Untreated, gonococcal ophthalmia progresses withalarming rapidity (2). Corneal involvement commonlyresults in blindness and sometimes perforation ofthe eye. Chlamydial infection is generally lesssevere, but signs of conjunctivitis may persist forseveral weeks during which vision may be impairedas a result of corneal scarring, vascularization andpseudomembrane formation (3, 4).Notwithstanding widespread reports of gonococciresistant to tetracycline (5-7), it is current practiceto treat all cases of neonatal ophthalmia withfrequent applications of 1 % tetracycline eyeointment, initially at hourly intervals decreasingprogressively after several days to 4 times daily (1).It is vital, however, that infants with gonococcalinfection — which is readily diagnosed byexamining a conjunctival smear for Gram-negativeintracellular diplococci (8) — additionally receiveeffective antigonococcal therapy. This is mostconveniently administered as a single intramuscularinjection of spectinomycin, kanamycin, or acefalosporin such as cefotaxime which haspronounced activity against Gram-negativeorganisms (9). The diagnosis of chlamydial diseaseis often established on a presumptive basis whengonococci cannot be detected, since laboratoryconfirmation demands cell culture or testing forspecific antigens. It is less responsive to antibiotics,and a two week course of erythromycin (50 mg/kgdaily in 4 divided doses) is widely used (9).The essential need for protectionEstimates of the prevalence of neonatal ophthalmiain less developed countries range as high as 4% oflive births for gonococcal infection and 8% forchlamydial infection (10). The prevalence of gonorrhoealand chlamydial infections among pregnantwomen in many of these countries is far higher, andin some surveys it has exceeded 20% (1, 2). Thesegrim statistics press home the urgent need to betterprotect the sight of infants throughout the lessdeveloped world by more effective treatment ofsexually transmitted diseases in pregnant women,and more effective chemoprophylaxis of infants atbirth. Meanwhile, considerable effort andexpenditure is directed to an often despairing effortto treat cases of neonatal ophthalmia that couldreadily have been prevented.Opportunity may now be at hand to protect agreater proportion of infants in developingcountries. Case-management of sexuallytransmitted diseases is improving in many countriesas a result of the HIV pandemic. Recentlygenerated evidence suggests that this effort andrelated educational programmes can reduce theprevalence of these infections both in mothers andin babies (11, 12). These improvements, however,can do no more than supplement the need forroutine prophylaxis at the time of delivery. Sincesilver nitrate was first instilled into the eyes ofnewborn infants as a protection against infectionover 100 years ago, this intervention has been themainstay in the management of neonatalophthalmia. Once the practice had become widelyaccepted the incidence of blindness in children innineteenth-century Europe was reduced 20 to 30-fold (13). Precisely the same technique — or somecomparably effective form of prophylaxis —remains a statutory requirement in many highlydeveloped countries. Yet, through lack ofresources, prophylaxis is failing in the leastdeveloped countries, where it is most needed.Erythromycin and tetracycline preparations aresome 20-fold less expensive than silver nitrate andhave been preferred in some centres on the basisof claims that they are more effective againstChlamydia trachomatis and less likely to causesevere toxic conjunctivitis (14,15). However, itseems that the protective efficacy of topicalerythromycin may have been overstated (16-19): inone recent study it did not significantly reduce theoverall incidence of ophthalmia (17); failure rates ashigh as 10 to 20% are quoted for chlamydialconjunctivitis (18); and outbreaks of erythromycinresistantstaphylococcal conjunctivitis have beenreported following its use (19).Tetracycline was found to be significantly superiorto silver nitrate in protecting against bothgonococcal and chlamydial infection in one largecontrolled trial undertaken in Kenya (20). However,concerns about the global prevalence of tetra¬cycline-resistant gonococci (5-7) have accentuatedthe need for a new approach to prophylaxis.Experience with povidone-iodineOne highly-promising candidate prophylacticsubstance is the non-organic broad-spectrumantimicrobial compound, povidone (INN =polyvidone) -iodine. A 2.5% ophthalmic solution canbe prepared at a cost estimated to be 70-fold lessthan that of 1% silver nitrate and 3-fold less thantetracycline ointment (9). In vitro, it is active againsta wide spectrum of microorganisms and noevidence of bacterial resistance has yet beenreported (21). Sensitive organisms include not onlygonococci and chlamydia but also the herpessimplex virus (22), an occasional yet serious causeof an insidious form of keratoconjunctivitis (23).
