14.08.2015 Views

Table of Contents

ERI_Scientific_Beta_Publication_Dimensions_of_Quality_Investing

ERI_Scientific_Beta_Publication_Dimensions_of_Quality_Investing

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

24An ERI Scientific Beta Publication — The Dimensions <strong>of</strong> Quality Investing: High Pr<strong>of</strong>itability and Low Investment Smart Factor Indices — July 2015Copyright © 2015 ERI Scientific Beta. All rights reserved. Please refer to the disclaimer at the end <strong>of</strong> this document.2. Smart Factor Indices for High Pr<strong>of</strong>itabilityand Low Investment TiltsExhibit 10: Drawdown Analysis <strong>of</strong> High Pr<strong>of</strong>itability and Low Investment Smart Factor IndicesThe analysis is based on daily total return data from 31 December 1974 to 31 December 2014 (40 years). The benchmark is the cap-weightedportfolio <strong>of</strong> all stocks in the Scientific Beta LTTR US universe. Maximum drawdown represents the maximum loss an investor can suffer from investingin the strategy at the highest point and selling at the lowest. It is the largest single drop from peak to bottom in the value <strong>of</strong> a portfolio (before a newpeak is achieved). Maximum relative drawdown is the maximum drawdown <strong>of</strong> the long/short index whose return is given by the fractional changein the ratio <strong>of</strong> the strategy index to the benchmark index. The Cornish-Fisher VaR is computed using the Cornish-Fisher extension that adjusts the VaRfor the presence <strong>of</strong> asymmetry (i.e. skewness) and/or heavy tails (i.e. excess kurtosis) in the return distribution. VaR is based on historical returns andmeasures the possibility <strong>of</strong> maximum daily loss. The level <strong>of</strong> 5% means that there is only a 5% chance that the strategy will experience a daily lossthat is greater than the reported loss. The Cornish-Fisher VaTER is similar to the Cornish-Fisher VaR except that it provides the worst expected loss <strong>of</strong>the strategy relative to the CW benchmark. The Scientific Beta LTTR US universe consists <strong>of</strong> the 500 largest US stocks.US Long Term(Dec-1974 to Dec-2014)Absolute AnalyticsAll Stocks CWLow InvestmentCWLow InvestmentMulti-StrategyHigh Pr<strong>of</strong>itabilityCWHigh Pr<strong>of</strong>itabilityMulti-StrategyMaximum Drawdown 54.53% 53.38% 53.20% 52.29% 48.28%Maximum Time Under Water 1594 1141 935 2802 856Start <strong>of</strong> Max Time Under Water 04-Sep-00 16-Jul-99 04-Jun-07 27-Mar-00 13-Jul-07End <strong>of</strong> Max Time Under Water 13-Oct-06 01-Dec-03 03-Jan-11 22-Dec-10 25-Oct-10Cornish Fisher 5% VaR (daily) 1.47% 1.35% 1.30% 1.46% 1.38%Relative AnalyticsMax Relative Drawdown - 26.47% 38.49% 20.27% 25.21%Max Relative Time Under Water - 2083 1944 4095 1837Start <strong>of</strong> Max Relative Time Under Water - 18-Apr-94 25-Mar-94 14-May-75 21-Nov-94End <strong>of</strong> Max Relative Time Under Water - 11-Apr-02 06-Sep-01 23-Jan-91 05-Dec-01Cornish Fisher 5% VaTER (daily) - 0.37% 0.51% 0.31% 0.41%2.2.3. Conditional Performance AnalysisExhibit 11 presents the conditional performance analysis <strong>of</strong> US long-term pr<strong>of</strong>itability andinvestment smart factor indices. The low investment multi-strategy index outperforms by 2.69%and 5.38% in bull and bear markets respectively. The low investment CW index outperforms byjust 0.08% in bull and 4.22% in bear markets. The high pr<strong>of</strong>itability multi-strategy index has anoutperformance <strong>of</strong> 3.65% and 2.63% in bull and bear markets respectively. Its CW counterpartoutperforms in bull markets (0.03%) and delivers 1.08% in bear markets, showing a clear inclinationtowards bear markets.It is essential to analyse the conditional performance to assess the robustness <strong>of</strong> weightingschemes. It is clear that investment and pr<strong>of</strong>itability multi-factor indices tend to provide morebalanced outperformance across different market conditions compared to the tilted cap-weightedindices.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!