05.12.2012 Views

Michael Fuchs National ethics councils - Deutscher Ethikrat

Michael Fuchs National ethics councils - Deutscher Ethikrat

Michael Fuchs National ethics councils - Deutscher Ethikrat

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Michael</strong> <strong>Fuchs</strong> <strong>National</strong> <strong>ethics</strong> <strong>councils</strong>. Their backgrounds, functions and modes of operation compared<br />

Korea<br />

South Korea plans to establish a permanent national <strong>ethics</strong> council. The preliminary<br />

work on this project is one of the tasks currently assigned to an ad hoc bio<strong>ethics</strong> advisory<br />

commission appointed by the Minister of Science and Technology. The<br />

group’s overall mandate is to arrive at a consensus and to draw up guidelines on the<br />

handling of bio<strong>ethics</strong> issues arising in Korea as a result of the rapid development of<br />

the life sciences. In particular, the commission is required to prepare a proposed<br />

framework for legislation, to sketch out the functions and mode of formation of the<br />

national <strong>ethics</strong> committee, to define limits for research on human embryos, cloning<br />

and the use of genetic transformation, and to specify the permissible scope of genetic<br />

intervention and enhancement, the use of human genetic information and the<br />

patenting of the results of genetic research.<br />

According to information supplied by the Korean Bio<strong>ethics</strong> Association, the KBA<br />

itself plays a significant part in this aspect of the commission’s work. The KBA, established<br />

in 1998, has 150 members drawn from the disciplines of philosophy, medicine,<br />

law, sociology and biology, as well as representatives of non-governmental<br />

organizations (NGOs).<br />

The Korean <strong>National</strong> Commission for UNESCO has already held two consensus<br />

conferences in the country. Along the lines of the Danish Technology Council, citizens’<br />

groups were set up in 1998 to discuss the safety and <strong>ethics</strong> of genetically modified<br />

foods. A second consensus process, on the application of cloning in humans and<br />

animals, followed from March to September 1999.<br />

Website<br />

KBA: http://www.koreabio<strong>ethics</strong>.net<br />

80<br />

Singapore<br />

One of the world’s most astonishing national <strong>ethics</strong> bodies is Singapore’s Bio<strong>ethics</strong><br />

Advisory Committee (BAC). Its foundation was closely bound up with the Government’s<br />

declared aspiration to make Singapore a leading centre of research in the biosciences.<br />

Under the Government’s programme, research and development are<br />

supposed to cover the entire range from clinical trials to the production and dissemination<br />

of healthcare services and drugs. In December 2000 the Committee was initially<br />

appointed for a two-year period to address the potential ethical, legal and social<br />

issues arising out of the intensification of biomedical sciences research. The Committee<br />

will submit its recommendations to the Life Sciences Ministerial Committee.<br />

In June 2002, the Committee published its first report: Ethical, Legal and Social Issues<br />

in Human Stem Cell Research, Reproductive and Therapeutic Cloning. Subject to<br />

certain conditions, the Committee considers research involving human embryonic<br />

stem cells to be legitimate. In particular, it calls for the establishment of a supervisory<br />

authority in accordance with the British model. The Committee’s second report –<br />

Human Tissue Research – which was devoted to tissue banks, followed in November of<br />

the same year. It too stresses the importance of a clear licensing procedure, and insists<br />

on the principle of informed consent.<br />

The Committee has a website of its own, on which the complete text of its reports<br />

can be accessed. Its electronic newsletter is also available for subscription. Published<br />

for the first time in April 2003, it reports on the work of the Committee and its Secretariat,<br />

on conferences and the like organized by the Committee and on visits from<br />

international bio<strong>ethics</strong> experts.<br />

Another Singaporean body is the Health Ministry’s <strong>National</strong> Medical Ethics<br />

Committee (NMEC). This has existed since 1994 and includes experts in medical disciplines<br />

and health policy, lay individuals and representatives of the ethnic minorities.<br />

It has published guidelines on organ and tissue transplantation, on the<br />

termination of pregnancy in the event of lethal malformations of the fetus, on the<br />

medical treatment of high-risk infants, on research on human subjects, on psychiatry,<br />

on ethical issues of gene technology (2/2001) and on financial issues in medical<br />

practice (1/2000).<br />

Website<br />

BAC: http://www.bio<strong>ethics</strong>-singapore.org<br />

81

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!