20.08.2015 Views

delivering leading edge technology in the most ... - Ricardo-AEA

delivering leading edge technology in the most ... - Ricardo-AEA

delivering leading edge technology in the most ... - Ricardo-AEA

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>AEA</strong> TECHNOLOGY PLCAnnual report 2002DELIVERING LEADING EDGETECHNOLOGY IN THE MOSTDEMANDING ENVIRONMENTS<strong>AEA</strong> TECHNOLOGY IS NOWSMARTER AND MORE FOCUSEDON ITS CUSTOMERS


2<strong>AEA</strong> TECHNOLOGY PLCAnnual report 2002Chairman’s statementA year of transformationIn last year’s Annual Report, we said that <strong>the</strong> transformation of <strong>AEA</strong> Technologywould essentially be achieved <strong>in</strong> 12 months. In this, my first Annual Report asChairman, I am pleased to say that this goal has been reached.Our strategy is to focus on two core bus<strong>in</strong>esses – Rail and Environment – and <strong>in</strong>vest<strong>in</strong> a portfolio of small bus<strong>in</strong>esses – called value development – where we envisagefuture growth. This strategy required <strong>the</strong> disposal of our rema<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g bus<strong>in</strong>esses,<strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g our traditional nuclear <strong>in</strong>terests.Peter WatsonChairman“OUR STRATEGYIS RADICAL ANDDELIVERING”The strategy is <strong>deliver<strong>in</strong>g</strong>. Our core bus<strong>in</strong>esses are <strong>deliver<strong>in</strong>g</strong> improved performance,harness<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong>ir world <strong>lead<strong>in</strong>g</strong> technologies and expertise to exploit <strong>the</strong> growth <strong>in</strong><strong>the</strong>ir markets. They occupy strong market positions and <strong>the</strong>re is <strong>the</strong> prospect ofmore good growth to come. With<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> value development portfolio, <strong>the</strong>re has beensignificant progress <strong>in</strong> our Battery Systems bus<strong>in</strong>ess and QSA. Accentus has alsomade satisfactory progress.The progress we made <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> first half of this f<strong>in</strong>ancial year has been acceleratedwith <strong>the</strong> result that <strong>the</strong> restructur<strong>in</strong>g of <strong>the</strong> Group is al<strong>most</strong> complete. We havelargely completed our early disposal programme, rais<strong>in</strong>g gross sale proceeds of£88.2 million dur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> f<strong>in</strong>ancial year and a fur<strong>the</strong>r £67.5 million follow<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong>disposal of Hyprotech <strong>in</strong> May 2002. We are <strong>deliver<strong>in</strong>g</strong> on our promise to return upto £70 million to shareholders.We have stripped out costs <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> centre and closed under-perform<strong>in</strong>g bus<strong>in</strong>essstreams. There have been over 230 redundancies dur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> year. This tough actionhas been driven by a relentless determ<strong>in</strong>ation to drive down costs and create a solidplatform for <strong>the</strong> future.Improved performanceThe benefits of streng<strong>the</strong>ned management teams are be<strong>in</strong>g felt. This year, ourtwo core bus<strong>in</strong>esses, Rail and Environment, have produced improved performances.Tak<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> two bus<strong>in</strong>esses toge<strong>the</strong>r, comb<strong>in</strong>ed sales and operat<strong>in</strong>g profit(before exceptional operat<strong>in</strong>g items) <strong>in</strong>creased by 18% and 24% respectivelyto £124.7 million and £20.2 million. This performance was achieved despite <strong>the</strong>well publicised difficulties with<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> UK rail <strong>in</strong>dustry and <strong>the</strong> economic climate<strong>in</strong> which our Environment bus<strong>in</strong>ess was operat<strong>in</strong>g.Rail had turnover of £75.3 million and an operat<strong>in</strong>g profit (before exceptionaloperat<strong>in</strong>g items) of £12.3 million, result<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> an operat<strong>in</strong>g marg<strong>in</strong> of over 16%;Environment had turnover of £49.4 million and an operat<strong>in</strong>g profit (beforeexceptional operat<strong>in</strong>g items) of £7.9 million, result<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> an operat<strong>in</strong>g marg<strong>in</strong> of 16%.


3<strong>AEA</strong> TECHNOLOGY PLCAnnual report 2002Chairman’s statement“DELIVERINGA RETURNOF UP TO£70 MILLION TOSHAREHOLDERSFULFILSANOTHEROF OURCOMMITMENTS”F<strong>in</strong>ancial overviewOverall Group turnover was £334.4 million (2001: £368.8 million), with a pre-taxprofit of £13.5 million (2001: pre-tax loss £17.2 million). Operat<strong>in</strong>g loss (beforeexceptional operat<strong>in</strong>g items) was £9.6 million (2001: operat<strong>in</strong>g profit £12.0 million).While our core bus<strong>in</strong>esses performed strongly, our value development bus<strong>in</strong>essesmade an £8.4 million operat<strong>in</strong>g loss (before exceptional operat<strong>in</strong>g items) on aturnover of £65.8 million. Bus<strong>in</strong>esses divested <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> f<strong>in</strong>ancial year made a smalloperat<strong>in</strong>g profit (before exceptional operat<strong>in</strong>g items) of £0.4 million on a turnoverof £82.0 million. There was an exceptional operat<strong>in</strong>g charge of £21.1 millionrelat<strong>in</strong>g to restructur<strong>in</strong>g of ongo<strong>in</strong>g bus<strong>in</strong>esses and a super exceptional ga<strong>in</strong> of£53.7 million. This figure relates to <strong>the</strong> disposals dur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> f<strong>in</strong>ancial year ofNuclear Consult<strong>in</strong>g, Nuclear Eng<strong>in</strong>eer<strong>in</strong>g and Value Realisation bus<strong>in</strong>esses. There wasalso a charge of £5.9 million for loss on term<strong>in</strong>ation of operations.The overall f<strong>in</strong>ancial performance was <strong>the</strong>refore mixed but should be seen <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong>context of <strong>the</strong> restructur<strong>in</strong>g of <strong>the</strong> bus<strong>in</strong>ess. Exceptional ga<strong>in</strong>s and charges relat<strong>in</strong>gto <strong>the</strong> disposals and restructur<strong>in</strong>g should not obscure <strong>the</strong> strong performance of ourtwo core bus<strong>in</strong>esses.Return of capital and dividendA f<strong>in</strong>al dividend will not be paid for <strong>the</strong> year to March 2002, given that it isproposed to return some £45 million to shareholders by way of a Special Dividend of50.0p per share to be paid on 30 August 2002. In addition, <strong>the</strong> Group <strong>in</strong>tends to use<strong>the</strong> authority given by shareholders to buy back shares <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> market. The capitalreturned to shareholders from <strong>the</strong> comb<strong>in</strong>ation of Special Dividend and sharebuyback would be up to a total of £70 million. This means that <strong>the</strong> total dividendfor <strong>the</strong> year, exclud<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> Special Dividend, was 3.8p per share (In 2001: 11.1p pershare but no Special Dividend was paid).The ‘new’ <strong>AEA</strong>A difficult time with<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> company’s history is draw<strong>in</strong>g to a close dur<strong>in</strong>g whichhard lessons have been learned. From this period of change, a ‘new’ <strong>AEA</strong> is emerg<strong>in</strong>g.I would like briefly to outl<strong>in</strong>e what I mean by, and expect from, <strong>the</strong> ‘new’ <strong>AEA</strong>.Firstly, <strong>the</strong>re are three common threads runn<strong>in</strong>g through all our bus<strong>in</strong>esses, all ofwhich enable us to susta<strong>in</strong> a lead <strong>in</strong> our high-value markets:■ Intellectual capital, specifically, <strong>the</strong> expert knowl<strong>edge</strong> of our people and ourIntellectual Property (IP) portfolio■ First class <strong>technology</strong>■ Strong market knowl<strong>edge</strong> which has enabled us to def<strong>in</strong>e and capture growth.We use <strong>the</strong> word ‘smart’ to encapsulate our aspiration and ability to deliver <strong>lead<strong>in</strong>g</strong><strong>edge</strong> <strong>technology</strong> and <strong>in</strong>novative solutions <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>most</strong> demand<strong>in</strong>g environments.


4<strong>AEA</strong> TECHNOLOGY PLCAnnual report 2002Chairman’s statementSecondly, we have a clear strategic approach to our markets:■ Focus<strong>in</strong>g on markets we know, where <strong>the</strong> demand for advice and <strong>technology</strong> isstrong, grow<strong>in</strong>g and highly valued■ Export<strong>in</strong>g expertise and smart systems across markets and countries■ Seek<strong>in</strong>g out acquisitions which fit our criteria■ Enhanc<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> Group’s <strong>in</strong>tellectual capital to anticipate market needs.Thirdly, we are an ambitious company, determ<strong>in</strong>ed to accelerate growth and enhanceshareholder value.Smarter and more focusedThis company had a wake-up call three years ago with its first profits warn<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>March 1999. We learned hard lessons and have taken tough actions. We will takemore if <strong>the</strong>y are needed.“...THE ‘NEW’<strong>AEA</strong> WILL BESMARTER ANDMORE FOCUSED”A key decision was to conduct a strategic review which led to <strong>the</strong> current strategy.Lead<strong>in</strong>g and <strong>deliver<strong>in</strong>g</strong> on that strategy has been my absolute priority.I am determ<strong>in</strong>ed that ‘new’ <strong>AEA</strong> will be smarter and more focused on markets andcustomers <strong>in</strong> which it has a dist<strong>in</strong>ctive competitive <strong>edge</strong>. Deliver<strong>in</strong>g smart solutionswill require cont<strong>in</strong>ued <strong>in</strong>vestment <strong>in</strong> <strong>technology</strong> and, particularly, people. We willcont<strong>in</strong>ue to streng<strong>the</strong>n our technical and <strong>in</strong>dustry knowl<strong>edge</strong> as well as ourcommercial acumen. Dur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> year, we <strong>in</strong>creased our research and developmentspend with<strong>in</strong> our cont<strong>in</strong>u<strong>in</strong>g bus<strong>in</strong>esses by £2.7 million, from £6.3 million to£9.0 million.However, <strong>in</strong>vestment alone will not be enough, it must translate <strong>in</strong>to performance.For this to happen, it is essential that this company becomes even morecommercially focused and competitive. We have made good progress and this ispartly reflected <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> performance of our core bus<strong>in</strong>esses. But more needs to bedone and I make it a priority that my senior management team accelerates <strong>the</strong>commercialisation of our culture.The future – opportunities for growthThere are excellent opportunities for growth <strong>in</strong> our core bus<strong>in</strong>esses. We have a clearbus<strong>in</strong>ess model, a clear strategy, a focus on performance and an <strong>in</strong>tolerance offailure. Rail and Environment both enjoy strong positions <strong>in</strong> growth markets and wealso see excellent prospects <strong>in</strong> our Battery Systems bus<strong>in</strong>ess <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> wake of <strong>the</strong>strategically important BOWMAN contract. QSA and Accentus also have significantprospects ahead of <strong>the</strong>m.Tak<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong>se opportunities will require a strong, commercially-driven managementand workforce. In <strong>the</strong> last year we have streng<strong>the</strong>ned management by br<strong>in</strong>g<strong>in</strong>g good,commercially-driven people <strong>in</strong>to <strong>the</strong> company but I repeat, we need to do more.


5<strong>AEA</strong> TECHNOLOGY PLCAnnual report 2002Chairman’s statementPrioritiesOur priority is to accelerate profitable growth <strong>in</strong> our core bus<strong>in</strong>esses and delivervalue to our shareholders. We will do this by:■■■■Driv<strong>in</strong>g growth <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> core bus<strong>in</strong>essesCont<strong>in</strong>u<strong>in</strong>g to deliver valueComplet<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> disposal programmeControll<strong>in</strong>g costs.Thank youI would like to thank my management team and all our employees for <strong>the</strong>hard work that has made <strong>the</strong> transformation of <strong>the</strong> company possible. We facea brighter future thanks to <strong>the</strong>ir efforts. I would like also to pay tribute toSir Anthony Cleaver, my predecessor. He conceived <strong>AEA</strong> Technology and throughhis determ<strong>in</strong>ation and vision we went <strong>in</strong>to <strong>the</strong> private sector. I strongly believe thatthis company has fundamental strengths which I am determ<strong>in</strong>ed will deliver realvalue to <strong>in</strong>vestors <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> near future.OutlookThe outlook <strong>in</strong> our two core bus<strong>in</strong>esses is good. We foresee cont<strong>in</strong>ued growth <strong>in</strong><strong>the</strong> markets for Rail and Environment both domestically and <strong>in</strong>ternationally. Bothbus<strong>in</strong>esses are already cash generative and our aim will be to improve this fur<strong>the</strong>r.The outlook is also good for Battery Systems as we see excellent opportunities tocapitalise on our strong position <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> portable power markets. QSA and Accentusare also mak<strong>in</strong>g considerable progress.The bus<strong>in</strong>ess overall is now better structured and f<strong>in</strong>ancially stronger. We arefocused on complet<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> outstand<strong>in</strong>g disposals, be<strong>in</strong>g rigorous with our costs andmaximis<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> potential of our core bus<strong>in</strong>esses, all of which will progressivelydeliver higher value for shareholders.Dr Peter WatsonChairman


6<strong>AEA</strong> TECHNOLOGY PLCAnnual report 2002Operat<strong>in</strong>g reviewA re-shaped GroupWe have made excellent progress <strong>in</strong> transform<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> Group from one with fivedivisions to a focus on two core bus<strong>in</strong>esses – Rail and Environment – plus our valuedevelopment portfolio of smaller bus<strong>in</strong>esses with growth potential. The exit from<strong>the</strong> nuclear market is al<strong>most</strong> complete and, follow<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> sale of Hyprotech <strong>in</strong> May2002, we have successfully disposed of our ma<strong>in</strong> Eng<strong>in</strong>eer<strong>in</strong>g Software bus<strong>in</strong>ess.With<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> cont<strong>in</strong>u<strong>in</strong>g bus<strong>in</strong>esses we focused on our areas of strength and strippedout loss-mak<strong>in</strong>g activities and costs. We streng<strong>the</strong>ned our management teams andcont<strong>in</strong>ued to place a priority on commercial focus and competitiveness.Our core Rail and Environment bus<strong>in</strong>esses cont<strong>in</strong>ued to perform well, withboth achiev<strong>in</strong>g record sales and operat<strong>in</strong>g profit figures. Comb<strong>in</strong>ed, turnoverwas £124.7 million and operat<strong>in</strong>g profit (before exceptional operat<strong>in</strong>g items)£20.2 million, up 18% and 24% respectively over last year.DisposalsDur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> f<strong>in</strong>ancial year we raised gross sale proceeds of £88.2 million. In May2002 we completed <strong>the</strong> disposal of our ma<strong>in</strong> Eng<strong>in</strong>eer<strong>in</strong>g Software bus<strong>in</strong>ess,Hyprotech for £67.5 million. We are <strong>in</strong> discussions regard<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> sale of our NuclearScience bus<strong>in</strong>ess.AcquisitionsDur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> year we spent £7.0 million on acquisitions. We streng<strong>the</strong>ned ourEnvironment bus<strong>in</strong>ess with <strong>the</strong> acquisition of K<strong>in</strong>ectrics Inc for £5.3 million.K<strong>in</strong>ectrics Inc is a Canadian bus<strong>in</strong>ess which will broaden our platform <strong>in</strong>to <strong>the</strong> NorthAmerican market. We also made two small acquisitions <strong>in</strong> our Rail bus<strong>in</strong>ess, SoMatCorporation Inc and ERSA Sarl (European Railway Signall<strong>in</strong>g Applications), whichwill streng<strong>the</strong>n our <strong>in</strong>ternational capability.


7<strong>AEA</strong> TECHNOLOGY PLCAnnual report 2002Operat<strong>in</strong>g bus<strong>in</strong>essesRail and EnvironmentRailSupplies expertise <strong>in</strong> enhanc<strong>in</strong>g railway performance, such as traction and roll<strong>in</strong>gstock test<strong>in</strong>g and new signall<strong>in</strong>g system development. Also offers strategic andeconomic consultancy.Subsidiaries:■■■■■<strong>AEA</strong> Technology Rail BV delivers <strong>technology</strong> services and solutions to <strong>the</strong> Dutchand wider European rail markets.nCode International Limited provides fatigue and lifetime destruction software,pr<strong>in</strong>cipally to <strong>the</strong> automotive <strong>in</strong>dustry.SoMat Corporation Inc develops portable and rugged data acquisition systems andsoftware tools for field and laboratory data analysis.ERSA Sarl develops software for European Rail Traffic Management Systems.Fleet Software Limited provides fleet ma<strong>in</strong>tenance schedul<strong>in</strong>g software totransport companies.EnvironmentProvides support and solutions to governments, agencies and <strong>in</strong>dustry. Expertisecovers <strong>the</strong> breadth of environmental concerns, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g risk assessment,contam<strong>in</strong>ation, plann<strong>in</strong>g, monitor<strong>in</strong>g, due diligence and programme management.Subsidiaries:■K<strong>in</strong>ectrics Inc operates <strong>in</strong> technological fields cover<strong>in</strong>g generation plant,<strong>the</strong> environment, transmission and distribution and emerg<strong>in</strong>g energy as well asprovid<strong>in</strong>g energy consult<strong>in</strong>g services.


5AM ON THE TRACK AT CHEDDINGTON, PAUL BROWN,AN ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING GRADUATE, COLLECTSDATA FROM WHEELCHEX, WHICH IDENTIFIESPOTENTIAL TRACK DAMAGE.


