverse operations and will have the opportunity to develop valuable skills and<br />

experience in rotational placements. They will also participate in a comprehensive<br />

induction process, a mentoring program and a customised training program.<br />

36<br />

Peer support program<br />

DoT’s peer support program continued in <strong>2011</strong>. A training workshop was held on<br />

1 March <strong>2011</strong> to provide further awareness and understanding to current peer<br />

support <strong>of</strong>ficers. The organisational development team will be calling for additional<br />

staff to become peer support <strong>of</strong>ficers over the coming months. Training needs are<br />

reviewed regularly and meetings are held on an as required basis.<br />

Employee assistance<br />

DoT provides employee assistance through its employee assistance program<br />

contract with Centacare.<br />

People and Organisational Development staff member


Employment and industrial relations<br />

During <strong>2010</strong>–11, the dispute resolution procedure was initiated nine times. All nine<br />

disputes have been actioned, with two ongoing.<br />

Number <strong>of</strong> employees by award<br />

Award No. Employees % Employees<br />

Public Service and<br />

Government Officer’s<br />

General Agreement <strong>2011</strong><br />

Salaries and Allowances<br />

Special Division<br />

FTE and headcount<br />

Status<br />

1455 99.8<br />

3 0.2<br />

1458 100.00%<br />

At 30June<br />

<strong>2010</strong><br />

Casual 7 12<br />

Permanent full time 959 1043<br />

Permanent part time 156 187<br />

Temporary full time 146 187<br />

Temporary part time 17 29<br />

Total no. Employees 1,285 1458<br />

Total paid FTE # 1,136.4 1304<br />

At 30 June<br />

<strong>2011</strong><br />

# Paid FTE includes all employees directly paid by DoT’s payroll. Seconded<br />

employees paid by their home agency are excluded.<br />

Internal audit reviews<br />

Following the split <strong>of</strong> DPI, DoT received internal audit services from the <strong>Department</strong><br />

<strong>of</strong> Planning’s (DoP) internal audit function under a service level agreement.<br />

The following audits were conducted by DoP towards the end <strong>of</strong> the 2009-10 financial<br />

year and tabled at the first DoT Audit and Risk Management Committee meeting in<br />

February <strong>2011</strong>:<br />

• Vic Roads confidentiality agreement 2009-10;<br />

• Country Age Pension Fuel Card subsidy scheme;<br />

• Leased premises; and<br />

• Office <strong>of</strong> Road Safety grant acquittals including motorcycle graduated rider<br />

training and licensing project, and driver awareness training.<br />

The recommendations derived from internal audit reviews are managed and<br />

monitored through DoT’s Audit Recommendation Management System. Progress<br />

reporting on the status <strong>of</strong> implementation <strong>of</strong> recommendations occurs on a quarterly<br />

basis to the Audit and Risk Management Committee.<br />

DoT is in the process <strong>of</strong> appointing an Internal Auditor through the whole <strong>of</strong><br />

Government Common Use Arrangement 23706.<br />

Other audit reviews<br />

The Vulnerability Assessment Group conducted a “Network Vulnerability<br />

Assessment” <strong>of</strong> DoT IT network with particular attention being given to the <strong>Transport</strong><br />

Executive Licensing Information System (TRELIS).<br />

37


Audit and Risk Management Committee<br />

With the split <strong>of</strong> DPI in July 2009, the initial development <strong>of</strong> the new DoT, and the<br />

impending move <strong>of</strong> some functions to OSS, DoP provided corporate support<br />

functions to DoT under a service level agreement until the split <strong>of</strong> corporate resources<br />

was determined.<br />

Therefore, a combined audit and risk management committee operated until DoT<br />

could develop its own. The DoT Audit and Risk Management Committee (ARMC)<br />

was developed in early <strong>2011</strong> and first met on 28 February <strong>2011</strong>. The committee is<br />

made up <strong>of</strong> the Director General, as the Chair <strong>of</strong> the committee; the Deputy Director<br />

General – Policy, Planning and Investment; the Managing Director – <strong>Transport</strong><br />

Services; the Director – Office <strong>of</strong> the Director General; Main Roads WA Executive<br />

Director, Finance and Commercial Services as the cross portfolio representative;<br />

and the contracted internal auditor.<br />

Two ex-<strong>of</strong>ficio members that also form part <strong>of</strong> the committee are the Executive<br />

Director, Investment and Finance Coordination (Chief Finance Officer) as the<br />

<strong>of</strong>ficer responsible for the audit function; and the Manager Governance and<br />

Strategic Planning, Office <strong>of</strong> the Director General as the <strong>of</strong>ficer responsible for risk<br />

management across the department. A representative from the Office <strong>of</strong> the Auditor<br />

General also attends meetings as an independent observer and executive support<br />

is provided by the Business Manager, Governance and Strategic Planning, Office <strong>of</strong><br />

the Director General.<br />

The ARMC is a sub-committee <strong>of</strong> DoT’s Corporate Executive and has their full<br />

endorsement.<br />

The ARMC plays a key role in fulfilling the department’s corporate governance and<br />

monitoring responsibilities in relation to the department’s reporting, internal control<br />

structure, risk management systems and internal audit functions.<br />

Following its establishment in February, the ARMC met twice in the second half <strong>of</strong><br />

the <strong>2010</strong>-11 financial year.<br />

38<br />

Risk management<br />

In line with Treasurer’s Instruction 825 and the Public Sector Commissioner’s Circular<br />

2009/19, DoT worked with RiskCover in <strong>2010</strong>-11 to complete a comprehensive agency<br />

wide review <strong>of</strong> its risks and risk management process, and to use the RiskBase<br />

system to record and manage the department’s risk information.<br />

DoT commenced a comprehensive organisation-wide operational risk assessment<br />

in late <strong>2010</strong> using DVS as a pilot. All <strong>Transport</strong> Services division business units<br />

completed risk assessments in <strong>2010</strong>-11 and the process has commenced in the<br />

Policy, Planning and Investment division. A number <strong>of</strong> risk assessment workshops<br />

for significant projects and contracts have also been conducted.<br />

Following the establishment <strong>of</strong> DoT’s new corporate structure, a strategic risk<br />

workshop was conducted in June <strong>2011</strong>. <strong>Department</strong> wide risk reference tables,<br />

against which all risks are assessed, were also reviewed and updated during this<br />

workshop. Workshops involving the Coastal Infrastructure and Regional Services<br />

business units are also being conducted to assess risks for the State’s boat harbours.<br />

Refined risk management policy, procedures and guidelines that reflect new<br />

processes being developed by DoT are being finalised. A framework for on-going<br />

training and support for staff in risk management, drawing the relevant links to<br />

budgeting and planning processes, is also being developed.<br />

Management oversight to ensure management <strong>of</strong> risks within DoT is the responsibility<br />

<strong>of</strong> the ARMC, which reviews high and extreme rated risks quarterly, medium risks<br />

bi-annually, and determines escalation <strong>of</strong> risks to Corporate Executive as required.


Freedom <strong>of</strong> information<br />

Freedom <strong>of</strong> information (FOI) services were provided to DoT by DoP’s FOI unit until<br />

15 October <strong>2010</strong>.<br />

The FOI unit is the initial contact point for members <strong>of</strong> the public, applicants, third<br />

parties, the Office <strong>of</strong> the Information Commissioner and other public sector agencies<br />

for all FOI related matters.<br />

Under the Freedom <strong>of</strong> Information Act 1992 (the Act), DoT is required to respond to<br />

FOI applications within 45 days <strong>of</strong> receipt, unless an extension <strong>of</strong> time is granted.<br />

The average time to process applications during <strong>2010</strong>-<strong>2011</strong> was 17 days.<br />

FOI fees and charges<br />

Fees and charges are set under the Act. Apart from the application fee for nonpersonal<br />

information, all charges are discretionary. Details <strong>of</strong> fees and charges are<br />

listed below.<br />

Application Amount<br />

Personal information about applicant No fee<br />

Application fee (for non-personal<br />

information)<br />

Charge for time taken dealing with<br />

the application<br />

Charge for access time supervised<br />

by staff<br />

Charges for photocopying<br />

$30.00<br />

$30.00 per hour<br />

$30.00 per hour<br />

$30.00 per hour for staff<br />

time and 20 cents per copy<br />

Rights <strong>of</strong> review<br />

The Act allows dissatisfied applicants to review a decision made by DoT. In accordance<br />

with Section 40 <strong>of</strong> the Act, internal review applications should be forwarded to DoT in<br />

writing within 30 days <strong>of</strong> the date <strong>of</strong> decision.<br />

Following an internal review, matters remaining in dispute can be submitted to the<br />

Office <strong>of</strong> the Information Commissioner for external review. Such applications must<br />

be submitted within 60 days from the date <strong>of</strong> decision.<br />

No fees or charges apply to internal or external reviews.<br />

FOI Statistics for <strong>2010</strong>-11 (as at July <strong>2011</strong>) listed below.<br />

Application Amount<br />

Total received 114<br />

Internal reviews 5<br />

External reviews 1<br />

Transferred to another agency 10<br />

39


Other legal requirements<br />

Advertising<br />

The following statement relates to advertising, direct mail and marketing research,<br />

as required under section 175 ZE <strong>of</strong> the Electoral Act 1907.<br />

Advertising<br />

Better recordkeeping<br />

DoT is committed to good recordkeeping and to meeting the requirements <strong>of</strong> the<br />

State Records Act 2000. Recordkeeping services were provided through a service<br />

level agreement with DoP until 15 October <strong>2010</strong>, when the records and information<br />

management functions were transferred to DoT.<br />

In view <strong>of</strong> the transfer <strong>of</strong> recordkeeping and information management services,<br />

the recordkeeping plan that was approved by the State Records Commission in<br />

December 2009 is under review. The deadline for submission to the State Records<br />

Commission is April 2012.<br />

40<br />

303 Design Management Pty Ltd 1,950.00<br />

ASB Marketing Pty Ltd 3,000.00<br />

Austroads Ltd 10,690.00<br />

Autotrader Australia 1,227.27<br />

Brandconnect (WA) 2,550.00<br />

Danica Graphic Design Studio 640.00<br />

Dyarchy Media 1,290.00<br />

Geon Australia Pty Ltd 73,255.00<br />

Media on Mars 465.00<br />

Point Design Solutions 3,880.00<br />

Slicker Stickers 3,700.00<br />

Spice Creative 760.00<br />

The Brand Agency 11,997.00<br />

Whistling Moose Graphics 1,200.00<br />

Worldwide Online Printing Perth<br />

West End<br />

978.18<br />

$<br />

Media advertising organisations<br />

Adcorp Australia Limited 183,682.58<br />

Albany Advertiser 943.64<br />

Albany Chamber <strong>of</strong> Commerce 209.22<br />

State Law Publisher 19,724.73<br />

Town <strong>of</strong> Bassendean 272.73<br />

WA News 3,939.74<br />

Direct mail<br />

Salmark Promotions 26,616.00<br />

Salmat Document Management<br />

Solutions Pty Limited<br />

2,629.00<br />

The State Records Commission’s minimum compliance requirements are:<br />

Requirement 1 - The efficiency and effectiveness <strong>of</strong> the organisation’s recordkeeping<br />

systems are evaluated not less than once every five years.<br />

DoT uses Objective as a single enterprise-wide electronic document and records<br />

management system, which is deployed to all DoT staff. During <strong>2010</strong>-<strong>2011</strong> DoT<br />

continued a program to consolidate the use <strong>of</strong> Objective throughout the <strong>Department</strong>.<br />

Objective allows DoT to deal with digital as well as paper records within an integrated<br />

environment. Training in Objective is mandatory for all staff.<br />

Requirement 2 - The organisation conducts a recordkeeping training program.<br />

Online record keeping awareness training is mandatory for all DoT staff. There are<br />

currently 1453 staff enrolled and 1315 (91 per cent) have completed the course.<br />

Number <strong>of</strong> staff enrolled in<br />

records awareness training<br />

Number <strong>of</strong> staff who completed<br />

records awareness training<br />

1600<br />

1400<br />

1200<br />

1000<br />

800<br />

600<br />

400<br />

200<br />

0<br />

September<br />

quarter<br />

December<br />

quarter<br />

March<br />

quarter<br />

1336 1390 1434 1453<br />

1222 1261 1296 1315<br />

92% 91% 90% 91%<br />

Rat Training<br />

Sept Quarter Dec Quarter March Quarter June Quarter<br />

June quarter<br />

No. enrolled<br />

No. completed


Requirement 3 - The efficiency and effectiveness <strong>of</strong> the recordkeeping training<br />

program is reviewed from time to time.<br />

The online records keeping awareness training is mandatory for all staff. Training<br />

assessment is integrated into the package and feedback from staff that have<br />

completed the course is reviewed and responded to.<br />

For DoT specific information regarding processes, employees are referred to the<br />

intranet. Content is reviewed periodically to ensure it reflects current operational<br />

and administrative practices and processes.<br />

A comprehensive training package in the use <strong>of</strong> the Objective system is available<br />

and all new staff attend 4.5 hours <strong>of</strong> hands-on training in document management<br />

and email management. Follow up assistance is available through the Help Desk as<br />

well as a Training and Support Officer. Quick reference guides are available on the<br />

intranet to assist staff.<br />

Requirement 4 - The organisation’s induction program addresses employee<br />

roles and responsibilities in regard to their compliance with the organisation’s<br />

Recordkeeping Plan.<br />

A presentation on recordkeeping is included in the department’s induction program,<br />

which advises employees <strong>of</strong> their roles and responsibilities in creating, managing<br />

and maintaining government records. All new staff are expected to complete the<br />

online recordkeeping awareness training, which covers roles and responsibilities in<br />

regard to recordkeeping and compliance with the Recordkeeping Plan. Additionally<br />

there is a brochure available on Recordkeeping:Your Responsibilities included in<br />

a series <strong>of</strong> information brochures designed to assist staff in dealing with different<br />

aspects <strong>of</strong> recordkeeping. New staff are also required to undertake training in the<br />

use <strong>of</strong> Objective.<br />

Governance disclosure<br />

During <strong>2010</strong>-11, other than normal contracts <strong>of</strong> employment <strong>of</strong> services, no senior<br />

<strong>of</strong>ficers or firms <strong>of</strong> which senior <strong>of</strong>ficers are members, or entities in which senior<br />

<strong>of</strong>ficer have substantial interests, had any interests in existing or proposed contracts<br />

with DoT.<br />

DoT does not hold director’s liability insurance.<br />

Ministerial directives<br />

Treasurer’s Instruction 903(12) requires the <strong>Department</strong> to disclose information on<br />

any Ministerial directives relevant to the setting and achievement <strong>of</strong> desired outcomes<br />

or operational objectives, investment activities and financing activities. There were<br />

no Ministerial directives issued by the responsible Minister during <strong>2010</strong>-11.<br />

Financial disclosures<br />

Pricing policies <strong>of</strong> services provided<br />

DoT reviews its fees and charges annually to reflect, where legally permissible, full<br />

cost recovery in the provision <strong>of</strong> its services pursuant to the department’s policy for<br />

costing and pricing.<br />

Gazette 50 dated 1 April <strong>2010</strong>, Gazette 73 dated 7 May <strong>2010</strong>, Gazette 83 dated 14<br />

May <strong>2010</strong>, Gazette 100 dated 4 June <strong>2010</strong>, Gazette 107 dated 18 June <strong>2010</strong>, Gazette<br />

126 dated 30 June <strong>2010</strong>, Gazette 127 dated 30 June <strong>2010</strong>, and Gazette 128 dated 30<br />

June <strong>2010</strong>, contain variations to the department’s fees and charges for the <strong>2010</strong>-11<br />

financial year.<br />

Major capital projects<br />

(Projects over $5m are considered as major)<br />

Projects remaining uncompleted<br />

Project name<br />

Broome Boating<br />

Facility - stage<br />

one<br />

Maritime facilities<br />

program<br />

DVS reform<br />

Wyndham Port<br />

facility upgrade<br />

Expected<br />

year <strong>of</strong><br />

completion<br />

Estimated cost<br />

to complete<br />

$’000<br />

2013-14 34,191 35,000<br />

Ongoing<br />

program<br />

Ongoing<br />

program<br />

89,306 93,579<br />

50,610 52,911<br />

2012-13 6,002 10,000<br />

Estimated total<br />

cost <strong>of</strong> project<br />

$’000<br />

41


Financial Statements<br />

For the year ended 30 June <strong>2011</strong><br />

Auditor General Independent Auditor’s <strong>Report</strong><br />

To the Parliament <strong>of</strong> Western Australia<br />

<strong>Report</strong> on the Financial Statements<br />

I have audited the accounts and financial statements <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Department</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Transport</strong>.<br />

The financial statements comprise the Statement <strong>of</strong> Financial Position as at 30<br />

June <strong>2011</strong>, the Statement <strong>of</strong> Comprehensive Income, Statement <strong>of</strong> Changes in<br />

Equity, Statement <strong>of</strong> Cash Flows, Schedule <strong>of</strong> Income and Expenses by Service,<br />

Schedule <strong>of</strong> Assets and Liabilities by Service, and Summary <strong>of</strong> Consolidated<br />

Account Appropriations and Income Estimates for the year then ended, and Notes<br />

comprising a summary <strong>of</strong> significant accounting policies and other explanatory<br />

information, including Administered transactions and balances.<br />

Director General’s Responsibility for the Financial Statements<br />

The Director General is responsible for keeping proper accounts, and the preparation<br />

and fair presentation <strong>of</strong> the financial statements in accordance with Australian<br />

Accounting Standards and the Treasurer’s Instructions, and for such internal<br />

control as the Director General determines is necessary to enable the preparation<br />

<strong>of</strong> financial statements that are free from material misstatement, whether due to<br />

fraud or error.<br />

42<br />

Auditor’s Responsibility<br />

As required by the Auditor General Act 2006, my responsibility is to express an<br />

opinion on the financial statements based on my audit. The audit was conducted<br />

in accordance with Australian Auditing Standards. Those Standards require<br />

compliance with relevant ethical requirements relating to audit engagements and<br />

that the audit be planned and performed to obtain reasonable assurance about<br />

whether the financial statements are free from material misstatement.<br />

An audit involves performing procedures to obtain audit evidence about the<br />

amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. The procedures selected<br />

depend on the auditor’s<br />

judgement, including the assessment <strong>of</strong> the risks <strong>of</strong> material misstatement <strong>of</strong><br />

the financial statements, whether due to fraud or error. In making those risk<br />

assessments, the auditor considers internal control relevant to the <strong>Department</strong>’s<br />

preparation and fair presentation <strong>of</strong> the financial statements in order to design<br />

audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances. An audit also<br />

includes evaluating the appropriateness <strong>of</strong> the accounting policies used and the<br />

reasonableness <strong>of</strong> accounting estimates made by the Director General, as well as<br />

evaluating the overall presentation <strong>of</strong> the financial statements.<br />

I believe that the audit evidence obtained is sufficient and appropriate to provide a<br />

basis for my audit opinion.


Opinion<br />

In my opinion, the financial statements are based on proper accounts and present<br />

fairly, in all material respects, the financial position <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Department</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Transport</strong><br />

at 30 June <strong>2011</strong> and its financial performance and cash flows for the year then<br />

ended. They are in accordance with Australian Accounting Standards and the<br />

Treasurer’s Instructions.<br />

<strong>Report</strong> on Controls<br />

I have audited the controls exercised by the <strong>Department</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Transport</strong>. The Director<br />

General is responsible for ensuring that adequate control is maintained over the<br />

receipt, expenditure and investment <strong>of</strong> money, the acquisition and disposal <strong>of</strong><br />

public and other property, and the incurring <strong>of</strong> liabilities in accordance with<br />

the Financial Management Act 2006 and the Treasurer’s Instructions, and other<br />

relevant written law.<br />

As required by the Auditor General Act 2006, my responsibility is to express an<br />

opinion on the controls exercised by the Director General based on my audit<br />

conducted in accordance with Australian Auditing Standards.<br />

Opinion<br />

In my opinion, the controls exercised by the <strong>Department</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Transport</strong> are sufficiently<br />

adequate to provide reasonable assurance that the receipt, expenditure and<br />

investment <strong>of</strong> money, the acquisition and disposal <strong>of</strong> property, and the incurring <strong>of</strong><br />

liabilities have been in accordance with legislative provisions.<br />

<strong>Report</strong> on the Key Performance Indicators<br />

I have audited the key performance indicators <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Department</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Transport</strong>.<br />

The Director General is responsible for the preparation and fair presentation <strong>of</strong><br />

the key performance indicators in accordance with the Financial Management<br />

Act 2006 and the Treasurer’s Instructions.<br />

As required by the Auditor General Act 2006, my responsibility is to express an<br />

opinion on the key performance indicators based on my audit conducted in<br />

accordance with Australian Auditing Standards.<br />

Opinion<br />

In my opinion, the key performance indicators <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Department</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Transport</strong> are<br />

relevant and appropriate to assist users to assess the <strong>Department</strong>’s performance<br />

and fairly represent indicated performance for the year ended 30 June <strong>2011</strong>.<br />

Independence<br />

In conducting this audit, I have complied with the independence requirements <strong>of</strong><br />

the Auditor General Act 2006 and the Australian Auditing Standards, and other<br />

relevant ethical requirements.<br />

COLIN MURPHY<br />

AUDITOR GENERAL<br />

13 September <strong>2011</strong><br />

43


Certification <strong>of</strong> Financial Statements<br />

For the year ended 30 June <strong>2011</strong><br />

The accompanying financial statements <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Department</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Transport</strong> have been<br />

prepared in compliance with the provisions <strong>of</strong> the Financial Management Act 2006<br />

from proper accounts and records to present fairly the financial transactions for the<br />

financial year ended 30 June <strong>2011</strong> and the financial position as at 30 June <strong>2011</strong>.<br />

At the date <strong>of</strong> signing we are not aware <strong>of</strong> any circumstances which would render<br />

any particulars included in the financial statements misleading or inaccurate.<br />

Graeme Doyle Reece Waldock<br />

Chief Finance Officer Accountable Authority<br />

7 September <strong>2011</strong> 7 September <strong>2011</strong><br />

44


Financial Statements<br />

Statement <strong>of</strong> Comprehensive Income<br />

For the year ended 30 June <strong>2011</strong><br />

<strong>2011</strong> <strong>2010</strong><br />

Note $ 000 $ 000<br />

COST OF SERVICES<br />

Expenses<br />

Employee benefits expense 4 109 676 87 509<br />

Supplies and services 5 96 976 109 292<br />

Depreciation and amortisation expense 6 11 121 11 506<br />

Accommodation expenses 7 8 605 3 657<br />

Grants and subsidies expense 8 73 534 63 447<br />

Loss on disposal <strong>of</strong> non-current assets 13 47 2 550<br />

Other expenses 9 8 179 2 212<br />

Total cost <strong>of</strong> services 308 138 280 173<br />

INCOME<br />

Revenue<br />

User charges and fees<br />

10 119 479 111 458<br />

Sales 231 888<br />

Grants and contributions 11 23 241 27 918<br />

Interest revenue 1 815 1 102<br />

Other revenues 12 38 278 30 226<br />

Total revenue 183 044 171 592<br />

Total income other than income from<br />

State Government<br />

183 044 171 592<br />

Net cost <strong>of</strong> services 125 094 108 581<br />

INCOME FROM STATE GOVERNMENT 14<br />

<strong>2011</strong> <strong>2010</strong><br />

Note $ 000 $ 000<br />

Service appropriation 143 513 133 769<br />

Resources received free <strong>of</strong> charge 1 019 683<br />

Royalties for Regions Fund 4 597 5 510<br />

Assets assumed/(transferred) 8 -<br />

Total income from State Government 149 137 139 962<br />

Surplus for the period 24 043 31 381<br />

OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME<br />

Changes in asset revaluation surplus 4 942 11 364<br />

Total other comprehensive income 4 942 11 364<br />

Total comprehensive income for the<br />

period<br />

28 985 42 745<br />

See also the Schedule <strong>of</strong> Income and Expenses by Service.<br />

The Statement <strong>of</strong> Comprehensive Income should be read in conjunction with the accompanying notes.<br />

45


Statement <strong>of</strong> Financial Position<br />

As at 30 June <strong>2011</strong><br />

<strong>2011</strong> <strong>2010</strong><br />

Note $ 000 $ 000<br />

ASSETS<br />

Current Assets<br />

Cash and cash equivalents<br />

15 27 122 27 429<br />

Restricted cash and cash equivalents 16 63 406 43 401<br />

Inventories 17 362 366<br />

Receivables 18 8 779 6 501<br />

Other current assets 20 1 065 514<br />

Total current assets 100 734 78 211<br />

Non-Current Assets<br />

Restricted cash and cash equivalents<br />

16 1 686 1 190<br />

Amounts receivable for services 19 122 031 107 234<br />

Property, plant, equipment, vehicles and<br />

vessels<br />

21 152 976 148 497<br />

Infrastructure 22 119 227 123 191<br />

Intangible assets 23 15 721 15 142<br />

Construction in progress 24 41 859 24 021<br />

Total non-current assets 453 500 419 275<br />

Total assets 554 234 497 486<br />

46<br />

<strong>2011</strong> <strong>2010</strong><br />

Note $ 000 $ 000<br />

LIABILITIES<br />

Current Liabilities<br />

Payables 26 10 219 8 379<br />

Borrowings 27 21 -<br />

Provisions 28 13 443 13 550<br />

Other liabilities 29 14 027 4 674<br />

Total current liabilities 37 710 26 603<br />

Non-Current Liabilities<br />

Provisions<br />

28 12 802 6 360<br />

Borrowings 27 26 -<br />

Total non-current liabilities 12 828 6 360<br />

Total liabilities 50 538 32 963<br />

Net assets 503 696 464 523<br />

EQUITY 30<br />

Contributed equity 431 483 421 295<br />

Reserves 16 306 11 364<br />

Accumulated surplus 55 907 31 864<br />

Total equity 503 696 464 523<br />

See also the Schedule <strong>of</strong> Assets and Liabilities by Service.<br />

The Statement <strong>of</strong> Financial Position should be read in conjunction with the accompanying notes.


