15.08.2015 Views

$1.95 The conflict the church and the synagogue

7DoZs5pTo

7DoZs5pTo

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

CHAPTER TWOTHE CLASH WITH CHRISTIANITYBIBLIOGRAPHICAL INTRODUCTION<strong>The</strong> narrative of this chapter turns mainly upon <strong>the</strong> accountgiven in Mark <strong>and</strong> in <strong>the</strong> Acts of <strong>the</strong> Apostles of <strong>the</strong> ministryof Jesus <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> development of <strong>the</strong> early Church. It isclaimed that <strong>the</strong>se narratives give a logical, reasonable <strong>and</strong>satisfying picture of what occurred, <strong>and</strong> it cannot be toostrongly urged that <strong>the</strong> main sources to be consulted are <strong>the</strong>narratives <strong>the</strong>mselves, approached with an open mind insteadof with some particular modern <strong>the</strong>ory as to <strong>the</strong>ir corruption.While modern exegesis has rendered incalculableservices to <strong>the</strong> elucidation of <strong>the</strong> texts, it has become socomplicated <strong>and</strong> contradictory that we are in perpetualdanger of forgetting that a reasonable amount of inaccuracy<strong>and</strong> forgetfulness on <strong>the</strong> part of <strong>the</strong>ir authors may beallowed without any need for a logical reason being given forthis carelessness. <strong>The</strong> danger of <strong>the</strong> modern approachisnowhere more conspicuous than when it is <strong>the</strong> general atmosphere<strong>and</strong> picture of <strong>the</strong> original narrative which is underconsideration, <strong>and</strong> not <strong>the</strong> exact implication of this or thatpoint of detail.This pleaisurged, not with <strong>the</strong> intention of claiming anyoriginality for my approach or conclusions, but because it isimpossible to survey <strong>and</strong> assess all <strong>the</strong> different <strong>the</strong>orieswhich might invalidate <strong>the</strong>m. Something, however, needsto be said of <strong>the</strong> two books which have been mainly quoted.<strong>The</strong> essential accuracy of <strong>the</strong> historical narrative of Mark isdefended by Burkitt, <strong>and</strong> I see no reason to forsake hisconclusions for <strong>the</strong> new German <strong>the</strong>ory of au<strong>the</strong>ntic scrapsof teaching set in an imaginary framework, which is presentedby Rawlinson. That so logical a development as Markpresents happened fortuitously seems to me impossible.And if it is not fortuitous, <strong>the</strong>n,' whe<strong>the</strong>r <strong>the</strong> author receivedit from eye-witnesses or toge<strong>the</strong>r with <strong>the</strong> scraps of teaching,seems to me an utterly unimportant issue. <strong>The</strong> same is

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!