9<strong>AEA</strong> TECHNOLOGY PLCAnnual report 2002Bus<strong>in</strong>ess reviewRailVision and strategyRail’s vision is to be recognised as Europe’s <strong>lead<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>technology</strong> adviser and supplier.Our strategy is to lead <strong>the</strong> market <strong>in</strong> terms of expertise, <strong>technology</strong> and scope ofoffer<strong>in</strong>g. We will do this by leverag<strong>in</strong>g our <strong>in</strong>tellectual capital and smart systemsacross high marg<strong>in</strong> growth segments. While <strong>the</strong> focus is on <strong>the</strong> UK, we plan to buildour presence <strong>in</strong> selected European markets.Cliff PerryManag<strong>in</strong>g DirectorPerformanceThis was our third year of strong organic growth. Sales were up 17% (13% exclud<strong>in</strong>gacquisitions) to a record £75.3 million and operat<strong>in</strong>g profit (before exceptionaloperat<strong>in</strong>g items) was up 31% at a record £12.3 million. Cash generation wasexcellent as a result of improv<strong>in</strong>g contract and project management, soundcommercial practice and <strong>the</strong> streaml<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g of our debt collection processes. Operat<strong>in</strong>gcash flow significantly exceeded contribution for <strong>the</strong> second year runn<strong>in</strong>g anddebtor days fell by 30%. We are look<strong>in</strong>g to cont<strong>in</strong>ue this performance.We are pleased with <strong>the</strong> performance of Rail’s first overseas acquisition, NSTO <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong>Ne<strong>the</strong>rlands, our Dutch bus<strong>in</strong>ess which outperformed expectations by cutt<strong>in</strong>g costsand w<strong>in</strong>n<strong>in</strong>g marg<strong>in</strong> enhanc<strong>in</strong>g bus<strong>in</strong>ess.“THIRDSUCCESSIVEYEAR OFSTRONGORGANICGROWTH”Bus<strong>in</strong>ess highlightsRailtrackA major success was our appo<strong>in</strong>tment as Specialist Railway Advisers to <strong>the</strong> Railtrackadm<strong>in</strong>istrators, Ernst & Young, reflect<strong>in</strong>g our position as <strong>lead<strong>in</strong>g</strong> strategists <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong><strong>in</strong>dustry. We also <strong>in</strong>creased our bus<strong>in</strong>ess with Railtrack by 29%, from £17 million to£22 million. This was <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> context of a slow<strong>in</strong>g of franchis<strong>in</strong>g activity because of<strong>the</strong> general election, political uncerta<strong>in</strong>ty and <strong>the</strong> entry of Railtrack <strong>in</strong>toadm<strong>in</strong>istration.AcquisitionsWe streng<strong>the</strong>ned our <strong>in</strong>ternational capability with <strong>the</strong> acquisition of US-basedSoMat Corporation Inc and ERSA Sarl <strong>in</strong> Strasbourg. SoMat Corporation Incstreng<strong>the</strong>ns our ability to deliver high quality data acquisition tools <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> US andAutomotive markets.There will be more <strong>in</strong>vestment <strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>terface management – wheel torail, tra<strong>in</strong> companies to Railtrack –our multi-discipl<strong>in</strong>ary approach isa key strength.


10<strong>AEA</strong> TECHNOLOGY PLCAnnual report 2002Bus<strong>in</strong>ess reviewRailERSA Sarl simulates and tests <strong>the</strong> European Railway Traffic Management System(ERTMS) which represents <strong>the</strong> biggest s<strong>in</strong>gle <strong>technology</strong> change fac<strong>in</strong>g today’srailways <strong>in</strong> Europe and beyond. The signals are go<strong>in</strong>g to move from <strong>the</strong> trackside to<strong>the</strong> tra<strong>in</strong>, and we are well placed to contribute to <strong>the</strong> development and adoption of<strong>the</strong> <strong>technology</strong>.Successful roll-outsDur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> year we achieved several national roll-outs of our systems across <strong>the</strong> UKnetwork: our VISION plann<strong>in</strong>g tool which provides large-scale simulation of railwaytraffic and timetables; <strong>the</strong> Control Centre of <strong>the</strong> Future (CCF) which deliversimprovements to tra<strong>in</strong> punctuality through <strong>the</strong> provision of real-time data across<strong>the</strong> whole rail network and is becom<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>dustry performance management tool;and WheelChex, which prevents damage to tracks by identify<strong>in</strong>g faulty vehiclesand excessive wheel loads. We have made good progress on <strong>deliver<strong>in</strong>g</strong> Virg<strong>in</strong> Tra<strong>in</strong>s’new middleware system (VMS) for electronic seat reservations and successfullyimplemented IECC (Integrated Electronic Control Centre) which provides real-timetra<strong>in</strong> control, on <strong>the</strong> Leeds re-signall<strong>in</strong>g project.Future growthIn <strong>the</strong> UK, <strong>the</strong> rail system is under pressure from ris<strong>in</strong>g passenger numbers andfreight volumes and <strong>the</strong> need to improve performance and safety. Last year <strong>the</strong>rewere 17 million “delay m<strong>in</strong>utes” cost<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>dustry approximately £50 per m<strong>in</strong>ute,538 rail fractures and 437 Signals Passed At Danger (SPADs). Infrastructure<strong>in</strong>vestment is required and planned. We are well placed to provide <strong>the</strong>appropriate solutions.Our offer<strong>in</strong>g to <strong>the</strong> market is at <strong>the</strong> high value end. We are <strong>the</strong> only supplier toprovide a complete one-stop shop portfolio of services and products – from adviserto provider, from economics to eng<strong>in</strong>eer<strong>in</strong>g and from track to tra<strong>in</strong>. We deliverperformance, sav<strong>in</strong>gs and safety improvement throughout <strong>the</strong> network. We take asystems approach, turn<strong>in</strong>g consultancy <strong>in</strong>to products, products <strong>in</strong>to systems andsystems <strong>in</strong>to solutions.In Europe <strong>the</strong>re is a trend towards outsourc<strong>in</strong>g and privatisation and an <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>gdemand for smart condition monitor<strong>in</strong>g and track<strong>in</strong>g systems.Market driversThe pace of change with<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>dustry cont<strong>in</strong>ues to accelerate and to create <strong>the</strong>opportunity for <strong>the</strong> new solutions and technical <strong>in</strong>novation at which we excel.This is true of <strong>the</strong> UK and key <strong>in</strong>ternational markets, particularly <strong>in</strong> Europe.Improved performance, safety and value for money are <strong>the</strong> key drivers <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong><strong>in</strong>dustry. As a result, <strong>the</strong> demand for greater <strong>in</strong>tegration via smart systems is ris<strong>in</strong>g.We estimate that <strong>the</strong>re are potential sav<strong>in</strong>gs of £1.9 billion to be made through <strong>the</strong><strong>in</strong>troduction of smarter systems and hardware.


11<strong>AEA</strong> TECHNOLOGY PLCAnnual report 2002Bus<strong>in</strong>ess reviewRailWe are strongly positioned to benefit from key <strong>in</strong>dustry trends.■ The trend is towards national, proven solutions. This limits competition and givesadvantage to UK-smart systems such as ours■ There will be more <strong>in</strong>vestment <strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>terface management - eg wheel-to-rail, tra<strong>in</strong>companies and Railtrack - which requires a truly multi-discipl<strong>in</strong>ary approach andis our key area of expertise■ There is a key trend towards predict<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> effect of duty on asset condition andhence improve <strong>the</strong> effectiveness and efficiency of ma<strong>in</strong>tenance. This plays to ourstrengths <strong>in</strong> condition monitor<strong>in</strong>g, decision support systems and fundamentalknowl<strong>edge</strong> of degradation mechanisms■ There is a need to improve <strong>the</strong> plann<strong>in</strong>g and performance of timetable generation.With our operational research capabilities we are extremely well placed to exploitthis opportunity via rapid development of our automatic software-based systems■ The Strategic Rail Authority (SRA) is tak<strong>in</strong>g responsibility for <strong>the</strong> future health of<strong>the</strong> railway. This provides an opportunity for forward-look<strong>in</strong>g proposals and wehave just qualified as one of only two ma<strong>in</strong> suppliers to <strong>the</strong> SRA’s Rail IndustryDevelopment Services panel.Globalisation of <strong>the</strong> railway supply market is <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g with new players enter<strong>in</strong>g<strong>the</strong> UK and o<strong>the</strong>r markets. We are <strong>in</strong> a strong position to work with <strong>the</strong>se newplayers through our unsurpassed knowl<strong>edge</strong> of <strong>the</strong> UK system. In addition, <strong>the</strong>serelationships will give us access to new markets for our own products and services.We expect to benefit from improved railway performance, return<strong>in</strong>g customer and<strong>in</strong>vestor confidence, improv<strong>in</strong>g profitability of key players and <strong>the</strong> implementationof London Underground’s Public Private Partnership.PrioritiesThe priority is to accelerate growth with<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> bus<strong>in</strong>ess by:■ Consolidat<strong>in</strong>g and enhanc<strong>in</strong>g our position <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> UK■ Extend<strong>in</strong>g our position <strong>in</strong> Europe■ Deliver<strong>in</strong>g new high value <strong>technology</strong> and products■ Identify<strong>in</strong>g suitable, earn<strong>in</strong>gs enhanc<strong>in</strong>g acquisitions.Outlook for <strong>the</strong> marketThe outlook rema<strong>in</strong>s very positive for <strong>the</strong> bus<strong>in</strong>ess. Investment <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> rail <strong>in</strong>dustryis <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g and we are well positioned to cont<strong>in</strong>ue strong growth.


12<strong>AEA</strong> TECHNOLOGY PLCAnnual report 2002Bus<strong>in</strong>ess reviewEnvironmentVision and strategyOur vision is to be recognised as a <strong>lead<strong>in</strong>g</strong> provider of energy and environmentalsolutions to governments, agencies and <strong>in</strong>dustry <strong>in</strong> Europe and North America.Our strategy is to focus on public sector customers like <strong>the</strong> UK government, which isdriv<strong>in</strong>g and def<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> marketplace, and high added value niches <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> privatesector such as environmental <strong>in</strong>formation management systems.Stuart HillManag<strong>in</strong>g DirectorPerformanceThis was a year of good progress. Sales were up 21% (7% exclud<strong>in</strong>g acquisitions)on last year’s figures to £49.4 million and operat<strong>in</strong>g profit (before exceptionaloperat<strong>in</strong>g items) was up 14% to £7.9 million. Our cash performance was excellentwith operat<strong>in</strong>g cash flow exceed<strong>in</strong>g operat<strong>in</strong>g profit.Our immediate priorities are to cont<strong>in</strong>ue to grow <strong>the</strong> UK base and target highervalue sectors, enhance marg<strong>in</strong>s through better resource utilisation and ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong>high levels of customer service <strong>in</strong> a rapidly chang<strong>in</strong>g market. In <strong>the</strong> longer term,we are look<strong>in</strong>g to use <strong>the</strong> <strong>technology</strong> and expertise developed by K<strong>in</strong>ectrics Inc toleverage our position <strong>in</strong> North America.Bus<strong>in</strong>ess highlightsAcquisitionA key highlight was <strong>the</strong> acquisition of K<strong>in</strong>ectrics Inc from Ontario Power Generation<strong>in</strong> Canada which will br<strong>in</strong>g expertise <strong>in</strong> multiple pollutant control, air qualitymodell<strong>in</strong>g and emission measurements. It will streng<strong>the</strong>n our energy and air qualitycapability, as well as giv<strong>in</strong>g access to North America and entry <strong>in</strong>to <strong>the</strong> power sector.“SALES WEREUP 21% ANDOPERATINGPROFIT UP14%”Restructur<strong>in</strong>gDur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> year we completed <strong>the</strong> restructur<strong>in</strong>g of <strong>the</strong> bus<strong>in</strong>ess <strong>in</strong>to four bus<strong>in</strong>essunits focused on energy/climate change, public sector programme management,environmental consultancy and monitor<strong>in</strong>g and environmental software solutions.Each are leaders <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir respective market sectors. The acquisition of K<strong>in</strong>ectrics Incadded a North American dimension. We exited non-core market activities and asmall number of operations which were fail<strong>in</strong>g to match expectations.Steven Tell<strong>in</strong>g – one of <strong>AEA</strong>’s Air PollutionSpecialists who <strong>in</strong>stall and check particulatemonitor<strong>in</strong>g equipment throughout <strong>the</strong> UK.


OXFORD STREET AT 4.30AM ON 10 JUNE. THE SUNIS RISING AND SO IS THE POLLUTION LEVEL.<strong>AEA</strong> TECHNOLOGY HAS SMART MONITORING SYSTEMSTO RECORD CRUCIAL DATA FOR GOVERNMENT.


14<strong>AEA</strong> TECHNOLOGY PLCAnnual report 2002Bus<strong>in</strong>ess reviewEnvironmentContract w<strong>in</strong>sOur primary customer rema<strong>in</strong>s <strong>the</strong> UK government from whom a number of keycontracts were won and renewed. A particular highlight was <strong>the</strong> £7.5 million peryear contract for advice and implementation of energy programmes. This was <strong>the</strong>first competitive tender for this programme for 15 years. We were successful <strong>in</strong>reta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g significant contracts with DEFRA and <strong>the</strong> Environment Agency for airquality monitor<strong>in</strong>g.Notable successes overseas <strong>in</strong>cluded our work with Ch<strong>in</strong>a to improve wastemanagement and advis<strong>in</strong>g European countries want<strong>in</strong>g to jo<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> EU on improv<strong>in</strong>g<strong>the</strong>ir environmental legislation.Future growthThe global market is be<strong>in</strong>g driven by governments seek<strong>in</strong>g to honour <strong>in</strong>ternationalcommitments and respond to domestic pressure. In <strong>the</strong> future this legislativeframework will accelerate private sector spend<strong>in</strong>g. Current trends are towards<strong>in</strong>tegrated or smart solutions which prevent pollution from aris<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> first place.In <strong>the</strong> UK, net government spend<strong>in</strong>g on environmental protection alone has grownby nearly 8% per annum over <strong>the</strong> last four years and now stands at about£4 billion. We are well positioned to address sectors such as waste management,environmental audit<strong>in</strong>g, risk assessment, government policy, air pollution andenvironmental management systems, giv<strong>in</strong>g us a total accessible market of about£450 million.Market driversIn our core public sector market <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> UK, <strong>the</strong> focus is on areas such as climatechange, renewable energy, landfill and <strong>in</strong>tegrated pollution control. Priorities <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong><strong>most</strong> recent UK budget were on tackl<strong>in</strong>g air quality and climate change.We are well placed to advise and deliver solutions on <strong>the</strong>se key areas by draw<strong>in</strong>g onour understand<strong>in</strong>g of <strong>the</strong> UK government and <strong>the</strong> European Union. We have been <strong>in</strong><strong>the</strong> forefront of develop<strong>in</strong>g and implement<strong>in</strong>g environmental policy and have over25 years of work<strong>in</strong>g with public sector organisations to turn policy <strong>in</strong>to practicalachievements.Because of our unparalleled knowl<strong>edge</strong>, we understand what environmentallegislation is try<strong>in</strong>g to achieve and how it affects bus<strong>in</strong>ess. Bus<strong>in</strong>ess is concernedabout comply<strong>in</strong>g with legislation, performance optimisation, manag<strong>in</strong>g liabilitiesand protect<strong>in</strong>g corporate image. We help bus<strong>in</strong>ess turn legislation <strong>in</strong>to opportunity,develop<strong>in</strong>g smart solutions to reduce <strong>the</strong> cost of compliance and exploit <strong>the</strong>opportunities for improv<strong>in</strong>g our environment. In short, we help and advisebus<strong>in</strong>esses to keep legal, protect <strong>the</strong>ir reputation, manage liabilities, staycompetitive and improve <strong>the</strong> environment. For example, our software expertise helps<strong>in</strong>tegrate environmental data with bus<strong>in</strong>ess systems and to meet environment,health and safety legislation.


15<strong>AEA</strong> TECHNOLOGY PLCAnnual report 2002Bus<strong>in</strong>ess reviewEnvironmentPrioritiesThe priority is to ensure we rema<strong>in</strong> fully aligned to <strong>the</strong> needs of <strong>the</strong> grow<strong>in</strong>genvironment market by:■ Cont<strong>in</strong>u<strong>in</strong>g to enhance <strong>the</strong> performance of our sector-<strong>lead<strong>in</strong>g</strong> bus<strong>in</strong>esses■ Us<strong>in</strong>g smart solutions to drive organic growth, particularly <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> private sector■ Seek<strong>in</strong>g out acquisitions which add value by streng<strong>the</strong>n<strong>in</strong>g our market positions.Outlook for <strong>the</strong> marketThe outlook for <strong>the</strong> market <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> UK and <strong>in</strong>ternationally is positive. We anticipatecont<strong>in</strong>ued strong growth <strong>in</strong> our target markets, which we are well positioned tocapitalise on.


16<strong>AEA</strong> TECHNOLOGY PLCAnnual report 2002Operat<strong>in</strong>g bus<strong>in</strong>essesFuture TechnologiesBattery SystemsSupplies specialist cells, batteries and battery <strong>technology</strong>.Subsidiaries:■ <strong>AEA</strong> Technology Battery Systems Limited offers custom-designed batteriesand chargers.■ AGM Batteries Limited produces specialist lithium-ion cells for <strong>in</strong>dustrial and nonconsumerapplications.AccentusInvention, development and exploitation of <strong>in</strong>tellectual property.Subsidiaries:■ Accentus plc was established on 1 April 2001 to <strong>in</strong>vent, develop and exploitan IP portfolio. Key technologies are <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> fields of non-<strong>the</strong>rmal plasmas andcatalysis; vortex process<strong>in</strong>g and mix<strong>in</strong>g; process <strong>in</strong>tensification; electrochemistry;sonocrystalisation; materials; and bio-pharmaceutical manufactur<strong>in</strong>g.■ <strong>AEA</strong> Technology Eng<strong>in</strong>eer<strong>in</strong>g Services Inc delivers structural eng<strong>in</strong>eer<strong>in</strong>g anddesign and non-destructive test<strong>in</strong>g for power generation companies and utilities<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> US, Europe and Japan.Value RealisationProvides high-tech systems for space, defence, nuclear, f<strong>in</strong>e chemicals andpharmaceutical markets. Supplies products and services to maximise plant value.Expertise focuses on eng<strong>in</strong>eer<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>tegrity, <strong>in</strong>spection, modell<strong>in</strong>g performance,safety and risk management.Subsidiaries:■ ERG Environmental Resource Group specialises <strong>in</strong> design<strong>in</strong>g and construct<strong>in</strong>g airpollution control equipment, process plant and liquid effluent treatment plantswith<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> manufactur<strong>in</strong>g and water <strong>in</strong>dustries.■ Forensic Alliance Limited provides forensic science services for UK police forcesand o<strong>the</strong>r customers.