Statement <strong>of</strong> Changes in Equity<br />

For the year ended 30 June <strong>2011</strong><br />

Note<br />

Contributed equity<br />

$ 000<br />

Reserves<br />

$ 000<br />

Accumulated surplus<br />

$ 000<br />

Total equity<br />

$ 000<br />

Balance at 1 July 2009 - - - -<br />

Net effect <strong>of</strong> prior period error - - 744 744<br />

Restated balance at 1 July 2009 - - 744 744<br />

Total comprehensive income for the year<br />

Transactions with owners in their capacity as owners<br />

30 - 11 364 31 120 42 484<br />

capital appropriations 9 010 - - 9 010<br />

Other contributions by owners 412 285 - - 412 285<br />

Balance at 30 June <strong>2010</strong> 421 295 11 364 31 864 464 523<br />

Balance at 1 July <strong>2010</strong> 421 295 11 364 31 864 464 523<br />

Total comprehensive income for the year<br />

Transactions with owners in their capacity as owners<br />

- 4 942 24 043 28 985<br />

Capital appropriations<br />

Other contributions by owners<br />

9 859 - - 9 859<br />

<strong>Department</strong> <strong>of</strong> Planning (2 789) - - (2 789)<br />

Regional Development Headworks Fund 3 150 - - 3 150<br />

Prior period adjustment ( 32) - - ( 32)<br />

10 188 - - 10 188<br />

Balance at 30 June <strong>2011</strong> 431 483 16 306 55 907 503 696<br />

The Statement <strong>of</strong> Changes in Equity should be read in conjunction with the accompanying notes.<br />

47


Statement <strong>of</strong> Cash Flows<br />

For the year ended 30 June <strong>2011</strong><br />

<strong>2011</strong> <strong>2010</strong><br />

Note $ 000 $ 000<br />

CASH FLOWS FROM STATE GOVERNMENT<br />

Service appropriation 129 307 120 923<br />

Capital appropriations 9 859 9 010<br />

Cash transferred from /(to) other agencies 3 663 48 088<br />

Royalties for Regions Fund 4 597 5 510<br />

Net cash provided by State Government 147 426 183 531<br />

Utilised as follows:<br />

CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING<br />

ACTIVITIES<br />

Payments<br />

Employee benefits (107 272) (84 605)<br />

Supplies and services (75 475) (57 668)<br />

Accommodation (7 431) (3 147)<br />

Grants and subsidies (71 984) (62 089)<br />

GST payments on purchases (16 609) (15 616)<br />

GST payments to taxation authority ( 205) -<br />

Other payments (18 983) (52 044)<br />

Receipts<br />

Sale <strong>of</strong> goods and services 228 972<br />

User charges and fees 133 334 123 970<br />

Grants and subsidies 21 826 27 355<br />

Interest received 1 661 1 060<br />

GST receipts on sales 5 608 6 044<br />

GST receipts from taxation authority 10 181 8 142<br />

Other receipts 22 459 15 150<br />

Net cash used in operating activities 31 (b) (102 662) (92 476)<br />

48<br />

<strong>2011</strong> <strong>2010</strong><br />

Note $ 000 $ 000<br />

CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING<br />

ACTIVITIES<br />

Proceeds from sale <strong>of</strong> non-current physical<br />

assets<br />

50 17<br />

Purchase <strong>of</strong> non-current physical assets (24 608) (19 052)<br />

Net cash used in investing activities (24 558) (19 035)<br />

CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING<br />

ACTIVITIES<br />

Payments for finance lease ( 12) -<br />

Net cash used in investing activities ( 12) -<br />

Net increase/ (decrease) in cash and cash<br />

equivalents<br />

Cash and cash equivalents at the beginning <strong>of</strong><br />

the period<br />

Cash and cash equivalents at the end<br />

<strong>of</strong> the period<br />

20 194 72 020<br />

72 020 -<br />

31 (a) 92 214 72 020<br />

The Statement <strong>of</strong> Cash Flows should be read in conjunction with the accompanying notes.


Schedule <strong>of</strong> Income and Expenses by Service<br />

For the year ended 30 June <strong>2011</strong><br />

<strong>Transport</strong> system<br />

planning and<br />

regulation<br />

Motor vehicle<br />

registration and driver<br />

licensing services<br />

Strategic <strong>Transport</strong><br />

Policy<br />

Integrated <strong>Transport</strong><br />

Planning<br />

Total<br />

<strong>2011</strong> <strong>2010</strong> <strong>2011</strong> <strong>2010</strong> <strong>2011</strong> <strong>2010</strong> <strong>2011</strong> <strong>2010</strong> <strong>2011</strong> <strong>2010</strong><br />

$ 000 $ 000 $ 000 $ 000 $ 000 $ 000 $ 000 $ 000 $ 000 $ 000<br />

COST OF SERVICES<br />

Expenses<br />

Employee benefits expenses 23 756 20 723 72 336 58 692 7 323 3 905 6 261 4 189 109 676 87 509<br />

Supplies and services 44 449 38 350 44 081 64 170 2 538 2 799 5 909 3 973 96 976 109 292<br />

Depreciation and amortisation expense 6 962 6 240 3 831 5 027 51 20 277 219 11 121 11 506<br />

Accommodation expenses 2 460 1 242 5 656 2 309 262 26 227 80 8 605 3 657<br />

Grants and subsidies 50 558 48 422 22 425 13 545 152 - 400 1 480 73 534 63 447<br />

Loss on disposal <strong>of</strong> non-current assets 46 2 550 1 - - - - - 47 2 550<br />

Other expenses from ordinary activities 4 907 1 275 2 733 809 296 43 243 85 8 179 2 212<br />

Total cost <strong>of</strong> services 133 138 118 802 151 063 144 552 10 621 6 793 13 316 10 026 308 138 280 173<br />

Income<br />

User charges and fees 38 397 64 211 51 232 47 247 1 - 29 850 - 119 479 111 458<br />

Sales 179 814 37 20 4 - 11 54 231 888<br />

Grants and contributions 1 299 7 175 21 908 14 225 0 - 34 6 518 23 241 27 918<br />

Interest revenue 1 417 1 102 335 - 34 - 29 - 1 815 1 102<br />

Other revenue 15 203 20 280 19 046 9 778 2 040 5 1 990 163 38 278 30 226<br />

Total income other than income from State<br />

Government<br />

56 495 93 582 92 558 71 270 2 078 5 31 913 6 735 183 044 171 592<br />

NET COST OF SERVICES 76 644 25 220 58 505 73 282 8 543 6 788 (18 598) 3 291 125 094 108 581<br />

INCOME FROM STATE GOVERNMENT<br />

Service appropriations 23 588 28 459 64 436 64 455 44 168 22 057 11 321 18 798 143 513 133 769<br />

Resources received free <strong>of</strong> charge 221 160 672 460 68 30 58 33 1 019 683<br />

Royalties for Regions Fund 1 472 - - - 2 897 - 228 5 510 4 597 5 510<br />

Assets assumed/(transferred) 2 - 5 - 1 - - - 8 -<br />

Total income from State Government 25 283 28 619 65 113 64 915 47 134 22 087 11 607 24 341 149 137 139 962<br />

SURPLUS FOR THE PERIOD (51 361) 3 399 6 608 (8 367) 38 591 15 299 30 205 21 050 24 043 31 381<br />

The Schedule <strong>of</strong> Income and Expenses by Service should be read in conjunction with the accompanying notes.<br />

49


Schedule <strong>of</strong> Assets and Liabilities by Service<br />

As at 30 June <strong>2011</strong><br />

50<br />

<strong>Transport</strong> system<br />

planning and<br />

regulation<br />

Motor vehicle<br />

registration and driver<br />

licensing services<br />

Strategic <strong>Transport</strong><br />

Policy<br />

Integrated <strong>Transport</strong><br />

Planning<br />

<strong>2011</strong> <strong>2010</strong> <strong>2011</strong> <strong>2010</strong> <strong>2011</strong> <strong>2010</strong> <strong>2011</strong> <strong>2010</strong> <strong>2011</strong> <strong>2010</strong><br />

$ 000 $ 000 $ 000 $ 000 $ 000 $ 000 $ 000 $ 000 $ 000 $ 000<br />

ASSETS<br />

Current Assets 81 037 62 918 19 387 15 052 108 84 202 157 100 734 78 211<br />

Non-Current Assets 395 831 365 958 55 976 51 752 812 751 880 814 453 500 419 275<br />

Total Assets 476 868 428 876 75 363 66 804 920 835 1 083 971 554 234 497 486<br />

LIABILITIES<br />

Current Liabilities 17 951 12 664 17 452 12 312 975 688 1 331 939 37 710 26 603<br />

Non-Current Liabilities 3 005 1 490 8 637 4 282 569 282 617 306 12 828 6 360<br />

Total Liabilities 20 957 14 154 26 089 16 594 1 544 970 1 948 1 245 50 538 32 963<br />

NET ASSETS 455 911 414 722 49 274 50 210 ( 624) ( 135) ( 866) ( 274) 503 696 464 523<br />

The Schedule <strong>of</strong> Assets and Liabilities by Service should be read in conjunction with the accompanying notes.<br />

Total


Summary <strong>of</strong> Consolidated Account Appropriations and Income Estimates<br />

For the year ended 30 June <strong>2011</strong><br />

<strong>2011</strong><br />

Estimate<br />

$ 000<br />

<strong>2011</strong><br />

Actual<br />

$ 000<br />

DELIVERY OF SERVICES<br />

Item 63 Net amount appropriated to deliver services<br />

Amount authorised by other statutes:<br />

139 424 142 489 3 065 142 489 133 451 9 038<br />

- Salaries and Allowances Act 1975 333 1 024 691 1 024 318 706<br />

Total appropriations provided to deliver services 139 757 143 513 3 756 143 513 133 769 9 744<br />

CAPITAL<br />

Item 138 Capital contribution 12 956 9 859 (3 097) 9 859 9 010 849<br />

Total capital contribution 12 956 9 859 (3 097) 9 859 9 010 849<br />

ADMINISTERED TRANSACTIONS<br />

Item 64 Western Australian Coastal<br />

Shipping Commission 329 329 - 329 - 329<br />

Total administered transactions 329 329 - 329 - 329<br />

GRAND TOTAL 153 042 153 701 659 153 701 142 779 10 922<br />

Details <strong>of</strong> expenses by service<br />

<strong>Transport</strong> system planning and regulation 142 887 133 138 (9 749) 133 138 118 802 14 336<br />

Motor vehicle registration & driver licensing services 151 695 151 063 ( 632) 151 063 144 552 6 511<br />

Strategic <strong>Transport</strong> Policy 7 790 10 621 2 831 10 621 6 793 3 828<br />

Integrated <strong>Transport</strong> planning 10 609 13 316 2 707 13 316 10 026 3 290<br />

Total cost <strong>of</strong> services 312 981 308 138 (4 843) 308 138 280 173 27 965<br />

Less: Total income 186 687 183 044 (3 643) 183 044 171 592 11 452<br />

Net cost <strong>of</strong> services 126 294 125 094 (1 200) 125 094 108 581 16 513<br />

Adjustments (i) 13 463 18 419 4 956 18 419 25 188 (6 769)<br />

Total appropriations provided to deliver services 139 757 143 513 3 756 143 513 133 769 9 744<br />

Capital expenditure<br />

Purchase <strong>of</strong> non-current physical assets 37 741 24 608 (13 133) 24 608 19 052 5 556<br />

Delivery <strong>of</strong> Services<br />

Adjustments for other funding sources<br />

- 1 077 1 077 1 077 20 658 (19 581)<br />

- Internal funds and balances (16 785) (12 676) 4 109 (12 676) (30 700) 18 024<br />

- Royalties for Regions (8 000) (3 150) 4 850 (3 150) - (3 150)<br />

Capital appropriations 12 956 9 859 (3 097) 9 859 9 010 849<br />

DETAILS OF INCOME ESTIMATES<br />

Income disclosed as Administered Income 721 408 1571 030 849 622 1571 030 1481 539 89 491<br />

(i) Adjustments comprise movements in cash balances and other accrual items such as receivables, payables and superannuation.<br />

Note 36 Explanatory statement provides details <strong>of</strong> any significant variations between estimates and actual results for <strong>2011</strong>.<br />

Variance<br />

$ 000<br />

<strong>2011</strong><br />

Actual<br />

$ 000<br />

<strong>2010</strong><br />

Actual<br />

$ 000<br />

Variance<br />

$ 000<br />

51


Notes to the Financial Statements<br />

For the year ended 30 June <strong>2011</strong><br />

1. Australian Accounting Standards<br />

General<br />

The <strong>Department</strong>’s financial statements for the year ended 30 June <strong>2011</strong> have been<br />

prepared in accordance with Australian Accounting Standards. The term ‘Australian<br />

Accounting Standards’ refers to the Standards and interpretation issued by the<br />

Australian Accounting Standard Board (AASB).<br />

The <strong>Department</strong> has adopted any applicable, new and revised Australian Accounting<br />

Standards from their operative dates.<br />

Early adoption <strong>of</strong> standards<br />

The <strong>Department</strong> cannot early adopt an Australian Accounting Standard unless<br />

specifically permitted by<br />

TI 1101 Application <strong>of</strong> Australian Accounting Standards and Other Pronouncements.<br />

No Australian Accounting Standards that have been issued or amended (but not<br />

operative) have been early adopted by the <strong>Department</strong> for the annual reporting<br />

period ended 30 June <strong>2011</strong>.<br />

52<br />

2. Summary <strong>of</strong> significant accounting policies<br />

(a) General statement<br />

The financial statements constitute general purpose financial statements that have<br />

been prepared in accordance with Australian Accounting Standards, the Framework,<br />

Statements <strong>of</strong> Accounting Concepts and other authoritative pronouncements <strong>of</strong> the<br />

Australian Accounting Standards Board as applied by the Treasurer’s instructions.<br />

Several <strong>of</strong> these are modified by the Treasurer’s instructions to vary application,<br />

disclosure, format and wording.<br />

The Financial Management Act and the Treasurer’s instructions are legislative<br />

provisions governing the preparation <strong>of</strong> financial statements and take precedence<br />

over Australian Accounting Standards, the Framework, Statements <strong>of</strong> Accounting<br />

Concepts and other authoritative pronouncements <strong>of</strong> the Australian Accounting<br />

Standards Board.<br />

Where modification is required and has a material or significant financial effect upon<br />

the reported results, details <strong>of</strong> that modification and the resulting financial effect, are<br />

disclosed in the notes to the financial statements<br />

(b) Basis <strong>of</strong> preparation<br />

The financial statements have been prepared on the accrual basis <strong>of</strong> accounting<br />

using the historical cost convention, modified by the revaluation <strong>of</strong> land and buildings<br />

which have been measured at fair value.<br />

The accounting policies adopted in the preparation <strong>of</strong> the financial statements have<br />

been consistently applied throughout all periods presented unless otherwise stated.<br />

The financial statements are presented in Australian dollars and all values are<br />

rounded to the nearest thousand dollars ($ 000).<br />

In the process <strong>of</strong> reporting the <strong>Department</strong> as a single entity, all intra entity<br />

transactions and balances have been eliminated.


(c) <strong>Report</strong>ing entity<br />

The reporting entity comprises the <strong>Department</strong>.<br />

Services:<br />

Service 1: <strong>Transport</strong> System and Services Development, Planning,<br />

Operation and Regulation<br />

<strong>Transport</strong> system and services development, planning, operation and regulation<br />

is designed to improve accessibility and safety <strong>of</strong> the transport system for all<br />

Western Australians.<br />

Service 2: Motor vehicle registration and driver licensing services<br />

The Road Traffic Act 1974 confers on the <strong>Department</strong> responsibility for licensing<br />

the State’s drivers and registering vehicles.<br />

Service 3: Strategic <strong>Transport</strong> Policy<br />

Strategic <strong>Transport</strong> Policy contributes to the achievement <strong>of</strong> the desired<br />

<strong>Transport</strong> outcome, where integrated transport systems facilitate economic<br />

development by providing leadership for strategic transport issues.<br />

Service 4: Integrated <strong>Transport</strong> Planning<br />

Integrated <strong>Transport</strong> Planning contributes to the achievement <strong>of</strong> the desired<br />

<strong>Transport</strong> outcome, where integrated transport systems facilitate economic<br />

development by providing leadership for strategic transport issues.<br />

The <strong>Department</strong> administers assets, liabilities, income and expenses on behalf<br />

<strong>of</strong> Government which are not controlled by, nor integral to the functions <strong>of</strong> the<br />

<strong>Department</strong>. These administered balances and transactions are not recognised<br />

in the principal financial statements <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Department</strong> but schedules are<br />

prepared using the same basis as the financial statements and are presented at<br />

note 44 Administered expenses and income and note 45 Administered assets<br />

and liabilities.<br />

(d) Contributed equity<br />

AASB Interpretation 1038 Contributions by Owners Made to Wholly-Owned Public<br />

Sector Entities requires transfers in the nature <strong>of</strong> equity contributions, other than<br />

as a result <strong>of</strong> a restructure <strong>of</strong> administrative arrangements, to be designated by<br />

the Government (the owner) as contributions by owners (at the time <strong>of</strong>, or prior<br />

to transfer) before such transfers can be recognised as equity contributions.<br />

Capital appropriations have been designated as contributions by owners by TI 955<br />

Contributions by Owners made to Wholly Owned Public Sector Entities and have<br />

been credited directly to Contributed Equity.<br />

The transfer <strong>of</strong> net assets to/from other agencies, other than as a result <strong>of</strong> a<br />

restructure <strong>of</strong> administrative arrangements, are designated as contributions by<br />

owners where the transfers are non-discretionary and non- reciprocal. See note<br />

30 Equity.<br />

53


(e) Income<br />

Revenue recognition<br />

Revenue is recognised and measured at the fair value <strong>of</strong> consideration received or<br />

receivable. Revenue is recognised for the major business activities as follows:<br />

Sale <strong>of</strong> goods<br />

Revenue is recognised from the sale <strong>of</strong> goods and disposal <strong>of</strong> other assets when<br />

the significant risks and rewards <strong>of</strong> ownership transfer to the purchaser and can be<br />

measured reliably.<br />

Provision <strong>of</strong> services<br />

Revenue is recognised on delivery <strong>of</strong> the service to the client or by reference to the<br />

stage <strong>of</strong> completion <strong>of</strong> the transaction.<br />

Revenues are received in the form <strong>of</strong> various registration, examination and licence<br />

fees (including Stamp Duty and Third Party Motor Vehicle Insurance). These<br />

revenues are received for services provided including undertaking inspections<br />

and/or issuing licences associated with the fees. As no part <strong>of</strong> these charges is<br />

refundable, revenues are recognised at the time they are received.<br />

Revenues collected from traffic and cannabis infringements are administered on<br />

behalf <strong>of</strong> the Western Australian Police and are recognised when the cash is received.<br />

The revenue from other operating activities including rendering <strong>of</strong> services and the<br />

sale <strong>of</strong> assets are recognised when the <strong>Department</strong> has passed control <strong>of</strong> the goods<br />

or other assets or delivery <strong>of</strong> the service to the customer. Recoups <strong>of</strong> operating<br />

activities are recognised when invoiced.<br />

Interest<br />

Revenue is recognised as the interest accrues.<br />

Service appropriations<br />

Service appropriations are recognised as revenues at nominal value in the period in<br />

which the <strong>Department</strong> gains control <strong>of</strong> the appropriated funds. The <strong>Department</strong> gains<br />

control <strong>of</strong> appropriated funds at the time those funds are deposited into the <strong>Department</strong>’s<br />

bank account or credited to the Amounts receivable for services (holding account) held<br />

at Treasury. See note 14 Income from State Government for further detail.<br />

Net appropriation determination<br />

54<br />

The Treasurer may make a determination providing for prescribed receipts to be<br />

retained for services under the control <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Department</strong>. In accordance with the<br />

determination specified in the <strong>2010</strong>-11 Budget Statements, the <strong>Department</strong> retained<br />

$183 million in <strong>2011</strong> ( $172 million in <strong>2010</strong>) from the following:<br />

Boat registration fees, Indian Ocean Territories Program, jetty licences, marine<br />

examinations, duplicate motor drivers licence fees, motor vehicle transfer<br />

fees, motor vehicle plate fees, pro<strong>of</strong> <strong>of</strong> age card, recoup for services provided,<br />

temporary permits, and other revenue.<br />

Grants, donations, gifts and other non-reciprocal contributions<br />

Revenue is recognised at fair value when the <strong>Department</strong> obtains control over the<br />

assets comprising the contributions usually when cash is received.<br />

Other non-reciprocal contributions that are not contributions by owners are<br />

recognised at their fair value. Contributions <strong>of</strong> services are only recognised when<br />

a fair value can be reliably determined and the services would be purchased if not<br />

donated.<br />

Royalties for regions funds are recognised as revenue at fair value in the period<br />

in which the <strong>Department</strong> obtains control over the funds. The <strong>Department</strong> obtains<br />

control <strong>of</strong> the funds at the time the funds are deposited into the <strong>Department</strong>’s bank<br />

account.<br />

Gains<br />

Gains may be realised or unrealised and are usually recognised on a net basis. These<br />

include gains arising on the disposal <strong>of</strong> non-current assets and some revaluations <strong>of</strong><br />

non-current assets.


(f) Property, plant and equipment and infrastructure<br />

Capitalisation/expensing <strong>of</strong> assets<br />

Items <strong>of</strong> property, plant and equipment and infrastructure costing $5,000 or more are<br />

recognised as assets and the cost <strong>of</strong> utilising assets is expensed (depreciated) over their<br />

useful lives. Items <strong>of</strong> property, plant and equipment and infrastructure costing less than<br />

$5,000 are immediately expensed direct to the Statement <strong>of</strong> Comprehensive Income.<br />

Initial recognition and measurement<br />

All items <strong>of</strong> property, plant and equipment and infrastructure are initially recognised<br />

at cost.<br />

For items <strong>of</strong> property, plant and equipment and infrastructure acquired at no cost or for<br />

nominal cost, the cost is their fair value at the date <strong>of</strong> acquisition.<br />

Subsequent measurement<br />

Subsequent to initial recognition as an asset, the revaluation model is used for the<br />

measurement <strong>of</strong> land and buildings, and the cost model for all other property, plant,<br />

equipment and infrastructure. Land and buildings are carried at fair value less<br />

accumulated depreciation (buildings only) and accumulated impairment losses. All<br />

other items <strong>of</strong> property, plant, equipment and infrastructure are stated at historical cost<br />

less accumulated depreciation and accumulated impairment losses.<br />

Where market-based evidence is available, the fair value <strong>of</strong> land and buildings is<br />

determined on the basis <strong>of</strong> current market buying values determined by reference to<br />

recent market transactions.<br />

Where market-based evidence is not available, the fair value <strong>of</strong> land and buildings<br />

is determined on the basis <strong>of</strong> existing use. This normally applies where buildings<br />

are specialised or where land use is restricted. Fair value for existing use assets is<br />

determined by reference to the cost <strong>of</strong> replacing the remaining future economic benefits<br />

embodied in the asset, i.e. the depreciated replacement cost.<br />

When buildings are revalued, the accumulated depreciation is eliminated against the<br />

gross carrying amount <strong>of</strong> the asset and the net amount restated to the revalued amount.<br />

Independent valuations <strong>of</strong> land and buildings are provided annually by the Western<br />

Australian Land Information Authority (Valuation Services) and recognised annually to<br />

ensure that the carrying amount does not differ materially from the asset’s fair value at<br />

the end <strong>of</strong> the reporting period.<br />

The most significant assumptions in estimating fair value are made in assessing whether<br />

to apply the existing use basis to assets and in determining estimated useful life.<br />

Pr<strong>of</strong>essional judgement by the valuer is required where the evidence does not provide a<br />

clear distinction between market type assets and existing use assets.<br />

Refer to note 21 Property, plant, equipment, vehicles and vessels for further information<br />

on revaluations.<br />

Derecognition<br />

Upon disposal or derecognition <strong>of</strong> an item <strong>of</strong> property, plant and equipment, any<br />

revaluation surplus relating to that asset is retained in the asset revaluation surplus.<br />

Asset revaluation surplus<br />

The asset revaluation surplus is used to record increments and decrements on the<br />

revaluation <strong>of</strong> non-current assets as described in note 21 Property, plant, equipment,<br />

vehicles and vessels.<br />

Depreciation<br />

All non-current assets having a limited useful life are systematically depreciated over<br />

their estimated useful lives in a manner that reflects the consumption <strong>of</strong> their future<br />

economic benefits.<br />

Land is not depreciated. Depreciation on other assets is calculated using the straight<br />

line method, using rates which are reviewed annually. Estimated useful lives for each<br />

class <strong>of</strong> depreciable asset are:<br />

Buildings 40 years<br />

Computer hardware 4 to 7 years<br />

Refurbishments, furniture and fittings 3 to 20 years<br />

Maritime infrastructure 5 to 100 years<br />

Plant and equipment 5 to 20 years<br />

Vehicles 5 to 20 years<br />

Vessels 10 years<br />

Leased plant, equipment and vehicles 2 years<br />

Assets under construction are not depreciated until commissioned.<br />

55


(g) Intangible assets<br />

Capitalisation/expensing <strong>of</strong> assets<br />

Acquisitions <strong>of</strong> intangible assets costing $5,000 or more are capitalised. The cost<br />

<strong>of</strong> utilising the assets is expensed (amortised) over their useful life. Costs incurred<br />

below these thresholds are immediately expensed directly to the Statement <strong>of</strong><br />

Comprehensive Income.<br />

All acquired and internally developed intangible assets are initially recognised at<br />

cost. For assets acquired at no cost or for nominal cost, the cost is their fair value<br />

at the date <strong>of</strong> acquisition.<br />

The cost model is applied for subsequent measurement requiring the asset to be<br />

carried at cost less any accumulated amortisation and accumulated impairment<br />

losses.<br />

Amortisation for intangible assets with finite useful lives is calculated for the period<br />

<strong>of</strong> the expected benefit (estimated useful life) on the straight line basis using rates<br />

which are reviewed annually. All intangible assets controlled by the <strong>Department</strong><br />

have a finite useful life and zero residual value.<br />

The expected useful lives for each class <strong>of</strong> intangible asset are:<br />

56<br />

S<strong>of</strong>tware not integral to the operation <strong>of</strong> related hardware 3 to 15 years<br />

Computer s<strong>of</strong>tware<br />

S<strong>of</strong>tware that is an integral part <strong>of</strong> the related hardware is treated as property,<br />

plant and equipment. S<strong>of</strong>tware that is not an integral part <strong>of</strong> the related hardware<br />

is treated as an intangible asset. S<strong>of</strong>tware costing less than $5,000 is expensed in<br />

the year <strong>of</strong> acquisition.<br />

(h) Impairment <strong>of</strong> assets<br />

The recoverable amount <strong>of</strong> assets identified as surplus assets is the higher <strong>of</strong> fair<br />

value less costs to sell and the present value <strong>of</strong> future cash flows expected to be<br />

derived from the asset. Surplus assets carried at fair value have no risk <strong>of</strong> material<br />

impairment where fair value is determined by reference to market-based evidence.<br />

Where fair value is determined by reference to depreciated replacement cost,<br />

surplus assets are at risk <strong>of</strong> impairment and the recoverable amount is measured.<br />

Surplus assets at cost are tested for indications <strong>of</strong> impairment at the end <strong>of</strong> each<br />

reporting period.<br />

See note 25 Impairment <strong>of</strong> assets for the outcome <strong>of</strong> impairment reviews and testing.<br />

See note 2(p) Receivables and note 18 Receivables for impairment <strong>of</strong> receivables.<br />

(i) Non-current assets (or disposal groups) classified as held for sale<br />

Non-current assets (or disposal groups) held for sale are recognised at the lower <strong>of</strong><br />

carrying amount and fair value less costs to sell and are presented separately from<br />

other assets in the Statement <strong>of</strong> Financial Position. Assets classified as held for sale<br />

are not depreciated or amortised.<br />

(j) Leases<br />

Finance lease rights and obligations are initially recognised, at the commencement <strong>of</strong><br />

the lease term, as assets and liabilities equal in amount to the fair value <strong>of</strong> the leased<br />

item or, if lower, the present value <strong>of</strong> the minimum lease payments, determined at the<br />

inception <strong>of</strong> the lease. The assets are disclosed as plant, equipment and vehicles<br />

under lease, and are depreciated over the period during which the <strong>Department</strong><br />

is expected to benefit from their use. Minimum lease payments are apportioned<br />

between the finance charge and the reduction <strong>of</strong> the outstanding lease liability,<br />

according to the interest rate implicit in the lease.<br />

The <strong>Department</strong> holds operating leases for a number <strong>of</strong> branch <strong>of</strong>fice buildings,<br />

motor vehicles and <strong>of</strong>fice equipment. Lease payments are expensed on a straight<br />

line basis over the lease term as this represents the pattern <strong>of</strong> benefits derived from<br />

the leased properties.


