WRIA 31 Instream Habitat Assessment

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Table 13. Total estimated spawning area (m 2 ) by basin and stream.BASIN / STREAMTOTALChapman Creek 6Glade Creek 0Pine Creek 9,346Rock Creek Luna Gulch 1,127Quartz Creek 3,158Rock Creek Mainstem 41,411Squaw Creek 13,908Rock Creek Total 59,604Wood Gulch 11,536Grand Total 80,492WRIA 31 Instream Habitat Assessment 29 Watershed Professionals Network
Chapman CreekAverage PercentComposition100806040200% Bedrock % Boulder % Cobble % Gravel % Pebble % Sand % Silt/ClayNon-RifflesRifflesSubstrate SizePine CreekAverage PercentComposition302520151050% Bedrock % Boulder % Cobble % Gravel % Pebble % Sand % Silt/ClayNon-RifflesRifflesSubstrate SizeRock CreekAverage PercentComposition35302520151050% Bedrock % Boulder % Cobble % Gravel % Pebble % Sand % Silt/ClayNon-RifflesRifflesSubstrate SizeWood GulchAverage PercentComposition302520151050% Bedrock % Boulder % Cobble % Gravel % Pebble % Sand % Silt/ClayNon-RifflesRifflesSubstrate SizeGlade CreekAverage PercentComposition6050403020100% Bedrock % Boulder % Cobble % Gravel % Pebble % Sand % Silt/ClayNon-RifflesRifflesSubstrate SizeFigure 9. Average substrate composition for riffle and non-riffle channel units foreach basin in the study area.WRIA 31 Instream Habitat Assessment 30 Watershed Professionals Network
Page 1: WRIA 31 InstreamHabitat AssessmentG
Page 5 and 6: Table of ContentsAbstract..........
Page 7 and 8: List of FiguresFigure 1. Study area
Page 9 and 10: We wish to thank the Nature Conserv
Page 11 and 12: Figure 1. Study areaWRIA 31 Instrea
Page 13 and 14: around 24 inches along the western
Page 15 and 16: Figure 3. Daily maximum water tempe
Page 17 and 18: Figure 4. Major streams in WRIA 31.
Page 19 and 20: Table 1. Data collected in the fiel
Page 21 and 22: Hydromodifications were noted withi
Page 23 and 24: • Existing traffic count data for
Page 25 and 26: Cultivated small grains; and Cultiv
Page 27 and 28: 3.5.6 Road Surface ErosionSEDMODL2
Page 29 and 30: Totalsamplelength(ft)TotalSampleLen
Page 31 and 32: Table 9. Number and type of channel
Page 33 and 34: 60.0%Percent of EachChannel Unit Ty
Page 35 and 36: Table 10. Pool Volume in each reach
Page 37: Table 12. Spawning area in each rea
Page 41 and 42: spawning habitats. Spawning areas a
Page 43 and 44: Chapman Creek30Number2010075%% Embe
Page 45 and 46: Basin Stream Reach CanopyCover (%)W
Page 47 and 48: 4.2 FISH SURVEYS4.2.1 Snorkel Surve
Page 49 and 50: 4.2.2 Spawning SurveysSpawning surv
Page 51 and 52: small depression 0.5 foot deep is p
Page 53 and 54: the heavy rainstorms which occurred
Page 55 and 56: Figure 16. 1992 Landsat land cover
Page 57 and 58: locations, the livestock have free
Page 59 and 60: Figure 18. Stream flow, water tempe
Page 61 and 62: mortality reported at various sedim
Page 63 and 64: some cases, the sparse condition is
Page 65 and 66: was based on a one-day site visit a
Page 67 and 68: Aspect Consulting, LLC 2005. Rock C
Page 69 and 70: Reiser, D.W., and R.G. White. 1988.

WRIA 31 Instream Habitat Assessment

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?