university employees and other pr<strong>of</strong>essionals left town. Those who could support themselvesby farming, as did Watson, were able to remain in Chapel Hill (Vickers 1985:78). As the warprogressed some <strong>of</strong> this economic loss was mitigated as refugees from other occupied towns(e.g., Wilmington, Edenton, and Newbern) took up residence in Chapel Hill until the warended (Battle 1907:746, 751).Watson was able to hold on to the eastern portion Lot 11, and after the war ended hesubdivided the lot. In a deed describing a land transaction in 1883, Henry N. Brown is listedas having purchased a strip at the southern end <strong>of</strong> this property from Jones Watson on March22, 1869 (Deed Book 47:568–569). This property is described as “The land whereonformerly stood a row <strong>of</strong> Brick <strong>of</strong>fices called the “Poor House” One hundred & twenty feetlong & Eighteen feet wide on the Extreme Southern end <strong>of</strong> the lot on which Jones Watsonformerly resided now owned by said Roberson” (Deed Book 47:568–69).The stone-foundation structure excavated on Lot 11 by the <strong>Research</strong> <strong>Laboratories</strong> <strong>of</strong>Archaeology is almost surely the “Poor House” described in the 1883 deed. The Universityhad been plagued by shortages <strong>of</strong> student housing for most <strong>of</strong> the nineteenth century.Student letters and diaries <strong>of</strong> the 1830s and 1840s indicate that housing space was at apremium and that students rushed into town to compete for rooms (Tolbert 1993). Because<strong>of</strong> the market for housing, many entrepreneurial Chapel Hillians rented rooms or constructedseparate buildings in their yards to serve as student housing. Vickers (1985:79) states that bythe 1850s “almost every substantial residence had one in it yard.” These buildings wereusually small two- and three-room shanties or shacks (Henderson 1949:175). Studentsbaptized these homes away from home with quaint names, including “Pandemonium,” “BatHall,” “Crystal Palace,” “Possum Quarter,” and “Poor House” (Battle 1907:593; 1912:40).Student Thomas Brown was a resident at the building known as the “Poor House.”He wrote to his sister on August 6, 1853 that he was “rooming in a brick row in front <strong>of</strong> theCampus two doors below Mr. Nicholson a very quiet and good place to study” (Tolbert1993:97). His account seems to fit the location and general description <strong>of</strong> the structure at thesouthern end <strong>of</strong> Lot 11. Brown was not fortunate enough to obtain either campus housing ora room at the “Poor House” in his next year <strong>of</strong> school. For the remainder <strong>of</strong> his Universitycareer, he lived farther and farther from campus. He wrote in the late summer <strong>of</strong> 1855:I would have written sooner but when we arrived I found all the Collegerooms occupied and also the room that I expected to get was also filled too, sothat it took all my time hunting a room and was obliged to take a very bad oneat last. The increase <strong>of</strong> students is so much more than anyone expected that allcannot get rooms and every place that is fit to stay in is full, and I believe thatsome have even gone home again on that account. But I understand that theFaculty intend making immediat [sic] provision for more rooms for thestudents. ¼ We are rooming together about a quarter <strong>of</strong> a mile from College inthe Village and it is quite boring going to prayers then [sic] mornings as wehave to run all the way to get there in time. I am boarding at Miss Hargraves aprivate house in the village with four other boys [Gordon and Hackett FamilyPapers]. 198