(k) Financial instruments<br />

In addition to cash and cash equivalents, the <strong>Department</strong> has two categories <strong>of</strong><br />

financial instruments:<br />

• Receivables; and<br />

• Financial liabilities measured at amortised cost.<br />

These have been disaggregated into the following classes: Financial Assets<br />

• Cash and cash equivalents<br />

• Restricted cash and cash equivalents<br />

• Receivables<br />

• Amounts receivable for services<br />

Financial Liabilities<br />

• Payables<br />

• Finance Lease Liabilities<br />

Initial recognition and measurement <strong>of</strong> financial instruments is at fair value which<br />

normally equates to the transaction cost or the face value. Subsequent measurement<br />

is at amortised cost using the effective interest method.<br />

The fair value <strong>of</strong> short-term receivables and payables is the transaction cost or the<br />

face value because there is no interest rate applicable and subsequent measurement<br />

is not required as the effect <strong>of</strong> discounting is not material.<br />

(l) Cash and cash equivalents<br />

For the purpose <strong>of</strong> the Statement <strong>of</strong> Cash Flows, cash and cash equivalents (and<br />

restricted cash and cash equivalent) assets comprise cash on hand and short-term<br />

deposits with original maturities <strong>of</strong> three months or less that are readily convertible<br />

to a known amount <strong>of</strong> cash and which are subject to insignificant risk <strong>of</strong> changes in<br />

value.<br />

(m) Accrued salaries<br />

Accrued salaries (see note 26 Payables) represent the amount due to staff but unpaid<br />

at the end <strong>of</strong> the financial year. Accrued salaries are settled within a fortnight <strong>of</strong> the<br />

financial year end. The <strong>Department</strong> considers the carrying amount <strong>of</strong> accrued salaries<br />

to be equivalent to its net fair value.<br />

The accrued salaries suspense account (See note 16 Restricted cash and cash<br />

equivalents) consists <strong>of</strong> amounts paid annually into a suspense account over a period <strong>of</strong><br />

10 financial years to largely meet the additional cash outflow in each eleventh year when<br />

27 pay days occur instead <strong>of</strong> the normal 26. No interest is received on this account.<br />

(n) Amounts receivable for services (Holding Account)<br />

The <strong>Department</strong> receives funding on an accrual basis that recognises the full annual<br />

cash and non cash cost <strong>of</strong> services. The appropriations are paid partly in cash and<br />

partly as an asset (holding account receivable) that is accessible on the emergence <strong>of</strong><br />

the cash funding requirement to cover leave entitlements and asset replacement.<br />

See also note 14 Income from State Government and note 19 Amounts receivable for<br />

services.<br />

(o) Inventories<br />

Inventories are measured at the lower <strong>of</strong> cost and net realisable value. Costs are<br />

assigned by the method most appropriate to each particular class <strong>of</strong> inventory, with the<br />

majority being valued on a first in first out basis.<br />

Inventories not held for resale are valued at cost unless they are no longer required, in<br />

which case they are valued at net realisable value.<br />

See note 17 Inventories.<br />

(p) Receivables<br />

Receivables are recognised and carried at original invoice amount less an allowance for<br />

any uncollectible amounts (i.e. impairment). The collectability <strong>of</strong> receivables is reviewed<br />

on an ongoing basis and any receivables identified as uncollectible are written-<strong>of</strong>f<br />

against the allowance account. The allowance for uncollectible amounts (doubtful<br />

debts) is raised when there is objective evidence that the <strong>Department</strong> will not be able<br />

to collect the debts. The carrying amount is equivalent to fair value as it is due for<br />

settlement within 30 days.<br />

See note 2(k) Financial Instruments and note 18 Receivables .<br />

57


(q) Payables<br />

Payables are recognised at the amounts payable when the <strong>Department</strong> becomes<br />

obliged to make future payments as a result <strong>of</strong> a purchase <strong>of</strong> assets or services.<br />

The carrying amount is equivalent to fair value, as they are generally settled within<br />

30 days.<br />

See note 2(k) Financial instruments and note 26 Payables.<br />

(r) Amounts due to the Treasurer<br />

The amount due to the Treasurer is in respect <strong>of</strong> a Treasurer’s Advance. Initial<br />

recognition and measurement, and subsequent measurement is at the amount<br />

repayable. Although there is no interest charged the amount repayable is equivalent<br />

to fair value as the period <strong>of</strong> the borrowing is less than 12 months with the effect <strong>of</strong><br />

discounting not being material.<br />

See note 45 Administered Assets and Liabilities.<br />

(s) Provisions<br />

Provisions are liabilities <strong>of</strong> uncertain timing or amount and are recognised where<br />

there is a present legal or constructive obligation as a result <strong>of</strong> a past event and when<br />

the outflow <strong>of</strong> resources embodying economic benefits is probable and a reliable<br />

estimate can be made <strong>of</strong> the amount <strong>of</strong> the obligation. Provisions are reviewed at<br />

the end <strong>of</strong> each reporting period. See note 27 Provisions.<br />

58<br />

(i) Provisions – employee benefits<br />

<strong>Annual</strong> leave and long service leave<br />

The liability for annual and long service leave expected to be settled within 12<br />

months after the reporting period is recognised and measured at the undiscounted<br />

amounts expected to be paid when the liabilities are settled. <strong>Annual</strong> and long<br />

service leave expected to be settled more than 12 months after the reporting<br />

period is measured at the present value <strong>of</strong> amounts expected to be paid when<br />

the liabilities are settled. Leave liabilities are in respect <strong>of</strong> services provided by<br />

employees up to the end <strong>of</strong> the reporting period.<br />

When assessing expected future payments consideration is given to expected<br />

future wage and salary levels including non-salary components such as employer<br />

superannuation contributions. In addition, the long service leave liability also<br />

considers the experience <strong>of</strong> employee departures and periods <strong>of</strong> service.<br />

The expected future payments are discounted using market yields at the end <strong>of</strong><br />

the reporting period on national government bonds with terms to maturity that<br />

match, as closely as possible, the estimated future cash outflows.<br />

All annual leave and unconditional long service leave provisions are classified as<br />

current liabilities as the <strong>Department</strong> does not have an unconditional right to defer<br />

settlement <strong>of</strong> the liability for at least 12 months after the reporting period.<br />

Superannuation<br />

The Government Employees Superannuation Board (GESB) in accordance with the<br />

legislative requirements administers public sector superannuation arrangements in<br />

Western Australia.<br />

Employees may contribute to the Pension Scheme, a defined benefit pension<br />

scheme now closed to new members or the Gold State Superannuation Scheme<br />

(GSS), a defined benefit lump sum scheme also closed to new members.<br />

The <strong>Department</strong> has no liabilities under the Pension or the GSS Schemes. The<br />

liabilities for the unfunded Pension Scheme and the unfunded GSS Scheme transfer<br />

benefits due to members who transferred from the Pension Scheme, are assumed<br />

by the Treasurer. All other GSS Scheme obligations are funded by concurrent<br />

contributions made by the <strong>Department</strong> to the GESB. The concurrently funded part <strong>of</strong><br />

the GSS Scheme is a defined contribution scheme as these contributions extinguish<br />

all liabilities in respect on the concurrently funded GSS Scheme obligations.<br />

Employees commencing employment prior to 16 April 2007 who were not members<br />

<strong>of</strong> either the Pension or GSS Schemes became non-contributory members <strong>of</strong> the<br />

West State Superannuation Scheme (WSS). Employees commencing employment<br />

on or after 16 April 2007 became members <strong>of</strong> the GESB Super Scheme (GESBS).<br />

Both <strong>of</strong> these schemes are accumulation schemes. The <strong>Department</strong> makes<br />

concurrent contributions to GESB on behalf <strong>of</strong> employees in compliance with the<br />

Commonwealth Government’s Superannuation Guarantee (Administration) Act<br />

1992. These contributions extinguish the liability for superannuation charges in<br />

respect <strong>of</strong> the WSS and GESBS Schemes.<br />

The GESB makes all benefit payments in respect <strong>of</strong> the Pension and GSS Schemes,<br />

and is recouped from the Treasurer for the employer’s share.<br />

See also note 2(t) Superannuation expense


(ii) Provisions – other<br />

Employment on-costs<br />

Employment on-costs, including workers’ compensation insurance, are not<br />

employee benefits and are recognised separately as liabilities and expenses<br />

when the employment to which they relate has occurred. Employment on-costs<br />

are included as part <strong>of</strong> ‘Other expenses’ and are not included as part <strong>of</strong> the<br />

<strong>Department</strong>’s ‘Employee benefits expense’. The related liability is included in<br />

‘Employment on-costs provision’.<br />

See note 9 Other Expenses and note 28 Provisions.<br />

(t) Superannuation expense<br />

The superannuation expense in the Statement <strong>of</strong> Comprehensive Income comprises<br />

<strong>of</strong> employer contributions paid to GSS (concurrent contributions), the West State<br />

Superannuation Scheme (WSS), and the GESB Super Scheme (GESBS). The<br />

employer contribution paid to the GESB in respect <strong>of</strong> the GSS is paid back into the<br />

Consolidated Fund by the GESB.<br />

The GSS Scheme is a defined benefit scheme for the purposes <strong>of</strong> employees<br />

and whole-<strong>of</strong>-government reporting. However, it is a defined contribution plan for<br />

agency purposes because the concurrent contributions (defined contributions)<br />

made by the agency to GESB extinguishes the agency’s obligation to the related<br />

superannuation liability.<br />

(u) Resources received free <strong>of</strong> charge or for nominal cost<br />

Resources received free <strong>of</strong> charge or for nominal cost that can be reliably measured<br />

are recognised as income and as assets or expenses as appropriate, at fair value.<br />

Where the resource received represents a service that the <strong>Department</strong> would<br />

otherwise pay for, a correspondng expense is recognised.<br />

Where assets or services are received from another State Government agency, these<br />

are separately disclosed under Income from State Government in the Statement <strong>of</strong><br />

Comprehensive Income.<br />

(v) Jointly controlled assets<br />

Interests in jointly controlled assets have been reported in the financial statements.<br />

The <strong>Department</strong>’s interest in jointly controlled assets is disclosed in note 40 Jointly<br />

controlled assets.<br />

(w) Comparative figures<br />

Comparative figures are, where appropriate, reclassified to be comparable with the<br />

figures presented in the current financial year.<br />

3. Disclosure <strong>of</strong> changes in accounting policy and estimates<br />

Initial application <strong>of</strong> an Australian Accounting Standard<br />

The <strong>Department</strong> has applied the following Australian Accounting Standards effective<br />

for annual reporting periods beginning on or after 1 July 2009 that impacted on the<br />

<strong>Department</strong>:<br />

2009-5 Further Amendments to Australian Accounting Standards arising from<br />

the <strong>Annual</strong> Improvements Project [AASB 5, 8, 101, 107, 117, 118, 136 &<br />

139] Under amendments to AASB 117, the classification <strong>of</strong> land elements<br />

<strong>of</strong> all existing leases has been reassessed to determine whether they<br />

are in the nature <strong>of</strong> operating or finance leases. As leases <strong>of</strong> land &<br />

buildings recognised in the financial statements have not been found to<br />

significantly expose the department to the risks/rewards attributable to<br />

control <strong>of</strong> land, no changes to accounting estimates have been included<br />

in the Financial Statements and Notes to the Financial Statements.<br />

Under amendments to AASB 107, only expenditures that result in a<br />

recognised asset are eligible for classification as investing activities in<br />

the Statement <strong>of</strong> Cash Flows. All investing cashflows reported in the<br />

<strong>Department</strong>’s Statement <strong>of</strong> Cash Flows relate to increases in recognised<br />

assets.<br />

59


Future impact <strong>of</strong> Australian Accounting Standards not yet operative<br />

The <strong>Department</strong> cannot early adopt an Australian Accounting Standard unless specifically<br />

permitted by Treasurer’s Instruction 1101 Application <strong>of</strong> Australian Accounting Standards<br />

and Other Pronouncement’s. Consequently, the <strong>Department</strong> has not applied the following<br />

Australian Accounting Standards that have been issued that may impact the <strong>Department</strong>.<br />

Where applicable, the <strong>Department</strong> plans to apply these Australian Accounting Standards<br />

from their application date.<br />

AASB 2009-11 Amendments to Australian Accounting Standards arising from AASB<br />

9 [AASB 1, 3, 4, 5, 7, 101, 102, 108, 112, 118, 121, 127, 128, 131, 132,<br />

136, 139, 1023 & 1038 and Interpretations 10 & 12].<br />

AASB 2009-11<br />

AASB 2009-12<br />

60<br />

The amendment to AASB 7 requires modification to the disclosure <strong>of</strong><br />

categories <strong>of</strong> financial assets. The <strong>Department</strong> does not expect any<br />

financial impact when the Standard is first applied. The disclosure <strong>of</strong><br />

categories <strong>of</strong> financial assets in the notes will change.<br />

Amendments to Australian Accounting Standards [AASB 5, 8, 108,<br />

110, 112, 119, 133, 137, 139, 1023 & 1031 and Interpretations 2, 4,<br />

16, 1039 & 1052] This Standard introduces a number <strong>of</strong> terminology<br />

changes. There is no financial impact resulting from the application<br />

<strong>of</strong> this revised Standard.<br />

AASB 1053 Application <strong>of</strong> Tiers <strong>of</strong> Australian Accounting Standards<br />

This Standard establishes a differential financial reporting framework<br />

consisting <strong>of</strong> two tiers <strong>of</strong> reporting requirements for preparing general<br />

purpose financial statements.<br />

The Standard does not have any financial impact on the <strong>Department</strong>.<br />

However it may affect disclosures in the financial statements <strong>of</strong> the<br />

<strong>Department</strong> if the reduced disclosure requirements apply. DTF has<br />

not yet determined the application or the potential impact <strong>of</strong> the new<br />

Standard for agencies.<br />

AASB <strong>2010</strong>-2 Amendments to Australian Accounting Standards arising from<br />

Reduced Disclosure Requirements<br />

This Standard makes amendments to many Australian Accounting<br />

Standards, including Interpretations, to introduce reduced disclosure<br />

requirements into these pronouncements for application by certain<br />

types <strong>of</strong> entities.<br />

The Standard is not expected to have any financial impact on<br />

the <strong>Department</strong>. However this Standard may reduce some note<br />

disclosures in financial statements <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Department</strong>. DTF has<br />

not yet determined the application or the potential impact <strong>of</strong> the<br />

amendments to these Standards for agencies.<br />

AASB <strong>2010</strong>-5 Amendments to Australian Accounting Standards [AASB 1, 3, 4, 5,<br />

101, 107, 112, 118, 119, 121, 132, 133, 134, 137, 139, 140, 1023 & 1038<br />

and Interpretations 112, 115, 127, 132 & 1042] (October <strong>2010</strong>)<br />

This Standard introduces a number <strong>of</strong> terminology changes as well as<br />

minor presentation changes to the Notes to the Financial Statements.<br />

There is no financial impact resulting from the application <strong>of</strong> this<br />

revised Standard.<br />

AASB <strong>2010</strong>-6 Amendments to Australian Accounting Standards – Disclosures on<br />

Transfers <strong>of</strong> Financial Assets [AASB 1 & AASB 7]<br />

This Standard makes amendments to Australian Accounting<br />

Standards, introducing additional presentation and disclosure<br />

requirements for Financial Assets.<br />

The Standard is not expected to have any financial impact on the<br />

<strong>Department</strong>. DTF has not yet determined the application or the<br />

potential impact <strong>of</strong> the amendments to these Standards for agencies.<br />

AASB 9 Financial<br />

Instruments This Standard supersedes AASB 139 Financial Instruments:<br />

Recognition and Measurement, introducing a number <strong>of</strong> changes<br />

to accounting treatments. The Standard was reissued on 6 Dec<br />

<strong>2010</strong> and the <strong>Department</strong> is currently determining the impact <strong>of</strong> the<br />

Standard. DTF has not yet determined the application or the potential<br />

impact <strong>of</strong> the Standard for agencies.


Correction <strong>of</strong> prior period error<br />

Monies held in trust by external property managers on behalf <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Department</strong> were<br />

brought to account during the current financial year. This resulted in the comparative<br />

data being restated with the following:-<br />

Financial <strong>Report</strong> Line Item Affected<br />

Statement <strong>of</strong> Comprehensive Income Extract<br />

Actual<br />

<strong>2010</strong><br />

$ 000<br />

Correction<br />

$ 000<br />

Corrected<br />

Actual<br />

<strong>2010</strong><br />

$ 000<br />

Expenses<br />

Supplies and services 109 244 48 109 292<br />

Other expenses 2 209 3 2 212<br />

Revenue<br />

Interest revenue 1 091 11 1 102<br />

Other revenues 29 925 301 30 226<br />

NET COST OF SERVICES 108 842 ( 261) 108 581<br />

Statement <strong>of</strong> financial position extract<br />

Current Assets<br />

Cash and cash equivalents 26 663 766 27 429<br />

Current Liabilities<br />

Other liabilities 4 652 22 4 674<br />

EQUITY<br />

Accumulated surplus 31 120 744 31 864<br />

Statement <strong>of</strong> Changes in Equity Extract<br />

Actual <strong>2010</strong><br />

$ 000<br />

Correction<br />

$ 000<br />

Corrected<br />

Actual<br />

<strong>2010</strong><br />

$ 000<br />

Opening Balance - - -<br />

Accumulated surplus<br />

Net effect <strong>of</strong> a correction <strong>of</strong> error - 483 483<br />

Operating surplus 31 120 261 31 381<br />

Total Income and Expense recognised directly in<br />

Equity for the period<br />

31 120 744 31 864<br />

Closing Balance 31 120 744 31 864<br />

61


4. Employee benefits expense<br />

62<br />

<strong>2011</strong><br />

$ 000<br />

<strong>2010</strong><br />

$ 000<br />

Wages and salaries (i) 82 745 67 564<br />

Superannuation - defined contribution plans (ii) 8 439 6 765<br />

Long service leave (iii) 4 824 3 246<br />

<strong>Annual</strong> leave (iii) 10 875 8 162<br />

Other related expenses 2 793 1 772<br />

109 676 87 509<br />

(i) Includes the value <strong>of</strong> the fringe benefit to the employee plus fringe benefits tax<br />

component.<br />

(ii) Defined contribution plans include West State, Gold State and GESB Super<br />

Scheme (contributions paid).<br />

(iii) Includes a superannuation contribution component.<br />

Employment on-costs such as workers’ compensation insurance are included at note<br />

9 Other expenses. The employment on-costs liability is included at note 28 Provisions.<br />

5 . Supplies and services<br />

Communications 6 550 6 067<br />

Consultants and contractors 39 329 18 084<br />

Consumables 17 579 16 336<br />

Commissions 13 943 13 278<br />

Repairs and maintenance 9 514 9 547<br />

Service Level Agreement (i) 2 865 38 403<br />

Travel 1 739 1 396<br />

Other 5 457 6 181<br />

96 976 109 292<br />

(i) Payments to the <strong>Department</strong> <strong>of</strong> Finance Shared Services for corporate services under a service<br />

level agreement.<br />

6. Depreciation and amortisation expense<br />

<strong>2011</strong><br />

$ 000<br />

<strong>2010</strong><br />

$ 000<br />

Depreciation<br />

Buildings 784 752<br />

Refurbishments, furniture and fittings 1 432 1 273<br />

Plant and equipment 493 398<br />

Computer hardware 611 510<br />

Vehicles and vessels 223 143<br />

Leased plant, equipment and vehicles 17 -<br />

Infrastructure 5 488 4 986<br />

Total depreciation 9 048 8 062<br />

Amortisation<br />

Intangible assets 2 073 3 444<br />

Total amortisation 2 073 3 444<br />

Total depreciation and amortisation expense 11 121 11 506


7. Accommodation expenses<br />

<strong>2011</strong><br />

$ 000<br />

<strong>2010</strong><br />

$ 000<br />

Lease rentals 7 058 2 742<br />

Cleaning 1 547 915<br />

8. Grants and subsidies expense<br />

8 605 3 657<br />

Bicycle infrastructure development 2 673 2 537<br />

Central Area Transit (CAT) bus services 12 694 9 817<br />

Coastal Projects & Zone Management 998 1 131<br />

Community Police 820 695<br />

Country pensioner petrol card subsidy scheme 20 125 12 769<br />

Fremantle Port Rail Service 2 121 2 081<br />

Grain Freight 1 881 2 120<br />

Liquid Petroleum Gas Subsidy Scheme - 952<br />

Marine Communications 469 469<br />

Marine Safety<br />

-<br />

227<br />

Milligan Street taxi rank<br />

1 109<br />

-<br />

National <strong>Transport</strong> Commission 396 344<br />

North West Shipping Service 5 613 5 830<br />

Pensioner subsidies 1 271 1 216<br />

Port management 2 165 2 037<br />

Public air transport 1 114 1 199<br />

Recreational Boating Facilities 1 366 1 064<br />

Regional airport development 4 326 7 595<br />

Student subsidies 1 187 1 002<br />

Taxi user subsidies 10 545 9 324<br />

Other Grants & Subsidies 2 661 1 038<br />

73 534 63 447<br />

9. Other expenses<br />

<strong>2011</strong><br />

$ 000<br />

<strong>2010</strong><br />

$ 000<br />

Employment on-costs (i) 285 261<br />

Audit cost (ii) 272 -<br />

Catering 122 ( 286)<br />

Donations and Sponsorship 127 -<br />

Doubtful debts expense 1 046 -<br />

Esperance clean up expenses 2 543 -<br />

Pr<strong>of</strong>essional Services - Board Fees 95 -<br />

Restricted Hour Taxi Plate Buy In 310 -<br />

Risk assesment workshop 83 -<br />

Storage and Removal 254 -<br />

Transfer <strong>of</strong> funds to <strong>Department</strong> <strong>of</strong> Planning 2 058 -<br />

Prior Year Work in Progress expensed 208 -<br />

Other 776 2 237<br />

8 179 2 212<br />

(i) Includes workers’ compensation insurance and other employment on-costs. The on-costs liability<br />

associated with the recognition <strong>of</strong> annual and long service leave liability is included at note 28<br />

