14.08.2015 Views

Table of Contents

ERI_Scientific_Beta_Publication_Dimensions_of_Quality_Investing

ERI_Scientific_Beta_Publication_Dimensions_of_Quality_Investing

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

48An ERI Scientific Beta Publication — The Dimensions <strong>of</strong> Quality Investing: High Pr<strong>of</strong>itability and Low Investment Smart Factor Indices — July 2015Copyright © 2015 ERI Scientific Beta. All rights reserved. Please refer to the disclaimer at the end <strong>of</strong> this document.AppendixFor example, FTSE proposes quality factor indices which use a factor score for non financial firmswhich is derived from a composite based on operating cash flow to debt, net income to assets (i.e.return on assets or ROA), annual change in sales over assets, and accruals.However, for financials, FTSE chose to use return on assets, as well as a measure they name “ROA-GARP”which consists <strong>of</strong> the five year ROA growth multiplied by the book-to-market ratio. These two measurescombined lead to the quality score for financials.There are two main issues with this approach. Firstly, it raises the question <strong>of</strong> the choice <strong>of</strong> comparableindustries and its sustainability through time. Why should we choose two sets such as financials ornon-financials, and not three or more sets, should market or financial accounting practices changestructurally through time? Secondly, is the issue <strong>of</strong> the choice <strong>of</strong> the very proxy for each industryfamily, which increases flexibility in specifying the factor and thus raises robustness issues.Using consistent investment and pr<strong>of</strong>itability proxies per industry/industry family while using industryadaptedfinancial items for the proxiesERI Scientific Beta does not have recourse to the two earlier options for pr<strong>of</strong>itability nor investmentfactors. Rather, the underlying accounting and financial statement variables used as inputs the twoproxies described earlier are adapted across industry groups.We remind readers <strong>of</strong> the main variables entering our investment and pr<strong>of</strong>itability proxies (seeequations 1 and 2)On the total asset side, there is no reason to differentiate across industries. That is why we use thetotal sum <strong>of</strong> all the (current and long-term) assets in the balance sheet <strong>of</strong> the company, regardlessthe industry. For the detail on the Total Assets items currently used, we refer the reader to the listbelow.On the gross pr<strong>of</strong>it side, there are differences between industries in the items that are reported bycompanies, notably in their cost <strong>of</strong> goods sold. One difference lies in the measurement <strong>of</strong> COGSbetween financial and non-financial companies:• Banks notably bear two specific items called interest expenses on Deposits/Borrowings and provisionfor loan losses/credit losses that make up an important part <strong>of</strong> their cost base. We thus use thoseitems in the COGS components for banks;• Insurance companies also have specific items in their cost base, such as Amortisation <strong>of</strong> DeferredPolicy Acquisition Costs, Write <strong>of</strong>f <strong>of</strong> policy acquisition costs and Underwriting expenses, which weuse in our COGS estimates for this particular industry;• Financial services and brokerage companies use Brokerage charges, Clearance charges, Selling, General& Administrative expenses, Provision for loan losses/credit losses, which we use in the COGS base.For the detail on the COGS, we provide detailed lists below.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!