17<strong>AEA</strong> TECHNOLOGY PLCAnnual report 2002Bus<strong>in</strong>ess reviewValue developmentValue developmentWe have three pr<strong>in</strong>cipal bus<strong>in</strong>esses <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> value development portfolio, BatterySystems, Accentus and QSA. The aim is to nurture <strong>the</strong>se bus<strong>in</strong>esses through a two tothree year <strong>in</strong>vestment programme which will <strong>in</strong>crease value significantly. In thistimeframe, we will decide on <strong>the</strong> best means of captur<strong>in</strong>g this developed value.Battery Systems’ and Accentus’ performance is <strong>in</strong>cluded with<strong>in</strong> Future Technologies.QSA is <strong>in</strong>cluded with<strong>in</strong> Nuclear Technology.Value development turnover was £65.8 million and made an operat<strong>in</strong>g loss (beforeexceptional operat<strong>in</strong>g items) of £8.4 million.Battery SystemsDur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> year we completed <strong>the</strong> restructur<strong>in</strong>g of <strong>the</strong> bus<strong>in</strong>ess by transferr<strong>in</strong>g ouroperations to Thurso, Scotland.There were two ma<strong>in</strong> highlights for <strong>the</strong> year. The first was <strong>the</strong> launch of a newKaizen cell <strong>in</strong> September which set new standards for cell performance and hasattracted worldwide <strong>in</strong>terest. The second was <strong>the</strong> award of a multi-million poundcontract by General Dynamics UK Ltd to <strong>the</strong> bus<strong>in</strong>ess to advise on and supplyportable power systems for <strong>the</strong> M<strong>in</strong>istry of Defence’s BOWMAN programme.The contract represented a major breakthrough for <strong>the</strong> bus<strong>in</strong>ess. It provides a strongplatform from which we will seek o<strong>the</strong>r markets where customers demand our highadded value service and products.AccentusThere were 80 new <strong>in</strong>ventions dur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> year and we anticipate generat<strong>in</strong>g morethan 500 patents per annum by 2005. Silver II successfully completed a$20 million programme for <strong>the</strong> US Army. We now await <strong>the</strong> US Army selectiondecision. Nuclear Fluidics cont<strong>in</strong>ued its successful work with <strong>the</strong> US Department ofEnvironment. Electrocat signed a jo<strong>in</strong>t development agreement with JEBERSPACHER GMBH & COKG, Europe’s largest <strong>in</strong>dependent exhaust systems manufacturer.BOC Edwards signed a jo<strong>in</strong>t development agreement for our plasma freon abatement<strong>technology</strong>.QSAThe restructur<strong>in</strong>g of <strong>the</strong> manufactur<strong>in</strong>g capability from <strong>the</strong> UK to Germany hasproceeded well. We enjoyed early successes <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> new medical bus<strong>in</strong>ess, forexample, <strong>the</strong> strategic alliance with Novoste, and made significant <strong>in</strong>vestment <strong>in</strong>medical <strong>the</strong>rapies.QSA reversed a loss-mak<strong>in</strong>g trend to achieve an operat<strong>in</strong>g profit <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> second halfof <strong>the</strong> year. This was supported by early impacts of our cost reduction plans. An<strong>in</strong>tegral part of our programme is to cont<strong>in</strong>ue to capitalise on our successful jo<strong>in</strong>tventure <strong>in</strong> Ch<strong>in</strong>a, where turnover <strong>in</strong>creased by 90% dur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> year.


18<strong>AEA</strong> TECHNOLOGY PLCAnnual report 2002Operat<strong>in</strong>g bus<strong>in</strong>essesNuclear TechnologyQSASupplies process control, smoke detection and radiographic <strong>in</strong>spection products.Services <strong>in</strong>clude product tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g and ma<strong>in</strong>tenance, application consultancy andrecycl<strong>in</strong>g.Subsidiaries:■ <strong>AEA</strong> Technology Limited (registered <strong>in</strong> Hong Kong) offers customer services forQSA products <strong>in</strong> Pacific Rim countries.■ <strong>AEA</strong> Technology QSA GmbH manufactures sources for calibration and medicalpurposes. It also conditions, and disposes of, waste residues from medical and<strong>in</strong>dustrial clients.■ <strong>AEA</strong> Technology QSA Inc manufactures Sent<strong>in</strong>el products, which serve <strong>the</strong>non-destructive test<strong>in</strong>g market.■ Shenzhen CIC-<strong>AEA</strong> Technology Manufactur<strong>in</strong>g Co Limited manufactures detectionunits for smoke alarms.Nuclear ProgrammesUses its nuclear facilities and expertise to help its customers optimise <strong>the</strong>performance and safety of <strong>the</strong>ir plants and to manage <strong>the</strong>ir waste aris<strong>in</strong>gs <strong>in</strong> anenvironmentally acceptable and efficient manner.Nuclear Eng<strong>in</strong>eer<strong>in</strong>gOffers comprehensive nuclear plant expertise, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g plant design, build andcommission<strong>in</strong>g, eng<strong>in</strong>eer<strong>in</strong>g consultancy, operational support and decommission<strong>in</strong>g.This bus<strong>in</strong>ess was disposed of on 1 October 2001.Nuclear Consult<strong>in</strong>gProvides safety and risk management services to ensure <strong>the</strong> safety and efficiencyof plant, processes and systems. The safety bus<strong>in</strong>ess centres on nuclear customers.This bus<strong>in</strong>ess was disposed of on 10 September 2001.


19<strong>AEA</strong> TECHNOLOGY PLCAnnual report 2002Bus<strong>in</strong>ess reviewO<strong>the</strong>r bus<strong>in</strong>essesEng<strong>in</strong>eer<strong>in</strong>g SoftwareOur Eng<strong>in</strong>eer<strong>in</strong>g Software bus<strong>in</strong>ess was split <strong>in</strong>to two separate operations dur<strong>in</strong>g<strong>the</strong> year <strong>in</strong> preparation for <strong>the</strong>ir divestment. The Hyprotech bus<strong>in</strong>ess was sold <strong>in</strong>May 2002, and <strong>the</strong> CFX bus<strong>in</strong>ess will be marketed <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> near future.HyprotechHyprotech cont<strong>in</strong>ued <strong>the</strong> development of its suite of three pr<strong>in</strong>cipal softwarefamilies, HYSYS, BaSYS and AXSYS, launch<strong>in</strong>g new software aimed at broaden<strong>in</strong>g itsusage base. At <strong>the</strong> same time it streaml<strong>in</strong>ed product development processes toimprove efficiency.The bus<strong>in</strong>ess was successful <strong>in</strong> secur<strong>in</strong>g an <strong>in</strong>creased number of multi-year licenceagreements from customers committed to us<strong>in</strong>g Hyprotech’s applications throughout<strong>the</strong>ir process operations. These deals helped deliver a 5% growth <strong>in</strong> sales.CFXCFX <strong>in</strong>vested heavily <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> development of a new core product, CFX-5, to replace itstwo legacy products, CFX-4 and CFX-TASCflow. CFX-5 has been launched to criticalacclaim with<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>dustry and is beg<strong>in</strong>n<strong>in</strong>g to capture competitor accounts. Thebus<strong>in</strong>ess also <strong>in</strong>vested <strong>in</strong> a start-up bus<strong>in</strong>ess, EASA, whose product, launched <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong>latter part of <strong>the</strong> year, promises to make complex software more easily accessible to awide user base. These developments helped to achieve growth <strong>in</strong> sales and streng<strong>the</strong>n<strong>the</strong> bus<strong>in</strong>ess’ market position.Nuclear ProgrammesNuclear Programmes’ performance is <strong>in</strong>cluded <strong>in</strong> Nuclear Technology.Nuclear Programmes covers <strong>the</strong> work to complete <strong>the</strong> rema<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g disposals andclosures of <strong>AEA</strong> Technology’s nuclear bus<strong>in</strong>ess activities.Follow<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> successful sale of Nuclear Consult<strong>in</strong>g and Nuclear Eng<strong>in</strong>eer<strong>in</strong>g, goodprogress was made <strong>in</strong> prepar<strong>in</strong>g for <strong>the</strong> regulatory approvals required for <strong>the</strong> sale ofNuclear Science. The focus of Nuclear Programmes is to complete <strong>the</strong> disposal andclosure of <strong>the</strong> rema<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g bus<strong>in</strong>ess streams safely, promptly and cost effectively.


20<strong>AEA</strong> TECHNOLOGY PLCAnnual report 2002Operat<strong>in</strong>g bus<strong>in</strong>essesEng<strong>in</strong>eer<strong>in</strong>g SoftwareEng<strong>in</strong>eer<strong>in</strong>g SoftwareOffers eng<strong>in</strong>eer<strong>in</strong>g software and support services for manufactur<strong>in</strong>g, chemical andprocess <strong>in</strong>dustries, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g process design, fluid eng<strong>in</strong>eer<strong>in</strong>g and heat transfer.Subsidiaries:■ Hyprotech Limited specialises <strong>in</strong> process simulation software. It provides<strong>in</strong>tegrated and value-added solutions to major operators <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> oil andgas markets.■ Hyprotech Inc provides Hyprotech products to <strong>the</strong> US.■ Hyprotech Europe SL supplies Hyprotech products <strong>in</strong> Europe.■ <strong>AEA</strong> Hyprotech Japan Limited supplies eng<strong>in</strong>eer<strong>in</strong>g software to Japan.■ EA Systems Inc offers plant design systems and consultancy.■ <strong>AEA</strong> Technology Eng<strong>in</strong>eer<strong>in</strong>g Software Inc and <strong>AEA</strong> Technology Eng<strong>in</strong>eer<strong>in</strong>gSoftware Limited (registered <strong>in</strong> Canada) both serve customers <strong>in</strong> North Americawith computational fluid dynamic software.■ <strong>AEA</strong> Technology Eng<strong>in</strong>eer<strong>in</strong>g Software Limited supplies CFX products <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> UK.■ <strong>AEA</strong> Technology GmbH provides eng<strong>in</strong>eer<strong>in</strong>g software licences and consultancy<strong>in</strong> Germany.■ <strong>AEA</strong> Technology Sarl resells eng<strong>in</strong>eer<strong>in</strong>g software <strong>in</strong> France.


21<strong>AEA</strong> TECHNOLOGY PLCAnnual report 2002F<strong>in</strong>ancial reviewIntroductionThe Group’s strategy is to focus on its core Rail and Environment bus<strong>in</strong>esses, to <strong>in</strong>vest<strong>in</strong> its value development bus<strong>in</strong>esses namely Accentus, Battery Systems and QSA and todispose of <strong>the</strong> rema<strong>in</strong>der. The resultant acquisitions and disposals toge<strong>the</strong>r with <strong>the</strong>restructur<strong>in</strong>g activity undertaken limit <strong>the</strong> mean<strong>in</strong>gfulness of year on yearcomparisons. This review seeks to highlight <strong>the</strong> transactions and trends <strong>in</strong>operat<strong>in</strong>g results that will aid <strong>in</strong>terpretation of <strong>the</strong> Group’s performance.Profit on ord<strong>in</strong>ary activities before taxationProfit before taxation was £13.5 million (2001: loss before taxation £17.2 million),reflect<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> exceptional net profit on sale of bus<strong>in</strong>esses dur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> year. The largestdivestment, Nuclear Consult<strong>in</strong>g, generated a profit on disposal of £61.0 millionwhilst o<strong>the</strong>r disposals resulted <strong>in</strong> a loss of £7.3 million (see note 32).Operat<strong>in</strong>g resultsThe results of discont<strong>in</strong>ued operations are shown separately on <strong>the</strong> face of <strong>the</strong>Consolidated Profit and Loss Account and <strong>in</strong>clude <strong>the</strong> results of Hyprotech asdescribed <strong>in</strong> note 38. A segmental analysis of turnover and of operat<strong>in</strong>g profit beforeand after exceptional items is given <strong>in</strong> note 3. The 2002 full year and half-year resultsof <strong>the</strong> bus<strong>in</strong>esses are analysed below <strong>in</strong> accordance with <strong>the</strong> Group’s strategy.Operat<strong>in</strong>g profit/(loss) beforeOperat<strong>in</strong>g profit/(loss) beforeTurnover exceptional items Turnover exceptional itemsFull year Full year Half-year Half-year2002 2002 2002 2002£m £m £m £mRail 75.3 12.3 36.7 4.4Environment 49.4 7.9 19.3 3.5Core bus<strong>in</strong>ess 124.7 20.2 56.0 7.9Accentus 23.4 (3.7) 11.8 (1.1)Battery Systems 7.0 (4.2) 1.7 (2.8)QSA 35.4 (0.5) 17.9 (1.3)Value development 65.8 (8.4) 31.4 (5.2)Value Realisation 16.0 (1.8) 8.8 0.1Eng<strong>in</strong>eer<strong>in</strong>g Software 13.3 (1.6) 6.4 (1.2)Nuclear Programmes 23.8 (5.0) 8.9 (2.0)Disposal programme 53.1 (8.4) 24.1 (3.1)Nuclear Eng<strong>in</strong>eer<strong>in</strong>g 17.9 (1.1) 17.5 (0.4)Nuclear Consult<strong>in</strong>g 15.8 2.6 15.8 2.9Value Realisation 15.0 (1.3) 9.0 (1.9)Eng<strong>in</strong>eer<strong>in</strong>g Software 33.3 0.2 17.4 0.8Disposed bus<strong>in</strong>esses 82.0 0.4 59.7 1.4Central items 8.8 (13.4) 2.5 (7.0)Total 334.4 (9.6) 173.7 (6.0)


22<strong>AEA</strong> TECHNOLOGY PLCAnnual report 2002F<strong>in</strong>ancial reviewThe operat<strong>in</strong>g loss pr<strong>in</strong>cipally arises as Accentus, Battery Systems and QSA are <strong>in</strong> adevelopment phase and <strong>in</strong>curr<strong>in</strong>g losses. The Board is confident that <strong>the</strong> cont<strong>in</strong>u<strong>in</strong>g<strong>in</strong>vestment <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong>se bus<strong>in</strong>esses is worthwhile and will add value.The Group has changed its policy on <strong>the</strong> recognition of <strong>in</strong>come on software license salesas described <strong>in</strong> note 1. Under <strong>the</strong> new account<strong>in</strong>g policy <strong>the</strong> full contract value isspread over <strong>the</strong> period of <strong>the</strong> contract. As a result, turnover to 31 March 2002decreased by £19.5 million and operat<strong>in</strong>g profit decreased by £17.0 million.AcquisitionsAcquisitions made <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> year are detailed <strong>in</strong> note 31. Rail acquisitions generated£2.1 million of sales <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> year. K<strong>in</strong>ectrics Inc added £6.0 million of sales with<strong>in</strong>Environment <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> three months s<strong>in</strong>ce its acquisition but low profit due toseasonal factors.Exceptional itemsThe profit on disposals and costs of term<strong>in</strong>ation of operations described abovecontributed respectively a net profit of £53.7 million and a loss of £5.9 million.These items relate to discont<strong>in</strong>ued bus<strong>in</strong>ess streams and are reported below operat<strong>in</strong>gprofit. Fur<strong>the</strong>r details are given <strong>in</strong> notes 11 and 32.In addition fur<strong>the</strong>r steps were taken with<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> cont<strong>in</strong>u<strong>in</strong>g bus<strong>in</strong>ess streams torestructure <strong>the</strong> Group <strong>in</strong> order to focus on areas of strength, elim<strong>in</strong>ate loss-mak<strong>in</strong>gactivities, reduce costs and rationalise <strong>the</strong> Group. As a result exceptional operat<strong>in</strong>gcharges of £21.1 million (2001: £24.0 million) were <strong>in</strong>curred as follows:■ £1.2 million <strong>in</strong> Future Technologies, cover<strong>in</strong>g redundancies aris<strong>in</strong>g from cont<strong>in</strong>u<strong>in</strong>grationalisation of products and services follow<strong>in</strong>g review by management of <strong>the</strong>bus<strong>in</strong>ess’s strategic direction and contract portfolio.■ £3.5 million <strong>in</strong> Nuclear Technology, for redundancy costs and £0.9 million o<strong>the</strong>rcosts relat<strong>in</strong>g to <strong>the</strong> decision to exit from <strong>the</strong> Harwell B220 facilities over <strong>the</strong>next two years.■ £5.2 million of additional decommission<strong>in</strong>g and waste costs identified follow<strong>in</strong>g areview of <strong>the</strong> B220 operations and exit plans.■ £1.8 million <strong>in</strong> Nuclear Technology cover<strong>in</strong>g redundancy costs relat<strong>in</strong>g to <strong>the</strong> decisionto cease QSA manufactur<strong>in</strong>g activities <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> UK.■ £7.6 million of o<strong>the</strong>r redundancy costs (£4.6 million <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> Corporate Centre),result<strong>in</strong>g from rationalisation of activities with<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> Group.■ £0.9 million of Offer Period costs.Research and DevelopmentResearch and development expenditure <strong>in</strong>creased by £3.5 million to £18.2 million.Details of research and development projects undertaken are given <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> Directors’report on page 30.


23<strong>AEA</strong> TECHNOLOGY PLCAnnual report 2002F<strong>in</strong>ancial reviewInterestNet <strong>in</strong>terest charges decreased from £5.5 million to £3.6 million, due to <strong>the</strong> reduction<strong>in</strong> net debt from £67.8 million to £15.4 million follow<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> net receipt of£83.0 million on disposal of bus<strong>in</strong>esses.TaxationThe Group taxation credit of £8.8 million (2001: £5.4 million) on <strong>the</strong> profit before taxation(note 14) arises because tax relief is available on <strong>the</strong> Group’s trad<strong>in</strong>g losses andexceptional operat<strong>in</strong>g restructur<strong>in</strong>g costs and because <strong>the</strong>re is no capital ga<strong>in</strong>s taxationpayable on <strong>the</strong> disposals. This is due to <strong>the</strong> high tax basis that <strong>AEA</strong> Technology plc has <strong>in</strong>those divested bus<strong>in</strong>esses.The tax credit on <strong>the</strong> loss before taxation and exceptional items of £13.2 million is£1.1 million, giv<strong>in</strong>g an effective tax rate of 8.3%. The key factors <strong>in</strong>fluenc<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> rateof tax are higher tax rates <strong>in</strong> overseas jurisdictions such as Germany, Japan and Canada,irrecoverable overseas taxes and unrelieved losses <strong>in</strong> certa<strong>in</strong> subsidiary companies.The Group has implemented F<strong>in</strong>ancial Report<strong>in</strong>g Standard 19: Deferred Taxation andhas recognised a net deferred tax asset of £13.0 million (2001: £0.1 million).Cash flow and borrow<strong>in</strong>gsAs a consequence of cash received on disposals, year-end net debt has reduced by£52.4 million to £15.4 million (2001: £67.8 million) and hence net <strong>in</strong>terest paid hasdecreased from £5.0 million to £4.1 million.The operat<strong>in</strong>g cash <strong>in</strong>flow before exceptional items reduced by £32.6 million and <strong>in</strong>addition a cash outflow of £8.6 million was <strong>in</strong>curred <strong>in</strong> respect of exceptionaloperat<strong>in</strong>g charges and closure costs. The key factor for <strong>the</strong> decrease <strong>in</strong> operat<strong>in</strong>gcashflows is <strong>the</strong> £21.7 million reduction <strong>in</strong> operat<strong>in</strong>g profit, of which £16.8 million isdue to <strong>the</strong> disposal of Nuclear Consult<strong>in</strong>g and Nuclear Eng<strong>in</strong>eer<strong>in</strong>g.Purchases of tangible fixed assets totalled £9.2 million (2001: £6.4 million). The <strong>in</strong>crease<strong>in</strong> capital expenditure is due to <strong>in</strong>vestment <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> Battery Systems’ manufactur<strong>in</strong>gfacility, new premises <strong>in</strong> Derby for Rail and a facility for <strong>the</strong> production ofYttrium-90 ma<strong>in</strong>ly for use <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> medical <strong>in</strong>dustry. Disposals of tangible fixed assetstotalled £1.1 million (2001: £0.3 million).