Provisions. Superannuation contributions accrued as part <strong>of</strong> the provision for leave are employee<br />

benefits and are not included in employment on-costs.<br />

(ii) Audit cost, includes <strong>2010</strong> fee, see also note 39 Remuneration <strong>of</strong> Auditor.<br />

63


10. User charges and fees<br />

64<br />

<strong>2011</strong><br />

$ 000<br />

<strong>2010</strong><br />

$ 000<br />

Boat registration fees 12 077 11 685<br />

Port charges 1 314 1 024<br />

Small boat harbour fees 7 314 6 694<br />

Vessel survey fees 2 909 2 375<br />

Other maritime fees 1 925 1 444<br />

Motor drivers licence application fees 15 533 14 955<br />

Motor vehicle transfer, plate and inspection fees 34 964 31 591<br />

Perth parking licence fees 29 850 29 007<br />

Rail safety registration fees 2 095 1 719<br />

Taxi licence fees 9 447 9 178<br />

Other fees 2 051 1 786<br />

11. Grants and subsidies revenue<br />

119 479 111 458<br />

Commonwealth grants 438 172<br />

General government grants 20 411 27 201<br />

Other 2 392 545<br />

23 241 27 918<br />

12. Other revenues<br />

<strong>2011</strong><br />

$ 000<br />

<strong>2010</strong><br />

$ 000<br />

Commissions 15 855 14 041<br />

Rents and leases 11 001 9 152<br />

Recoups <strong>of</strong> operating expenses 9 130 6 004<br />

Other 2 292 1 029<br />

13. Net gain/(loss) on disposal <strong>of</strong> non-current assets<br />

38 278 30 226<br />

Plant, equipment, vehicles and vessels<br />

Costs <strong>of</strong> disposal 87 2 419<br />

Proceeds from disposal 50 16<br />

Net gain/(loss) ( 37) (2 403)<br />

Infrastructure<br />

Costs <strong>of</strong> disposal 10 147<br />

Proceeds from disposal - -<br />

Net gain/(loss) ( 10) ( 147)<br />

Total net gain/(loss) ( 47) (2 550)


14. Income from State Government<br />

<strong>2011</strong><br />

$ 000<br />

<strong>2010</strong><br />

$ 000<br />

Appropriation received during the year<br />

Service appropriations 143 513 133 769<br />

Service appropriations are accrual amounts reflecting the net cost <strong>of</strong> services<br />

delivered. The appropriation revenue comprises a cash component and a receivable<br />

(asset). The receivable (holding account) comprises the depreciation expense for the<br />

year and any agreed increase in leave liabilities during the year.<br />

Assets Assumed/(Transferred)<br />

The following assets have been assumed from/(transferred<br />

to) other state government agencies during the financial<br />

year<br />

Property, plant, equipment, vehicles and vessels assumed - -<br />

Infrastructure assumed - -<br />

Property, plant, equipment, vehicles and vessels<br />

(transferred)<br />

8 -<br />

Total assets assumed/(transferred) 8 -<br />

Resources received free <strong>of</strong> charge<br />

Determined on the basis <strong>of</strong> the following estimates<br />

provided by agencies: <strong>Department</strong> <strong>of</strong> Treasury and Finance<br />

570 7<br />

Landgate 24 520<br />

State Solicitor’s Office 423 19<br />

<strong>Department</strong> <strong>of</strong> Education 2 136<br />

1 019 683<br />

Where assets or services have been received free <strong>of</strong> charge or for nominal<br />

consideration, the <strong>Department</strong> recognises revenue (except where the contributions<br />

<strong>of</strong> assets or services are in the nature <strong>of</strong> contributions by owners, the <strong>Department</strong><br />

shall make a direct adjustment to equity) equivalent to the fair value <strong>of</strong> the assets<br />

and/or the fair value <strong>of</strong> those services that can be reliably determined and which<br />

would have been purchased if they were not donated, and those fair values shall be<br />

recognised as assets or expenses, as applicable.<br />

<strong>2011</strong><br />

$ 000<br />

<strong>2010</strong><br />

$ 000<br />

Royalties for Regions Fund<br />

Regional Boating Facilities Scheme 1 700 -<br />

Regional Airport Development Scheme 2 897 5 510<br />

4 597 5 510<br />

This is a sub-fund within the over-arching Royalties for Regions Fund. The recurrent<br />

funds are committed to projects and programs in WA regional areas.<br />

15. Cash and cash equivalents<br />

Cash and cash equivalents 27 122 27 429<br />

Includes cash received as capital contributions remaining unspent at year end <strong>of</strong> $5,651,000 (<strong>2010</strong>:<br />

$8,811,000).<br />

65


16. Restricted cash and cash equivalents<br />

66<br />

<strong>2011</strong><br />

$ 000<br />

<strong>2010</strong><br />

$ 000<br />

Current<br />

Off-Road Vehicles Account (i) 264 231<br />

Perth Parking Licensing Account (ii) 38 891 21 742<br />

Rail Safety Accreditation Account (iii) 1 493 1 391<br />

Taxi Industry Development Account (iv) 21 461 17 667<br />

Small Craft Facilities - User Pays(v) 1 296 2 370<br />

Non-current<br />

63 406 43 401<br />

Accrued salaries suspense account (vi) 1 686 1 190<br />

(i) meet the costs <strong>of</strong> administering the Control <strong>of</strong> Vehicles (Off Road Areas) Act 1978 and for matters<br />

approved by the Minister and the Treasurer.<br />

(ii) meet the costs <strong>of</strong> administering the Perth Parking Management Act 1999 or for a purpose connected<br />

with the Perth Parking Policy.<br />

(iii) meet the costs <strong>of</strong> administering the Rail Safety Act 1998.<br />

(iv) pay remuneration and allowances to board members, pay for taxi plates surrendered to the Minister,<br />

pay grants for research, promotion and development projects that benefit the taxi industry and<br />

meet the costs <strong>of</strong> administering the Taxi Act 1994.<br />

(v) fund the provision, maintenance, upgrading and management <strong>of</strong> small craft facilities.<br />

(vi) meet the 27th pay in a financial year that occurs every 11 years.<br />

17. Inventories<br />

<strong>2011</strong><br />

$ 000<br />

<strong>2010</strong><br />

$ 000<br />

Current<br />

Inventories held for sale - -<br />

Charts and publications (at cost) 43 46<br />

Motor vehicle plates (at cost) 319 320<br />

362 366<br />

See also note 2(o) Inventories


18. Receivables<br />

<strong>2011</strong><br />

$ 000<br />

<strong>2010</strong><br />

$ 000<br />

Current<br />

Receivables 7 960 5 446<br />

Allowance for impairment <strong>of</strong> receivables (2 165) (1 118)<br />

Goods and services tax receivable 2 515 1 840<br />

Interest receivable 469 333<br />

8 779 6 501<br />

Reconciliation <strong>of</strong> changes in the allowance for<br />

impairment <strong>of</strong> receivables<br />

Balance at start <strong>of</strong> year 1 118 -<br />

Transfers from other agencies - 1 405<br />

Doubtful debts expense 1 046 ( 286)<br />

Amounts written <strong>of</strong>f during the year ( 7) ( 12)<br />

Amount recovered during the year 8 11<br />

Balance at end <strong>of</strong> year 2 165 1 118<br />

The <strong>Department</strong> does not hold any collateral as security or other credit enhancements relating to<br />

receivables.<br />

See also note 2(p) Receivables and note 37 Financial Instruments<br />

19. Amounts receivable for services<br />

<strong>2011</strong><br />

$ 000<br />

<strong>2010</strong><br />

$ 000<br />

Non-current 122 031 107 234<br />

122 031 107 234<br />

Represents the non-cash component <strong>of</strong> service appropriations (see note 2(n)<br />

Amounts Receivable for Services (Holding Account)). It is restricted in that it can<br />

only be used for asset replacement or payment <strong>of</strong> leave liability.<br />

20. Other assets<br />

<strong>2011</strong><br />

$ 000<br />

<strong>2010</strong><br />

$ 000<br />

Current<br />

Prepayments 1 047 492<br />

Other current assets 18 22<br />

1 065 514<br />

67


21. Property, plant, equipment, vehicles and vessels<br />

<strong>2011</strong><br />

68<br />

Cost/ Fair<br />

value<br />

$ 000<br />

Accumulated<br />

depreciation<br />

$ 000<br />

Carrying<br />

Amount<br />

$ 000<br />

At fair value:<br />

Land 123 557 - 123 557<br />

Buildings 17 766 - 17 766<br />

141 323 - 141 323<br />

At cost:<br />

Refurbishments, furniture and fittings 10 857 4 351 6 506<br />

Plant and equipment 7 214 4 604 2 610<br />

Computer hardware 3 268 1 978 1 290<br />

Vehicles 862 740 122<br />

Leased plant, equipment and vehicles 58 17 41<br />

Vessels 1 999 915 1 084<br />

24 258 12 605 11 653<br />

Total 165 581 12 605 152 976<br />

<strong>2010</strong><br />

Cost/ Fair<br />

value<br />

$ 000<br />

Accumulated<br />

depreciation<br />

$ 000<br />

Carrying<br />

Amount<br />

$ 000<br />

At fair value:<br />

Land 120 504 - 120 504<br />

Buildings 16 540 - 16 540<br />

137 044 - 137 044<br />

At cost:<br />

Refurbishments, furniture and fittings 10 155 2 987 7 168<br />

Plant and equipment 6 613 4 657 1 956<br />

Computer hardware 2 965 1 436 1 529<br />

Vehicles 189 181 8<br />

Leased plant, equipment and vehicles - - -<br />

Vessels 1 556 764 792<br />

21 478 10 025 11 453<br />

Total 158 522 10 025 148 497<br />

Freehold land and buildings were revalued as at 1 July <strong>2010</strong> by the Western Australian Land Information<br />

Authority (Valuation Services). The valuations were performed during the year ended 30 June <strong>2011</strong> and<br />

recognised at 30 June <strong>2011</strong>. In undertaking the revaluation, fair value was determined by reference to<br />

market values for land: $ 13,696,000 and buildings: $ 2,436,000. For the remaining balance, fair value <strong>of</strong><br />

land was determined on the basis <strong>of</strong> current use for land: $ 109,861,000 and depreciated replacement<br />

cost for buildings: $ 15,330,000 See note 2(f) Property, plant and equipment and infrastructure.


21. Property, plant, equipment, vehicles and vessels (continued)<br />

Reconciliations <strong>of</strong> the carrying amounts <strong>of</strong> property, plant, equipment, vehicles and vessels at the beginning and end <strong>of</strong> the financial year are set out in the table below.<br />

<strong>2011</strong><br />

Carrying<br />

amount at<br />

start <strong>of</strong> year<br />

$ 000<br />

Transfers<br />

$ 000<br />

Additions<br />

$ 000<br />

Revaluation<br />

$ 000<br />

Disposals<br />

$ 000<br />

Other<br />

transfers<br />

$ 000<br />

Depreciation<br />

$ 000<br />

Carrying<br />

amount at<br />

end <strong>of</strong> year<br />

$ 000<br />

Land 120 504 37 84 2 932 - - - 123 557<br />

Buildings 16 540 - - 2 010 - - ( 784) 17 766<br />

Refurbishments, furniture and fittings 7 168 ( 81) 851 - - - (1 432) 6 506<br />

Plant and equipment 1 956 51 1 179 - ( 83) - ( 493) 2 610<br />

Computer hardware 1 529 ( 14) 390 - ( 4) - ( 611) 1 290<br />

Vehicles 8 53 94 - - - ( 33) 122<br />

Vessels 792 - 482 - - - ( 190) 1 084<br />

Leased plant, equipment and vehicles - - 58 - - - ( 17) 41<br />

148 497 46 3 138 4 942 ( 87) - (3 560) 152 976<br />

<strong>2010</strong><br />

Carrying<br />

amount at<br />

start <strong>of</strong> year<br />

$ 000<br />

Transfers at<br />

1-Jul-09<br />

$ 000<br />

Additions<br />

$ 000<br />

Revaluation<br />

$ 000<br />

Disposals<br />

$ 000<br />

Other<br />

transfers<br />

$ 000<br />

Depreciation<br />

$ 000<br />

Carrying<br />

amount at<br />

end <strong>of</strong> year<br />

$ 000<br />

Land - 111 583 125 11 199 (2 403) - - 120 504<br />

Buildings - 17 232 359 165 - ( 465) ( 751) 16 540<br />

Refurbishments, furniture and fittings - 5 521 2 920 - - - (1 273) 7 168<br />

Plant and equipment - 1 596 774 - ( 16) - ( 398) 1 956<br />

Computer hardware - 1 425 614 - - - ( 510) 1 529<br />

Vehicles - 18 - - - - ( 10) 8<br />

Vessels - 846 80 - - - ( 134) 792<br />

Leased plant, equipment and vehicles - - - - - - - -<br />

- 138 221 4 872 11 364 (2 419) ( 465) (3 076) 148 497<br />

69


22. Infrastructure<br />

70<br />

<strong>2011</strong><br />

$ 000<br />

<strong>2010</strong><br />

$ 000<br />

Infrastructure<br />

At cost 233 813 232 348<br />

Accumulated depreciation (114 586) (109 157)<br />

119 227 123 191<br />

Reconciliation<br />

Reconciliations <strong>of</strong> the carrying amounts <strong>of</strong> infrastructure<br />

at the beginning and end <strong>of</strong> the financial year are set out<br />

below.<br />

Infrastructure<br />

Carrying amount at the start <strong>of</strong> the year 123 191 -<br />

Transfers at 1 July 2009 - 119 811<br />

Additions 1 534 8 048<br />

Disposals ( 10) ( 147)<br />

Other transfers - 465<br />

Depreciation (5 488) (4 986)<br />

Carrying amount at the end <strong>of</strong> the year 119 227 123 191<br />

23. Intangible Assets<br />

<strong>2011</strong><br />

$ 000<br />

<strong>2010</strong><br />

$ 000<br />

S<strong>of</strong>tware<br />

At cost 36 985 34 334<br />

Accumulated amortisation (21 264) (19 192)<br />

15 721 15 142<br />

Reconciliation<br />

Reconciliations <strong>of</strong> the carrying amount <strong>of</strong> intangible assets<br />

at the beginning and end <strong>of</strong> the financial year are set out<br />

below.<br />

S<strong>of</strong>tware<br />

Carrying amount at the start <strong>of</strong> the year 15 142 -<br />

Transfers at 1 July 2009 - 17 821<br />

Additions 2 652 765<br />

Disposals - -<br />

Other transfers - -<br />

Amortisation expense (2 073) (3 444)<br />

Carrying amount at the end <strong>of</strong> the year 15 721 15 142


24. Construction in progress<br />

<strong>2011</strong><br />

$ 000<br />

<strong>2010</strong><br />

$ 000<br />

At cost:<br />

Vessels 173 85<br />

Computer hardware 1 224 1 198<br />

Buildings and refurbishments 2 007 809<br />

Intangibles 4 924 5 359<br />

Maritime infrastructure 33 531 16 570<br />

41 859 24 021<br />

Reconciliation<br />

Reconciliations <strong>of</strong> the carrying amounts <strong>of</strong> construction in<br />

progress at the beginning and end <strong>of</strong> the financial year are<br />

set out below.<br />

Carrying amount at the start <strong>of</strong> the year<br />

24 021<br />

-<br />

Transfers at 1 July 2009<br />

-<br />

17 509<br />

Expenditure during the year 24 000 19 084<br />

Non-current assets commissioned during the year (5 953) (12 359)<br />

Amounts expensed ( 209) ( 213)<br />

Carrying amount at the end <strong>of</strong> the year 41 859 24 021<br />

25. Impairment <strong>of</strong> assets<br />

There were no indications <strong>of</strong> impairment to property, plant and equipment,<br />

infrastructure and intangible assets at 30 June <strong>2011</strong>.<br />

The <strong>Department</strong> held no goodwill or intangible assets with an indefinite useful life<br />

during the end <strong>of</strong> the reporting period and at the end <strong>of</strong> the reporting period there<br />

were no intangible assets not yet available for use.<br />

26. Payables<br />

<strong>2011</strong><br />

$ 000<br />

<strong>2010</strong><br />

$ 000<br />

Current<br />

Trade payables 8 689 7 317<br />

Accrued salaries 1 530 1 062<br />

10 219 8 379<br />

See also note 2(q) Payables and note 37 Financial instruments.<br />

27. Borrowings<br />

Finance lease liabilities (secured)<br />

Current 21 -<br />

Non-current 26 -<br />

47 -<br />

See also note 2(j) Leases.<br />

71


28. Provisions<br />

72<br />

<strong>2011</strong><br />

$ 000<br />

<strong>2010</strong><br />

$ 000<br />

Current<br />

Employee benefits provision<br />

<strong>Annual</strong> leave (i) 9 867 7 511<br />

Long service leave (ii) 3 396 5 830<br />

13 263 13 341<br />

Other provisions<br />

Employment on-costs (iii) 180 209<br />

13 443 13 550<br />

Non-current<br />

Employee benefits provision<br />

Long service leave (ii) 11 563 6 260<br />

Other provisions<br />

Employment on-costs (iii) 1 239 100<br />

12 802 6 360<br />

(i) <strong>Annual</strong> leave liabilities have been classified as current as there is no unconditional right to defer<br />

settlement for at least 12 months after reporting period. Assessments indicate that actual settlement<br />

<strong>of</strong> the liabilities will occur as follows:<br />

Within 12 months <strong>of</strong> the end <strong>of</strong> the reporting period 5 961 4 074<br />

More than 12 months after the end <strong>of</strong> the reporting period 3 758 3 437<br />

9 719 7 511<br />

(ii) Long service leave liabilities have been classified as current where there is no unconditional right<br />

to defer settlement for at least 12 months after reporting period. Assessments indicate that actual<br />

settlement <strong>of</strong> the liabilities will occur as follows:<br />

<strong>2011</strong><br />

$ 000<br />

<strong>2010</strong><br />

$ 000<br />

Within 12 months <strong>of</strong> the end <strong>of</strong> the reporting period 3 759 3 664<br />

More than 12 months after the end <strong>of</strong> the reporting period 12 784 8 427<br />

16 543 12 091<br />

(iii) The settlement <strong>of</strong> annual and long service leave liabilities gives rise to the payment <strong>of</strong> employment<br />

on-costs including workers’ compensation insurance. The provision is the present value <strong>of</strong> expected<br />

future payments. The associated expense is disclosed in note 9 Other expenses.<br />

Movements in other provisions:<br />

Movements in each class <strong>of</strong> provisions during the financial<br />

year, other than employee<br />

benefits, are set out below.<br />

Employment on-costs provision<br />

Carrying amount at the start <strong>of</strong> the year 309 -<br />

Transferred from the <strong>Department</strong> <strong>of</strong> Planning<br />

on 1 July 2009<br />

- 372<br />

Additional provisions recognised 1 110 ( 2)<br />

Payments/other sacrifices <strong>of</strong> economic benefits - ( 61)<br />

Carrying amount at end <strong>of</strong> year 1 419 309


29. Other liabilities<br />

<strong>2011</strong><br />

$ 000<br />

<strong>2010</strong><br />

$ 000<br />

Current<br />

Income received in advance 4 190 4 294<br />

Other payables 151 350<br />

Other liabilities 9 686 30<br />

14 027 4 674<br />

30. Equity<br />

Equity represents the residual interest in the net assets <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Department</strong>. The<br />

Government holds the equity interest in the <strong>Department</strong> on behalf <strong>of</strong> the community.<br />

The asset revaluation surplus represents that portion <strong>of</strong> equity resulting from the<br />

revaluation <strong>of</strong> non-current assets.<br />

<strong>2011</strong><br />

$ 000<br />

<strong>2010</strong><br />

$ 000<br />

Contributed equity<br />

Balance at the start <strong>of</strong> the period 421 295 -<br />

Prior period adjustment ( 32) -<br />

Contributions by owners<br />

Capital contributions<br />

9 859 9 010<br />

Transfer <strong>of</strong> net assets<br />

- <strong>Department</strong> <strong>of</strong> Planning<br />

(2 789) 412 285<br />

- Regional Development Headworks Fund 3 150 -<br />

Balance at the end <strong>of</strong> the period 431 483 421 295<br />

RESERVES<br />

Asset Revaluation Surplus<br />

Balance at the start <strong>of</strong> the period<br />

Net revaluation increments:<br />

11 364 -<br />

Land 2 932 11 199<br />

Buildings 2 010 165<br />

Balance at the end <strong>of</strong> the period 16 306 11 364<br />

ACCUMULATED SURPLUS<br />

Balance at the start <strong>of</strong> the period 31 864 -<br />

Net effect <strong>of</strong> correction <strong>of</strong> error - 744<br />

Result for the period 24 043 31 120<br />

Balance at the end <strong>of</strong> the period 55 907 31 864<br />

73


31. Notes to the Statement <strong>of</strong> Cash Flows<br />

(a) Reconciliation <strong>of</strong> cash<br />

Cash at the end <strong>of</strong> the financial year as shown in the Statement <strong>of</strong> Cash Flows is<br />

reconciled to the related items in the Statement <strong>of</strong> Financial Position as follows:<br />

<strong>2011</strong><br />

<strong>2010</strong><br />

$ 000<br />

$ 000<br />

Cash and cash equivalents (i) 27 122 27 429<br />

Restricted cash and cash equivalents (ii) 65 092 44 591<br />

92 214 72 020<br />

Cash transferred (to)/from other sources<br />

Cash and cash equivalents transferred:<br />

from <strong>Department</strong> <strong>of</strong> Planning 3 663 48 088<br />

3 663 48 088<br />

(i) These cash and cash equivalents include $ 9,859,000 capital contribution and funds available to<br />

meet expenditure commitments.<br />

(ii) See note 16 Restricted cash and cash equivalents.<br />

74<br />

(b) Reconciliation <strong>of</strong> net cost <strong>of</strong> services to net cash flows provided by/(used in)<br />

operating activities<br />

<strong>2011</strong><br />

<strong>2010</strong><br />

$ 000<br />

$ 000<br />

Net cost <strong>of</strong> services<br />

Non cash items:<br />

(125 094) (108 842)<br />

Depreciation and amortisation expense 11 121 11 506<br />

Doubtful debts expense 1 046 ( 286)<br />

Net (gain)/loss on disposal <strong>of</strong> non-current assets 47 2 550<br />

Resources received free <strong>of</strong> charge 1 019 683<br />

Expenses previously held in construction in<br />

progress<br />

209 149<br />

Initial recognition <strong>of</strong> assets not previously<br />

recognised<br />

- ( 125)<br />

(Increase)/decrease in assets<br />

Current inventories 4 165<br />

Current receivables (iii) (2 278) (1 706)<br />

Other current assets 40 ( 21)<br />

Increase/(decrease) in liabilities<br />

Current payables 1 840 3 277<br />

Current provisions (2 901) 2 912<br />

Other current liabilities 9 353 ( 369)<br />

Non-current provisions 5 526 540<br />

Net GST receipts/payments (i) (1 025) (1 430)<br />

Change in GST in receivables/payables (ii) (1 569) (1 479)<br />

Net cash used in operating activities (102 662) (92 476)<br />

(i) This is the net Goods and Services Tax paid/received, i.e. cash transactions.<br />

(ii) Note that the Australian Taxation Office receivables/payable in respect <strong>of</strong> GST and the receivable/<br />

payable in respect <strong>of</strong> sale/purchase <strong>of</strong> non-current assets are not included in these items as they<br />

do not form part <strong>of</strong> the reconciling items.


32. Resources provided free <strong>of</strong> charge<br />

<strong>2011</strong><br />

$ 000<br />

<strong>2010</strong><br />

$ 000<br />

Western Australian Police Service - firearms<br />

collection fees<br />

Various State and Commonwealth departments<br />

and agencies:<br />

52 55<br />

Spatial (mapping) information - 9<br />

Technical advice 128 87<br />

Advice - waterfront and canal developments 142 382<br />

322 533<br />

33. Commitments<br />

(a) Capital expenditure commitments<br />

Within one year 911 334<br />

Later than one year but not later than five years 617 -<br />

Later than five years 2 474 -<br />

4 002 334<br />

The capital expenditure commitments include<br />

amounts for:<br />

Regional <strong>of</strong>fice accommodation 3 416 282<br />

Office refurbishment 116 -<br />

Country Aged Pensioner Fuel Card Scheme<br />

database<br />

155 -<br />

Workforce management system 315 52<br />

4 002 334<br />

(b) Non-capital expenditure commitments<br />

<strong>2011</strong><br />

$ 000<br />

<strong>2010</strong><br />

$ 000<br />

Within one year 3 262 450<br />

Later than one year but not later than five years 3 314 2 000<br />

Later than five years - -<br />

6 576 2 450<br />

The other expenditure commitments include<br />

amounts for:<br />

Quality assurance and compliance - 2 450<br />

Country Aged Pensioner Fuel Card Scheme 1 920 -<br />

Knowledge Management 230 -<br />

Motorcyle Graduated Rider Training and<br />

Assessment<br />

46 -<br />

Maritime - Ports Project 79 -<br />

Perth Solar City 40 -<br />

Travelsmart Household Program 58 -<br />

National <strong>Transport</strong> Reform 1 970 -<br />

Secure Taxi Ranks 877 -<br />

Passenger Services Business Unit 1 356 -<br />

6 576 2 450<br />

75


33. Commitments (continued)<br />

(c) Lease commitments<br />

76<br />

<strong>2011</strong><br />

$ 000<br />

<strong>2010</strong><br />

$ 000<br />

Commitments in relation to leases contracted<br />

for at the end <strong>of</strong> the reporting period but not<br />

recognised in the financial statements are payable<br />

as follows:<br />

Within one year 6 118 6 431<br />

Later than one year but not later than five years 8 426 11 812<br />

Later than five years - 2 793<br />

14 544 21 036<br />

Representing:<br />

Non-cancellable operating leases 14 541 21 036<br />

Future finance charges on finance leases 3 -<br />

14 544 21 036<br />

(d) Finance lease commitments<br />

Minimum lease payment commitments in relation<br />

to finance leases are payable as follows:<br />

Within one year 23 -<br />

Later than one year but not later than five years 27 -<br />

Minimum finance lease payments 50 -<br />

Less future finance charges ( 3) -<br />

Present value <strong>of</strong> finance lease liabilities 47 -<br />

The present value <strong>of</strong> finance leases payable is as<br />

follows:<br />

Within one year 21 -<br />

Later than one year but not later than five years 26 -<br />

Present value <strong>of</strong> finance lease liabilities 47 -<br />

(e) Minimum lease revenue commitments<br />

Future minimum rentals under non-cancellable operating leases are receivable as<br />

follows:<br />

<strong>2011</strong><br />

$ 000<br />

<strong>2010</strong><br />

$ 000<br />

Within one year 8 922 7 634<br />

Later than one year but not later than five years 30 995 26 734<br />

Later than five years 97 339 61 673<br />

137 256 96 041<br />

34. Contingent liabilities and contingent assets<br />

Contingent liabilities:<br />

In addition to the liabilities incorporated in the financial statements, the <strong>Department</strong><br />

has the following contingent liabilities:<br />

Litigation in progress:<br />

- One claim for recovery <strong>of</strong> fees. The potential maximum effect is $250,000.<br />

Contingent assets:<br />

In addition to the assets incorporated in the financial statements, the <strong>Department</strong><br />

has the following contingent assets:<br />

Insurance claims:<br />

- One claim for costs incurred relating to flood damage, thirty six claims relating<br />

to motor vehicles and three general liabilitiy claims. The potential maximum<br />

financial effect is $152,000.