After the Civil War, the town fell upon even harder times as the refugees which hadflooded the town returned to their homes, and the population <strong>of</strong> students at the University fellto a handful. The University had lost its pre-war income from stock dividends, and wassolely dependent on student tuition for support (Battle 1907:751). In addition to the fact thatmany university-age males had died in the war, few parents could afford to send their sons tothe University during the Reconstruction period, and many <strong>of</strong> those who could afford to do sowould not send their sons to a university now staffed completely by Republican faculty(Vickers 1985:83). The University closed in February 1871 and did not reopen until fouryears later in September <strong>of</strong> 1875 (Battle 1907:41, 85).Chapel Hill was given the name <strong>of</strong> “Deserted Village” during this period. Evenbefore the University <strong>of</strong>ficially closed, Mrs. Cornelia Spencer wrote in 1868:Chapel Hill is the Deserted Village <strong>of</strong> the South. Nearly twenty <strong>of</strong> the bestfamilies in the place are leaving and their houses are standing untenanted anddesolate. The business <strong>of</strong> the village is at a standstill, while I am told that n<strong>of</strong>ewer than six places have been lately established where liquor is openly sold[Battle 1907:29–30]. 20In addition to empty houses left to decay or inhabited by squatters, many gardens andyards were turned into cotton fields at this time (Battle 1912:40). Most <strong>of</strong> the structures or“<strong>of</strong>fices,” such as the “Poor House,” which had been built around town to house students fellinto ruin at this time. Battle (1912:40) states that “These cottages were torn down, or sold,some erected a mile or so away on neighboring farms. Thus disappeared from the map. . .the‘Poor House’. . .and other places dear to the ante-bellum students.” As stated above, it wasduring this Reconstruction period (1869) that Watson sold the portion <strong>of</strong> his lot containingthe “Poor House” to Henry Brown. The condition <strong>of</strong> the building at this time is not known.Three years later (and a year after the University closed), on May 16, 1872, Jonathan W. Carracquired this strip <strong>of</strong> land in a bankruptcy proceeding against Henry Brown (Deed Book47:568–569).Jonathan Wesley Carr “was one <strong>of</strong> the most successful merchants in Chapel Hillhistory. Between 1835 and 1889 he ran a general store, a blacksmith shop, a cotton gin, asawmill, a brick-making plant, and he engaged in over 100 real estate transactions” (Vickers1985:58) (see also Battle 1907:607, 611). He was one <strong>of</strong> a few wealthy citizens <strong>of</strong> ChapelHill who were able to take advantage <strong>of</strong> the depressed land values after the war to acquirelarge tracts <strong>of</strong> land within the town for speculative purposes. This caused some hard feelingsamong the many who lost their land through Sheriff’s sales on account <strong>of</strong> their debts (Vickers1985:78).Years later, on June 13, 1883, Dr. A. B. Roberson purchased this southernmost strip<strong>of</strong> land from Jonathan Carr and his wife Eliza for a sum <strong>of</strong> $35 (Deed Book 47:568–69). Thedeed also states that Carr retained the right to salvage and remove “within a reasonable time”the brick located on the lot. Thus, the “Poor House” was no longer standing by 1883, andalthough the bricks and rubble which had formed the above-ground structure were apparentlystill on the lot, it had probably not been a functional dwelling for quite some time.9
- Page 1 and 2: ARCHAEOLOGICAL INVESTIGATIONS AT TH
- Page 3 and 4: ABSTRACTArchaeological investigatio