24<strong>AEA</strong> TECHNOLOGY PLCAnnual report 2002F<strong>in</strong>ancial reviewPurchases of subsidiaries totalled £7.6 million (2001: £6.5 million) which represented£0.6 million deferred payments on acquisitions made <strong>in</strong> previous years and £7.0 millionrelat<strong>in</strong>g to acquisitions made dur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> year (note 31). The pr<strong>in</strong>cipal acquisitions <strong>in</strong><strong>the</strong> year were <strong>in</strong> Environment and Rail. Environment acquired K<strong>in</strong>ectrics Inc, <strong>the</strong>power <strong>technology</strong> arm of Ontario Power Generation, for £5.3 million. Acquisitions <strong>in</strong>Rail were SoMat Corporation Inc £0.8 million, a company which designs and manufacturesdata acquisition hardware and accompany<strong>in</strong>g software for <strong>the</strong> automotive <strong>in</strong>dustry,and ERSA Sarl £0.5 million, a company which develops software for European RailTraffic Management Systems. The group disposed of several bus<strong>in</strong>esses dur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong>year to enhance fur<strong>the</strong>r <strong>the</strong> focus on its core activities (note 32). The net cash receiptsfrom <strong>the</strong>se disposals amounted to £83.0 million (2001: £4.0 million) generat<strong>in</strong>g aprofit on disposal of £53.7 million (2001: £1.1 million). The pr<strong>in</strong>cipal disposals were<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> Nuclear Technology bus<strong>in</strong>ess: Nuclear Consult<strong>in</strong>g net cash £66.9 million andNuclear Eng<strong>in</strong>eer<strong>in</strong>g net cash £15.8 million. Fur<strong>the</strong>r cash outflows will be <strong>in</strong>curred<strong>in</strong> future years on <strong>the</strong>se disposals as accrued outstand<strong>in</strong>g costs are paid. The currentestimate is that future payments could total £14.6 million over <strong>the</strong> next one tofive years.The Group f<strong>in</strong>ances its operations through a comb<strong>in</strong>ation of reta<strong>in</strong>ed profits, bankoverdrafts, a revolv<strong>in</strong>g credit facility, and a seven-year private placement facility.Risk management and treasury policiesThe Board has an established risk management process that complies with <strong>the</strong> TurnbullCommittee guidance on <strong>in</strong>ternal control. This is detailed <strong>in</strong> Corporate Governance onpages 34 to 37.Treasury managementThe Group uses various f<strong>in</strong>ancial <strong>in</strong>struments <strong>in</strong> order to manage <strong>the</strong> exposures thatarise <strong>in</strong> its bus<strong>in</strong>ess operations as a result of movements <strong>in</strong> f<strong>in</strong>ancial markets. TheGroup does not undertake speculative foreign exchange or <strong>in</strong>terest rate deal<strong>in</strong>gs forwhich <strong>the</strong>re is no underly<strong>in</strong>g exposure. Treasury deal<strong>in</strong>gs such as <strong>in</strong>vestments,borrow<strong>in</strong>gs and foreign exchange are conducted only to support underly<strong>in</strong>g bus<strong>in</strong>esstransactions. All treasury activities are focused on <strong>the</strong> management of risk. Therehave been no significant changes <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> Group’s policies <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> last year. The ma<strong>in</strong>risk cont<strong>in</strong>ues to be movements <strong>in</strong> foreign currency exchange rates. All such exposuresare managed by <strong>the</strong> Group Treasury function, which reports to <strong>the</strong> Group F<strong>in</strong>anceDirector and operates with<strong>in</strong> written policies approved by <strong>the</strong> Board and with<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong><strong>in</strong>ternal control framework.


25<strong>AEA</strong> TECHNOLOGY PLCAnnual report 2002F<strong>in</strong>ancial reviewForeign exchangeThe Group is exposed to movements <strong>in</strong> exchange rates for foreign currency transactionsand for <strong>the</strong> translation of net assets and profit and loss accounts of foreign subsidiaries.Where <strong>the</strong> Group has a significant overseas operation, foreign currency borrow<strong>in</strong>gsare utilised to protect <strong>the</strong> Group’s balance sheet from <strong>the</strong> movement <strong>in</strong> exchange rates.The Group is exposed to a number of currencies. The <strong>most</strong> significant transactionalcurrency exposures are <strong>the</strong> US dollar, Canadian dollar, Japanese yen and <strong>the</strong> Euro.The Group seeks to h<strong>edge</strong> its transactional exposure us<strong>in</strong>g a variety of f<strong>in</strong>ancial<strong>in</strong>struments. Exposures result<strong>in</strong>g from sales and purchases <strong>in</strong> foreign currencies arematched where possible and <strong>the</strong> net exposure may be h<strong>edge</strong>d by <strong>the</strong> use of forwardcurrency transactions. The objective is to m<strong>in</strong>imise <strong>the</strong> impact of fluctuations <strong>in</strong>exchange rates on future transactions and cash flows.Credit risk managementThe Group’s policy is to monitor and manage its exposure to counter-parties.Interest rate riskThe Group borrows <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> required currencies at both fixed and float<strong>in</strong>g rates of <strong>in</strong>terestand <strong>the</strong>n uses <strong>in</strong>terest rate swaps to generate <strong>the</strong> desired <strong>in</strong>terest rate profile tomanage <strong>the</strong> Group’s exposure to <strong>in</strong>terest rate fluctuations. The Group’s policy is to achievea fund<strong>in</strong>g profile such that at least 50% net fund<strong>in</strong>g is on a fixed basis. Imbalanceswhich are likely to persist for more than a year are corrected us<strong>in</strong>g hedg<strong>in</strong>g techniques.At 31 March 2002 £7.0 million (13%) of <strong>the</strong> Group debt was <strong>in</strong> US dollars, with <strong>the</strong>rema<strong>in</strong>der <strong>in</strong> sterl<strong>in</strong>g or US dollars swapped <strong>in</strong>to sterl<strong>in</strong>g.Shareholders’ return and valueEarn<strong>in</strong>gs per share <strong>in</strong>creased to 25.3p (2001: (12.9)p). After adjust<strong>in</strong>g for exceptionaloperat<strong>in</strong>g charges, profit on sale of bus<strong>in</strong>esses, loss on term<strong>in</strong>ation of operations andamortisation of goodwill earn<strong>in</strong>gs per share fell to (11.4)p (2001: 10.6p).No f<strong>in</strong>al dividend is proposed, br<strong>in</strong>g<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> total dividend for <strong>the</strong> year to 3.8p pershare. The dividend is covered 6.6 times by earn<strong>in</strong>gs.Dur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> year <strong>AEA</strong> Technology shares rose from 157.5p per share at 1 April 2001 to260.5p per share at 31 March 2002. The Company’s shares ranged <strong>in</strong> price from156.5p <strong>in</strong> April 2001 to 348.5p <strong>in</strong> August 2001.Information <strong>technology</strong>Investment <strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>formation <strong>technology</strong> (IT) is cont<strong>in</strong>u<strong>in</strong>g with <strong>the</strong> emphasis on<strong>in</strong>frastructure and network development <strong>in</strong> order to fur<strong>the</strong>r exploit web basedtechnologies and services both for our <strong>in</strong>ternal management <strong>in</strong>formation systems andfor our customers. The outsourc<strong>in</strong>g agreement has been renegotiated to deliver moreflexible IT services and significant cost sav<strong>in</strong>gs to <strong>the</strong> Group over <strong>the</strong> next three years.


26<strong>AEA</strong> TECHNOLOGY PLCAnnual report 2002F<strong>in</strong>ancial reviewAccount<strong>in</strong>g policiesAdescription of <strong>the</strong> pr<strong>in</strong>cipal account<strong>in</strong>g policies appears on pages 52 to 54. The policiesfollowed are consistent with those applied last year except for <strong>the</strong> implementation of<strong>the</strong> follow<strong>in</strong>g new account<strong>in</strong>g standards:■ F<strong>in</strong>ancial Report<strong>in</strong>g Standard 17: Retirement Benefits has a phased implementation,beg<strong>in</strong>n<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> 2002 for disclosure, with full implementation <strong>in</strong> 2004. The newdisclosures are given <strong>in</strong> note 9 and show a net deficit on <strong>the</strong> Group schemes of£46.1 million. From 1 April 2002 <strong>the</strong> Company <strong>in</strong>creased its contribution rate from10.9% to 13.1% to ext<strong>in</strong>guish any fund<strong>in</strong>g deficit. As a result <strong>the</strong> pension charge<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> 2003 budget is expected to <strong>in</strong>crease by broadly £4 million compared to <strong>the</strong>charge for 2002. Statement of Standard Account<strong>in</strong>g Practice 24: Account<strong>in</strong>g forPension Costs cont<strong>in</strong>ues to be used to calculate <strong>the</strong> Group pension costs <strong>in</strong> 2002.■ F<strong>in</strong>ancial Report<strong>in</strong>g Standard 18: Account<strong>in</strong>g Policies is mandatory for <strong>the</strong> 2002f<strong>in</strong>ancial statements. <strong>AEA</strong> Technology’s account<strong>in</strong>g policies have been reviewed toassess <strong>the</strong> appropriateness of all policies under this standard. This resulted <strong>in</strong>changes to our policy for recognition of software licenses as detailed <strong>in</strong> note 1.The change <strong>in</strong> policy reduced turnover and operat<strong>in</strong>g profit <strong>in</strong> 2002 by £19.5 millionand £17.0 million respectively.■ F<strong>in</strong>ancial Report<strong>in</strong>g Standard 19: Deferred Taxation is also mandatory for <strong>the</strong> 2002f<strong>in</strong>ancial statements and requires a full ra<strong>the</strong>r than partial provision for deferredtaxation. The impact of this change is detailed <strong>in</strong> note 1.Post balance sheet eventFollow<strong>in</strong>g shareholder approval, <strong>the</strong> Group disposed of <strong>the</strong> Hyprotech bus<strong>in</strong>ess on31 May 2002 for sale proceeds of £67.5 million. See note 38.David L<strong>in</strong>dsayGroup F<strong>in</strong>ance Director19 June 2002


27<strong>AEA</strong> TECHNOLOGY PLCAnnual report 2002Board of DirectorsDirectorsThe Directors of <strong>the</strong> Company dur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> year were as follows:Executive DirectorsDr Peter Watson (58) ChairmanDr Peter Watson was appo<strong>in</strong>ted Chairman <strong>in</strong> January 2002 hav<strong>in</strong>g jo<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>AEA</strong> Technologyas Chief Executive <strong>in</strong> June 1994. He chairs <strong>the</strong> Nom<strong>in</strong>ation Committee. Previously,he was with GKN plc before becom<strong>in</strong>g board member for eng<strong>in</strong>eer<strong>in</strong>g for British Rail.He is a non-executive director of Spectris plc and of <strong>the</strong> Mart<strong>in</strong> Currie EnhancedIncome Trust.David L<strong>in</strong>dsay (46) Group F<strong>in</strong>ance DirectorDavid L<strong>in</strong>dsay jo<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>the</strong> Board <strong>in</strong> September 2001 upon recruitment as Group F<strong>in</strong>anceDirector. Before jo<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g <strong>AEA</strong> Technology, he was group f<strong>in</strong>ance director, IndustrialControls Services Group, hav<strong>in</strong>g previously worked <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> UK and <strong>in</strong> France forGEC ALSTHOM and for BET plc.Andrew McCree (44) Director, Corporate Affairs and Human ResourcesAndrew McCree was appo<strong>in</strong>ted to <strong>the</strong> Board <strong>in</strong> November 2000. He has held a numberof senior posts <strong>in</strong> corporate affairs and human resources <strong>in</strong> <strong>AEA</strong> Technology and,before that, <strong>in</strong> UK<strong>AEA</strong>, which he jo<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>in</strong> 1991. He was previously with BP plc.Stephen Thornton (45) Chief Operat<strong>in</strong>g OfficerStephen Thornton jo<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>the</strong> Board <strong>in</strong> January 2001 upon his appo<strong>in</strong>tment asChief Operat<strong>in</strong>g Officer. Previously, he was manag<strong>in</strong>g director British Steel Asia beforejo<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> BOC Group where he was vice-president, Europe, Middle East, Africa.


28<strong>AEA</strong> TECHNOLOGY PLCAnnual report 2002Board of DirectorsNon-executive directorsDr Leslie Atk<strong>in</strong>son (58)Dr Leslie Atk<strong>in</strong>son was appo<strong>in</strong>ted to <strong>the</strong> Board <strong>in</strong> August 1996. He worked for manyyears with BP plc where he became chairman of BP Asia Pacific. He later was anexecutive director of Tarmac plc responsible for construction services. He is a nonexecutivedirector of Electrocomponents plc. He is a member of <strong>the</strong> Audit,Nom<strong>in</strong>ation and Remuneration Committees.Professor Michael Brady (57)Professor Michael Brady was appo<strong>in</strong>ted to <strong>the</strong> Board of <strong>AEA</strong> Technology <strong>in</strong> March1996 hav<strong>in</strong>g before that served as a non-executive member of UK<strong>AEA</strong>. He chairs <strong>the</strong>Science and Eng<strong>in</strong>eer<strong>in</strong>g Advisory Committee and is a member of <strong>the</strong> Nom<strong>in</strong>ation andRemuneration Committees. He is BP Professor of Information Eng<strong>in</strong>eer<strong>in</strong>g at OxfordUniversity, and is an executive director of Guidance Control Systems Limited, OxfordMedical Image Analysis Limited and Oxiva Limited, and deputy chairman of OxfordInstruments Limited.Lord Sharman of Redlynch (59)Lord Sharman was appo<strong>in</strong>ted to <strong>the</strong> Board of <strong>AEA</strong> Technology <strong>in</strong> March 1996 hav<strong>in</strong>gbeen a non-executive member of UK<strong>AEA</strong>. He chairs <strong>the</strong> Audit Committee and is amember of <strong>the</strong> Nom<strong>in</strong>ation Committee. Lord Sharman is chairman of Aegis plc and anon-executive director of BG Group plc and Young & Co’s Brewery plc. He retired aschairman of KPMG International <strong>in</strong> September 1999.Andrew Shilston (46)Andrew Shilston was appo<strong>in</strong>ted to <strong>the</strong> Board <strong>in</strong> August 1996. He chairs <strong>the</strong> RemunerationCommittee and is a member of <strong>the</strong> Audit and Nom<strong>in</strong>ation Committees. He was f<strong>in</strong>ancedirector of Enterprise Oil plc.Sir Anthony Cleaver resigned as Chairman <strong>in</strong> December 2001. He had also chaired <strong>the</strong>Nom<strong>in</strong>ation Committee.David L<strong>in</strong>dsay, who was appo<strong>in</strong>ted by <strong>the</strong> Board dur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> year, will retire and standfor election at <strong>the</strong> forthcom<strong>in</strong>g annual general meet<strong>in</strong>g (AGM).Dr Watson and Professor Brady will retire from <strong>the</strong> Board by rotation <strong>in</strong> accordancewith <strong>the</strong> Company’s articles of association and will seek re-election at <strong>the</strong>forthcom<strong>in</strong>g AGM.


29<strong>AEA</strong> TECHNOLOGY PLCAnnual report 2002Directors’ reportPr<strong>in</strong>cipal activities<strong>AEA</strong> Technology plc and its subsidiaries (“<strong>the</strong> Group”) is a <strong>technology</strong> and consultancybasedbus<strong>in</strong>ess which has built on its UK public sector strength to develop <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>gly<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> UK private sector and abroad. It focuses on two growth markets, Rail andEnvironment, to which it provides customers a portfolio of advanced <strong>technology</strong>products and services, expert consultancy, and deep <strong>in</strong>dustry understand<strong>in</strong>g.In addition, <strong>AEA</strong> Technology has a value development portfolio of bus<strong>in</strong>esses that<strong>in</strong>cludes Accentus, Battery Systems, and QSA.Review of <strong>the</strong> bus<strong>in</strong>ess and future developmentThe performance of <strong>the</strong> Group and its bus<strong>in</strong>ess segments is reviewed on pages 6 to 20.Results and dividendsThis year’s results are set out <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> Consolidated Profit and Loss Account onpage 47. The Directors, as part of <strong>the</strong>ir commitment to return capital toshareholders, recommend a Special Dividend of 50.0p per share with no f<strong>in</strong>aldividend <strong>in</strong> respect of 2002. Based on <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>terim dividend of 3.8p a share, paid <strong>in</strong>February 2002, this would make a total for <strong>the</strong> year of 3.8p (2001: 11.1p). Details of<strong>the</strong> proposed Special Dividend will be given to shareholders <strong>in</strong> a circular.Changes <strong>in</strong> fixed assetsDetails of changes <strong>in</strong> fixed assets, ma<strong>in</strong>ly as a result of divestments dur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> year,are given <strong>in</strong> note 19 to <strong>the</strong> f<strong>in</strong>ancial statements.Post balance sheet eventsDetails of post balance sheet events are given <strong>in</strong> note 38.Directors’ <strong>in</strong>terestsThe Directors’ service agreements and <strong>the</strong>ir <strong>in</strong>terests <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> Company’s shares aredescribed <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> Report on Directors’ Remuneration on pages 38 to 43.The only contract of significance to which <strong>the</strong> Company or any of its subsidiarycompanies is a party and <strong>in</strong> which a Director of <strong>the</strong> Company is materially <strong>in</strong>terested,is an agreement for <strong>the</strong> jo<strong>in</strong>t purchase of property with Dr Peter Watson (see section 2of <strong>the</strong> Report on Directors’ Remuneration).Share capitalThe issued ord<strong>in</strong>ary share capital <strong>in</strong>creased dur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> year by 631,732 to 89,264,839through <strong>the</strong> issue of new shares to meet <strong>the</strong> exercise of options under <strong>the</strong> Group’semployee share schemes.