35. Events occurring after balance sheet date<br />

There are no significant events occurring after the reporting date.<br />

36. Explanatory Statement<br />

Significant variations between estimates and actual results for income and expenses<br />

as presented in the financial statement titled Summary <strong>of</strong> Consolidated Account<br />

Appropriations and Income Estimates are shown below. Significant variations are<br />

considered to be those greater than 10% or $1 million.<br />

(i) Significant variations between estimate and actual for <strong>2011</strong> – Total appropriation<br />

to deliver services<br />

(a) Net amount appropriated to deliver services<br />

The major variations in funding were:<br />

Additional funding:<br />

• Section 25 transfer from the Public <strong>Transport</strong><br />

Authority for multi modal planning activity<br />

including development work associated with<br />

public transport planning.<br />

• To address cost pressures and revenue<br />

shortfalls.<br />

• Increased infringement process for Enhanced<br />

Speed Enforcement.<br />

Reduction in funding for:<br />

• Section 25 appropriation for Corporate<br />

Services to the <strong>Department</strong> <strong>of</strong> Planning from<br />

the <strong>Department</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Transport</strong>.<br />

• Deferral <strong>of</strong> appropriation to <strong>2011</strong>-12<br />

<strong>2011</strong><br />

Estimate<br />

$ 000<br />

<strong>2011</strong><br />

Actual<br />

$ 000<br />

Variance<br />

$ 000<br />

139 424 142 489 3 065<br />

4 950<br />

6 075<br />

2 360<br />

(7 460)<br />

(3 185)<br />

(b) Amount authorised by other statutes<br />

<strong>2011</strong><br />

Estimate<br />

$ 000<br />

<strong>2011</strong><br />

Actual<br />

$ 000<br />

Variance<br />

$ 000<br />

333 1 024 691<br />

The Salaries and Allowance Tribunal made a determination in respect <strong>of</strong> the position<br />

<strong>of</strong> Director General, <strong>Department</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Transport</strong> and the new second tier positions<br />

<strong>of</strong> Managing Director, <strong>Transport</strong> Services and Deputy Director General. The net<br />

movement in amounts is a result <strong>of</strong> the determination <strong>of</strong> 22nd October <strong>2010</strong>.<br />

77


36. Explanatory Statement (continued)<br />

(i) Significant variations between estimate and actual for <strong>2011</strong> – Total appropriation<br />

to deliver services (continued)<br />

(c) Service expenditure<br />

78<br />

<strong>2011</strong><br />

Estimate<br />

$ 000<br />

<strong>2011</strong><br />

Actual<br />

$ 000<br />

Variance<br />

$ 000<br />

<strong>Transport</strong> system planning and regulation<br />

The variation is primarily due to reduced<br />

expenditure as a result <strong>of</strong>:<br />

142 887 133 138 (9 749)<br />

• Delays to the implemetation <strong>of</strong> a new contract<br />

for the Northwest Shipping Service.<br />

(5 400)<br />

• Deferral <strong>of</strong> Regional Recreational Boating<br />

Facilities to <strong>2011</strong>-12.<br />

(3 300)<br />

• Reduction in cost associated with<br />

the Regional Airport Development<br />

Scheme(RADS) funded from Royalties for<br />

Region mainly due to grantee project timing.<br />

(3 124)<br />

• Lower employment costs as a result <strong>of</strong><br />

vacancies.<br />

(2 267)<br />

• Reduced Grain Freight Subsidy due to lower<br />

than expected grain harvest which resulted<br />

in lower requirement for rail transportation <strong>of</strong><br />

grain.<br />

(2 207)<br />

• Cost associated with Coastal Infrastructure<br />

Policy function where costs correctly<br />

allocated to Service 3 whereas budget was<br />

classified as Service 1.<br />

(1 720)<br />

• Deferral <strong>of</strong> the Tantabiddi Boat Ramp project<br />

to <strong>2011</strong>-12.<br />

(1 500)<br />

• Realignment <strong>of</strong> corporate support costs<br />

following the transfer <strong>of</strong> the function to the<br />

<strong>Department</strong> <strong>of</strong> Planning.<br />

(1 133)<br />

These reductions are <strong>of</strong>fset by:<br />

• Increased costs associated with the<br />

Esperance lead and nickel clean up project.<br />

• Increase in demand under the Taxi User<br />

Subsidy Scheme.<br />

• Research and project managements costs<br />

related to resolving the sea grass problems at<br />

Port Geographe.<br />

• Expenditure on Milligan Street taxi rank<br />

security initiatives.<br />

• Increased Central Area Transit service<br />

improvement.<br />

• Grants to Local Government from Coastal<br />

Infrastructure.<br />

Motor vehicle registration and driver<br />

licensing services<br />

No significant variation in service expenditure.<br />

<strong>2011</strong><br />

Estimate<br />

$ 000<br />

<strong>2011</strong><br />

Actual<br />

$ 000<br />

Variance<br />

$ 000<br />

3 545<br />

2 155<br />

1 975<br />

1 109<br />

1 020<br />

970<br />

151 695 151 063 ( 632)<br />

Strategic <strong>Transport</strong> Policy 7 790 10 621 2 831<br />

The variation is primarily as a result <strong>of</strong>:<br />

• Increase in expenditure as a result <strong>of</strong><br />

increased level <strong>of</strong> activities within the service,<br />

and includes the Section 25 transfer <strong>of</strong> policy<br />

function from Public <strong>Transport</strong> Authority.<br />

This increase is <strong>of</strong>fset by:<br />

• Cost associated with Coastal Infrastructure<br />

Policy function correctly allocated to Service 3<br />

whereas budget was classified as Service 1.<br />

1 766<br />

1 065<br />

Integrated <strong>Transport</strong> planning<br />

The variation is primarily as a result <strong>of</strong>:<br />

10 609 13 316 2 707<br />

• Section 25 transfer <strong>of</strong> appropriation from the<br />

Public <strong>Transport</strong> Authority for multi modal<br />

planning activity including development work<br />

associated with public transport planning.<br />

2 261


(d) Operating revenues<br />

Total income other than from state<br />

government<br />

The decrease is primarily due to:<br />

• Decrease in Motor Vehicle Plate fee revenue<br />

mainly due to a lower than anticipated<br />

demand for new and used vehicles together<br />

with a decrease in inspection fee revenue due<br />

to the overall decrease in the total number <strong>of</strong><br />

vehicle inspections performed.<br />

• Decrease in Motor Driver’s Licence<br />

Application fee revenue mainly due to a<br />

lower than anticipated demand for new driver<br />

licences.<br />

These decreases are mainly <strong>of</strong>fset by:<br />

• Increase in Perth Parking fee revenue mainly<br />

due to additional revenue received from a<br />

major licence holder after changes to Perth<br />

Parking Regulations.<br />

• Increase in taxi lease revenue mainly a result<br />

<strong>of</strong> conversion <strong>of</strong> Restricted Hours Taxis to<br />

conventional taxi plates.<br />

<strong>2011</strong><br />

Estimate<br />

$ 000<br />

<strong>2011</strong><br />

Actual<br />

$ 000<br />

Variance<br />

$ 000<br />

186 687 183 044 (3 643)<br />

(2 951)<br />

(2 072)<br />

1 575<br />

1 086<br />

(ii) Significant variations between actuals for <strong>2010</strong> and <strong>2011</strong> – Total appropriation to<br />

deliver services<br />

(a) Net amount appropriated to deliver services<br />

<strong>2011</strong><br />

Actual<br />

$ 000<br />

<strong>2010</strong><br />

Actual<br />

$ 000<br />

Variance<br />

$ 000<br />

142 489 133 451 9 038<br />

The increase is primarily due to:<br />

• Esperance Lead and Nickle Clean up. 10 290<br />

• Section 25 Transfer <strong>of</strong> appropriation from the<br />

Public <strong>Transport</strong> Authority for multi modal<br />

planning activity including development work<br />

associated with public transport planning.<br />

4 950<br />

• Cost and salary escalation. 2 669<br />

• Enhanced Speed enforcement - additional<br />

infringement processing.<br />

2 360<br />

• Funding provided to support advertising<br />

target.<br />

2 000<br />

These increases are mainly <strong>of</strong>fset by:<br />

• Section 25 Transfer <strong>of</strong> appropriation for<br />

Corporate Services to the <strong>Department</strong> <strong>of</strong><br />

Planning from the <strong>Department</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Transport</strong><br />

(7 460)<br />

• Licensing Business Unit efficiency gains. (3 889)<br />

• Deferral <strong>of</strong> appropriation to <strong>2011</strong>-12 (3 185)<br />

(b) Amount authorised by other statutes<br />

Additional two positions subject to Salaries and<br />

Allowances Act coverage.<br />

1 024 318 706<br />

79


36. Explanatory Statement (continued)<br />

(ii) Significant variations between actuals for <strong>2010</strong> and <strong>2011</strong> – Total appropriation to<br />

deliver services (continued)<br />

(c) Service expenditure<br />

80<br />

<strong>2011</strong><br />

Actual<br />

$ 000<br />

<strong>2010</strong><br />

Actual<br />

$ 000<br />

Variance<br />

$ 000<br />

<strong>Transport</strong> system planning and regulation<br />

The variation is primarily due to additional<br />

expenditure as a result <strong>of</strong>:<br />

133 138 118 802 14 336<br />

• Esperance Lead and Nickel Clean up. 12 646<br />

• Enhanced Central Area Transit service. 3 763<br />

• Increase in Grain Freight Transitional<br />

Assistance Program (compared to 2009-10).<br />

1 243<br />

• Implementation <strong>of</strong> Milligan Street Taxi Rank<br />

Security Initiatives.<br />

1 109<br />

These increases are mainly <strong>of</strong>fset by:<br />

• Reduction in cost associated with the<br />

Regional Airport Development Scheme<br />

(compared to 2009-10) mainly due to deferral<br />

<strong>of</strong> cost to <strong>2011</strong>-12.<br />

• Realignment <strong>of</strong> corporate support costs<br />

following the transfer <strong>of</strong> function to<br />

<strong>Department</strong> <strong>of</strong> Planning.<br />

Motor vehicle registration and driver<br />

licensing services<br />

The variation is primarily due to additional<br />

expenditure as a result <strong>of</strong>:<br />

• Increase in the Country Age Fuel Card<br />

Subsidy administered on behalf <strong>of</strong> Royalties<br />

for Regions.<br />

This increase is mainly <strong>of</strong>fset by:<br />

• Realignment <strong>of</strong> corporate support costs<br />

following the transfer <strong>of</strong> function to the<br />

<strong>Department</strong> <strong>of</strong> Planning.<br />

(3 299)<br />

(1 133)<br />

151 063 144 552 6 511<br />

9 480<br />

(3 639)<br />

<strong>2011</strong><br />

Actual<br />

$ 000<br />

<strong>2010</strong><br />

Actual<br />

$ 000<br />

Variance<br />

$ 000<br />

Strategic <strong>Transport</strong> Policy<br />

The variation is mainly due to additional<br />

expenditure as a result <strong>of</strong>:<br />

10 621 6 793 3 828<br />

• Cost associated with the transfer <strong>of</strong> policy<br />

function from Public <strong>Transport</strong> Authority to<br />

<strong>Department</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Transport</strong> it together with<br />

increased level <strong>of</strong> activity.<br />

Integrated <strong>Transport</strong> planning<br />

The variation is primarily due to additional<br />

expenditure as a result <strong>of</strong>:<br />

13 316 10 026 3 290<br />

• Increased planning activity associated with<br />

regional and metropolitan freight and people<br />

movement planning and the public transport<br />

plan.


(d) Operating revenues<br />

Total income other than from state<br />

government<br />

The variation is primarily due to:<br />

• Increase in funding received for Country Age<br />

Pensioner fuel cards.<br />

• Increase in revenue from user fees and<br />

charges.<br />

• Increase in rent and lease revenue arising<br />

from rent reviews undertaken at market rates<br />

at Fremantle Fishing Boat Harbour and Hillary<br />

Boat Harbour.<br />

• Increase in commission received from the<br />

Insurance Commission WA, where the level<br />

<strong>of</strong> commission is based on an agreed rate<br />

that represents full cost recovery, and reflects<br />

both an increase in the volume <strong>of</strong> transactions<br />

and an increase in the charge per transaction.<br />

These increases are mainly <strong>of</strong>fset by:<br />

• Contribution not received from the<br />

<strong>Department</strong> <strong>of</strong> State Development for capital<br />

works associated with Port <strong>of</strong> Wyndham,<br />

rescheduled to be received in <strong>2011</strong>-12<br />

financial year.<br />

• One <strong>of</strong>f revenue adjustment for grain freight<br />

transition assistance in 2009-10.<br />

<strong>2011</strong><br />

Actual<br />

$ 000<br />

<strong>2010</strong><br />

Actual<br />

$ 000<br />

Variance<br />

$ 000<br />

183 044 171 592 11 452<br />

9 023<br />

8 021<br />

1 849<br />

1 814<br />

(5 000)<br />

(4 669)<br />

(iii) Significant variances between estimate and actual for <strong>2011</strong> – Capital contribution<br />

<strong>2011</strong><br />

Estimate<br />

$ 000<br />

<strong>2011</strong><br />

Actual<br />

$ 000<br />

Variance<br />

$ 000<br />

Total Capital Contribution 12 956 9 859 (3 097)<br />

Decrease in Capital Contribution is mainly<br />

attributable to project timing adjustments for:<br />

• Driver and Vehicle Services Reform and<br />

Maritime Facilities Program<br />

(3 469)<br />

(iv) Significant variations between actuals for <strong>2010</strong> and <strong>2011</strong> – Capital Contribution<br />

<strong>2011</strong><br />

Actual<br />

$ 000<br />

<strong>2011</strong><br />

Actual<br />

$ 000<br />

Variance<br />

$ 000<br />

9 859 9 010 849<br />

Increase in Capital Contribution is mainly<br />

attributable to the following:<br />

• Batavia Coast Marina - Additional Mooring Pens 700<br />

• Hillarys Boat Harbour - Replacement Pens<br />

• Section 25 transfer from the <strong>Department</strong><br />

428<br />

<strong>of</strong> Planning for Minor Works Program and<br />

Accommodation and Refurbishment<br />

783<br />

• General Increases for Capital Works Program 500<br />

• Deferral <strong>of</strong> Maritime Facilities Program to <strong>2010</strong>-11 1 165<br />

• Completion <strong>of</strong> the following projects in <strong>2010</strong>-11:<br />

• Hillarys Boat Harbour - Precinct Upgrade (1 520)<br />

• Albany Waterfront and Convention Centre (1 207)<br />

81


36. Explanatory Statement (continued)<br />

(v) Significant variances between estimate and actual for <strong>2011</strong> – Administered income<br />

82<br />

<strong>2011</strong><br />

Estimate<br />

$ 000<br />

<strong>2011</strong><br />

Actual<br />

$ 000<br />

Variance<br />

$ 000<br />

Administered Revenue 721 408 1 571 030 849 622<br />

The significant items comprising the variance were:<br />

- Items not reflected in Budget Statements<br />

for the <strong>Department</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Transport</strong><br />

• Third party insurance surcharge<br />

collected on behalf <strong>of</strong> the Insurance<br />

Commission <strong>of</strong> WA.<br />

• Stamp Duty on motor vehicle registrations,<br />

budgeted for by the <strong>Department</strong> <strong>of</strong> Treasury<br />

(DT), where collections are made through<br />

licensing centres and transferred to the DT.<br />

- Other Variances<br />

• Increase in Motor Vehicle Licence fee<br />

revenue is due to growth in the number<br />

<strong>of</strong> registered vehicles, combined with<br />

increases <strong>of</strong> fees for light vehicles and<br />

higher rates for heavy vehicles.<br />

• Increase to Motor Drivers Licence renewals<br />

is primarily due to Motor Drivers Licence<br />

renewals being dependent upon the time<br />

period chosen at the last renewal. Motor<br />

Driver Licence Fees are cyclical in nature and<br />

the number <strong>of</strong> driver licences expiring in this<br />

period has increased.<br />

• Increase in Federal and Interstate Licence<br />

Fees revenue mainly due to the growth in the<br />

number <strong>of</strong> registered vehicles, combined<br />

with the increase <strong>of</strong> fees for heavy vehicle<br />

within the scheme.<br />

• Increase in Plate Infringement Fines is due<br />

to higher than expected fines issued for<br />

failure to return number plates.<br />

• Reduction in revenue from Speed and Red<br />

Light Traffic Infringement Fines is due to<br />

lower than forecast issue <strong>of</strong> infringements by<br />

WA Police Service.<br />

532 754<br />

343 017<br />

19 367<br />

2 616<br />

2 045<br />

467<br />

(49 961)<br />

(vi) Significant variations between actuals for <strong>2010</strong> and <strong>2011</strong> – Administered income<br />

<strong>2011</strong><br />

Actual<br />

$ 000<br />

<strong>2010</strong><br />

Actual<br />

$ 000<br />

Variance<br />

$ 000<br />

Administered Revenue<br />

The significant items comprising the variance<br />

were:<br />

1 571 030 1 481 539 89 491<br />

• Increase in Third party motor vehicle<br />

insurance premium revenue.<br />

23 411<br />

• Increase in revenue from Stamp Duty on<br />

motor vehicle registrations.<br />

12 009<br />

- Other Variances<br />

• Increase in Motor Vehicle Licence revenue<br />

mainly attributable to growth in the number <strong>of</strong><br />

registered vehicles combined with increases<br />

to vehicle licence fees for light vehicles and<br />

higher rates for heavy vehicles determined<br />

by the National Tranport Commission.<br />

• Increase in Speed and Red Light<br />

Infringement Fines primarily a result <strong>of</strong><br />

increases to fines and increase in the number<br />

<strong>of</strong> infringements issued.<br />

(vii) Authorisations to expend in advance <strong>of</strong> appropriation<br />

38 101<br />

11 763<br />

Authorisation has been given to expend $5.463<br />

million in advance <strong>of</strong> appropriation in <strong>2010</strong>-11<br />

comprising the following:<br />

• Funding to address cost pressures and<br />

revenue shortfalls.<br />

6 075<br />

• Enhanced Speed enforcement - additional<br />

infringement processing.<br />

2 360<br />

• Funding provided for an increase in provision<br />

for long service leave, as a result <strong>of</strong> the<br />

annual review <strong>of</strong> adequancy provision.<br />

715<br />

• Salary Escalation. 26<br />

• Deferral <strong>of</strong> appropriation to <strong>2011</strong>-12. (3 185)<br />

• Public <strong>Transport</strong> Plan. ( 300)<br />

• Severance Savings. ( 228)


37. Financial Instruments<br />

(a) Financial risk management objectives and policies<br />

Financial instruments held by the <strong>Department</strong> are cash and cash equivalents,<br />

restricted cash and cash equivalents, Treasurer’s advances and receivables and<br />

payables. The <strong>Department</strong> has limited exposure to financial risks. The <strong>Department</strong>’s<br />

overall risk management program focuses on managing the risks identified below.<br />

Credit risk<br />

Credit risk arises when there is the possibility <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Department</strong>’s receivables<br />

defaulting on their contractual obligations resulting in financial loss to the <strong>Department</strong>.<br />

The maximum exposure to credit risk at the end <strong>of</strong> the reporting period in relation<br />

to each class <strong>of</strong> recognised financial assets is the gross carrying amount <strong>of</strong> those<br />

assets inclusive <strong>of</strong> any provisions for impairment, as shown in the table at Note<br />

36(c) Financial instrument disclosures and Note 18 Receivables.<br />

Credit risk associated with the <strong>Department</strong>’s financial assets is minimal because<br />

the main receivable is the amounts receivable for services (holding account). For<br />

receivables other than government, the <strong>Department</strong> trades only with recognised,<br />

creditworthy third parties. The <strong>Department</strong> has policies in place to ensure that sales<br />

<strong>of</strong> products and services are made to customers with an appropriate credit history.<br />

In addition, receivable balances are monitored on an ongoing basis with the result<br />

that the <strong>Department</strong>’s exposure to bad debts is minimal. There were no significant<br />

concentrations <strong>of</strong> credit risk at the end <strong>of</strong> the reporting period.<br />

Allowance for impairment <strong>of</strong> financial assets is calculated based on objective<br />

evidence such as observable data indicating changes in client credit ratings. For<br />

financial assets that are either past due or impaired, refer to Note 36(c) Financial<br />

instrument disclosures and Note 18 Receivables.<br />

Liquidity risk<br />

Liquidity risk arises when the <strong>Department</strong> is unable to meet its financial obligations<br />

as they fall due. The <strong>Department</strong> is exposed to liquidity risk through its trading in<br />

the normal course <strong>of</strong> business.<br />

The <strong>Department</strong> has appropriate procedures to manage cash flows including<br />

drawdowns <strong>of</strong> appropriations by monitoring forecast cash flows to ensure that<br />

sufficient funds are available to meet its commitments.<br />

Market risk<br />

Market risk is the risk that changes in market prices such as foreign exchange rates<br />

and interest rates will affect the <strong>Department</strong>’s income or the value <strong>of</strong> its holdings <strong>of</strong><br />

financial instruments. The <strong>Department</strong> does not trade in foreign currency and is not<br />

materially exposed to other price risks (for example, equity securities or commodity<br />

prices changes).<br />

Other than as detailed in the interest rate sensitivity analysis table at note 36(c)<br />

Financial instrument disclosures. The <strong>Department</strong> is not exposed to interest rate<br />

risk because apart from minor amounts <strong>of</strong> restricted cash, all other cash and cash<br />

equivalents and restricted cash are non-interest bearing, and have no borrowings<br />

other than the Treasurer’s advance (non-interest bearing).<br />

(b) Categories <strong>of</strong> Financial instruments<br />

<strong>2011</strong><br />

$ 000<br />

<strong>2010</strong><br />

$ 000<br />

Financial Assets<br />

Cash and cash equivalents 27 122 26 663<br />

Restricted cash and cash equivalents 65 092 44 591<br />

Receivables (i) - 4 661<br />

Amounts receivable for services 122 031 107 234<br />

Total Financial Assets 214 245 183 149<br />

Financial Liabilities<br />

Payables 10 219 8 379<br />

Finance lease liabilities 47 -<br />

Total Financial Assets 10 266 8 379<br />

(i) The amount <strong>of</strong> receivables excludes GST recoverable from the ATO (statutory receivable).<br />

83


37. Financial Instruments (continued)<br />

(c) Financial instrument disclosures<br />

Credit Risk and Interest Rate Risk Exposures<br />

The following table disclose the <strong>Department</strong>’s maximum exposure to credit risk, interest rate exposures and the ageing analysis <strong>of</strong> financial assets. The <strong>Department</strong>’s<br />

maximum exposure to credit risk at the end <strong>of</strong> the reporting period is the carrying amount <strong>of</strong> the financial assets as shown below. The table discloses the ageing <strong>of</strong> financial<br />

assets that are past due but not impaired and impaired financial assets. The table is based on information provided to senior management <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Department</strong>.<br />

The <strong>Department</strong> does not hold any collateral as security or other credit enhancement relating to the financial assets it holds.<br />

The <strong>Department</strong> does not hold any financial assets that had to have their terms renegotiated that would have otherwise resulted in them being past due or impaired.<br />

84<br />

Weighted<br />

Average<br />

Effective<br />

Interest Rate<br />

%<br />

Carrying<br />

Amount<br />

$ 000<br />

Interest rate exposure Past due but not impaired<br />

Variable<br />

Interest<br />

Rate<br />

$ 000<br />

Non<br />

Interest<br />

Bearing<br />

$ 000<br />

Up to 3<br />

months<br />

$ 000<br />

3-12<br />

months<br />

$ 000<br />

1-2 years<br />

$ 000<br />

2-5 years<br />

$ 000<br />

More than<br />

5 years<br />

$ 000<br />

Impaired<br />

Financial<br />

Assets<br />

$ 000<br />

Financial assets<br />

<strong>2011</strong><br />

Cash and cash equivalents 5.03 27 122 - - - - - - - -<br />

Restricted cash and cash equivalents 5.03 65 092 - - - - - - - -<br />

Receivables (i) - - - - - - - - -<br />

Amounts receivable for services 122 031 - - - - - - - -<br />

214 245 - - - - - - - -<br />

<strong>2010</strong><br />

Cash and cash equivalents 4 26 663 11 877 14 786 - - - - - -<br />

Restricted cash and cash equivalents 4 44 591 20 037 24 554 - - - - - -<br />

Receivables (i) 4 661 - 4 661 388 363 78 6 - -<br />

Amounts receivable for services 107 234 - 107 234 - - - - - -<br />

183 149 31 914 151 235 388 363 78 6 - -<br />

(i) The amount <strong>of</strong> receivables excludes GST recoverable from the Australian Taxation Office (statutory receivable).