- Page 5 and 6: Moffitt, Brooks Rainey, Patricia Sa
- Page 7 and 8: ChapterPage6. Conclusions and Recom
- Page 9 and 10: TablePage16. Distribution of cerami
- Page 11 and 12: FigurePage18. Excavating Sq. 140R95
- Page 13 and 14: Chapter 1INTRODUCTIONThis report de
- Page 15 and 16: Chapter 2HISTORICAL BACKGROUNDThe t
- Page 17 and 18: Book 17:59-60). Gavin Hogg paid off
- Page 19: and the sale of the western half of
- Page 23 and 24: train young men and women to teach
- Page 25 and 26: the university was the Delta Kappa
- Page 27 and 28: ENDNOTES1 A typescript of this deed
- Page 29 and 30: Chapter 3FIELD METHODSFieldwork was
- Page 31 and 32: Chapter 4RESULTS OF ARCHAEOLOGICAL
- Page 33 and 34: foundations were 2 ft wide and the
- Page 35 and 36: Level 2aThis soil level occurred on
- Page 37 and 38: Feature 2Feature 2 was a linear dis
- Page 39 and 40: Feature 12Feature 12 was a small, s
- Page 41 and 42: ARCHITECTURAL GROUPA large number o
- Page 43 and 44: southern and northern parts of the
- Page 45 and 46: Kitchen GroupCeramics. As shown in
- Page 47 and 48: is probably no earlier than the sec
- Page 49: consumption of wine in ante-bellum
- Page 53 and 54: 50% of the assemblage). If, and whe
- Page 55 and 56: sat down. Diners then helped themse
- Page 57 and 58: ecords show his property increased
- Page 59 and 60: The ceramic marbles could easily be
- Page 61 and 62: southern to northern halves of the
- Page 63 and 64: anthropomorphic pipes (Sudbury 1979
- Page 65 and 66: TOILETRIES GROUPThe Toiletries grou
- Page 67 and 68: shampoo bottles, and a cosmetic jar
- Page 69 and 70: Items likely associated with the fr
- Page 71 and 72:
Chapter 6CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDA
- Page 73 and 74:
REFERENCESAnonymousc.1797 Plan of t
- Page 75 and 76:
Majewski, Teresita, and Michael J.
- Page 77 and 78:
Wilson, Louis R.1957 The University
- Page 79 and 80:
Table 1 continued.Activity Group Qu
- Page 81 and 82:
Table 3 continued.Category 0-2 cm 2
- Page 83 and 84:
Table 7. Distribution of kitchen ce
- Page 85 and 86:
Table 10. Distribution of ceramic t
- Page 87 and 88:
Table 13. Distribution of glass and
- Page 89 and 90:
Table 17. Distribution of pharmaceu
- Page 91 and 92:
PRESBYTERIANCHURCHHENDERSON STREETN
- Page 93 and 94:
Figure 4. 1797 map of Chapel Hill a
- Page 95 and 96:
Figure 6. 1857 Chapel Hill Business
- Page 97 and 98:
Figure 8. View of Franklin Street l
- Page 99 and 100:
Figure 10. Portion of a 1911 map co
- Page 101 and 102:
Figure 12. Delta Kappa Epsilon hous
- Page 103 and 104:
Figure 14. Kemp P. Battle with Phi
- Page 105 and 106:
Figure 16. Portion of a 1932 map co
- Page 107 and 108:
Figure 18. Excavating Sq. 140R95 pr
- Page 109 and 110:
Figure 20. Removing topsoil from th
- Page 111 and 112:
Figure 22. Exposing the south wall
- Page 113 and 114:
Pettigrew Site(RLA-Or412)Architectu
- Page 115 and 116:
Stone FoundationsStone FoundationsD
- Page 117 and 118:
Figure 28. View of Structure 2 full
- Page 119 and 120:
160 150 140 130 120 110 100100 ft99
- Page 121 and 122:
Figure 32. Prehistoric lithic artif
- Page 123 and 124:
Figure 34. Miscellaneous ceramic an
- Page 125 and 126:
Figure 36. Glassware: oil lamp chim
- Page 127 and 128:
Figure 38. Stoneware: Virginia-made
- Page 129 and 130:
Figure 40. Refined, undecorated war
- Page 131 and 132:
Figure 42. Whiteware plate, 9.5”
- Page 133 and 134:
Figure 44. Transfer printed wares:
- Page 135 and 136:
Figure 46. Transfer printed wares:
- Page 137 and 138:
Figure 48. Toothbrushes and possibl
- Page 139 and 140:
Figure 50. Early to mid-nineteenth-
- Page 141 and 142:
Figure 52. Refined, undecorated whi
- Page 143 and 144:
Figure 54. Glass cosmetic and shamp
- Page 145 and 146:
Appendix 1. Chain of title for Lot
- Page 147 and 148:
30030024060300Lot 11George Johnston