30<strong>AEA</strong> TECHNOLOGY PLCAnnual report 2002Directors’ reportSubstantial shareholdersAs at 6 June 2002, <strong>the</strong> Company had been notified under section 198 of <strong>the</strong> CompaniesAct 1985 (as amended) of <strong>the</strong> follow<strong>in</strong>g notifiable <strong>in</strong>terests <strong>in</strong> its shares: SchrodersInvestment Management Limited: 17.05%, Phillips & Drew Life Limited: 3.24%.Acquisitions, jo<strong>in</strong>t ventures and new branchesAcquisitions made <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> year are detailed <strong>in</strong> note 31. The Company has 9 registeredbranches <strong>in</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r countries.Research and developmentResearch and development (R&D) expenditure was £18.2 million (2001: £14.7 million).R&D <strong>in</strong>vestment is controlled by <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>dividual bus<strong>in</strong>esses with<strong>in</strong> an overall strategicframework set by <strong>the</strong> Board. It is directed at <strong>the</strong> development of new products andventures <strong>in</strong> which <strong>the</strong> Group has a dist<strong>in</strong>ctive technological lead as well as longerterm<strong>technology</strong> developments to underp<strong>in</strong> future organic growth.In our two core bus<strong>in</strong>esses, <strong>the</strong> emphasis for R&D expenditure is on ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>gand fur<strong>the</strong>r develop<strong>in</strong>g strong positions <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir respective growth markets:■ In Rail, R&D <strong>in</strong> fields such as signall<strong>in</strong>g, safety and reliability, ma<strong>in</strong>tenance andrevenue management has been carried out <strong>in</strong> response to <strong>the</strong> cont<strong>in</strong>u<strong>in</strong>g strongdemand for advanced <strong>technology</strong>, driven by <strong>the</strong> UK’s significant and grow<strong>in</strong>g<strong>in</strong>vestment <strong>in</strong> railway <strong>in</strong>frastructure and roll<strong>in</strong>g stock.■ In Environment, R&D <strong>in</strong>vestment has focused on three major growth strands:broaden<strong>in</strong>g its position as a <strong>lead<strong>in</strong>g</strong> supplier of environmental know-how to <strong>the</strong>UK government, develop<strong>in</strong>g its capability <strong>in</strong> environmental software and <strong>in</strong>formationsystems, and develop<strong>in</strong>g products and services that respond to climate changeissues and associated regulatory changes.In <strong>the</strong> bus<strong>in</strong>esses <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> value development portfolio, R&D expenditure is support<strong>in</strong>g<strong>the</strong>m through a two to three year <strong>in</strong>vestment programme aimed at <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong>irvalue significantly. In QSA, <strong>in</strong>vestment has cont<strong>in</strong>ued <strong>in</strong> build<strong>in</strong>g its capability <strong>in</strong><strong>the</strong> medical area and <strong>in</strong> particular <strong>in</strong> develop<strong>in</strong>g a major production facility to supply<strong>the</strong> radioisotope Yttrium-90 for use <strong>in</strong> cancer treatment. In Accentus, <strong>the</strong>re cont<strong>in</strong>uesto be significant R&D <strong>in</strong>vestment <strong>in</strong> develop<strong>in</strong>g its IP and patent portfolio <strong>in</strong> selected<strong>technology</strong> clusters, for example <strong>in</strong> develop<strong>in</strong>g advanced plasma <strong>technology</strong> for <strong>the</strong>destruction of diesel particulates and oxides of nitrogen <strong>in</strong> vehicle exhausts.The Innovation Plus and University L<strong>in</strong>ks schemes cont<strong>in</strong>ue to be pursued as ameans of access<strong>in</strong>g and secur<strong>in</strong>g IP from sources external to <strong>the</strong> Group. They are managedon behalf of <strong>the</strong> bus<strong>in</strong>esses by Accentus, as part of its IP management capability.


31<strong>AEA</strong> TECHNOLOGY PLCAnnual report 2002Directors’ reportCorporate Social ResponsibilityThe Directors take regular account of <strong>the</strong> significance of social, environmentaland ethical (SEE) matters to <strong>the</strong> bus<strong>in</strong>ess of <strong>the</strong> <strong>AEA</strong>T Group. They have identifiedand assessed <strong>the</strong> significant risks to <strong>the</strong> Group’s short and long term value aris<strong>in</strong>gfrom SEE matters, as well as <strong>the</strong> opportunities to enhance value that may arise froman appropriate response. They have received adequate <strong>in</strong>formation dur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> year tomake this assessment and account is taken of SEE matters <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g ofdirectors. The Board has ensured that <strong>the</strong> Group has <strong>in</strong> place effective systems formanag<strong>in</strong>g significant risks, which, where relevant, <strong>in</strong>corporate performancemanagement systems and appropriate remuneration <strong>in</strong>centives <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong>Executive Directors. Regular meet<strong>in</strong>gs are held with major shareholders <strong>in</strong> which <strong>the</strong>yhave <strong>the</strong> opportunity to raise SEE matters affect<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> Group.The Board reviews SEE matters regularly as part of its corporate governance, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>gannual reports on health and safety and on environmental management performance,and through monthly performance statistics and <strong>in</strong>dicators. Dur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> year, StephenThornton was <strong>the</strong> Board member for health, safety and environmental management andAndrew McCree was <strong>the</strong> Board member for Corporate Affairs and Human Resources.The Group Executive and bus<strong>in</strong>ess boards similarly discuss SEE matters on a regularbasis, with health and safety always <strong>the</strong> first item on <strong>the</strong> agenda.The Board <strong>in</strong>cludes SEE matters with<strong>in</strong> its wider annual review of risks under <strong>the</strong>Turnbull guidel<strong>in</strong>es. The three that it has identified as <strong>most</strong> significant <strong>in</strong> terms ofeffect on <strong>the</strong> Group’s short and long term value are: high standards of health,safety and environmental management and observance of regulatory requirements;effective employee relations; and systems and culture that ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> Group’sreputation for scientific and technical <strong>in</strong>tegrity and <strong>in</strong>dependence. Details of <strong>the</strong>Company’s record on key SEE matters and verification for disclosures is describedelsewhere <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> Directors’ report.The Board ensures that systematic policies and procedures exist to document and tomanage key risks <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong>se areas. These form part of <strong>the</strong> Group’s <strong>in</strong>tegrated QualityManagement System, and performance aga<strong>in</strong>st <strong>the</strong>m is regularly audited and verifiedexternally by Lloyds Registrars.The Board has agreed a code of bus<strong>in</strong>ess ethics which has been distributed to allstaff, “Integrity at Work”, sett<strong>in</strong>g out <strong>the</strong> standards of behaviour expected of staff <strong>in</strong>circumstances call<strong>in</strong>g for judgement. The text is on <strong>the</strong> Company web site.Commitment to <strong>the</strong> community is demonstrated <strong>in</strong> a number of ways, for example,through local site liaison committees, membership of Bus<strong>in</strong>ess <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> Environmentand of <strong>the</strong> Per Cent Club. The Group’s policy is to focus its corporate community<strong>in</strong>volvement on promot<strong>in</strong>g science and <strong>technology</strong>, for example <strong>in</strong> local schools.The Group donated £30,441 (2001: £61,318) for charitable purposes dur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> yearplus contributions <strong>in</strong> k<strong>in</strong>d. No political contributions were made <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> current orprevious year.


32<strong>AEA</strong> TECHNOLOGY PLCAnnual report 2002Directors’ reportEmployeesDur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> year <strong>the</strong> Group had an average of 4,235 employees.Employee <strong>in</strong>volvement and participation is actively encouraged. Elected employeerepresentatives sit as full members on <strong>the</strong> Group Executive Meet<strong>in</strong>g and bus<strong>in</strong>essboards of management and as trustee directors for pension and employee shareschemes. This contributes to ensur<strong>in</strong>g that employee views and <strong>in</strong>terests areeffectively represented and taken <strong>in</strong>to account.The Directors are committed to enhanc<strong>in</strong>g opportunities for employees to becomeshareholders <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> Company. Ano<strong>the</strong>r annual save-as-you-earn share option<strong>in</strong>vitation was made across <strong>the</strong> Group <strong>in</strong> December 2001.Disabled employeesThe Group recognises and welcomes its obligations to employ people with disabilities.To <strong>the</strong> extent that <strong>the</strong> demands of <strong>the</strong> bus<strong>in</strong>ess and aptitude and ability of each<strong>in</strong>dividual allows, it aims to give people with disabilities equal opportunities fortra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g, promotion, and career development. This policy applies to fill<strong>in</strong>g vacanciesand <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> cont<strong>in</strong>u<strong>in</strong>g employment of current employees who may become disabled.Health and safety<strong>AEA</strong> Technology’s commitment to <strong>the</strong> health and safety of its staff is set out <strong>in</strong> itshealth, safety and environmental policy signed by <strong>the</strong> Chairman. Stephen Thorntonwas <strong>the</strong> Board member for health and safety management last year.The requirements of our policy are implemented through <strong>in</strong>structions and guidancenotes available to all employees. Compliance is monitored by an <strong>in</strong>ternal audit team<strong>in</strong>dependent of operational management.Safety issues, toge<strong>the</strong>r with <strong>the</strong> control measures <strong>in</strong> place, form part of <strong>the</strong> Group’srisk-based <strong>in</strong>ternal control system. The Board also reviews annually a report onhealth and safety performance. Details of <strong>the</strong> health and safety policy, targets, andperformance measures can be found on <strong>the</strong> Group’s website.Environmental managementThe major environmental effects of <strong>the</strong> Group’s activities dur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> year cont<strong>in</strong>uedto be <strong>the</strong> discharge of radioactivity, energy consumption for heat<strong>in</strong>g and light<strong>in</strong>g,office waste production and bus<strong>in</strong>ess travel.Discharges of radioactivity are closely monitored <strong>in</strong> compliance with regulatoryrequirements. Discharges <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> year were well with<strong>in</strong> authorised limits. They areregularly reviewed to ensure that <strong>the</strong>y cont<strong>in</strong>ue to be as low as reasonably practicable.We are cont<strong>in</strong>u<strong>in</strong>g to target reductions <strong>in</strong> energy consumption across <strong>the</strong> company.<strong>AEA</strong> Technology’s environmental commitment is set out <strong>in</strong> its health, safety andenvironmental policy signed by <strong>the</strong> Chairman. Environmental risks to <strong>the</strong> Group,toge<strong>the</strong>r with <strong>the</strong> control measures <strong>in</strong> place, form part of <strong>the</strong> wider risk-basedcontrol process <strong>in</strong> place <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> Group. The Board also reviews annually a report onenvironmental performance.


33<strong>AEA</strong> TECHNOLOGY PLCAnnual report 2002Directors’ reportThe requirements of our policy are implemented through <strong>in</strong>structions and guidancenotes available to all employees. Compliance is monitored by an <strong>in</strong>ternal audit team<strong>in</strong>dependent of operational management.The Group’s target is to achieve certification to ISO14001. Environment has alreadyachieved such certification. Dialogue has been <strong>in</strong>itiated with <strong>the</strong> company’s <strong>most</strong>significant suppliers about improv<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong>ir environmental performance.More details of our environmental performance, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g data on our <strong>most</strong>significant impacts, can be found on our website, which also <strong>in</strong>cludes <strong>the</strong> Group’senvironmental policy and management arrangements. Our arrangements <strong>in</strong>cludeexternal audit<strong>in</strong>g of <strong>the</strong> figures by external environmental consultants.Dur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> year we aga<strong>in</strong> took part <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> Bus<strong>in</strong>ess <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> Environment Index ofCorporate Environmental Engagement.Economic and monetary unionA steer<strong>in</strong>g group reviewed <strong>the</strong> various ways <strong>in</strong> which <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>troduction of <strong>the</strong> Eurowould affect bus<strong>in</strong>ess. The Group is committed to ensur<strong>in</strong>g that its procedures andsystems suit <strong>the</strong> new currency. No issues have arisen s<strong>in</strong>ce <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>troduction of <strong>the</strong>Euro notes and co<strong>in</strong>s on 1 January 2002 <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g with<strong>in</strong> subsidiary companies <strong>in</strong>those European countries that have adopted <strong>the</strong> Euro. Costs <strong>in</strong>curred to date havebeen negligible and future costs are not expected to be significant.Payment policy<strong>AEA</strong> Technology is a registered supporter of <strong>the</strong> CBI’s Prompt Payment Code. Its policyis to agree terms of trad<strong>in</strong>g which are appropriate for suppliers’ markets and to abideby such terms where suppliers’ obligations have been met.The average creditor payment period at 31 March 2002 was 34 days (2001: 33 days).By order of <strong>the</strong> BoardKeith RussellCompany Secretary19 June 2002


34<strong>AEA</strong> TECHNOLOGY PLCAnnual report 2002Corporate governanceStatement of appliance of <strong>the</strong> Comb<strong>in</strong>ed CodeThe Board supports <strong>the</strong> highest standards of corporate governance and has applied asfollows <strong>the</strong> 14 pr<strong>in</strong>ciples of good governance set out <strong>in</strong> section one of <strong>the</strong> Comb<strong>in</strong>edCode on Corporate Governance issued by <strong>the</strong> F<strong>in</strong>ancial Services Authority(“<strong>the</strong> Comb<strong>in</strong>ed Code”).DirectorsBetween 1 April 2001 and 31 December 2001, <strong>the</strong> Board comprised a non-executivechairman, four Executive Directors <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> Group’s key management and operationalposts, and four o<strong>the</strong>r non-executive directors. Between 1 January 2002 and 31 March2002, after Sir Anthony Cleaver resigned, Dr Peter Watson moved from Chief Executiveto Executive Chairman. Between <strong>the</strong>m, <strong>the</strong> directors have a range of <strong>in</strong>ternationalbus<strong>in</strong>ess and f<strong>in</strong>ancial expertise.In l<strong>in</strong>e with <strong>the</strong> Comb<strong>in</strong>ed Code, <strong>the</strong> Board publicly justified <strong>the</strong> appo<strong>in</strong>tment ofDr Peter Watson as Executive Chairman. It drew attention to <strong>the</strong> cont<strong>in</strong>uity that hisknowl<strong>edge</strong> of <strong>the</strong> Company would br<strong>in</strong>g and, <strong>most</strong> importantly, <strong>the</strong> direct andsignificant value to <strong>the</strong> Group of his knowl<strong>edge</strong> and reputation with<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> rail<strong>in</strong>dustry. He is also widely known <strong>in</strong> a number of government departments where<strong>the</strong> Environment bus<strong>in</strong>ess is target<strong>in</strong>g future growth.The four rema<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g non-executives are all <strong>in</strong>dependent of management and of anybus<strong>in</strong>ess or o<strong>the</strong>r relationship which could materially <strong>in</strong>terfere with <strong>the</strong> exercise of<strong>the</strong>ir <strong>in</strong>dependent judgement. Lord Sharman is <strong>the</strong> senior <strong>in</strong>dependent director.All Directors must stand for election by shareholders at <strong>the</strong> first opportunity after<strong>the</strong>ir appo<strong>in</strong>tment. They must stand for re-election at <strong>in</strong>tervals of no more thanthree years.The Board meets monthly except <strong>in</strong> August. It decides <strong>the</strong> direction and strategy of<strong>the</strong> Group and ensures <strong>the</strong> best performance of Group resources for shareholders.It has agreed a schedule of matters reserved for its decision. It receives a monthlyreview of performance and regular reviews on key aspects of <strong>the</strong> Group’s activities.The Chairman briefs Directors on issues aris<strong>in</strong>g at <strong>the</strong> Board, which has adopted aprocess for self-assessment of its operation and performance.Directors have access to <strong>the</strong> advice and services of <strong>the</strong> Company Secretary and have<strong>the</strong> right to obta<strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>dependent legal advice <strong>in</strong> connection with <strong>the</strong> Group’s bus<strong>in</strong>essat its expense. Directors receive <strong>in</strong>duction and cont<strong>in</strong>ued tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g.Board committeesThe Nom<strong>in</strong>ation Committee has written terms of reference to consider new Boardappo<strong>in</strong>tments and make recommendations to <strong>the</strong> Board. It is chaired by Dr PeterWatson and members <strong>in</strong>clude all non-executive directors. The Committee met twicelast year.The Remuneration and Audit Committees are described later <strong>in</strong> this report. All membersare <strong>in</strong>dependent non-executives.


35<strong>AEA</strong> TECHNOLOGY PLCAnnual report 2002Corporate governanceThe Science and Eng<strong>in</strong>eer<strong>in</strong>g Advisory Committee is chaired by Professor MichaelBrady and <strong>in</strong>cludes external members. It reviews, advises on and provides <strong>in</strong>sights<strong>in</strong>to <strong>the</strong> development of <strong>the</strong> <strong>technology</strong> base of <strong>the</strong> Group, thus help<strong>in</strong>g to ensurethat <strong>the</strong> technical base of <strong>the</strong> Group is robust enough to generate significant newproducts and services. It met once last year.Directors’ remunerationThe Report on Directors’ Remuneration is given on pages 38 to 43. It has regard toSchedule B of <strong>the</strong> Comb<strong>in</strong>ed Code.Shareholders considered and approved <strong>the</strong> executive remuneration policy byresolution at <strong>the</strong> 2001 AGM and a similar resolution is be<strong>in</strong>g put to <strong>the</strong> 2002 AGM.Relations with shareholdersThe Group welcomes dialogue with its shareholders and communicates with <strong>the</strong>mthrough its <strong>in</strong>terim and annual reports and through its website. Regular meet<strong>in</strong>gsare held with <strong>in</strong>stitutional <strong>in</strong>vestors.At <strong>the</strong> AGM, shareholders can question <strong>the</strong> Directors, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> chairmen ofBoard Committees. Separate resolutions are proposed on each substantially differentissue so that each receives proper consideration. Resolutions <strong>in</strong>clude <strong>the</strong> approvalof <strong>the</strong> Annual Report and Accounts. Proxy votes are announced after each resolutionhas been dealt with on a show of hands. Notice of <strong>the</strong> AGM and related papers weresent to shareholders at least 20 work<strong>in</strong>g days <strong>in</strong> advance.The Company cont<strong>in</strong>ues to monitor <strong>in</strong>terest of shareholders <strong>in</strong> receiv<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>formationelectronically, as allowed under new legislation.Accountability and auditThe Board takes care to ensure that it presents a clear and balanced assessment of<strong>the</strong> Company and Group position and prospects <strong>in</strong> statutory and <strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>terim and o<strong>the</strong>rprice-sensitive public reports and <strong>in</strong> reports to regulators. It takes advice fromprofessional advisers as part of its processes.The members of <strong>the</strong> Audit Committee are Lord Sharman (Chairman), Dr LeslieAtk<strong>in</strong>son and Andrew Shilston. The Committee met twice dur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> year. Underwritten terms of reference, it reviews draft f<strong>in</strong>ancial statements before <strong>the</strong>y areconsidered by <strong>the</strong> Board. It also reviews <strong>the</strong> scope, results and cost-effectiveness of<strong>in</strong>ternal and external audit. The Committee ensures <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>dependence of <strong>in</strong>ternalauditors and reviews <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>dependence and objectivity of external auditors.The Directors’ responsibilities for prepar<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> accounts are set out <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> Statementof Directors’ Responsibilities on page 44.Internal controlThe Board is responsible for <strong>the</strong> Group’s system of <strong>in</strong>ternal control and for review<strong>in</strong>gits effectiveness. This system is designed to manage ra<strong>the</strong>r than to elim<strong>in</strong>ate risk offailure to achieve bus<strong>in</strong>ess objectives and can only provide reasonable and notabsolute assurance aga<strong>in</strong>st material misstatement and loss.