(b) Financial instrument disclosures (continued)<br />

Liquidity Risk<br />

The following table details the contractual maturity analysis for financial liabilities. The contractual maturity amounts are representative <strong>of</strong> the undiscounted amounts at the<br />

end <strong>of</strong> the reporting period. The table includes both interest and principal cash flows. An adjustment has been made where material.<br />

Interest rate exposures and maturity analysis <strong>of</strong> financial liabilities<br />

Weighted<br />

Average Effective<br />

Interest Rate<br />

Carrying<br />

Amount<br />

Interest rate exposure Maturity date<br />

Variable<br />

Interest<br />

Rate<br />

Non Interest<br />

Bearing<br />

Up to 3<br />

months<br />

3-12 months 1-2 years 2-5 years<br />

More than 5<br />

years<br />

% $ 000 $ 000 $ 000 $ 000 $ 000 $ 000 $ 000 $ 000<br />

Financial Liabilities<br />

<strong>2011</strong><br />

Payables 10 219 - 10 219 - - - - -<br />

Finance lease liabilities 6.23 47 47 - 6 17 24 - -<br />

10 266 47 10 219 6 17 24 - -<br />

Weighted<br />

Average Effective<br />

Interest Rate<br />

Carrying<br />

Amount<br />

Interest rate exposure Maturity date<br />

Variable<br />

Interest<br />

Rate<br />

Non Interest<br />

Bearing<br />

Up to 3<br />

months<br />

3-12 months 1-2 years 2-5 years<br />

More than 5<br />

years<br />

% $ 000 $ 000 $ 000 $ 000 $ 000 $ 000 $ 000 $ 000<br />

Financial Liabilities<br />

<strong>2010</strong><br />

Payables 8 379 - 8 379 - - - - -<br />

Finance lease liabilities - - - - - - - -<br />

8 379 - 8 379 - - - - -<br />

The amounts disclosed are the contractual undiscounted cash flows <strong>of</strong> each class <strong>of</strong> financial liabilities.<br />

85


37. Financial Instruments (continued)<br />

Interest rate sensitivity analysis<br />

The following table represents a summary <strong>of</strong> the interest rate sensitivity <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Department</strong>’s financial assets and liabilities at the end <strong>of</strong> the reporting period on the surplus for<br />

the period and equity for a 1% change in interest rates. It is assumed that the change in interest rates is held constant throughout the reporting period.<br />

86<br />

Carrying -100 basis points +100 basis points<br />

amount<br />

$ 000<br />

Surplus<br />

$ 000<br />

Equity<br />

$ 000<br />

Surplus<br />

$ 000<br />

Financial assets<br />

<strong>2011</strong><br />

Cash assets - - - - -<br />

Restricted cash assets - - - - -<br />

- - - - -<br />

<strong>2010</strong><br />

Cash assets 11 877 ( 119) ( 119) 119 119<br />

Restricted cash assets 20 037 ( 200) ( 200) 200 200<br />

31 914 ( 319) ( 319) 319 319<br />

Fair values<br />

All financial assets and liabilities recognised in the Statement <strong>of</strong> Financial Position, whether they are carried at cost or fair value, are recognised at amounts that represent a reasonable approximation <strong>of</strong> fair value<br />

unless otherwise stated in the applicable notes.<br />

Equity<br />

$ 000


38. Remuneration <strong>of</strong> senior <strong>of</strong>ficers<br />

The number <strong>of</strong> senior <strong>of</strong>ficers, whose total <strong>of</strong> fees, salaries, superannuation, non-<br />

monetary benefits and other benefits for the financial year, fall within the following<br />

bands are:<br />

$ <strong>2011</strong> <strong>2010</strong><br />

50 001 - 60 000 1 -<br />

60 001 - 70 000 - -<br />

70 001 - 80 000 1 -<br />

110 001- 120 000 1 -<br />

130 001- 140 000 - -<br />

140 001 - 150 000 1 2<br />

150 001 - 160 000 1 -<br />

160 001 - 170 000 - 1<br />

170 001 - 180 000 1 -<br />

220 001 - 230 000 1 -<br />

260 001 - 270 000 - 1<br />

280 001 - 290 000 - -<br />

290 001 - 300 000 1 -<br />

450 001 - 460 000 - 1<br />

500 001 - 510 000 1 -<br />

$ 000 $ 000<br />

1 751 1 168<br />

The total remuneration includes the superannuation expense incurred by the<br />

<strong>Department</strong> in respect <strong>of</strong> senior <strong>of</strong>ficers.<br />

No senior <strong>of</strong>ficers are members <strong>of</strong> the Pension Scheme.<br />

39. Remuneration <strong>of</strong> Auditor<br />

Remuneration payable to the Auditor General in respect <strong>of</strong> the audit for the current<br />

financial year is as follows:<br />

Auditing the accounts, financial statements and<br />

performance indicators<br />

The expense is included at Note 9 Other expenses.<br />

40. Jointly controlled assets<br />

<strong>2011</strong><br />

$ 000<br />

<strong>2010</strong><br />

$ 000<br />

132 140<br />

The following represents the <strong>Department</strong>’s 50% ownership interest in the Marine<br />

Operations Centre with the <strong>Department</strong> <strong>of</strong> Fisheries. The jointly controlled assets<br />

are included in the financial statements.<br />

Non current assets<br />

Property, plant, equipment, vehicles and vessels 3 076 3 139<br />

Infrastructure 156 167<br />

Total assets 3 232 3 306<br />

87


41. Special purpose accounts<br />

Deposits<br />

88<br />

<strong>2011</strong><br />

$ 000<br />

<strong>2010</strong><br />

$ 000<br />

Opening balance 1 812 1 614<br />

Receipts:<br />

Deposits - Keys 15 13<br />

Deposits - Bonds 1 173 304<br />

Deposits - Motor Dealer’s Licences 104 6<br />

Deposits - Buyback MPT Plates 71 3<br />

Interest 17 28<br />

1 380 354<br />

Payments:<br />

Refunds - Keys ( 6) ( 5)<br />

Refunds - Bonds ( 711) ( 86)<br />

Refunds - Motor Dealer’s Licences ( 94) -<br />

Refunds - Buyback MPT Plates ( 82) ( 65)<br />

( 893) ( 156)<br />

Closing balance 2 299 1 812<br />

This Account holds deposits for the issue <strong>of</strong> keys to boat owners to access the<br />

harbour pens, performance bonds, motor vehicle dealer plates and Multi Purpose<br />

Taxi Plate deposits. These monies are held in a private trustee capacity, and in<br />

accordance with Treasurer’s Instruction 1101A Financial <strong>Report</strong>ing by <strong>Department</strong>s<br />

are only reported in these notes to the financial statements.<br />

Off-road Vehicles Account<br />

<strong>2011</strong><br />

$ 000<br />

<strong>2010</strong><br />

$ 000<br />

Opening balance 231 235<br />

Receipts:<br />

Licence and plate fees 33 34<br />

33 34<br />

Payments:<br />

Grants and subsidies - ( 38)<br />

- ( 38)<br />

Closing balance 264 231<br />

This Account holds monies collected for the registration <strong>of</strong> vehicles under the Control<br />

<strong>of</strong> Vehicles (Off-road areas) Act and to provide funds to meet the expenses <strong>of</strong> the<br />

<strong>Department</strong> in connection with administration <strong>of</strong> the Act pursuant to section 43(2)<br />

<strong>of</strong> the Act.


Perth Parking Licensing Account<br />

<strong>2011</strong><br />

$ 000<br />

<strong>2010</strong><br />

$ 000<br />

Opening balance 21 742 2 173<br />

Receipts:<br />

Licence fees 29 850 29 007<br />

29 850 29 007<br />

Payments:<br />

Public <strong>Transport</strong> Authority (11 831) (9 038)<br />

Employee costs ( 179) ( 165)<br />

Supplies and services ( 691) ( 235)<br />

(12 701) (9 438)<br />

Closing balance 38 891 21 742<br />

This Account was established to hold funds for the purpose <strong>of</strong> administering the<br />

Perth Parking Management Act 1999.<br />

Rail Heritage<br />

Opening balance 2 2<br />

Receipts:<br />

Fees - -<br />

- -<br />

Payments:<br />

Grants and Subsidies - -<br />

- -<br />

Closing balance 2 2<br />

This account holds funds from the sale <strong>of</strong> property transferred from Westrail to the<br />

Australian Historical Society.<br />

Rail Safety Accreditation Account<br />

<strong>2011</strong><br />

$ 000<br />

<strong>2010</strong><br />

$ 000<br />

Opening balance 1 391 1 223<br />

Receipts:<br />

Registration fees 1 817 1 719<br />

Recoups and other receipts 6 42<br />

Payments:<br />

1 823 1 761<br />

Employee costs ( 833) (1 024)<br />

Superannuation ( 95) ( 92)<br />

Contractors ( 2) ( 33)<br />

Lease and rental ( 33) ( 30)<br />

Other payments ( 758) ( 414)<br />

(1 721) (1 593)<br />

Closing balance 1 493 1 391<br />

This Account was established to hold funds for the purpose <strong>of</strong> administering the Rail<br />

Safety Act 1998.<br />

89


41. Special purpose accounts (continued)<br />

Small Craft Facilities<br />

90<br />

<strong>2011</strong><br />

$ 000<br />

<strong>2010</strong><br />

$ 000<br />

Opening balance 4 203 4 848<br />

Receipts:<br />

Boat harbour fees 3 915 3 838<br />

Other fees 6 2<br />

Rental 8 522 7 590<br />

Recoups 3 709 3 217<br />

Funds for dredging 7 959 10 058<br />

Other revenue 5 636 5 293<br />

29 747 29 998<br />

Payments:<br />

Employment costs ( 529) ( 656)<br />

Contractors (1 476) (2 768)<br />

Administration expenses (4 826) ( 715)<br />

Recreational Boat Scheme (9 615) (14 722)<br />

Maintenance (5 829) (7 218)<br />

Power, water and sewerage (4 260) (3 431)<br />

Other operating expenses (1 814) (1 133)<br />

(28 349) (30 643)<br />

Closing balance 5 601 4 203<br />

This account holds funds for the purpose <strong>of</strong> funding the provision, maintenance,<br />

upgrading and management <strong>of</strong> small craft facilities.<br />

Taxi Fare Evasion Recoupment Account<br />

<strong>2011</strong><br />

$ 000<br />

<strong>2010</strong><br />

$ 000<br />

Opening balance - -<br />

Receipts:<br />

Deposits 6 4<br />

6 4<br />

Payments:<br />

Refunds ( 6) ( 4)<br />

( 6) ( 4)<br />

Closing balance - -<br />

The purpose <strong>of</strong> this Account is to reimburse taxi drivers with monies collected from<br />

passengers who failed to pay their fare.


Taxi Industry Development Account<br />

<strong>2011</strong><br />

$ 000<br />

<strong>2010</strong><br />

$ 000<br />

Opening balance 17 667 13 065<br />

Receipts:<br />

Licence fees 7 585 6 909<br />

Interest income 932 526<br />

Other revenue 1 046 1 562<br />

9 563 8 997<br />

Payments:<br />

Consultants’ fees (1 282) (1 133)<br />

Other payments (4 487) (3 262)<br />

(5 769) (4 395)<br />

Closing balance 21 461 17 667<br />

The purpose <strong>of</strong> this Account is to hold funds received by the <strong>Department</strong> for the<br />

purposes <strong>of</strong> the Taxi Act 1994.<br />

41. Special purpose accounts (continued)<br />

Receipts in Suspense<br />

Opening balance 4 235 3 424<br />

Receipts credited to suspense account 16 616 9 353<br />

Receipts transferred from suspense account (16 658) (8 542)<br />

Closing balance 4 193 4 235<br />

Pursuant to section 26 (2) <strong>of</strong> the Financial Management Act, the purpose <strong>of</strong> this<br />

Account is to hold funds pending identification <strong>of</strong> the purpose for which these<br />

monies were received.<br />

42. Supplementary financial information<br />

Write-<strong>of</strong>fs<br />

<strong>2011</strong><br />

$ 000<br />

<strong>2010</strong><br />

$ 000<br />

During the Financial Year, assets valued at $ 7,055<br />

were written <strong>of</strong>f the <strong>Department</strong>’s asset register<br />

under the authority <strong>of</strong>:<br />

The Accountable Authority 7 12<br />

Losses through theft, defaults and other causes<br />

The <strong>Department</strong> suffered no losses <strong>of</strong> public money or other property through theft,<br />

defaults or other causes during the current financial period.<br />

Gifts <strong>of</strong> public property<br />

The <strong>Department</strong> provided no gifts <strong>of</strong> public property during the current financial<br />

period.<br />

43. Indian Ocean Territories Service Level Agreement<br />

The provision <strong>of</strong> services to the Indian Ocean<br />

territories are recouped from the Commonwealth<br />

government.<br />

<strong>2011</strong><br />

$ 000<br />

<strong>2010</strong><br />

$ 000<br />

Balance at the start <strong>of</strong> the year 6 -<br />

Receipts 105 94<br />

Payments ( 114) ( 88)<br />

Balance at the end <strong>of</strong> the year ( 3) 6<br />

91


44. Administered expenses and income<br />

92<br />

<strong>Transport</strong> system planning<br />

and regulation<br />

<strong>2011</strong><br />

$ 000<br />

<strong>2010</strong><br />

$ 000<br />

Motor vehicle registration<br />

and driver licensing services<br />

<strong>2011</strong><br />

$ 000<br />

<strong>2010</strong><br />

$ 000<br />

General - Not Attributed Total<br />

Expenses<br />

Other expenses - - 3 321 827 329 - 3 650 827<br />

Total administered expenses - - 3 321 827 329 - 3 650 827<br />

Revenues<br />

For transfer to the Consolidated Account or Agencies<br />

Appropriations for transfer to the:<br />

Western Australian Coastal Shipping Commission 329 - 329 -<br />

Conservancy<br />

Infringements<br />

291 281 - - - - 291 281<br />

Cannabis infringement fines - - 67 71 - - 67 71<br />

Plate and transfer infringements - - 6 856 6 148 - - 6 856 6 148<br />

Speed and red light infringement fines - - 73 262 61 499 - - 73 262 61 499<br />

Final demand fees - traffic infringements - - 1 561 1 212 - - 1 561 1 212<br />

Dealer Plates - - 232 230 - - 232 230<br />

Motor drivers’ licences<br />

Motor vehicle registrations<br />

- - 40 424 39 445 - - 40 424 39 445<br />

Motor vehicle registrations - - 522 304 484 203 - - 522 304 484 203<br />

Recording fees - - 44 985 43 072 - - 44 985 43 072<br />

Stamp duty - - 342 449 331 008 - - 342 449 331 008<br />

Third party motor vehicle insurance premiums - - 532 754 509 343 - - 532 754 509 343<br />

Collection <strong>of</strong> interstate licensing fees - - 2 072 1 732 - - 2 072 1 732<br />

Firearm licence fees - - 3 444 3 295 - - 3 444 3 295<br />

Total administered income 291 281 1 570 410 1 481 258 329 - 1 571 030 1 481 539<br />

<strong>2011</strong><br />

$ 000<br />

<strong>2010</strong><br />

$ 000<br />

<strong>2011</strong><br />

$ 000<br />

<strong>2010</strong><br />

$ 000


45. Administered assets and liabilities<br />

Current assets<br />

<strong>2011</strong><br />

$ 000<br />

<strong>2010</strong><br />

$ 000<br />

Cash 11 470 11 615<br />

Accounts receivable (i) 3 603 1 541<br />

Total current assets 15 073 13 156<br />

Total administered assets 15 073 13 156<br />

Current liabilities<br />

Treasurer’s Advance 2 000 2 000<br />

Payables 2 701 3 477<br />

Accruals and interest payable 3 866 3 835<br />

Income received in advance 3 13<br />

Total current liabilities 8 570 9 325<br />

Total administered liabilities 8 570 9 325<br />

(i) Notes to the Schedules <strong>of</strong> Administered Items - Accounts receivable<br />

Current Receivables 21 991 16 610<br />

Allowance for impairment <strong>of</strong> receivables (18 388) (15 069)<br />

3 603 1 541<br />

93


Key performance indicators<br />

Certification <strong>of</strong> key performance indicators<br />

For the year ended 30 June <strong>2011</strong><br />

I hereby certify that the performance indicators are based on proper records, are<br />

relevant and appropriate for assisting users to assess the DoT’s performance and<br />

fairly represent the performance <strong>of</strong> the DoT for the financial year ended 30 June <strong>2011</strong><br />

Reece Waldock<br />

Accountable Authority<br />

94<br />

Key performance indicators<br />

The transport function is integral to business and commerce, and important for<br />

social interaction and connecting communities. DoT’s key focus is on strategic<br />

transport policy and planning, regulation, and operational transport functions<br />

across the range <strong>of</strong> public and commercial transport systems that service Western<br />

Australia. With more than 1200 employees, and together with its portfolio partners,<br />

DoT has the expertise to deliver high quality and integrated transport policy and<br />

plans that connect a complex, inter-related economic and social network. DoT<br />

connects people with goods and services through an intricate system <strong>of</strong> roads,<br />

railways, airports, ports and waterways, and educates and regulates to keep people<br />

safe within those networks.<br />

DoT’s outcome structure was changed for the <strong>2010</strong>-11 financial year to address the<br />

final split <strong>of</strong> the DPI into three new departments, including DoT. New key performance<br />

indicators (KPIs) will better align to the DoT outcomes by providing more relevant<br />

assessments, such as accessibility to taxis through measuring the taxi jobs not<br />

covered and the percentage <strong>of</strong> times acceptable industry waiting times are met.<br />

KPIs that are no longer considered relevant to DoT business have been removed.<br />

The breadth and diversity <strong>of</strong> DoT’s functions and services means that DoT contributes<br />

to many <strong>of</strong> the Government’s strategic goals, with the most significant contributions<br />

outlined below.<br />

Government strategic goals<br />

Outcome based service delivery<br />

Greater focus on achieving<br />

results in key service delivery<br />

areas for the benefit <strong>of</strong> all<br />

Western Australians.<br />

State building – Major projects<br />

Building strategic infrastructure<br />

that will create jobs and underpin<br />

Western Australia’s long-term<br />

economic development.<br />

<strong>Department</strong>al desired<br />

outcomes<br />

1. An accessible and safe<br />

transport system<br />

2. Vehicles and road users<br />

that meet established<br />

vehicle standards and<br />

driver competencies.<br />

3. Integrated transport<br />

systems that facilitate<br />

economic development.<br />

<strong>Department</strong>al services<br />

1. <strong>Transport</strong> system and<br />

services development,<br />

planning, operation and<br />

regulation.<br />

2. Motor vehicle and driver<br />

licensing services.<br />

3. Strategic transport policy.<br />

4. Integrated transport<br />

planning.


<strong>Department</strong>al desired outcome 1: An accessible and safe transport system<br />

DoT’s responsibility for the accessibility and safety <strong>of</strong> the transport system derives<br />

from the <strong>Transport</strong> Co-ordination Act 1966 (the Act). The Act confers on DoT the<br />

responsibility for co-ordinating and planning the transport system and enabling<br />

accessibility and safety considerations.<br />

There are varying degrees <strong>of</strong> accessibility and safety across the agency for the<br />

different modes <strong>of</strong> transport. For example, Marine Safety provides regulation,<br />

education, training and compliance monitoring in regards to safety <strong>of</strong> marine<br />

vessels, whereas accessibility to marine related infrastructure and waterways is the<br />

responsibility <strong>of</strong> Coastal Infrastructure.<br />

Rail safety is managed by the Office <strong>of</strong> Rail Safety, which is charged with<br />

administering the Rail Safety Act <strong>2010</strong> in Western Australia and nationally as part <strong>of</strong><br />

a national approach to rail safety regulation. It does this by ensuring railway owners<br />

and operators comply with regulatory standards to construct, operate and maintain<br />

railways. Accessibility to railways is the responsibility <strong>of</strong> the owners and operators.<br />

Accessibility to taxis is the responsibility <strong>of</strong> the Passenger Services whereby they<br />

are responsible for ensuring an adequate taxi service is being provided to the<br />

public <strong>of</strong> Western Australia. Safety in taxis in regards to vehicles and drivers is the<br />

responsibility <strong>of</strong> DVS in its role in administering the Road Traffic Act 1974 and is<br />

covered under Outcome 2 <strong>of</strong> the DoT’s outcome structure: “Vehicles and road users<br />

that meet established vehicle standards and driver competencies”. Safety for taxi<br />

operators and passengers not related to use on the road is the responsibility <strong>of</strong> the<br />

Western Australia Police in its community safety role.<br />

Accessibility to regular public transport air services is the responsibility <strong>of</strong> the<br />

<strong>Transport</strong> Policy and Systems, which ensures adequate air services are provided to<br />

key regional communities throughout the State. Aviation safety is controlled through<br />

the Commonwealth Government’s Civil Aviation Safety Authority. DoT ensures all<br />

aircraft that carry passengers for regular public transport or charter purposes within<br />

Western Australia are licensed annually.<br />

Effectiveness key performance indicators<br />

Percentage <strong>of</strong> standard metropolitan (non multi-purpose) taxi jobs not covered<br />

The Taxi Act 1994 bestows on DoT, through Passenger Services, the responsibility<br />

<strong>of</strong> regulating Perth’s metropolitan taxi industry.<br />

Following the 1999 National Competition Policy Review <strong>of</strong> the industry, the then DPI<br />

introduced industry performance standards. The standards have been in place<br />

since 1 July 2000 to ensure that the public receives acceptable levels <strong>of</strong> service and<br />

the taxi industry is required to meet these performance standards. An independent<br />

external consultant analyses taxi industry data, sourced from the taxi dispatch<br />

service (TDS) providers, and reports on taxi demand and industry viability trends<br />

as well as the performance <strong>of</strong> the taxi industry against the industry standards on a<br />

monthly and quarterly basis.<br />

This assessment gives DoT the ability to provide the Minister with evidence-based<br />

policy recommendations and therefore directly assists the regulatory function <strong>of</strong> the<br />

DoT.<br />

The key performance indicator <strong>of</strong> taxi service is jobs not covered (JNC), which is the<br />

percentage <strong>of</strong> total jobs going unserviced in the peak and <strong>of</strong>f-peak periods.<br />

Trends from this indicator assist with determining supply and demand requirements<br />

for the industry and provide rationale for determining whether or not there is a<br />

requirement to release additional taxi plates.<br />

Industry performance is assessed by obtaining and analysing data from the two<br />

major TDS providers in the metropolitan area. Of these, the number <strong>of</strong> customer<br />

telephone orders placed on and advertised through the taxi company dispatch<br />

system and the number <strong>of</strong> jobs not covered against these orders are recorded.<br />

Percentage<br />

<strong>of</strong> standard<br />

metropolitan<br />

(non multipurpose)<br />

taxi<br />

jobs that were<br />

not covered.<br />

2007-08<br />

actual<br />

2008-09<br />

actual<br />

2009-10<br />

actual<br />

<strong>2010</strong>-11<br />

target<br />

<strong>2010</strong>-11<br />

actual<br />

3.60% 1.79% 1.18% 1.00% 1.60%<br />

Reasons for significant variance<br />

During the <strong>2010</strong>-11 year, the<br />

demand for metropolitan taxis has<br />

increased by 9.4 per cent (peak<br />

and <strong>of</strong>f-peak period demand<br />

combined). As a consequence<br />

<strong>of</strong> this increase in demand, the<br />

percentage <strong>of</strong> jobs not covered<br />

has also increased.<br />

95


Percentage by which the waiting time standard for metropolitan area taxis is met<br />

DoT is responsible for regulation <strong>of</strong> the Perth metropolitan taxi industry via the<br />

administration <strong>of</strong> the Taxi Act 1994.<br />

Following the 1999 National Competition Policy Review <strong>of</strong> the Perth metropolitan taxi<br />

industry, the then DPI introduced industry performance standards. The standards<br />

have been in place since 1 July 2000 and the taxi industry is required to meet these<br />

performance standards.<br />

An independent external consultant analyses taxi industry data, sourced from the<br />

TDS providers, and reports on taxi demand and industry viability trends as well as<br />

the performance <strong>of</strong> the taxi industry against the industry standards on a monthly and<br />

quarterly basis.<br />

This assessment gives DoT the ability to provide the Minister with evidence-based policy<br />

recommendations and therefore directly assists the regulatory function <strong>of</strong> the DoT.<br />

In addition to JNC, taxi performance is measured by determining the average time<br />

a customer has to wait for a taxi following a booking, during peak and <strong>of</strong>f-peak<br />

times, and then comparing the result against the relevant performance standards. To<br />

calculate this measure, the wait times for taxis requested as soon as possible (asap)<br />

have been measured during peak and <strong>of</strong>f-peak times, and bookings that meet the<br />

performance standard are presented as a percentage against all asap bookings.<br />

