Challenging Upgradesto the Guerneville Treatment Plant14 - www.westcountygazette.com - 4/16/09By Brenda AdelmanPicture this. You live on a quiet,narrow, windy country road that hasmany blind curves and at least onethird of it is much narrower than thestandard 20’ across; there are steepslopes along the edge of the road,private fences right up to the road,parking along narrow parts of the roadwhere homes don’t have their ownprivate driveways, and significantdrainage problems in many areas.There are slide areas; there are manymature redwood trees prohibiting thestandard 20’ road width; the pavementis badly cracked in many places, and soon. Some of the blind curves are riskywhen you meet another car. And, sincethere are no sidewalks, walking dogsand children in the narrow sectionscan be challenging. Yet we love ourpicturesque roadways and we traversethe narrow places carefully.Now picture 92 large truck tripshauling spoils and fill materials everyday for five days a week, over fourmonths, going up and down the roadin order to construct a big storagepond at the Guerneville TreatmentPlant. (about one truck every sixminutes) Picture the dust, the noise,the toxic fumes, and the traffic tie-upsto let them pass. The packet providedthe Supervisors when this project wasapproved stated: “The Proposed Projectwould not change the design of existingroadways and does not include anyoperational features that would impacttraffic or increase hazards.”Neeley Road, like many of our localroads, is the one described. Only theyare “lucky” to have the GuernevilleSewage Treatment Plant located at thevery end. Picture how this would affectyour entire summer if you lived in thearea, since it’s a four-month summerproject, probably to take place in 2011.In addition, there’s another projectplanned for 2010 that will have similarimpacts. Do you believe the County’sassessment above about no impacts?In order to calm concerns expressedat the Final Hearing on this project, theCounty Supervisors (District Directors)of the Russian River County SanitationDistrict (RRCSD) promised not to cutany redwoods, or other mature trees;they promised not to widen the road,and they promised that in order tomove trucks all day, they would finda way to have one way traffic in all thenarrow parts. They also promised tokeep the road maintained in useablecondition. Yet we wonder how theywould keep the road maintainedin the midst of 92 daily truck trips?Because the document they authorizedis so vague, there is no legal authorityholding the County to these promises.Russian River Watershed ProtectionCommittee (RRWPC) asked thatthe Board delay certification of thisproject until these significant trafficand safety issues on Neeley Rd. wereaddressed. It would be very sad ifsome tragic accident should occur as aresult of poor planning on this project.They went ahead and approved itanyway. They promised to hold somecommunity meetings right before theproject begins. Meetings should havebeen held BEFORE project approval.After April 20th,THERE IS NOLEGAL WAY TOHOLD THEM TOTHEIR PROMISES.We agree thatadditional storageis needed at theTreatment Plantto address waterquality problems ofthe current system.We are very concerned however, thatthis approval is premature and manyissues need to be worked out first.In fact, RRWPC has been concernedfor years that the Water Agency(Yes, the same guys running ourwater system are also running ourwastewater system.) has divided upTreatment Plant improvements intoseparate environmental reviews,thus enabling them to minimize theimpacts they address. They also liketo put bureaucratic obstacles in ourway. In mid-February, we asked whenCHALLENGE cont’d on page 15
CHALLENGE cont’d from page 14the Final EIR would be released. Theyresponded that we could get it March2 nd , two weeks before the hearing.Three days before the final decision,we learned that the document hadactually been released Feb. 24 th . We lostsix days in notifying the communityabout the important meeting.They have repeatedly misrepresentedthe ultimate users of the system. TheAgency paid for the Occidental/CampMeeker environmental review todevelop a pipeline hooking up thosecommunities to the RRCSD. The wholetime they were meeting regularly withthose communities (and RegionalBoard staff who informally supportedthe pipeline project), assuring themthere was plenty of capacity in theGuerneville system, they were tellingRRCSD ratepayers that plannedimprovements were for currentratepayers only. (That pipeline projectwas shot down by lead agency CampMeeker Recreation and Park Districtbecause of the $22 million dollar costand inadequate environmental review.)We know that the Regional WaterQuality Control Board supportsupgrading Guerneville’s systemand not only hooking up MonteRio, but also about 750 developedand undeveloped parcels betweenGuerneville and Monte Rio that arecurrently on septic. RRWPC has calledfor full environmental review beforethis occurs, including a Master Plan ofthe Russian River County SanitationDistrict as described in the SonomaCounty General Plan.Furthermore, the Storage Project hasmany geological problems that couldultimately cause contamination of theriver and the ground water. There isonly one option remaining for citizensto protest this project at this point.We have to file a lawsuit challengingthe environmental review. RRWPC isgoing to do that, and our attorney isworking on it right now. We need yoursupport.We would greatly appreciatedonations of any amount be made outto RRWPC and mailed to P.O. Box 501,Guerneville, Ca 95446. You can alsodonate at the RRWPC website throughPayPal at www.rrwpc.org If you wantmore information, please send anemail to rrwpc@comcast.netWe hope you can help.4/16/09 - www.westcountygazette.com - 15