36<strong>AEA</strong> TECHNOLOGY PLCAnnual report 2002Corporate governanceThe Board confirms that <strong>the</strong>re is an on-go<strong>in</strong>g process for identify<strong>in</strong>g, evaluat<strong>in</strong>g andmanag<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> Group’s significant risks, that this has been <strong>in</strong> place for <strong>the</strong> year ended31 March 2002 and up to <strong>the</strong> date of approval of <strong>the</strong> Annual Report and Accounts,that it covers subsidiaries <strong>in</strong> which <strong>the</strong> Group has an <strong>in</strong>terest of 50% or more, that itis regularly reviewed by <strong>the</strong> Board, and that it accords with <strong>the</strong> F<strong>in</strong>ancial ServicesAuthority’s <strong>in</strong>ternal control guidance for directors on <strong>the</strong> Comb<strong>in</strong>ed Code (“<strong>the</strong>Turnbull guidance”).Control environmentThe Group’s organisational structure has clearly documented and communicatedlevels of responsibility, delegated authority and report<strong>in</strong>g procedures. Managementsystems have been externally accredited. The professionalism and competence ofemployees is ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong>ed through recruitment, performance appraisal, and personaltra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g and development plans. The Board supports <strong>the</strong> highest levels of commitmentand <strong>in</strong>tegrity from employees and has endorsed a Code of Bus<strong>in</strong>ess Ethics which isgiven to all employees.Identification of bus<strong>in</strong>ess riskManagers are required to identify and assess risks to meet<strong>in</strong>g objectives, and <strong>the</strong>n totake timely action to manage or elim<strong>in</strong>ate <strong>the</strong>m. The effectiveness of <strong>the</strong>se actions ismonitored and reviewed.Control proceduresControl procedures are documented <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> Group’s management systems, which aresubject to external audit. These <strong>in</strong>clude a f<strong>in</strong>ance manual, corporate and bus<strong>in</strong>essquality assurance manuals, safety procedures and environmental management procedures.Procedures are designed to ensure that work is carried out to meet stated objectives,that risk is managed, and that variances are identified and reported <strong>in</strong> a timely wayto enable corrective actions to be taken.Monitor<strong>in</strong>g and corrective actionsThe Board approves a bus<strong>in</strong>ess plan and an annual Group budget. It receives monthlyreports, supplemented by o<strong>the</strong>r reviews, on a range of key performance and risk<strong>in</strong>dicators, and considers possible control issues. The <strong>in</strong>dicators cover f<strong>in</strong>ancial,operational, safety, environmental and compliance aspects of performance. TheGroup Executive, bus<strong>in</strong>ess boards and boards of subsidiary companies similarlyreceive regular reports.Dur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> year, <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>ternal audit function reported to <strong>the</strong> Audit Committee,which approved its programme and considered its recommendations. The Board alsoreceived, and decided appropriate action on, reports from <strong>the</strong> Audit Committee andexternal auditors.For its annual review of <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>ternal control system, <strong>the</strong> Board took account of its ownreviews and monitor<strong>in</strong>g dur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> year plus documentation from <strong>the</strong> Group Executive,<strong>in</strong> order to obta<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> degree of assurance required under <strong>the</strong> Comb<strong>in</strong>ed Code.


37<strong>AEA</strong> TECHNOLOGY PLCAnnual report 2002Corporate governanceCompliance with control procedures was monitored dur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> year by <strong>in</strong>ternal auditand through reviews of compliance with <strong>the</strong> Quality Management System. Bus<strong>in</strong>essesare required to confirm <strong>the</strong>ir compliance annually with <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>ternal control systems.Statement of compliance with <strong>the</strong> Comb<strong>in</strong>ed CodeThe Group has been fully compliant throughout <strong>the</strong> year with <strong>the</strong> 45 provisions setout <strong>in</strong> section one of <strong>the</strong> Comb<strong>in</strong>ed Code, with one exception. This, as expla<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>in</strong><strong>the</strong> Report on Directors’ Remuneration, is that Dr Peter Watson’s contract provides fora two-year roll<strong>in</strong>g notice period.Statement of go<strong>in</strong>g concernAfter mak<strong>in</strong>g appropriate enquiries, <strong>the</strong> Directors have a reasonable expectation that<strong>the</strong> Group and <strong>the</strong> Company have adequate resources to cont<strong>in</strong>ue <strong>in</strong> operationalexistence for <strong>the</strong> foreseeable future. Accord<strong>in</strong>gly, <strong>the</strong>y consider it appropriate tocont<strong>in</strong>ue to adopt <strong>the</strong> go<strong>in</strong>g concern basis <strong>in</strong> prepar<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> f<strong>in</strong>ancial statements.


38<strong>AEA</strong> TECHNOLOGY PLCAnnual report 2002Report on Directors’ remunerationThe Remuneration Committee comprises three <strong>in</strong>dependent non-executive directors:Andrew Shilston (Chairman), Dr Leslie Atk<strong>in</strong>son and Professor Michael Brady. TheCompany Secretary acts as its secretary.In l<strong>in</strong>e with <strong>the</strong> F<strong>in</strong>ancial Services Authority’s Comb<strong>in</strong>ed Code on Corporate Governance,<strong>the</strong> Committee is responsible, under written terms of reference, for mak<strong>in</strong>grecommendations to <strong>the</strong> Board on <strong>the</strong> framework of executive remuneration and fordeterm<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g on behalf of <strong>the</strong> Board <strong>the</strong> remuneration package for each Executive Director.No matters outside this remit were considered by <strong>the</strong> Committee <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> last year.In conduct<strong>in</strong>g its work, <strong>the</strong> Committee takes advice from external consultants that itchooses and also talks to <strong>the</strong> Chairman and Human Resources Director <strong>in</strong> order to be ableto relate its work to pay and o<strong>the</strong>r human resources developments with<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> Group.In prepar<strong>in</strong>g this report, <strong>the</strong> Board has had regard to Schedule B of <strong>the</strong> Comb<strong>in</strong>ed Code.Non-executive directorsNo non-executive director has a service contract with <strong>the</strong> Company. They are appo<strong>in</strong>tedfor a fixed term which may be renewed upon expiry. The remuneration of <strong>the</strong> nonexecutivedirectors is determ<strong>in</strong>ed by <strong>the</strong> Board with<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> limits set out <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> articlesof association. The Board has delegated this responsibility to a sub-committee compris<strong>in</strong>gall <strong>the</strong> Executive Directors. In this way, none of <strong>the</strong> non-executive directors is <strong>in</strong>volved<strong>in</strong> any discussion relat<strong>in</strong>g to <strong>the</strong>ir own remuneration, nor do <strong>the</strong>y participate <strong>in</strong> anyvote on <strong>the</strong>ir remuneration at <strong>the</strong> Board.Non-executive directors are paid a set fee plus set fees for chair<strong>in</strong>g sub-committees.These fees are determ<strong>in</strong>ed with reference to <strong>the</strong> f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>gs of external remunerationconsultants on <strong>the</strong> fees paid to non-executive directors <strong>in</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r companies ofbroadly similar size and complexity. They do not receive share options, performancerelated bonuses or pension entitlements. They are entitled to be reimbursed forreasonable expenses <strong>in</strong> l<strong>in</strong>e with <strong>the</strong> policy apply<strong>in</strong>g to <strong>the</strong> Group’s employees.Executive Directors’ remuneration1 Remuneration policyThe Group’s executive remuneration policy is to set total remuneration at levelsdesigned to attract, motivate and reta<strong>in</strong> high calibre executives and to reward <strong>the</strong>mfairly for enhanc<strong>in</strong>g shareholder value.Market comparatorsThe Remuneration Committee uses external consultants and published survey data toensure that <strong>the</strong> Group’s remuneration policies and practices are <strong>in</strong> l<strong>in</strong>e with those ofcross-sector <strong>in</strong>dustrial and service companies of broadly comparable market capitalisationand turnover. The Committee also takes <strong>in</strong>to account pay levels elsewhere <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> Group,<strong>the</strong> complexity and responsibility of <strong>in</strong>dividual roles and <strong>the</strong> performance of <strong>in</strong>dividualDirectors. The Remuneration Committee <strong>in</strong>tends fixed remuneration (basic salary andbenefits) to be broadly <strong>in</strong> l<strong>in</strong>e with <strong>the</strong> median rates for <strong>the</strong> comparator group.


39<strong>AEA</strong> TECHNOLOGY PLCAnnual report 2002Report on Directors’ remunerationExecutive remuneration policy is consistent with that apply<strong>in</strong>g more generally with<strong>in</strong><strong>the</strong> Group, where <strong>the</strong> objectives are to set basic pay levels <strong>in</strong> l<strong>in</strong>e with medianmarket rates of relevant comparator organisations, to revise basic pay levels eachyear tak<strong>in</strong>g account of movements <strong>in</strong> market pay rates and company performance,and to reward <strong>in</strong>dividual and team performance through <strong>the</strong> use of bonuses.2 Remuneration packagesThe remuneration arrangements for Executive Directors comprise basic salary, annual<strong>in</strong>centive scheme, post-retirement benefits, Company Share Option Plan (which hassuperseded <strong>the</strong> former Long-Term Incentive Plan arrangements) and normal non-cashbenefits. The follow<strong>in</strong>g paragraphs describe <strong>the</strong>se elements:A Fixed elementsA 1 Basic salaryThe Committee reviews basic salaries annually, or when changes <strong>in</strong> responsibilitiesoccur, tak<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>to account external market levels, <strong>in</strong>ternal relativities andpersonal performance.A 2 Post-retirement benefitsExecutive Directors are eligible to participate <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>AEA</strong> Technology Pension Scheme,a def<strong>in</strong>ed benefit scheme, and also benefit from top up provisions <strong>in</strong> lieu of pensionbenefits above <strong>the</strong> pensionable earn<strong>in</strong>g cap. Details of Directors’ pension arrangementsare set out <strong>in</strong> section 4 below.A 3 O<strong>the</strong>r benefitsBenefits <strong>in</strong>clude <strong>the</strong> provision of a fully expensed company car and health <strong>in</strong>surance.The Company also pays for life assurance cover for Dr Peter Watson. The sum of <strong>the</strong>sebenefits is recorded <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> Directors’ emoluments table below.The Company has <strong>in</strong>vested <strong>in</strong> a share <strong>in</strong> a London property occupied by Dr Peter Watson,whose duties require his presence <strong>in</strong> London for extended periods. The Company’s<strong>in</strong>vestment <strong>in</strong> this property is £75,000.B Performance related elementsB 1 Annual <strong>in</strong>centivesExecutive Directors were eligible to earn a bonus of up to 50% of basic salary <strong>in</strong> 2002,payable if challeng<strong>in</strong>g, quantified targets relat<strong>in</strong>g to Group performance were met(50% of <strong>the</strong> possible bonus) and if personal targets relat<strong>in</strong>g to <strong>the</strong> development of <strong>the</strong>Group were met (50% of <strong>the</strong> possible bonus). All targets are reviewed each year by <strong>the</strong>Remuneration Committee and changed where judged appropriate to ensure that <strong>the</strong>serema<strong>in</strong> challeng<strong>in</strong>g and focused on <strong>in</strong>centivis<strong>in</strong>g directors to enhance shareholder value.In 2002, Group performance targets related to improvements <strong>in</strong> earn<strong>in</strong>gs per share andcash flow. Bonuses, which are taxable but not pensionable, are paid <strong>in</strong> cash <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> yearfollow<strong>in</strong>g that <strong>in</strong> which <strong>the</strong>y are earned. In 2003 Executive Directors will be eligibleto earn a bonus of up to 60% of basic salary.


40<strong>AEA</strong> TECHNOLOGY PLCAnnual report 2002Report on Directors’ remunerationB 2 Long-term <strong>in</strong>centivesA Long-Term Incentive Plan (LTIP) <strong>in</strong>troduced <strong>in</strong> 1997 was used annually to 1999.Conditional awards of shares were subject to Group performance criteria be<strong>in</strong>g metover a three-year period from <strong>the</strong> date of <strong>the</strong> award. The f<strong>in</strong>al measurement of <strong>the</strong>performance criteria for <strong>the</strong> 1999 LTIP awards was made on 31 March 2002 aga<strong>in</strong>stcomparative performance of FTSE mid 250 companies. Awards made under this planwill not vest. No fur<strong>the</strong>r awards will be made under <strong>the</strong> LTIP. Details of movements<strong>in</strong> LTIP awards dur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> year are as follows:Shares conditionallyShares conditionallyScheme awarded as at 1 April 2001 Lapsed <strong>in</strong> year awarded as at 31 March 2002Dr Peter Watson 1999 36,800 (36,800) –Andrew McCree 1999 14,000 (14,000) –A Company Share Option Plan (CSOP) was <strong>in</strong>troduced <strong>in</strong> July 1999 and extended toExecutive Directors <strong>in</strong> July 2000.The CSOP is <strong>in</strong> two parts: an approved part, under which participants can hold up to£30,000 worth of options free of <strong>in</strong>come tax on exercise, and an unapproved part forhigher amounts.Details of awards made to Directors under <strong>the</strong> CSOP schemes dur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> year are as follows:Percentage Option NumberDate of award of salary price of shares Performance periodDr Peter Watson 26 June 2001 200% £2.965 187,042 1 April 2001–31 March 2004David L<strong>in</strong>dsay (1) 26 September 2001 150% £2.380 94,537 1 April 2001–31 March 2004Andrew McCree 26 June 2001 150% £2.965 90,923 1 April 2001–31 March 2004Stephen Thornton 26 June 2001 175% £2.965 121,231 1 April 2001–31 March 2004(1) Awarded follow<strong>in</strong>g appo<strong>in</strong>tment as Director.These CSOP awards are subject to a performance target based on <strong>the</strong> achievement overa three-year period of earn<strong>in</strong>gs per share (EPS) growth as set out below. On top ofthis, vest<strong>in</strong>g and <strong>the</strong> extent of vest<strong>in</strong>g is additionally dependent on <strong>the</strong> RemunerationCommittee’s assessment <strong>in</strong> 2004 of <strong>the</strong> success <strong>in</strong> implement<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> November 2000strategy review and <strong>the</strong> contribution made by <strong>the</strong> option holder.Options with a value of up to 100% of a participant’s annual salary may be exercisedwhere real growth <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> Institute of Investment Management and Research (IIMR)EPS is equal to or greater than 3% per year above <strong>the</strong> level of <strong>the</strong> UK Retail PriceIndex (RPI);That part of an option award between 101% of salary and 150% of salary may be exercisedwhere real growth <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> IIMR EPS is equal to or greater than 5% per year above <strong>the</strong>level of <strong>the</strong> UK RPI. For performance between RPI plus 3% and 5%, this part of anoption award may be exercised pro rata;That part of an option award above 150% of salary may be exercised where realgrowth <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> IIMR EPS is equal to or greater than 8% per year above <strong>the</strong> level of <strong>the</strong>UK RPI. For performance between RPI plus 5% and 8%, this part of an option awardmay be exercised pro rata.This performance condition was chosen as be<strong>in</strong>g appropriate to <strong>the</strong> circumstances of<strong>the</strong> Company and designed to be aligned with <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>terests of shareholders.