Trends from this indicator assist with determining supply and demand requirements<br />

for the industry and provide rationale for determining whether or not there is a<br />

requirement to release additional taxi plates.<br />

Industry performance is assessed by obtaining and analysing data from the two<br />

major TDS providers in the metropolitan area. Waiting time information is available<br />

from the TDS systems and measured as the difference between when the customer<br />

first requested the taxi and when the driver turned on their meter to start the job.<br />

Percentage by<br />

which the waiting<br />

time standard<br />

for metropolitan<br />

area taxis is met.<br />

96<br />

2007-08<br />

actual<br />

2008-09<br />

actual<br />

2009-10<br />

actual<br />

<strong>2010</strong>-11<br />

target<br />

<strong>2010</strong>-11<br />

actual<br />

87.2% 91.1% 91.8% 90.0% 91.9%<br />

Reasons for<br />

significant<br />

variance<br />

Percentage <strong>of</strong> time maritime infrastructure is fit for purpose when required<br />

DoT is responsible for the planning, creation, enhancement and management <strong>of</strong><br />

new and existing land and water based maritime facilities for small craft throughout<br />

Western Australia.<br />

DoT manages and maintains a variety <strong>of</strong> maritime infrastructure assets, including<br />

jetties, wharves, boat launching facilities, pens and moorings at approximately<br />

50 discrete locations throughout the State, to service the fishing and commercial<br />

maritime industries and the recreational boating needs <strong>of</strong> Western Australians.<br />

DoT also maintains associated navigational aids that are strategically placed in<br />

water and onshore to ensure that the boating community can safely transit through<br />

waterways. It also maintains the navigable waters at its managed maritime facilities<br />

as well as at a small number <strong>of</strong> other locations, including two commercial ports,<br />

throughout the State by providing access via dredged channels.<br />

The facilities and their purpose vary for each location and the associated management<br />

and maintenance plans vary accordingly.<br />

The outcome <strong>of</strong> this indicator is measured by determining the percentage <strong>of</strong> time<br />

each <strong>of</strong> the four infrastructure categories (1. Pens and moorings, 2. Jetties and other<br />

infrastructure, 3. Navigational aids, and 4. Dredged channels) is fit for purpose when<br />

required, then calculating the average percentage across all four to arrive at the<br />

measure.<br />

A consistently high percentage <strong>of</strong> availability will confirm that maritime infrastructure<br />

is being appropriately maintained and is accessible to the boating industries and the<br />

public <strong>of</strong> Western Australia.<br />

Percentage <strong>of</strong><br />

time maritime<br />

infrastructure is<br />

fit for purpose<br />

when required.<br />

2007-08<br />

actual<br />

2008-09<br />

actual<br />

2009-10<br />

actual<br />

<strong>2010</strong>-11<br />

target<br />

<strong>2010</strong>-11<br />

actual<br />

98.77% 99.65% 99.87% 99.65% 99.73%<br />

Reasons for<br />

significant<br />

variance


Percentage <strong>of</strong> regional airports receiving regular public transport air services<br />

DoT advises on a range <strong>of</strong> aviation issues, provides grants to support the development<br />

<strong>of</strong> airport infrastructure through RADS, and regulates intrastate air services to ensure<br />

that key Western Australian regional communities receive sustainable, regular public<br />

transport (RPT) air services.<br />

Under the <strong>Transport</strong> Co-ordination Act 1966 all aircraft that carry passengers for<br />

regular public transport or charter purposes within Western Australia are required<br />

to be licensed annually. In addition, the Minister has powers to apply conditions<br />

to aircraft licences to determine where they may fly in the State. Where there are<br />

insufficient passenger numbers to support competition to a key regional centre, the<br />

Government protects the service by <strong>of</strong>fering it, through a public tender process, to<br />

only one airline service provider.<br />

The objective <strong>of</strong> the Act is to ensure that no Western Australian community with<br />

a population <strong>of</strong> more than 500 is more than 250km from an airport, unless the<br />

community has access to another form <strong>of</strong> public transport. The airport must provide<br />

at least two RPT services per week and be accessible by a safe road.<br />

From 2007-08 to 2009-10, 25 key regional centres were identified as receiving<br />

scheduled RPT air services. In <strong>2010</strong>-11, Busselton was identified as an airport to<br />

receive scheduled RPT air services, increasing the total number to 26.<br />

Currently, <strong>of</strong> the 26 key regional centres receiving scheduled RPT air services, 11<br />

are open to competition and 15 are protected through various arrangements with or<br />

without a Government subsidy.<br />

To ensure that charter operations do not undermine the RPT service, charter<br />

operators are limited by a condition on their aircraft licence to providing one return<br />

flight per client per week to an RPT airport. The Minister’s approval is required to<br />

provide additional services.<br />

The licensing arrangements and contracts for the protected and subsidised services<br />

are monitored through monthly statistics and meetings with the airlines to ensure that<br />

the outcome <strong>of</strong> the regional centres having a sustainable RPT service is achieved.<br />

A reduction in the percentage <strong>of</strong> key regional centres being serviced by RPT air<br />

services or other forms <strong>of</strong> public transport would indicate that services to remote<br />

communities are not being maintained.<br />

Percentage <strong>of</strong><br />

regional airports<br />

receiving regular<br />

public transport<br />

air services.<br />

2007-08<br />

actual<br />

2008-09<br />

actual<br />

2009-10<br />

actual<br />

<strong>2010</strong>-11<br />

target<br />

<strong>2010</strong>-11<br />

actual<br />

100% 100% 96% 100% 96%<br />

Reasons for<br />

significant<br />

variance<br />

97


Rate <strong>of</strong> reported incidents (accidents) on the water per 100 commercial<br />

vessels surveyed under the Western Australian Marine Act 1982<br />

All commercial vessels in Western Australia are subject to survey to ensure they meet<br />

minimum standards for construction and equipment safety before they may begin<br />

to operate. These vessels are surveyed annually to ensure safety and maintenance<br />

standards are upheld (excluding vessels certified as Class 4 Hire and Drive vessels).<br />

Under the Western Australian Marine Act 1982 all accidents or incidents that result<br />

in serious injury or death, or cause damage to the vessel rendering it unseaworthy<br />

or unsafe, must be reported and, as mentioned above, a commercial vessel must<br />

hold a current certificate <strong>of</strong> survey to show that it meets national and international<br />

maritime standards to continue to operate.<br />

The information for this indicator is derived from the DoT’s commercial vessel<br />

database and the marine incidents database, and is calculated by dividing the<br />

number <strong>of</strong> incidents by the number <strong>of</strong> commercial vessels holding current survey<br />

certificates (expressed as a rate per hundred vessels).<br />

A reduction in the rate <strong>of</strong> incidents per commercial vessel indicates that the safety<br />

outcome is being met in relation to commercial activities.<br />

Rate <strong>of</strong><br />

reported<br />

incidents<br />

(accidents)<br />

on the water<br />

per 100<br />

commercial<br />

vessels<br />

surveyed under<br />

the Western<br />

Australian<br />

Marine Act<br />

1982.<br />

98<br />

2007-08<br />

actual<br />

2008-09<br />

actual<br />

2009-10<br />

actual<br />

<strong>2010</strong>-11<br />

target<br />

<strong>2010</strong>-11<br />

actual<br />

5.15 3.26 5.11 4.00 5.95<br />

Reasons for<br />

significant variance<br />

The introduction <strong>of</strong><br />

a penalty provision<br />

for non-reporting <strong>of</strong><br />

incidents appears to<br />

have had an impact on<br />

incident numbers known<br />

to the DoT. In turn,<br />

there has been a shift<br />

<strong>of</strong> fishing vessels now<br />

surveyed to operate as<br />

trading vessels in the<br />

North-West servicing<br />

the resource industry.<br />

Rate <strong>of</strong> reported incidents (accidents) on the water per 10,000 registered<br />

recreational vessels.<br />

Western Australia’s temperate climate and unique marine environment entice an<br />

estimated 250,000 people to make recreational use <strong>of</strong> the State’s waterways each year.<br />

DoT takes a lead role in ensuring the safety <strong>of</strong> the State’s mariners through:<br />

• setting standards for recreational vessels and registering only those that meet<br />

legislative requirements;<br />

• requiring recreational mariners to meet basic safety competencies through the<br />

Recreational Skipper’s Tickets (compulsory from 1 April, 2008);<br />

• maintaining marine charts and signs to promote safe navigation and warn <strong>of</strong><br />

hazards;<br />

• responding to oil spills and other pollutants;<br />

• maintaining navigational aids (NAVAIDS); and<br />

• educating and informing mariners on marine safety matters.<br />

Under the Navigable Waters Regulations 1958, to operate on navigable waters in<br />

Western Australia all vessels that have a motor or have the capacity to have a motor<br />

fitted must be registered. It is also a requirement under the Western Australian Marine<br />

Act 1982 for people to report any accident or incident that results in serious injury<br />

or death, or the vessel being damaged enough to make it unseaworthy or unsafe.<br />

The data for this indicator is taken from the DoT’s recreational vessel registration<br />

database and the marine incidents database, and is calculated by dividing the<br />

number <strong>of</strong> incidents by the number <strong>of</strong> registered recreational vessels (expressed as<br />

a rate per 10,000 vessels).<br />

A reduction in the rate <strong>of</strong> incidents per registered recreational vessel indicates that<br />

the safety outcome is being met in relation to recreational boating.<br />

Rate <strong>of</strong> reported<br />

incidents<br />

(accidents)<br />

on the water<br />

per 10,000<br />

registered<br />

recreational<br />

vessels.<br />

2007-08<br />

actual<br />

2008-09<br />

actual<br />

2009-10<br />

actual<br />

<strong>2010</strong>-11<br />

target<br />

<strong>2010</strong>-11<br />

actual<br />

9.05 9.46 9.51 9.00 12.52<br />

Reasons for significant<br />

variance<br />

Recreational vessel registrations<br />

have increased by 4.7 per cent<br />

whereas incident numbers<br />

have increased by 38 per cent.<br />

It appears the introduction <strong>of</strong><br />

a penalty provision for nonreporting<br />

<strong>of</strong> incidents has had a<br />

negative effect on this indicator.


Rate <strong>of</strong> serious rail accidents per million train kilometres<br />

DoT is responsible for promoting safety <strong>of</strong> the rail transport system through<br />

administration <strong>of</strong> the Rail Safety Act <strong>2010</strong>. In this regulatory scheme under which<br />

railway managers are accountable for rail safety, the ORS accredits railway owners<br />

and operators to construct, operate and maintain railways where they have met the<br />

requirements <strong>of</strong> the Rail Safety Act <strong>2010</strong>, including:<br />

• demonstrating competence and capacity to meet the requirements <strong>of</strong> Australian<br />

Standard AS4292 Railway Safety Management, Part 1: General and interstate<br />

requirements;<br />

• having a comprehensive safety management plan that identifies significant<br />

potential safety risks; and<br />

• an appropriate system to address those risks.<br />

The ORS also monitors accredited railways performance to ensure they comply with<br />

the terms <strong>of</strong> their accreditation and their approved safety management system, and<br />

to achieve continuous development and improvement in railway safety.<br />

A ‘serious’ incident is one consistent with a Category A ‘notifiable occurrence’ as set<br />

out in the Rail Safety Regulations <strong>2011</strong>, vis:<br />

• an accident or incident that causes death, serious injury or significant property<br />

damage;<br />

• a running line derailment;<br />

• a running line collision between rolling stock;<br />

• a collision at a road or pedestrian level crossing between rolling stock and either<br />

a road vehicle or a person;<br />

• a fire or explosion on or in rail infrastructure or rolling stock that affects the safety<br />

<strong>of</strong> railway operations or endangers one or more people;<br />

• a suspected terrorist attack or threat <strong>of</strong> attack;<br />

• any accident or incident involving a significant failure <strong>of</strong> a safety management<br />

system that could cause death, serious injury or significant property damage; and<br />

• any other accident or incident that is likely to generate intense public interest or<br />

concern.<br />

A train kilometre is the distance travelled by a train over one kilometre <strong>of</strong> track. The<br />

measure is calculated by dividing the total number <strong>of</strong> Category A occurrences by<br />

the total number <strong>of</strong> train kilometres travelled (expressed in millions) managed by<br />

accredited operators in Western Australia.<br />

A reduction in the number <strong>of</strong> occurrences indicates that the safety outcome is being<br />

met on rail transport and provides users with reasonable confidence that the rail<br />

system they use is safe.<br />

The result is economic growth and development through the promotion <strong>of</strong> rail as a<br />

safe passenger and freight carrier connecting commuters and goods to the desired<br />

destination for business or personal purposes. Social and economic benefits are<br />

also accrued through avoiding the high costs associated with rail accidents.<br />

Rate <strong>of</strong><br />

serious rail<br />

accidents<br />

per million<br />

train<br />

kilometres.<br />

2007-08<br />

actual<br />

2008-09<br />

actual<br />

2009-10<br />

actual<br />

<strong>2010</strong>-11<br />

target<br />

<strong>2010</strong>-11<br />

actual<br />

4.23 3.90 4.05 3.30 2.38<br />

Reasons for significant<br />

variance<br />

The reporting definition for<br />

Category A occurrences<br />

changed with the introduction<br />

<strong>of</strong> the Rail Safety Act <strong>2010</strong> on<br />

1 February <strong>2011</strong>. This resulted<br />

in 24 occurrences previously<br />

categorised as Category A to<br />

become Category B. Had all<br />

occurrences been classified<br />

according to the Rail Safety<br />

Act 1998 then the actual rate <strong>of</strong><br />

serious accidents would be 2.998.<br />

99


Efficiency key performance indicators<br />

Service 1: <strong>Transport</strong> system and services development, planning, operation<br />

and regulation<br />

<strong>Transport</strong> system and services development, planning, operation and regulation is<br />

designed to improve accessibility and safety <strong>of</strong> the transport system for all Western<br />

Australians.<br />

This service contributes to the Government’s framework for strategic management<br />

goal – Outcome based service delivery through:<br />

1. <strong>Transport</strong> system and services development and planning:<br />

• integration between and within transport modes;<br />

• managing heavy vehicle freight movement to major industrial and intermodal<br />

sites;<br />

• increasing accessibility to a reasonable level <strong>of</strong> transport services for all<br />

individuals, businesses and communities; and<br />

• encouraging sustainable choices through programs such as TravelSmart and<br />

cycling promotions.<br />

100<br />

2. <strong>Transport</strong> operation and regulation:<br />

• providing and managing infrastructure, including small craft facilities and marine<br />

navigation aids, to maintain safe and accessible transport operations;<br />

• setting competencies and standards, and monitoring compliance <strong>of</strong> operators,<br />

vehicles and vessels in the taxi, omnibus and maritime industries;<br />

• developing policies, standards and guidelines for rail safety regulation, accrediting<br />

rail owners and rail operators in accordance with relevant standards, and<br />

ensuring rail owners and operators comply with the terms <strong>of</strong> their accreditation;<br />

• developing and implementing policies and strategies to facilitate safe navigation<br />

and safe use <strong>of</strong> the State’s waters;<br />

• maintaining effective contingency response strategies and mechanisms to<br />

combat marine transport emergencies and marine environmental pollution<br />

incidents;<br />

• providing safe jetties through licensing;<br />

• collecting, analysing and disseminating marine and transport related data; and<br />

• providing cartographic information services.<br />

The key efficiency performance indicators used to measure this performance are:<br />

Key<br />

efficiency<br />

indicators<br />

Cost <strong>of</strong><br />

regulation<br />

per taxi plate<br />

administered.<br />

2007-08<br />

actual<br />

2008-09<br />

actual<br />

2009-10<br />

actual<br />

<strong>2010</strong>-11<br />

target<br />

<strong>2010</strong>-11<br />

actual<br />

n/a 3,024 3,503 $4,135 $2,959<br />

Reasons for<br />

significant variance<br />

This is the first year <strong>of</strong><br />

reporting this KPI and<br />

further consideration<br />

has been given as to<br />

what costs constitute<br />

the regulation <strong>of</strong> the taxi<br />

industry. For example,<br />

costs more aligned<br />

with a customer service<br />

<strong>of</strong>ficer provision have<br />

been removed, as well<br />

as Taxi Industry Board<br />

expenditure (apart from<br />

board sitting fees). The<br />

changes have resulted in a<br />

decrease in the estimated<br />

cost <strong>of</strong> regulation per taxi<br />

plate administered.


Key efficiency<br />

indicators<br />

Average cost<br />

per day per<br />

maritime<br />

infrastructure<br />

asset managed.<br />

Key efficiency<br />

indicators<br />

Average survey<br />

cost per<br />

commercial<br />

vessel.<br />

Key efficiency<br />

indicators<br />

Average cost<br />

per private<br />

recreational<br />

vessel<br />

registration.<br />

2007-08<br />

actual<br />

2008-09<br />

actual<br />

2009-10<br />

actual<br />

<strong>2010</strong>-11<br />

target<br />

<strong>2010</strong>-11<br />

actual<br />

$61.17 $63.34 $69.61 $63.07 $58.28<br />

2007-08<br />

actual<br />

2008-09<br />

actual<br />

2009-10<br />

actual<br />

<strong>2010</strong>-11<br />

target<br />

<strong>2010</strong>-11<br />

actual<br />

$2,124 $2,749 $2,662 $3,210 $2,429<br />

2007-08<br />

actual<br />

2008-09<br />

actual<br />

2009-10<br />

actual<br />

<strong>2010</strong>-11<br />

target<br />

<strong>2010</strong>-11<br />

actual<br />

$59.99 $79.83 $93.87 $104.01 $113.26<br />

Reasons for significant<br />

variance<br />

The 2009-10 actual<br />

included costs associated<br />

with the functional transfer<br />

<strong>of</strong> coastal infrastructure<br />

from DPI to the DoT.<br />

Reasons for significant<br />

variance<br />

The variation between the<br />

<strong>2010</strong>-11 budget target and<br />

the <strong>2010</strong>-11 actual was<br />

due to lower staffing costs<br />

attributable to a lower<br />

than expected number<br />

<strong>of</strong> surveyed vessels and<br />

improved data collection<br />

for regional services and<br />

corporate overhead costs<br />

resulting in a more accurate<br />

allocation <strong>of</strong> costs.<br />

Reasons for significant<br />

variance<br />

New costing models<br />

developed for the DoT have<br />

more accurately identified<br />

Marine Safety’s costs<br />

across the regions that align<br />

directly to this service. This<br />

along with an unanticipated<br />

drop in the estimated<br />

number <strong>of</strong> recreational boat<br />

registrations combined to<br />

increase the actual cost per<br />

vessel.<br />

Key efficiency<br />

indicators<br />

Cost to maintain<br />

marine pollution<br />

response<br />

preparedness<br />

per registered<br />

vessel.<br />

Key efficiency<br />

indicators<br />

Average cost<br />

per household<br />

contacted<br />

under the<br />

‘TravelSmart’<br />

scheme.<br />

2007-08<br />

actual<br />

2008-09<br />

actual<br />

2009-10<br />

actual<br />

<strong>2010</strong>-11<br />

target<br />

<strong>2010</strong>-11<br />

actual<br />

$48.01 $35.40 $34.96 $29.08 $24.48<br />

2007-08<br />

actual<br />

2008-09<br />

actual<br />

2009-10<br />

actual<br />

<strong>2010</strong>-11<br />

target<br />

<strong>2010</strong>-11<br />

actual<br />

$105.98 $219.47 $204.21 $335.51 $182.42<br />

Reasons for significant<br />

variance<br />

The <strong>2010</strong>-11 actual is<br />

lower than both the<br />

2009-10 actual and the<br />

<strong>2010</strong>-11 budget due to<br />

the original estimate<br />

including additional costs<br />

<strong>of</strong> $250,000 for oil spill<br />

mapping, which did not<br />

eventuate.<br />

Reasons for significant<br />

variance<br />

The method to calculate the<br />

KPI has been changed to<br />

include only the nett cost<br />

to the State Government,<br />

excluding grants received<br />

during <strong>2010</strong>-11.<br />

The <strong>2010</strong>-11 actual is below<br />

the <strong>2010</strong>-11 budget target<br />

because the grant was<br />

secured after the KPI target<br />

was established and the<br />

program scale was doubled<br />

(from 5,000 to 10,000<br />

households) at no extra<br />

cost. The cost effectiveness<br />

improved as a result <strong>of</strong> the<br />

grant income.<br />

101


Time series graphical representations<br />

$4,500<br />

$4,000<br />

$3,500<br />

$3,000<br />

$2,500<br />

$2,000<br />

$1,500<br />

$1,000<br />

$500<br />

$0<br />

$3,500<br />

$3,000<br />

$2,500<br />

$2,000<br />

$1,500<br />

$1,000<br />

$500<br />

$0<br />

102<br />

Cost <strong>of</strong> regulation per Taxi plate administered<br />

2008-09<br />

Actual<br />

2009-10<br />

Actual<br />

<strong>2010</strong>-11<br />

Budget Target<br />

Average survey cost per commercial vessel<br />

2007-08<br />

Actual<br />

2008-09<br />

Actual<br />

2009-10<br />

Actual<br />

<strong>2010</strong>-11<br />

Budget Target<br />

<strong>2011</strong>-12<br />

Actual<br />

<strong>2010</strong>-11<br />

Actual<br />

$60<br />

$50<br />

$40<br />

$30<br />

$20<br />

$10<br />

$0<br />

Cost to Maintain Marine Pollution Response Preparedness<br />

Per Registered Vessel<br />

2007-08<br />

Actual<br />

2008-09<br />

Actual<br />

2009-10<br />

Actual<br />

<strong>2010</strong>-11<br />

Budget Target<br />

<strong>2010</strong>-11<br />

Actual<br />

Average cost per day per maritime infrastructure asset managed<br />

70<br />

60<br />

50<br />

40<br />

30<br />

20<br />

10<br />

0<br />

2007-08<br />

Actual<br />

2008-09<br />

Actual<br />

2009-10<br />

Actual<br />

<strong>2010</strong>-11<br />

Budget Target<br />

<strong>2010</strong>-11<br />

Actual<br />

Average cost per day per private recreational vessel registration<br />

$120<br />

$100<br />

$80<br />

$60<br />

$40<br />

$20<br />

$0<br />

$400<br />

$350<br />

$300<br />

$250<br />

$200<br />

$150<br />

$100<br />

$50<br />

$0<br />

2007-08<br />

Actual<br />

2008-09<br />

Actual<br />

2009-10<br />

Actual<br />

<strong>2010</strong>-11<br />

Budget Target<br />

<strong>2010</strong>-11<br />

Actual<br />

Average cost Per Household Contacted Under the<br />

‘TravelSmart’ Scheme<br />

2007-08<br />

Actual<br />

2008-09<br />

Actual<br />

2009-10<br />

Actual<br />

<strong>2010</strong>-11<br />

Budget Target<br />

<strong>2010</strong>-11<br />

Actual


<strong>Department</strong>al desired outcome 2: Vehicles and road users that meet<br />

established vehicle standards and driver competencies<br />

The Road Traffic Act 1974 confers on DoT through DVS, responsibility for licensing<br />

the State’s drivers and registering vehicles. Drivers must demonstrate they are<br />

competent to drive a vehicle through complying with the requirements <strong>of</strong> Section<br />

16 <strong>of</strong> the Road Traffic (Authorisation to Drive) Regulations 2008. Vehicles must<br />

be registered before they may be lawfully used on roads. Road Traffic (Vehicle<br />

Standards) Rules 2002 details the specific requirements for examination against the<br />

Australian Design Rules, which allow a vehicle to be deemed roadworthy.<br />

DoT measures its effectiveness in meeting this outcome through measuring:<br />

Effectiveness indicator: Percentage <strong>of</strong> vehicle examinations completed in accordance<br />

with the Australian Design Rules assessed by independent audit<br />

The Road Traffic Act 1974 confers on DoT responsibility for registering the State’s<br />

vehicles in order for them to be lawfully used on roads. Registration is determined<br />

only where a vehicle has passed examination and is deemed roadworthy.<br />

This indicator measures the extent to which vehicle examinations are conducted<br />

according to processes designed to establish levels <strong>of</strong> roadworthiness pursuant to<br />

the provisions <strong>of</strong> the Road Traffic Act 1974 and related regulations.<br />

The Road Traffic (Vehicle Standards) Rules 2002 details specific requirements<br />

for vehicles, including dimensions, braking, lighting and emissions – all <strong>of</strong> which<br />

must conform to the Australian Design Rules applicable at the date <strong>of</strong> the vehicle’s<br />

manufacture. The DoT’s Vehicle Examiners and Authorised Inspection Station<br />

personnel are registered motor vehicle mechanics and trained to examine vehicles<br />

in accordance with the Australian Design Rules.<br />

The motor vehicle “Certificate <strong>of</strong> Inspection” form (MR1) is used to record details <strong>of</strong><br />

the vehicle examination.<br />

To measure this indicator, a sample <strong>of</strong> completed MR1 forms are audited by an<br />

independent auditor and the number <strong>of</strong> audited forms that pass the criteria are<br />

counted and expressed as a percentage.<br />

The simple random sampling method is used to determine the applications selected. One<br />

hundred MR1 forms are selected at random for each quarter, giving a total random sample<br />

for the year <strong>of</strong> 400 out <strong>of</strong> a total more than 100,000 examinations conducted 1 . This sample<br />

size provides a confidence interval <strong>of</strong> approximately +/- 4.89 at the 95% confidence level.<br />