Instilled prophylactically before ocular surgery, a5% solution has been shown in adults to be welltolerated and effective in reducing the bacterial floraand to significantly decrease the incidence of postoperativeendophthalmitis (24, 25).In a preliminary trial of povidone-iodine amongnewborn infants, a 2.5% solution was used todecrease risk of conjunctival hyperaemia. Even atthis lower concentration, povidone-iodine was morepotent in inhibiting bacterial growth and lessirritating than silver nitrate (26). This finding hasnow been confirmed in a masked prospective trial(27) involving over 3000 newborn infants in an areaof Kenya where the incidence of ophthalmia hasbeen reported to exceed 20% (10). Each childreceived an instillation of either 2.5% povidoneiodine,1 % silver nitrate, or 0.5% erythromycinointment. Within these treatment groups, theincidence of infective conjunctivitis was respectively,13%, 17.5% and 15%, and of conjunctivalhyperaemia, 10%, 14% and 13%. In both respects,the advantage associated with povidone-iodine wasstatistically significant.The authors conclude that povidone-iodine providesmore secure protection than silver nitrate, is lesslikely to cause allergic or inflammatory reactions,and is less costly to administer. But there is needfor caution: the incidence of ophthalmitis resultingfrom gonococcal infection was 0.8% among thechildren who received povidone-iodine, but only0.4% among those who received silver nitrate. Thisdifference, which was determined within a total ofonly 13 cases, does not attain significance, but thetrend is disquieting. An independent commentatoremphasizes the need to determine the efficacy ofpovidone-iodine more precisely in gonococcal andother specific infections and to monitor possibleadverse effects in a considerably larger cohort.It is important to resolve these residual issuesefficiently and promptly: on the available evidence,any one of these treatments offers manifestadvantage to the considerable numbers of infants inless developed countries that remain perilouslydevoid of protection.References1. Conjunctivitis of the newborn: prevention and treatmentat the primary health care level. <strong>World</strong> <strong>Health</strong> <strong>Organization</strong>,Geneva, 1986.2. Laga, M., Meheus, A., Piot, P. Epidemiology andcontrol of gonococcal ophthalmia neonatorum. Bulletin ofthe <strong>World</strong> <strong>Health</strong> <strong>Organization</strong>, 67: 471-477 (1989).[Erratum. Ibid, 68: 690 (1990)].3. Mordhorst, C, Dawson, C. Sequelae of neonatalinclusion conjunctivitis and associated disease in parents.American Journal of Ophthalmology, 71: 861-867 (1971 ).4. Sandstrom, I. Etiology and diagnosis of neonatalconjunctivitis. Acta Paediatrica Scandinavica, 76: 211-217(1978).5. Knapp, J., Zenilman, J., Biddle, J. et al. Frequency anddistribution in the United States of strains of Neisseriagonorrhoeae with plasmid-mediated, high-level resistanceto tetracycline. Journal of Infectious Diseases, 155: 819—822(1987).6. Ison, C, Terry, P., Bendayna, K. et al. Tetracyclineresistantgonococci in the UK. Lancet, 1: 651-652 (1988).7. van Kingeren, B., Dessens-Kroon, M., Verheuvel, M.Increased tetracycline resistance in gonococci in theNetherlands. Lancet, 2: 1278 (1989).8. Winceslaus, J., Goh, B., Dunlop, E. et al. Diagnosis ofophthalmia neonatorum. British Medical Journal, 295:1377-1379(1987).9. Foster, A., Klauss, V. Ophthalmia neonatorum indeveloping countries. New England Journal of Medicine,332:600-601 (1995).10. Laga, M., Plummer, F., Nzanze, H. et al. Epidemiologyof ophthalmia neonatorum in Kenya, Lancet, 2: 1145-1149(1986).11. Grosskurth, H., Mosha, F., Todd, J. et al. Impact ofimproved treatment of sexually transmitted disease onHIV infection in rural Tanzania: randomised controlledtrial. Lancet, 346: 530-536 (1995).12. Laga, M. STD control for HIV prevention — it works!Lancet, 346: 518-519 (1995).13. Credé, C. Die Verhütung der Augenentzündung derNeugeborenen. Archives Gynaekologie, 18: 367-370(1881).14. Christian, J. Comparison of ocular reactions with theuse of silver nitrate and erythromycin ointment inophthalmia neonatorum prophylaxis. Journal of Pediatrics,57: 55-60 (1960).15. Butterfield, P., Ende, R., Platt, B, Effects of silvernitrate on initial visual behaviour. American Journal ofDiseases of Children, 132: 246 (1978).16. Bell, T., Grayston, J., Krohn, M., Kronmal, R.Randomized trial of silver nitrate, erythromycin, and noeye prophylaxis for the prevention of conjunctivitis amongnewborns not at risk for gonococcal ophthalmitis.Pediatrics, 92: 755-760 (1993).17. Chen, J. Prophylaxis of ophthalmia neonatorum:comparison of silver nitrate, tetracycline, erythromycin andno prophylaxis. Pediatric Infectious Diseases Journal, 11:1026-1030(1992).
- Page 1 and 2: WHODRUGINFORMATIONV O L U M E 9 •
- Page 3: WHO Drug InformationContentsGeneral
- Page 7 and 8: 2. Geiling, E., Cannon, P. Patholog
- Page 9 and 10: Magnesium sulfate held no statistic
- Page 11 and 12: • In control programmes involving
- Page 13 and 14: 31. Addiss, D., Eberhard, M., Lammi
- Page 15 and 16: esponse to treatment need more syst
- Page 17 and 18: 2. Nichol, K., Margolis, K., Wuoren
- Page 19: 9. Thumham, D. Vitamin A deficiency
- Page 23 and 24: months of administration, ivermecti
- Page 25 and 26: General Information"Natural" medici
- Page 27 and 28: 12. Moertel, C, Fleming, T., Rubin,
- Page 29 and 30: In the United Kingdom, a working gr
- Page 31 and 32: healers require education to recogn
- Page 33 and 34: 4. Federal regulations that are dev
- Page 35 and 36: Several benefits are identified tha
- Page 37 and 38: To detect vancomycin-resistant ente
- Page 39 and 40: particularly long half-life, this p
- Page 41 and 42: for less severe forms of acne, hirs
- Page 43 and 44: International Nonproprietary Names
- Page 45 and 46: adefovirumadefoviradéfoviradefovir
- Page 47 and 48: cefoselisumcefoseliscéfoséliscefo
- Page 49 and 50: efegatranumefegatranéfégatranefeg
- Page 51 and 52: follitropinum alfafollitropin alfaf
- Page 53 and 54: idramantonumidramantoneidramantonei
- Page 55 and 56: lanprostonumlanprostonlanprostonela
- Page 57 and 58: mapinastinummapinastinemapinastinem
- Page 59 and 60: napsagatranumnapsagatrannapsagatran
- Page 61 and 62: orientiparcina mezcla de orienticin
- Page 63 and 64: prulifloxacinumprulifloxacinprulifl
- Page 65 and 66: tagorizinumtagorizinetagorizinetago
- Page 67 and 68: zifrosilonumzifrosilonezifrosilonez
- Page 69: SELECTED WHO PUBLICATIONSOF RELATED