41<strong>AEA</strong> TECHNOLOGY PLCAnnual report 2002Report on Directors’ remunerationDirectors’ emolumentsDetails of <strong>in</strong>dividual Directors’ emoluments, exclud<strong>in</strong>g contributions <strong>in</strong>to a pensionscheme, for <strong>the</strong> year are as follows:2002 2001Basic salary Annual Term<strong>in</strong>ation Total Totaland fees Benefits bonus payment emoluments emoluments£000 £000 £000 £000 £000 £000ExecutiveDr Peter Watson 277 42 83 – 402 295David L<strong>in</strong>dsay (1) 87 18 25 – 130 –Andrew McCree 180 35 54 – 269 72Stephen Thornton 205 47 62 – 314 169Ray Proctor (2) – 148 – 206 354 216Dr Mel Wood (3) – – – – – 220Dr Chris Wright (3) – – – – – 229Non-executiveSir Anthony Cleaver (4) 54 – – – 54 71Dr Leslie Atk<strong>in</strong>son 25 – – – 25 25Professor Michael Brady 30 – – – 30 30Lord Sharman 27 – – – 27 27Andrew Shilston 27 – – – 27 27Dame Steve Shirley (5) – – – – – 8Total 912 290 224 206 1,632 1,389(1) David L<strong>in</strong>dsay was appo<strong>in</strong>ted as a Director with effect from 3 September 2001.(2) The term<strong>in</strong>ation payment made to Ray Proctor on retirement comprised pay <strong>in</strong> lieu of notice of £200,000 and non-cash benefits of £6,000. In addition, <strong>the</strong>Company transferred to Ray Proctor its <strong>in</strong>terest <strong>in</strong> a London property previously held jo<strong>in</strong>tly with Ray Proctor and a company car <strong>in</strong> return for consultancyservices <strong>in</strong> 2002. The market value of <strong>the</strong> share of <strong>the</strong> property transferred on 1 April 2001 was £135,000 and <strong>the</strong> market value of <strong>the</strong> car was £12,600. Alloutstand<strong>in</strong>g CSOP and LTIP awards lapsed on retirement.(3) Dr Mel Wood and Dr Chris Wright retired as directors on 3 May 2000.(4) Sir Anthony Cleaver resigned as Chairman and non-executive director on 31 December 2001.(5) Dame Steve Shirley retired as a non-executive director on 20 July 2000.The figures above represent emoluments earned dur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> relevant f<strong>in</strong>ancial year.Such emoluments are paid normally <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> same f<strong>in</strong>ancial year, with <strong>the</strong> exception ofbonuses which are paid <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> year follow<strong>in</strong>g that <strong>in</strong> which <strong>the</strong>y are earned.3 Service contractsAndrew McCree, Stephen Thornton and David L<strong>in</strong>dsay have service contracts thatprovide for one year’s notice of term<strong>in</strong>ation of appo<strong>in</strong>tment. Dr Peter Watson has atwo-year notice period <strong>in</strong> his contract, dat<strong>in</strong>g from when he was first recruited. TheRemuneration Committee has reviewed this arrangement and has concluded thatnegotiat<strong>in</strong>g a shorter period would not be <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> best <strong>in</strong>terests of shareholders. TheCommittee accepts and endorses <strong>the</strong> pr<strong>in</strong>ciple of mitigation of damages onterm<strong>in</strong>ation of a contract.The service contracts of all four directors run from <strong>the</strong>ir date of contract to <strong>the</strong>irdate of retirement. Contract dates are as follows:Contract dateRetirement dateDr Peter Watson 31 March 1996 08 January 2004David L<strong>in</strong>dsay 03 September 2001 16 May 2021Andrew McCree 27 November 2000 19 August 2017Stephen Thornton 29 January 2001 16 June 2022


42<strong>AEA</strong> TECHNOLOGY PLCAnnual report 2002Report on Directors’ remuneration4PensionsAll <strong>the</strong> Executive Directors participate <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> Senior Executive section of <strong>the</strong> Companypension scheme. This provides for a two thirds pension at normal pension age providedthat 30 years’ service is completed. The Senior Executive section provides for a 37.5%pension payable to a dependant on <strong>the</strong> death of <strong>the</strong> scheme member. Dr Peter Watsonhas a pension age of 62, Andrew McCree 60, and Stephen Thornton and David L<strong>in</strong>dsay65. Pensions <strong>in</strong>crease each year <strong>in</strong> l<strong>in</strong>e with <strong>in</strong>flation as measured by <strong>the</strong> RPI subjectto a maximum annual <strong>in</strong>crease of 6% <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> Senior Executive section. Directorscontribute 5% of salary up to <strong>the</strong> pensionable earn<strong>in</strong>gs cap.In addition to <strong>the</strong> pension benefits derived from his membership of <strong>the</strong> <strong>AEA</strong> TechnologyPension Scheme, Dr Peter Watson has an unfunded top-up arrangement which isdesigned to br<strong>in</strong>g his total pension benefits up to 2/3 f<strong>in</strong>al pay once benefits fromformer employment have been taken <strong>in</strong>to account. The Company makes a provision<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> accounts <strong>in</strong> order to cover <strong>the</strong>se benefits. The accrual made dur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> year to31 March 2002 was £216,000 and <strong>the</strong> total accrual to 31 March 2002 was £1,045,000.David L<strong>in</strong>dsay, Andrew McCree and Stephen Thornton are paid a cash allowance <strong>in</strong>lieu of pension benefits which is equal to 25% of <strong>the</strong> amount by which <strong>the</strong>ir salaryexceeds <strong>the</strong> pension cap. There is also an <strong>in</strong>surance arrangement to provide additionaldeath <strong>in</strong> service benefits and permanent health <strong>in</strong>surance for Dr Peter Watson, <strong>the</strong>cost of which <strong>in</strong> 2002 was £31,097.The pension benefits earned <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> year to 31 March 2002, calculated <strong>in</strong> accordancewith <strong>the</strong> recommendations of <strong>the</strong> Institute and Faculty of Actuaries, are set out below:Transfer valueTotal accrued Total Increase <strong>in</strong> Total of benefitspension accrued accrued lump accrued accrueddur<strong>in</strong>g pension at sum dur<strong>in</strong>g lump sum at dur<strong>in</strong>g<strong>the</strong> year year end <strong>the</strong> year year end <strong>the</strong> year£ £ £ £ £Dr Peter Watson approved benefits 3,791 24,909 – – 46,883Dr Peter Watson unapproved benefits 9,273 66,989 – – 126,347David L<strong>in</strong>dsay (1) – 1,830 – – 8,218Andrew McCree 2,633 18,487 639 22,614 17,230Stephen Thornton 1,897 2,375 – – 6,274(1) Appo<strong>in</strong>ted 3 September 2001.The accrued pension entitlement shown is <strong>the</strong> amount that would be paid each yearon retirement based on service to <strong>the</strong> end of <strong>the</strong> current year.The transfer value has been calculated on <strong>the</strong> basis of actuarial advice <strong>in</strong> accordancewith Actuarial Guidance Note GN 11, less Directors’ contributions.The Directors, like all members of <strong>the</strong> <strong>AEA</strong> Technology Pension Scheme, have <strong>the</strong>option of pay<strong>in</strong>g additional voluntary contributions. Nei<strong>the</strong>r <strong>the</strong> contributions nor<strong>the</strong> result<strong>in</strong>g benefits are <strong>in</strong>cluded <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> above table.Ray Proctor’s pension was brought <strong>in</strong>to payment <strong>in</strong> April 2001 and, <strong>in</strong> accordancewith his contract of employment, was enhanced by one additional year’s serviceprovid<strong>in</strong>g an additional pension of £6,927 a year. The total pension payable was£45,772 a year, with £8,580 be<strong>in</strong>g funded by <strong>the</strong> <strong>AEA</strong> Technology Pension Scheme,and £37,192 by <strong>the</strong> Company.


43<strong>AEA</strong> TECHNOLOGY PLCAnnual report 2002Report on Directors’ remuneration5 Directors’ <strong>in</strong>terestsInterests <strong>in</strong> sharesThe <strong>in</strong>terests of <strong>the</strong> Directors <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> shares of <strong>the</strong> Company were:1 April 200131 March 2002 or date of appo<strong>in</strong>tmentThe Company – ord<strong>in</strong>ary shares of 10pDr Peter Watson 58,771 56,321David L<strong>in</strong>dsay – –Andrew McCree 127 127Stephen Thornton – –Dr Leslie Atk<strong>in</strong>son 11,369 11,369Professor Michael Brady 1,147 1,147Lord Sharman 5,000 5,000Andrew Shilston 683 683There were no changes between 1 April and 6 June 2002. No Director had an <strong>in</strong>terestat any time <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> year <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> share capital or loan stock of o<strong>the</strong>r Group companies.Interests <strong>in</strong> share optionsThe <strong>in</strong>terests of Directors <strong>in</strong> options to subscribe for ord<strong>in</strong>ary shares of <strong>the</strong> Companyare all from options granted under <strong>the</strong> SAYE share option scheme (note 30) or <strong>the</strong>Company Share Option Plan (CSOP) and are set out below:Number of1 April 2001 options Date fromor date of granted 31 March Exercise whichappo<strong>in</strong>tment <strong>in</strong> year 2002 price exercisable Expiry date SchemeThe Company – ord<strong>in</strong>ary shares of 10pDr Peter Watson 1,574 – 1,574 £3.200 1 March 2003 31 Aug 2003 SAYE113,966 – 113,966 £4.475 8 Aug 2003 8 Aug 2010 CSOP6,779 – 6,779 £4.425 20 Sept 2003 20 Sept 2010 CSOP820 – 820 £2.360 1 March 2004 31 Aug 2004 SAYE– 187,042 187,042 £2.965 26 June 2004 26 June 2011 CSOP– 1,357 1,357 £1.960 1 March 2005 31 Aug 2005 SAYEDavid L<strong>in</strong>dsay – 94,537 94,537 £2.380 26 Sept 2004 26 Sept 2011 CSOPAndrew McCree 950 – 950 £3.630 1 March 2003 31 Aug 2003 SAYE31,446 – 31,446 £3.975 30 June 2003 30 June 2010 CSOP– 90,923 90,923 £2.965 26 June 2004 26 June 2011 CSOPStephen Thornton 170,731 – 170,731 £2.050 1 April 2004 1 April 2011 CSOP– 121,231 121,231 £2.965 26 June 2004 26 June 2011 CSOP– 4,846 4,846 £1.960 1 March 2005 31 Aug 2005 SAYEThe market price of <strong>the</strong> Company’s shares at <strong>the</strong> end of <strong>the</strong> f<strong>in</strong>ancial year was 260.5pand <strong>the</strong> range of market prices dur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> year was 156.5p to 348.5p.


44<strong>AEA</strong> TECHNOLOGY PLCAnnual report 2002Statement of Directors’ responsibilitiesThe Directors are required by UK company law to prepare f<strong>in</strong>ancial statements thatgive a true and fair view of <strong>the</strong> state of affairs of <strong>the</strong> Company and of <strong>the</strong> Group asat <strong>the</strong> end of <strong>the</strong> f<strong>in</strong>ancial year and of <strong>the</strong> profit or loss of <strong>the</strong> Group for that period.The Directors confirm that suitable account<strong>in</strong>g policies have been used and appliedconsistently, with <strong>the</strong> exception of changes aris<strong>in</strong>g on <strong>the</strong> adoption of new account<strong>in</strong>gstandards <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> year as expla<strong>in</strong>ed on page 26. They also confirm that reasonable andprudent judgements and estimates have been made <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> preparation of <strong>the</strong> f<strong>in</strong>ancialstatements for <strong>the</strong> year ended 31 March 2002. The Directors also confirm thatapplicable account<strong>in</strong>g standards have been followed and that <strong>the</strong> f<strong>in</strong>ancialstatements have been prepared on a go<strong>in</strong>g concern basis.The Directors are responsible for keep<strong>in</strong>g proper account<strong>in</strong>g records, for safeguard<strong>in</strong>g<strong>the</strong> assets of <strong>the</strong> Company and of <strong>the</strong> Group, and hence for tak<strong>in</strong>g reasonable stepsfor <strong>the</strong> prevention and detection of fraud and o<strong>the</strong>r irregularities.A copy of <strong>the</strong> Annual Report and Accounts of <strong>the</strong> Company is placed on <strong>the</strong> <strong>AEA</strong>Technology plc website. The ma<strong>in</strong>tenance and <strong>in</strong>tegrity of <strong>the</strong> website is <strong>the</strong>responsibility of <strong>the</strong> Directors’ and <strong>the</strong> work carried out by <strong>the</strong> auditors does not<strong>in</strong>volve consideration of <strong>the</strong>se matters. Accord<strong>in</strong>gly, <strong>the</strong> auditors accept noresponsibility for any changes that may have occurred to <strong>the</strong> f<strong>in</strong>ancial statementss<strong>in</strong>ce <strong>the</strong>y were <strong>in</strong>itially presented on <strong>the</strong> website.Legislation <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> UK govern<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> preparation and dissem<strong>in</strong>ation of f<strong>in</strong>ancialstatements may differ from legislation <strong>in</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r jurisdictions.By order of <strong>the</strong> BoardKeith RussellCompany Secretary19 June 2002


45<strong>AEA</strong> TECHNOLOGY PLCAnnual report 2002Independent Auditors’ report to <strong>the</strong>members of <strong>AEA</strong> Technology plcWe have audited <strong>the</strong> f<strong>in</strong>ancial statements which comprise <strong>the</strong> Consolidated Profit andLoss Account, <strong>the</strong> Balance Sheets, <strong>the</strong> Cash Flow Statement, <strong>the</strong> Statement of TotalRecognised Ga<strong>in</strong>s and Losses, <strong>the</strong> Reconciliation of Movements <strong>in</strong> EquityShareholders’ Funds and <strong>the</strong> related notes.Respective responsibilities of Directors and auditorsThe Directors’ responsibilities for prepar<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> Annual Report and <strong>the</strong> f<strong>in</strong>ancialstatements <strong>in</strong> accordance with applicable United K<strong>in</strong>gdom law and account<strong>in</strong>gstandards are set out <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> Statement of Directors’ Responsibilities.Our responsibility is to audit <strong>the</strong> f<strong>in</strong>ancial statements <strong>in</strong> accordance with relevantlegal and regulatory requirements, United K<strong>in</strong>gdom Audit<strong>in</strong>g Standards issued by <strong>the</strong>Audit<strong>in</strong>g Practices Board and <strong>the</strong> List<strong>in</strong>g Rules of <strong>the</strong> F<strong>in</strong>ancial Services Authority.We report to you our op<strong>in</strong>ion as to whe<strong>the</strong>r <strong>the</strong> f<strong>in</strong>ancial statements give a true andfair view and are properly prepared <strong>in</strong> accordance with <strong>the</strong> Companies Act 1985. We alsoreport to you if, <strong>in</strong> our op<strong>in</strong>ion, <strong>the</strong> Directors’ report is not consistent with <strong>the</strong>f<strong>in</strong>ancial statements, if <strong>the</strong> Company has not kept proper account<strong>in</strong>g records, if wehave not received all <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>formation and explanations we require for our audit, or if<strong>in</strong>formation specified by law or <strong>the</strong> List<strong>in</strong>g Rules regard<strong>in</strong>g Directors’ remunerationand transactions is not disclosed.We read <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r <strong>in</strong>formation conta<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> Annual Report and consider <strong>the</strong>implications for our report if we become aware of any apparent misstatements ormaterial <strong>in</strong>consistencies with <strong>the</strong> f<strong>in</strong>ancial statements. The o<strong>the</strong>r <strong>in</strong>formationcomprises only <strong>the</strong> F<strong>in</strong>ancial Summary, <strong>the</strong> Chairman’s Statement, Operat<strong>in</strong>gBus<strong>in</strong>esses, <strong>the</strong> Operat<strong>in</strong>g Review, <strong>the</strong> F<strong>in</strong>ancial Review, <strong>the</strong> Corporate Governancestatement, <strong>the</strong> Report on Director’s Remuneration and <strong>the</strong> Five Year Summary.We review whe<strong>the</strong>r <strong>the</strong> Corporate Governance statement reflects <strong>the</strong> Company’scompliance with <strong>the</strong> seven provisions of <strong>the</strong> Comb<strong>in</strong>ed Code specified for our reviewby <strong>the</strong> List<strong>in</strong>g Rules, and we report if it does not. We are not required to considerwhe<strong>the</strong>r <strong>the</strong> Board’s statements on <strong>in</strong>ternal control cover all risks and controls, or toform an op<strong>in</strong>ion on <strong>the</strong> effectiveness of <strong>the</strong> Group’s corporate governance proceduresor its risk and control procedures.Basis of audit op<strong>in</strong>ionWe conducted our audit <strong>in</strong> accordance with audit<strong>in</strong>g standards issued by <strong>the</strong> Audit<strong>in</strong>gPractices Board. An audit <strong>in</strong>cludes exam<strong>in</strong>ation, on a test basis, of evidence relevantto <strong>the</strong> amounts and disclosures <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> f<strong>in</strong>ancial statements. It also <strong>in</strong>cludes an assessmentof <strong>the</strong> significant estimates and judgements made by <strong>the</strong> Directors <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> preparationof <strong>the</strong> f<strong>in</strong>ancial statements, and of whe<strong>the</strong>r <strong>the</strong> account<strong>in</strong>g policies are appropriateto <strong>the</strong> Company’s circumstances, consistently applied and adequately disclosed.


46<strong>AEA</strong> TECHNOLOGY PLCAnnual report 2002Independent Auditors’ report to <strong>the</strong>members of <strong>AEA</strong> Technology plcWe planned and performed our audit so as to obta<strong>in</strong> all <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>formation andexplanations which we considered necessary <strong>in</strong> order to provide us with sufficientevidence to give reasonable assurance that <strong>the</strong> f<strong>in</strong>ancial statements are free frommaterial misstatement, whe<strong>the</strong>r caused by fraud or o<strong>the</strong>r irregularity or error.In form<strong>in</strong>g our op<strong>in</strong>ion we also evaluated <strong>the</strong> overall adequacy of <strong>the</strong> presentationof <strong>in</strong>formation <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> f<strong>in</strong>ancial statements.Op<strong>in</strong>ionIn our op<strong>in</strong>ion <strong>the</strong> f<strong>in</strong>ancial statements give a true and fair view of <strong>the</strong> state ofaffairs of <strong>the</strong> Company and <strong>the</strong> Group at 31 March 2002 and of <strong>the</strong> profit and cashflows of <strong>the</strong> Group for <strong>the</strong> year <strong>the</strong>n ended and have been properly prepared <strong>in</strong>accordance with <strong>the</strong> Companies Act 1985.PricewaterhouseCoopersChartered Accountants and Registered AuditorsLondon19 June 2002


47<strong>AEA</strong> TECHNOLOGY PLCAnnual report 2002Consolidated profit and loss accountCont<strong>in</strong>u<strong>in</strong>g Discont<strong>in</strong>uedCont<strong>in</strong>u<strong>in</strong>g Discont<strong>in</strong>ued operations operations Totaloperations operations Total 2001 2001 20012002 2002 2002 restated restated restatedFOR THE YEAR ENDED 31 MARCH Notes £m £m £m £m £m £mTurnoverGroup and share of jo<strong>in</strong>t ventures 1,2,3,5 251.8 82.6 334.4 220.5 148.3 368.8Less: Share of jo<strong>in</strong>t ventures (2.0) (1.0) (3.0) (2.5) (2.1) (4.6)249.8 81.6 331.4 218.0 146.2 364.2Operat<strong>in</strong>g costs 5,6Operat<strong>in</strong>g costs (259.7) (81.5) (341.2) (219.9) (132.4) (352.3)Exceptional operat<strong>in</strong>g charges 4 (20.9) (0.2) (21.1) (20.9) (3.1) (24.0)(280.6) (81.7) (362.3) (240.8) (135.5) (376.3)Group operat<strong>in</strong>g (loss)/profit (30.8) (0.1) (30.9) (22.8) 10.7 (12.1)Share of operat<strong>in</strong>g profit/(loss) <strong>in</strong> jo<strong>in</strong>t ventures – 0.2 0.2 (0.1) 0.2 0.1Total operat<strong>in</strong>g (loss)/profit: Group and share of jo<strong>in</strong>t ventures 1–10 (30.8) 0.1 (30.7) (22.9) 10.9 (12.0)Profit on sale of bus<strong>in</strong>esses 32 0.1 53.6 53.7 – – –Loss on term<strong>in</strong>ation of operations 11 (4.5) (1.4) (5.9) – – –Income from o<strong>the</strong>r fixed asset <strong>in</strong>vestments 12 – – – 0.3 – 0.3(Loss)/profit on ord<strong>in</strong>ary activities before <strong>in</strong>terest and taxation (35.2) 52.3 17.1 (22.6) 10.9 (11.7)Interest receivable and similar <strong>in</strong>come 1.8 1.0Interest payable and similar charges 13 (5.4) (6.5)Profit/(loss) on ord<strong>in</strong>ary activities before taxation 3,10 13.5 (17.2)Taxation on ord<strong>in</strong>ary activities 14 8.8 5.4Profit/(loss) on ord<strong>in</strong>ary activities after taxation 22.3 (11.8)M<strong>in</strong>ority <strong>in</strong>terests – Equity 0.1 0.4Profit/(loss) for <strong>the</strong> f<strong>in</strong>ancial year 15 22.4 (11.4)Dividends 16 (3.4) (9.9)Reta<strong>in</strong>ed profit/(loss) for <strong>the</strong> year 27 19.0 (21.3)Earn<strong>in</strong>gs per share (pence) 17 25.3p (12.9)pAdjusted earn<strong>in</strong>gs per share (pence) 17 (11.4)p 10.6pIIMR earn<strong>in</strong>gs per share (pence) 17 (25.6)p (5.2)pDiluted earn<strong>in</strong>gs per share (pence) 17 25.1p (12.9)pThere is no material difference between <strong>the</strong> profit/(loss) on ord<strong>in</strong>ary activities before taxation and <strong>the</strong> reta<strong>in</strong>ed profit/(loss) for <strong>the</strong> year stated above, and <strong>the</strong>irhistorical cost equivalents.Details of <strong>the</strong> restatement of <strong>the</strong> results for <strong>the</strong> year ended 31 March 2001 are given <strong>in</strong> note 1 to <strong>the</strong> f<strong>in</strong>ancial statements.