Percentage <strong>of</strong><br />

vehicle examinations<br />

completed in<br />

accordance with the<br />

Australian Design<br />

Rules assessed by<br />

independent audit.<br />

2007-08<br />

actual<br />

2008-09<br />

actual<br />

2009-10<br />

actual<br />

<strong>2010</strong>-11<br />

target<br />

<strong>2010</strong>-11<br />

actual<br />

89.0% 99.0% 98.0% 100% 99.8%<br />

Reasons for<br />

significant<br />

variance<br />

1 Total number <strong>of</strong> vehicle examinations relates to vehicle examinations that received a pass result.<br />

103


Effectiveness indicator: Percentage <strong>of</strong> driver licences issued that comply<br />

with the Graduated Driver Training and Licensing System assessed by<br />

independent audit<br />

The Road Traffic Act 1974 confers on DoT responsibility for licensing the State’s<br />

drivers. Section 16 <strong>of</strong> the Road Traffic (Authorisation To Drive) Regulations 2008<br />

details the requirements prescribed under section 42 (2)(c) <strong>of</strong> the Road Traffic<br />

Act 1974. Drivers must demonstrate that they are competent to drive a vehicle<br />

through passing theoretical and practical tests, completing the prescribed hours <strong>of</strong><br />

supervised driving and passing a computerised hazard perception test.<br />

This indicator measures the extent to which licensing <strong>of</strong> drivers is conducted<br />

according to processes designed to establish levels <strong>of</strong> competence pursuant to the<br />

provisions <strong>of</strong> the Road Traffic Act 1974 and related regulations.<br />

To measure this indicator, an independent auditor conducts a sample oversight <strong>of</strong><br />

driver’s licences issued, ensuring that each key component in the Graduated Driver<br />

Training and Licensing System is completed and passed.<br />

The simple random sampling method is used to determine the applications selected.<br />

One hundred Motor Driver Licences issued are selected at random for each quarter,<br />

giving a total random sample for the year <strong>of</strong> 400 out <strong>of</strong> a total in excess <strong>of</strong> 30,000<br />

licences issued. 2 This sample size provides a confidence interval <strong>of</strong> approximately<br />

+/- 4.88 at the 95% confidence level.<br />

Percentage <strong>of</strong><br />

driver licences<br />

issued that<br />

comply with<br />

the Graduated<br />

Driver Training<br />

and Licensing<br />

System<br />

assessed by<br />

independent<br />

audit.<br />

104<br />

2007-08<br />

actual<br />

2008-09<br />

actual<br />

2009-10<br />

actual<br />

<strong>2010</strong>-11<br />

target<br />

<strong>2010</strong>-11<br />

actual<br />

85.0% 88.8% 92.0% 100% 84.5%<br />

2 Total number <strong>of</strong> driver’s licences issued relates to ‘C’ and ‘RE’ classes only.<br />

Reasons for<br />

significant<br />

variance<br />

Records<br />

management<br />

practices associated<br />

with pro<strong>of</strong> <strong>of</strong> identity<br />

documentation<br />

and log books<br />

not meeting the<br />

mandatory 25 hours<br />

<strong>of</strong> supervised driving<br />

are key contributors<br />

to the variance.<br />

Efficiency key performance indicators<br />

Service 2: Motor vehicle and driver licensing services<br />

The Road Traffic Act 1974 confers on DoT, through DVS, responsibility for licensing<br />

the State’s drivers and registering vehicles. Drivers must demonstrate they are<br />

competent to drive a vehicle through passing theoretical and practical tests,<br />

completing the prescribe hours <strong>of</strong> supervised driving and passing a computerised<br />

hazard perception test.<br />

Vehicles must be registered before they may lawfully be used on roads. Registration<br />

is conferred only where a vehicle is roadworthy.<br />

This service contributes to the Government’s outcome based service delivery <strong>of</strong><br />

‘Greater focus on achieving results in key service delivery areas for the benefit <strong>of</strong> all<br />

Western Australians’, through:<br />

setting motor vehicle standards in accordance with national and state government<br />

requirements, examining motor vehicles for compliance with those standards and<br />

registering and transferring compliant motor vehicles;<br />

setting standards and requirements within government policies for the issue <strong>of</strong> a<br />

licence to drive on roads;<br />

assessing driver competency, issuing and renewing driver licences in accordance<br />

with national and state government requirements and driver competency standards;<br />

maintaining a database <strong>of</strong> registered vehicles and drivers, and managing vehicle<br />

identification numbers to support the enforcement <strong>of</strong> road traffic and other relevant laws;<br />

collecting revenue for vehicle and driver licensing on behalf <strong>of</strong> other government<br />

agencies; and,<br />

informing and educating road users about driver licensing, vehicle registration and<br />

related requirements.


The key efficiency performance indicators used to measure this performance are:<br />

Key<br />

efficiency<br />

indicators<br />

Average cost<br />

per vehicle<br />

and driver<br />

transaction.<br />

Key<br />

efficiency<br />

indicators<br />

Average cost<br />

per vehicle<br />

inspection.<br />

2007-08<br />

actual<br />

2008-09<br />

actual<br />

2009-10<br />

actual<br />

<strong>2010</strong>-11<br />

target<br />

<strong>2010</strong>-11<br />

actual<br />

$15.09 $16.80 $17.46 $17.57 $17.19<br />

2007-08<br />

actual<br />

2008-09<br />

actual<br />

2009-10<br />

actual<br />

<strong>2010</strong>-11<br />

target<br />

<strong>2010</strong>-11<br />

actual<br />

$57.99 $81.70 $90.46 $78.22 $81.22<br />

Reasons for<br />

significant variance<br />

Reasons for<br />

significant variance<br />

The variance is primarily<br />

due to a decrease <strong>of</strong><br />

approximately three<br />

per cent in overall costs<br />

together with an increase<br />

<strong>of</strong> approximately eight per<br />

cent in vehicle inspections<br />

undertaken resulting in<br />

a $9.24 decrease per<br />

vehicle inspection.<br />

Key<br />

efficiency<br />

indicators<br />

Average cost<br />

per driver<br />

assessment.<br />

Key<br />

efficiency<br />

indicators<br />

Percentage <strong>of</strong><br />

driver licence<br />

cards issued<br />

within 21 days<br />

<strong>of</strong> completed<br />

application.<br />

2007-08<br />

actual<br />

2008-09<br />

actual<br />

2009-10<br />

actual<br />

<strong>2010</strong>-11<br />

target<br />

<strong>2010</strong>-11<br />

actual<br />

$56.46 $59.97 $87.06 $66.25 $77.94<br />

2007-08<br />

actual<br />

2008-09<br />

actual<br />

2009-10<br />

actual<br />

<strong>2010</strong>-11<br />

target<br />

<strong>2010</strong>-11<br />

actual<br />

99.0% 100% 99.8% 99.0% 99.9%<br />

Reasons for significant<br />

variance<br />

Revised models have<br />

more accurately identified<br />

driver assessment costs<br />

associated with the<br />

regions that align directly<br />

to this measure.<br />

An increase <strong>of</strong><br />

approximately six per cent<br />

in the number <strong>of</strong> driver<br />

assessments during <strong>2010</strong>-<br />

11 together with reduced<br />

costs <strong>of</strong> approximately<br />

five per cent resulting in a<br />

$9.12 decrease per driver<br />

assessment.<br />

Reasons for<br />

significant variance<br />

105


Time series graphical representations<br />

106<br />

$20<br />

$18<br />

$16<br />

$14<br />

$12<br />

$10<br />

$8<br />

$6<br />

$4<br />

$2<br />

$0<br />

$100<br />

$90<br />

$80<br />

$70<br />

$60<br />

$50<br />

$40<br />

$30<br />

$20<br />

$10<br />

$0<br />

Average cost per vehicle and driver transaction<br />

2007-08<br />

Actual<br />

2007-08<br />

Actual<br />

2008-09<br />

Actual<br />

2009-10<br />

Actual<br />

<strong>2010</strong>-11<br />

Budget Target<br />

Average cost per driver assessment<br />

2008-09<br />

Actual<br />

2009-10<br />

Actual<br />

<strong>2010</strong>-11<br />

Budget Target<br />

<strong>2010</strong>-11<br />

Actual<br />

<strong>2010</strong>-11<br />

Actual<br />

$100<br />

$90<br />

$80<br />

$70<br />

$60<br />

$50<br />

$40<br />

$30<br />

$20<br />

$10<br />

$0<br />

100%<br />

80%<br />

60%<br />

40%<br />

20%<br />

0%<br />

2007-08<br />

Actual<br />

Average cost per vehicle inspection<br />

2008-09<br />

Actual<br />

2009-10<br />

Actual<br />

<strong>2010</strong>-11<br />

Budget Target<br />

<strong>2010</strong>-11<br />

Actual<br />

Percentage <strong>of</strong> driver’s licence cards issued within 21 days<br />

<strong>of</strong> completed application<br />

2007-08<br />

Actual<br />

2008-09<br />

Actual<br />

2009-10<br />

Actual<br />

<strong>2010</strong>-11<br />

Budget Target<br />

<strong>2010</strong>-11<br />

Actual


<strong>Department</strong>al desired outcome 3: Integrated transport systems that<br />

facilitate economic development.<br />

The transport function is integral to business and commerce, and important for<br />

social interaction and connecting communities. Therefore a major focus for DoT is<br />

on strategic transport policy and planning across the range <strong>of</strong> public and commercial<br />

transport systems that service Western Australia.<br />

DoT, through its Policy, Planning and Investment division, develops, integrates and<br />

regulates the State’s transport systems and infrastructure.<br />

Through its policy and planning role, DoT determines the location <strong>of</strong> major transport<br />

routes and infrastructure, their suitability for a range <strong>of</strong> transport services and how<br />

each integrates into the broader transport system for boats, trains, planes and<br />

vehicles.<br />

DoT measures its effectiveness in meeting this outcome through measuring:<br />

Effectiveness indicator: Percentage <strong>of</strong> containerised freight transported<br />

via rail in relation to total metropolitan container movements to and from<br />

Fremantle port.<br />

As the lead agency in the planning <strong>of</strong> strategic transport routes and infrastructure,<br />

DoT understands that efficient logistics are essential between major metropolitan<br />

freight generators in order to avoid congestion and bottlenecks. Freight movement<br />

also needs to be balanced with community consideration such as noise, road safety<br />

and amenity.<br />

An example <strong>of</strong> this approach, developed through the Metropolitan Freight Network<br />

Review (MFNR), is the encouragement <strong>of</strong> industry to transport more containerised<br />

freight by rail between Fremantle port and inland terminals in the Kewdale-Forrestfield<br />

region.<br />

The MFNR set a target for containers carried by rail between Fremantle and<br />

Kewdale-Forresfield <strong>of</strong> 15 per cent by 2007-08 and 30 per cent by 2012-13. At<br />

the end <strong>of</strong> 2008-09, container volumes reached 15.1 per cent, however, these<br />

percentages dropped to 11.5 per cent for <strong>2010</strong>-11 due to the long-term effect <strong>of</strong> the<br />

global economic downturn.<br />

The State Government originally provided financial assistance to support the rail<br />

service at $50 per 20ft container in reflection <strong>of</strong> rail’s higher costs than road. The<br />

subsidy reduced to $45 per 20ft container and $95 per 40ft container on 18 May<br />

2009 and on 3 August 2009 the amount per 40ft container further reduced to $90.<br />

The subsidy is paid on loaded containers having their origin or destination in the<br />

metropolitan area. It was expected that the subsidy per container would further<br />

decrease as volumes on rail increased and operational efficiencies were introduced,<br />

however, further evaluation <strong>of</strong> the subsidy for the future may be required due to the<br />

long term effects <strong>of</strong> the global financial crisis.<br />

This indicator provides information on effectiveness and performance <strong>of</strong> the subsidy<br />

DoT paid on behalf <strong>of</strong> Fremantle Port Authority to Intermodal Link Services (ILS) to<br />

effect a modal shift from road to rail for containers transported to and from Fremantle<br />

port for export or import.<br />

To calculate this indicator, data on rail containers is sourced from the North Quay<br />

Rail Terminal and is compared to Fremantle Port Authority’s trade figures for total<br />

containers (excluding those that are transhipped and do not leave the port precinct).<br />

This comparison enables calculation <strong>of</strong> rail’s market share.<br />

Percentage <strong>of</strong><br />

containerised<br />

freight transported<br />

by rail in relation to<br />

total metropolitan<br />

container<br />

movements to and<br />

from Fremantle<br />

port.<br />

2007-08<br />

actual<br />

2008-09<br />

actual<br />

2009-10<br />

actual<br />

<strong>2010</strong>-11<br />

target<br />

<strong>2010</strong>-11<br />

actual<br />

13.3% 15.1% 10.9% 16.0% 11.5%<br />

Reasons for<br />

significant<br />

variance<br />

The global economic<br />

downturn in trade has<br />

impacted significantly<br />

on rail volumes<br />

through loss <strong>of</strong> certain<br />

trades and intense<br />

competition from the<br />

road transport sector.<br />

107


Efficiency key performance indicators<br />

Service 3: Strategic transport policy<br />

This service contributes to the Government’s framework for the strategic management<br />

goal <strong>of</strong> ‘State Building – Major Projects’ by providing leadership for strategic transport<br />

issues and by shaping the pattern <strong>of</strong> transport system development through:<br />

• provision <strong>of</strong> an integrated transport policy framework to guide government and<br />

the private sector in decision-making;<br />

• the provision and coordination <strong>of</strong> integrated state-wide transport policy including<br />

those <strong>of</strong> national significance and those involving multi-modal solutions; and<br />

• ensuring the transport policy framework supports cost effective transport<br />

systems and services.<br />

The key efficiency performance indicator used to measure this performance is:<br />

Key<br />

efficiency<br />

indicators<br />

Average<br />

cost per<br />

policy hour<br />

for strategic<br />

transport<br />

policy<br />

development.<br />

108<br />

2007-08<br />

actual<br />

2008-09<br />

actual<br />

2009-10<br />

actual<br />

<strong>2010</strong>-11<br />

target<br />

<strong>2010</strong>-11<br />

actual<br />

n/a n/a $73.26 $118.25 $109.78<br />

Reasons for significant<br />

variance<br />

Due to the split <strong>of</strong> DPI and<br />

the introduction <strong>of</strong> OSS, the<br />

<strong>2010</strong>-11 KPIs were remapped<br />

to include not only human<br />

resources costs (as was done<br />

in 2009-10), but items such as:<br />

• Consultancy fees<br />

• Pr<strong>of</strong>essional services<br />

that are attributable to Strategic<br />

<strong>Transport</strong> policy functions.<br />

**NOTE: Project costs totalling<br />

$961,706.90 were incorrectly<br />

allocated to the Strategic<br />

<strong>Transport</strong> Policy KPI. This<br />

amount has been manually<br />

reallocated to correct the KPI<br />

figures for TravelSmart and<br />

Strategic <strong>Transport</strong> Policy.<br />

Graphical representations actual against target<br />

Average cost per policy hour for strategic transport policy development<br />

$140<br />

$120<br />

$100<br />

$80<br />

$60<br />

$40<br />

$20<br />

$0<br />

2009-10<br />

Actual<br />

<strong>2010</strong>-11<br />

Budget Target<br />

<strong>2010</strong>-11<br />

Actual


Efficiency key performance Indicators<br />

Service 4: Integrated transport planning<br />

This service contributes to the Government’s framework for strategic management<br />

goal <strong>of</strong> ‘State building – Major projects’ by providing leadership for strategic transport<br />

issues and by shaping the pattern <strong>of</strong> transport system development through:<br />

• developing an agreed State-wide integrated transport strategy;<br />

• developing multi-modal network plans;<br />

• undertaking State-wide capital investment planning, evaluation and prioritisation;<br />

• integrated planning for major transport system projects;<br />

• developing funding principles and pricing signals to ensure appropriate<br />

development and use <strong>of</strong> transport assets;<br />

• improving freight access to key terminals, improving freight flows and increasing<br />

competitiveness through reduced costs;<br />

• reducing the costs associated with road trauma by enhancing the accessibility<br />

and safety <strong>of</strong> public transport systems;<br />

• providing for the efficient distribution <strong>of</strong> goods and services to business and the<br />

community;<br />

• ensuring flexibility to meet the demands <strong>of</strong> a changing economy and market<br />

environments; and<br />

• enabling commuter access to industrial centres and to the services and goods<br />

they require.<br />

The key efficiency performance indicator used to measure this performance is:<br />

Key<br />

efficiency<br />

indicators<br />

Average cost<br />

per planning<br />

hour for<br />

integrated<br />

transport<br />

planning<br />

development.<br />

2007-08<br />

actual<br />

2008-09<br />

actual<br />

2009-10<br />

actual<br />

<strong>2010</strong>-11<br />

target<br />

<strong>2010</strong>-11<br />

actual<br />

n/a n/a $99.48 $121.05 $149.73<br />

Graphical representations actual against target<br />

$160<br />

$140<br />

$120<br />

$100<br />

$80<br />

$60<br />

$40<br />

$20<br />

$0<br />

Reasons for significant<br />

variance<br />

Average cost per planning hour for integrated transport<br />

planning development<br />

2009-10<br />

Actual<br />

<strong>2010</strong>-11<br />

Budget Target<br />

The variance reflects cost<br />

structures for Multi-Modal<br />

Planning activity and management<br />

<strong>of</strong> the Perth Parking Fund (totalling<br />

$3.66 million) that transferred to<br />

DoT during <strong>2010</strong>-11 which were<br />

not included in the budget target.<br />

Due to the split <strong>of</strong> DPI and the<br />

introduction <strong>of</strong> OSS, the <strong>2010</strong>-11<br />

KPIs were remapped to include<br />

not only human resource costs (as<br />

was done in 2009-10), but items<br />

such as:<br />

• Consultancy fees<br />

• Pr<strong>of</strong>essional services<br />

that are attributable to Integrated<br />

<strong>Transport</strong> planning functions.<br />

<strong>2010</strong>-11<br />

Actual<br />

109


Office locations - as at 26 May <strong>2011</strong><br />

Metropolitan Offices<br />

Office Contact Numbers Street Address Postal Address<br />

Head Office<br />

Phone: 08 6551 6000<br />

Facsimile: 08 6551 6001<br />

140 William Street<br />

PERTH WA 6000<br />

GPO Box C102<br />

PERTH WA 6839<br />

Driver and Vehicle<br />

Services<br />

110<br />

Phone: 08 6551 6000<br />

Passenger Services Phone: 1300 660 147<br />

Coastal Infrastructure<br />

Marine Safety<br />

Fremantle Fishing Boat<br />

Harbour<br />

(Marine operations centre)<br />

Hillarys<br />

(Coastal Infrastructure)<br />

Phone: 08 9216 8999<br />

Facsimile: 08 9216 8979<br />

Phone: 08 9431 1000<br />

Facsimile: 08 9431 1019<br />

Phone: 08 9448 7544<br />

Facsimile: 08 9447 8713<br />

Public <strong>Transport</strong> Centre<br />

West Parade<br />

EAST PERTH WA 6004<br />

20 Brown Street<br />

EAST PERTH WA 6004<br />

Marine House<br />

1 Essex Street<br />

FREMANTLE WA 6160<br />

14 Capo D’Orlando Drive<br />

FREMANTLE WA 6160<br />

86 Southside Drive<br />

HILLARYS WA 6025<br />

GPO Box R1290<br />

PERTH WA 6844<br />

GPO Box C102<br />

PERTH WA 6839<br />

PO Box 402<br />

FREMANTLE WA 6959<br />

PO Box 402<br />

Fremantle WA 6959<br />

PO Box 410<br />

HILLARYS WA 6923<br />

Country Offices<br />

Region Office Contact Numbers Street Address Postal Address<br />

Kimberley<br />

Broome<br />

(One-stop shop)<br />

Phone: 08 9192 0200<br />

Facsimile: 08 9193 5651<br />

9 Napier Terrace<br />

BROOME WA 6725<br />

PO Box 1993<br />

BROOME WA 6725<br />

Pilbara<br />

Karratha<br />

(One-stop shop)<br />

Phone: 08 9185 6100<br />

Facsimile: 08 9143 1288<br />

3-5 Welcome Road<br />

KARRATHA WA 6714<br />

PO Box 429<br />

KARRATHA WA 6714<br />

Gascoyne<br />

Gascoyne<br />

Mid West<br />

Goldfields/<br />

Esperance<br />

Goldfields/<br />

Esperance<br />

Carnarvon<br />

(One Stop Shop)<br />

Exmouth<br />

(One Stop Shop)<br />

Geraldton<br />

(One-stop shop)<br />

Esperance<br />

(Regional<br />

services)<br />

Kalgoorlie<br />

(One-stop shop)<br />

South West Bunbury<br />

(One Stop Shop)<br />

Great<br />

Southern<br />

Albany<br />

(One Stop Shop)<br />

Phone: 08 9941 6800<br />

Facsimile: 08 9941 1067<br />

Phone: 08 9949 2079<br />

Facsimile: 08 9949 2078<br />

Phone: 08 9956 0111<br />

Facsimile: 08 9956 0130<br />

(licensing)<br />

Phone: 08 9076 2100<br />

Facsimile: 08 9071 6892<br />

Phone: 08 9022 5999<br />

Facsimile: 08 9091 6288<br />

Phone: 08 9792 6666<br />

Facsimile: 08 9792 6600<br />

Phone: 08 9892 7333<br />

Facsimile: 08 9842 1079<br />

Carnarvon Boat Harbour<br />

Boat Harbour Road<br />

CARNARVON WA 6701<br />

21 Maidstone Crescent<br />

EXMOUTH WA 6707<br />

65 Chapman Road<br />

Geraldton WA 6530<br />

53 The Esplanade<br />

ESPERANCE WA 6450<br />

Unit 4, 35 Brookman<br />

Street<br />

KALGOORLIE WA 6430<br />

24 Wellington Street<br />

BUNBURY WA 6230<br />

178 Stirling Tce<br />

Albany WA 6330<br />

PO Box 775<br />

CARNARVON WA 6701<br />

PO Box 220<br />

EXMOUTH WA 6707<br />

PO Box 68<br />

Geraldton WA 6530<br />

PO Box 2255<br />

ESPERANCE WA 6450<br />

PO Box 10412<br />

Kalgoorlie WA 6430<br />

PO Box 2247<br />

BUNBURY WA 6231<br />

PO Box 1108<br />

Albany WA 6330


Driver and Vehicle Service Centres<br />

Vehicle Examination Centres<br />

Metropolitan Area<br />

Office Street Address Postal Address<br />

West Perth<br />

(Driver and Vehicle<br />

Services)<br />

Willagee<br />

(Driver and Vehicle<br />

Services)<br />

Joondalup<br />

(Driver and Vehicle<br />

Services)<br />

Kelmscott<br />

(Driver and Vehicle<br />

Services and vehicle<br />

examination services)<br />

Mandurah<br />

(Driver and Vehicle<br />

Services)<br />

Midland<br />

(Driver and Vehicle<br />

Services)<br />

Midland<br />

(Vehicle examination<br />

services)<br />

Morley<br />

(Driver and Vehicle<br />

Services)<br />

Osborne Park<br />

(Vehicle examination<br />

services)<br />

Suite 42 – 44, 102 Railway Parade<br />

Cnr Troode and Plaistowe Mews<br />

West PERTH WA 6005<br />

Cnr Stock Road and Leach Highway<br />

WILLAGEE WA 6156<br />

65 Boas Avenue<br />

JOONDALUP WA 6027<br />

34 Gillam Drive<br />

KELMSCOTT WA 6111<br />

Cnr Pinjarra Rd and Ranceby Ave<br />

MANDURAH WA 6210<br />

Shop T053<br />

Midland Gate Shopping Centre<br />

Crn Cale Street and Great Eastern Hwy<br />

MIDLAND WA 6056<br />

11 Victoria Street<br />

MIDLAND WA 6056<br />

63 Russell Street<br />

MORLEY WA 6024<br />

34 Howe Street<br />

OSBORNE PARK WA 6017<br />

Suite 42 – 44, 102 Railway Parade<br />

Cnr Troode and Plaistowe Mews<br />

West PERTH WA 6005<br />

Cnr Stock Road and Leach Highway<br />

WILLAGEE WA 6156<br />

65 Boas Avenue<br />

JOONDALUP WA 6027<br />

34 Gillam Drive<br />

KELMSCOTT WA 6111<br />

PO Box 3102<br />

MANDURAH EAST<br />

WA 6210<br />

Shop T053<br />

Midland Gate Shopping Centre<br />

Crn Cale Street and Great Eastern Hwy<br />

MIDLAND WA 6056<br />

11 Victoria Street<br />

MIDLAND WA 6056<br />

63 Russell Street<br />

MORLEY WA 6024<br />

34 Howe St<br />

OSBORNE PARK WA 6017<br />

Office Street Address Postal Address<br />

Rockingham<br />

(Driver and Vehicle<br />

Services)<br />

Warwick<br />

(Driver and Vehicle<br />

Services and vehicle<br />

examination services)<br />

Welshpool<br />

(Driver and Vehicle<br />

Services and vehicle<br />

examination services)<br />

37 McNicholl Street<br />

ROCKINGHAM WA 6168<br />

37 Eddington Road<br />

WARWICK WA 6024<br />

21 Murray Road South<br />

WELSHPOOL WA 6106<br />

37 McNicholl Street<br />

ROCKINGHAM WA 6168<br />

37 Eddington Road<br />

WARWICK WA 6024<br />

21 Murray Road South<br />

WELSHPOOL WA 6106<br />

People with Disabilities<br />

If you are deaf or have a hearing or speech impairment please call 13 36 77 and<br />

quote the number you want.<br />

TTY access for people with a hearing impairment:<br />

Fremantle <strong>of</strong>fice TTY: 08 9430 6263<br />

Licensing information TTY: 08 9216 8484<br />

111


For more information about the <strong>Department</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Transport</strong>:<br />

Phone: 08 6551 6000 Email: info@transport.wa.gov.au<br />

www.transport.wa.gov.au

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!