48<strong>AEA</strong> TECHNOLOGY PLCAnnual report 2002Statement of total recognised ga<strong>in</strong>s and losses20012002 restatedFOR THE YEAR ENDED 31 MARCH Notes £m £mProfit/(loss) for <strong>the</strong> f<strong>in</strong>ancial year 22.4 (11.4)Currency translation differences on foreign currency net <strong>in</strong>vestments (1) 0.1 (2.7)Total recognised ga<strong>in</strong>s and losses for <strong>the</strong> year 22.5 (14.1)Prior year adjustment 1 (22.2) –Total ga<strong>in</strong>s/(losses) recognised s<strong>in</strong>ce 1 April 0.3 (14.1)(1) Included with<strong>in</strong> this is £11,361 credit (2001: £765,000 debit) <strong>in</strong> respect of exchange differences on foreign currency borrow<strong>in</strong>gs that have been used to h<strong>edge</strong> equity <strong>in</strong>vestments. The tax credit on this is nil (2001: nil).Reconciliation of movements <strong>in</strong> equity shareholders’ funds20012002 restatedFOR THE YEAR ENDED 31 MARCH Notes £m £mEquity shareholders’ funds at 1 April (£46.1 million before deduct<strong>in</strong>g prior year adjustment of£22.2 million at 1 April 2001) 23.9 47.5Profit/(loss) for <strong>the</strong> f<strong>in</strong>ancial year 22.4 (11.4)Dividends 16 (3.4) (9.9)New share capital issued 1.4 0.5Goodwill aris<strong>in</strong>g on acquisitions before 1 April 1998 31 – 0.2Goodwill written back to profit on disposals 31 4.3 –Currency translation differences on foreign currency net <strong>in</strong>vestments 0.1 (2.7)Reversal of amounts accrued under <strong>the</strong> Long-Term Incentive Plan – (0.3)Equity shareholders’ funds at 31 March 48.7 23.9


49<strong>AEA</strong> TECHNOLOGY PLCAnnual report 2002Balance sheetGroupCompany2001 20012002 restated 2002 restatedAT 31 MARCH Notes £m £m £m £mFixed assetsIntangible assets 18 0.3 0.4 – –Intangible assets – goodwill 18 29.7 24.8 – –Tangible assets 19 39.5 40.0 20.0 26.5Investments 20 2.9 2.8 148.2 132.6Investments <strong>in</strong> jo<strong>in</strong>t ventures: 0.3 0.4 – –Share of gross assets 3.2 3.2 – –Share of gross liabilities (2.9) (2.8) – –72.7 68.4 168.2 159.1Current assetsStocks and work <strong>in</strong> progress 21 19.2 21.1 7.8 15.6Debtors due after one year 22 27.7 10.1 26.1 8.0Debtors due with<strong>in</strong> one year 22 125.1 131.2 65.8 113.5Cash at bank and <strong>in</strong> hand 38.9 27.2 21.1 8.6210.9 189.6 120.8 145.7Creditors: amounts fall<strong>in</strong>g due with<strong>in</strong> one year 23 (139.7) (158.0) (77.8) (124.5)Net current assets 71.2 31.6 43.0 21.2Total assets less current liabilities 143.9 100.0 211.2 180.3Creditors: amounts fall<strong>in</strong>g due after more than one yearBorrow<strong>in</strong>gs 24 (46.8) (46.7) (48.7) (48.6)O<strong>the</strong>r creditors 24 (1.9) (1.4) (0.1) (0.1)Provisions for liabilities and charges 25 (46.5) (27.7) (33.1) (19.8)Net assets 48.7 24.2 129.3 111.8Capital and reservesCalled up share capital 26 8.9 8.9 8.9 8.9Share premium 27 9.9 8.4 9.9 8.4Merger reserve 27 – – 25.0 25.0O<strong>the</strong>r reserve 27 – – 49.1 49.1Profit and loss account 27 29.9 6.6 36.4 20.4Equity shareholders’ funds 48.7 23.9 129.3 111.8M<strong>in</strong>ority <strong>in</strong>terests – Equity 28 – 0.3 – –48.7 24.2 129.3 111.8The f<strong>in</strong>ancial statements on pages 47 to 86 were approved by <strong>the</strong> Board on 19 June 2002.Signed on behalf of <strong>the</strong> Board of DirectorsDr Peter WatsonChairmanDavid L<strong>in</strong>dsayGroup F<strong>in</strong>ance Director


50<strong>AEA</strong> TECHNOLOGY PLCAnnual report 2002Consolidated cash flow statement2002 2001 restatedFOR THE YEAR ENDED 31 MARCH Notes £m £m £m £mNet cash (outflow)/<strong>in</strong>flow from operat<strong>in</strong>g activities (3.4) 35.2Dividends from jo<strong>in</strong>t ventures 0.2 –Returns on <strong>in</strong>vestments and servic<strong>in</strong>g of f<strong>in</strong>anceInterest received 1.9 1.0Interest paid (6.0) (6.0)Dividends received from fixed asset <strong>in</strong>vestments – 1.3Dividends paid to m<strong>in</strong>ority <strong>in</strong>terests (0.3) (0.3)(4.4) (4.0)TaxationCorporation tax paid (3.0) (8.1)Capital expenditure and f<strong>in</strong>ancial <strong>in</strong>vestmentPurchase of <strong>in</strong>tangible assets – (0.1)Sale of tangible fixed assets 1.1 0.3Purchase of tangible fixed assets (9.2) (6.4)Sale of fixed asset <strong>in</strong>vestment 0.1 –Purchase of fixed asset <strong>in</strong>vestments (0.1) (0.2)(8.1) (6.4)Free cash flow (18.7) 16.7Acquisitions and disposalsSale of subsidiaries/bus<strong>in</strong>esses 32 83.0 4.0Purchase of subsidiaries 31 (7.6) (6.5)Net cash acquired with subsidiaries 31 4.9 0.5Sale of associated undertak<strong>in</strong>g – 1.2Investment <strong>in</strong> associated undertak<strong>in</strong>g – (0.2)80.3 (1.0)Equity dividends paid (9.9) (9.8)Cash <strong>in</strong>flow before management of liquid resources and f<strong>in</strong>anc<strong>in</strong>g 51.7 5.9Management of liquid resources – –F<strong>in</strong>anc<strong>in</strong>gIssue of shares 1.4 0.5Borrow<strong>in</strong>gs drawn down 1.2 80.1Repayment of loans (42.4) (71.0)Net cash (outflow)/<strong>in</strong>flow from f<strong>in</strong>anc<strong>in</strong>g activities (39.8) 9.6Increase <strong>in</strong> cash <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> year 29 11.9 15.5


51<strong>AEA</strong> TECHNOLOGY PLCAnnual report 2002Reconciliation of operat<strong>in</strong>g (loss)/profit to netcash <strong>in</strong>flow/(outflow) from operat<strong>in</strong>g activitiesBeforeBefore exceptional Exceptionalexceptional Exceptional items items Totalitems items Total 2001 2001 20012002 2002 2002 restated restated restated£m £m £m £m £m £mOperat<strong>in</strong>g (loss)/profit (9.8) (21.1) (30.9) 11.9 (24.0) (12.1)Amortisation of <strong>in</strong>tangible fixed assets 2.0 – 2.0 1.7 – 1.7Depreciation of tangible fixed assets 7.4 – 7.4 8.1 – 8.1Impairment of tangible fixed assets 0.2 0.5 0.7 0.2 5.9 6.1Loss on sale of tangible fixed assets 0.1 – 0.1 0.2 – 0.2Profit on disposal of subsidiaries/bus<strong>in</strong>esses – – – (1.1) – (1.1)Loss on term<strong>in</strong>ation of operations – (5.9) (5.9) – – –(Increase)/decrease <strong>in</strong> stocks and work <strong>in</strong> progress (5.3) 0.2 (5.1) (4.0) 7.0 3.0(Increase)/decrease <strong>in</strong> debtors (0.5) 0.1 (0.4) 5.1 0.8 5.9Increase <strong>in</strong> creditors 9.8 6.0 15.8 8.6 0.3 8.9Increase <strong>in</strong> provisions relat<strong>in</strong>g to operat<strong>in</strong>g activities 1.3 11.6 12.9 7.4 7.4 14.8Reversal of amounts accrued under <strong>the</strong> Long-Term Incentive Plan – – – (0.3) – (0.3)Net cash <strong>in</strong>flow/(outflow) from operat<strong>in</strong>g activities 5.2 (8.6) (3.4) 37.8 (2.6) 35.2The cash outflow from operat<strong>in</strong>g activities <strong>in</strong>cludes an outflow of £5.3 million <strong>in</strong> respect of current year exceptional operat<strong>in</strong>g items and costs on term<strong>in</strong>ation ofoperations. This comprises £3.4 million of redundancies, Offer Period costs of £0.9 million, transfer of equipment of £0.7 million and £0.3 million of closure costs.Of <strong>the</strong> total exceptional profit and loss items £0.1 million have no cash impact. The rema<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g cash flows of £16.0 million will be <strong>in</strong>curred over <strong>the</strong> next one tofour years. In addition a cash outflow of £3.3 million has been <strong>in</strong>curred <strong>in</strong> respect of 2001 exceptional items. This comprises £2.2 million of rent, £0.7 millionrelocation costs and £0.4 million of redundancies.Group share of operat<strong>in</strong>g profits <strong>in</strong> jo<strong>in</strong>t ventures are accounted for <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> profit and loss account for <strong>the</strong> period. Cash flows aris<strong>in</strong>g from <strong>the</strong>se entities areaccounted for on receipt of dividends as recorded <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> Group Cash Flow Statement. Dividends from jo<strong>in</strong>t ventures accounted for <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> year ended 31 March2002 represent Group share of profit after tax <strong>in</strong> respect of <strong>the</strong> current and previous years.


52<strong>AEA</strong> TECHNOLOGY PLCAnnual report 2002Pr<strong>in</strong>cipal account<strong>in</strong>g policiesThe f<strong>in</strong>ancial statements have been prepared <strong>in</strong> accordance with applicable Account<strong>in</strong>g Standards <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> United K<strong>in</strong>gdom. A summary of <strong>the</strong> more importantGroup account<strong>in</strong>g policies, which have been applied consistently, is set out below.The Group has adopted <strong>the</strong> follow<strong>in</strong>g new account<strong>in</strong>g standards, <strong>the</strong> effect of which is disclosed <strong>in</strong> note 1, and comparative figures have been restatedaccord<strong>in</strong>gly:– F<strong>in</strong>ancial Report<strong>in</strong>g Standard 17: Retirement Benefits– F<strong>in</strong>ancial Report<strong>in</strong>g Standard 18: Account<strong>in</strong>g Policies– F<strong>in</strong>ancial Report<strong>in</strong>g Standard 19: Deferred TaxationGo<strong>in</strong>g concernThe f<strong>in</strong>ancial statements have been prepared on a go<strong>in</strong>g concern basis.Basis of account<strong>in</strong>gThe f<strong>in</strong>ancial statements are prepared <strong>in</strong> accordance with <strong>the</strong> historical cost convention as modified by <strong>the</strong> revaluation of certa<strong>in</strong> tangible fixed assets.Basis of consolidationThe Consolidated Profit and Loss Account and Balance Sheet <strong>in</strong>clude <strong>the</strong> f<strong>in</strong>ancial statements of <strong>the</strong> Company and its subsidiary undertak<strong>in</strong>gs made up to31 March 2002. Subsidiaries, jo<strong>in</strong>t ventures and associates with an account<strong>in</strong>g reference date o<strong>the</strong>r than 31 March have been consolidated on <strong>the</strong> basis ofmanagement accounts made up to 31 March 2002. The results of subsidiaries acquired or sold are <strong>in</strong>cluded <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> Consolidated Profit and Loss Account fromor to <strong>the</strong> date on which control passes. Intra-group sales and profits are elim<strong>in</strong>ated fully on consolidation.Acquisitions are accounted for under <strong>the</strong> acquisition method. On acquisition of a subsidiary, all of <strong>the</strong> subsidiary’s assets and liabilities that exist at <strong>the</strong> date ofacquisition are recorded at <strong>the</strong>ir fair values reflect<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong>ir condition at that date. All changes to those assets and liabilities, and <strong>the</strong> result<strong>in</strong>g ga<strong>in</strong>s and losses,that arise after <strong>the</strong> Group has ga<strong>in</strong>ed control of <strong>the</strong> subsidiary are charged to <strong>the</strong> post acquisition profit and loss account.TurnoverGroup turnover represents <strong>the</strong> total value of <strong>in</strong>come (exclud<strong>in</strong>g sales taxes and <strong>in</strong>tra-group sales) earned <strong>in</strong> respect of products delivered and services renderedto customers, royalties and contributions receivable <strong>in</strong> support of programmes, and <strong>the</strong> value of long-term contract work completed. Turnover relates to ord<strong>in</strong>aryactivities and is stated after trade discounts.Income from licences where <strong>the</strong> underly<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>tellectual property is secure and on which <strong>AEA</strong> Technology will not <strong>in</strong>cur future costs is recognised on sign<strong>in</strong>g of <strong>the</strong>contract with <strong>the</strong> licensee. Where <strong>AEA</strong> Technology will <strong>in</strong>cur future ma<strong>in</strong>tenance and support costs <strong>the</strong> full contract value is spread over <strong>the</strong> period of <strong>the</strong> contract.Any <strong>in</strong>voices raised or cash received <strong>in</strong> advance of recognition of <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>come is <strong>in</strong>cluded with<strong>in</strong> payments received on account <strong>in</strong> creditors. As detailed on page 53<strong>in</strong>come on long-term contracts is recognised as work is completed under <strong>the</strong> contract. All o<strong>the</strong>r <strong>in</strong>come is recognised on delivery of <strong>the</strong> product or service or onceall risks and rewards have passed to <strong>the</strong> customer.Research and developmentResearch and development expenditure is written off to <strong>the</strong> profit and loss account as <strong>in</strong>curred.Government grantsCapital based government grants are <strong>in</strong>cluded with<strong>in</strong> accruals and deferred <strong>in</strong>come <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> balance sheet and credited to operat<strong>in</strong>g profit over <strong>the</strong> expected usefuleconomic lives of <strong>the</strong> assets to which <strong>the</strong>y relate. Revenue based government grants are credited to operat<strong>in</strong>g profit to match <strong>the</strong> expenditure to which <strong>the</strong>y relate.Investment <strong>in</strong>comeIncome from fixed asset <strong>in</strong>vestments comprises dividends declared for periods up to <strong>the</strong> balance sheet date.Pension costsCosts <strong>in</strong> relation to def<strong>in</strong>ed benefit schemes are charged to <strong>the</strong> profit and loss account so as to spread <strong>the</strong> cost over <strong>the</strong> expected average rema<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g servicelives of employees. Variations from regular cost are spread over <strong>the</strong> average rema<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g service lives of <strong>the</strong> members of <strong>the</strong> schemes. Actuarial valuations of <strong>the</strong>schemes are carried out periodically and <strong>the</strong> rates of contribution payable and <strong>the</strong> pension costs are determ<strong>in</strong>ed hav<strong>in</strong>g regard to <strong>the</strong> results of <strong>the</strong>se valuations.The fund<strong>in</strong>g policy may differ from <strong>the</strong> account<strong>in</strong>g policy <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> recognition of any surplus/deficit or cost of benefit improvements, which may be over ashorter period than <strong>the</strong> average rema<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g service lives of employees.


53<strong>AEA</strong> TECHNOLOGY PLCAnnual report 2002Pr<strong>in</strong>cipal account<strong>in</strong>g policiesPension costs (cont<strong>in</strong>ued)Costs of def<strong>in</strong>ed contribution schemes are charged to <strong>the</strong> profit and loss account at <strong>the</strong> time <strong>the</strong> related pensionable pay is charged.The transitional arrangements of F<strong>in</strong>ancial Report<strong>in</strong>g Standard 17: Retirement Benefits have been applied <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> preparation of <strong>the</strong>se f<strong>in</strong>ancial statements with<strong>the</strong> relevant disclosures be<strong>in</strong>g made <strong>in</strong> note 9.GoodwillGoodwill aris<strong>in</strong>g on consolidation represents <strong>the</strong> excess of <strong>the</strong> fair value of <strong>the</strong> consideration given over <strong>the</strong> fair value of <strong>the</strong> identifiable net assets acquired.From 1 April 1998 goodwill aris<strong>in</strong>g on <strong>the</strong> acquisition of subsidiaries, jo<strong>in</strong>t ventures and associates is capitalised and amortised on a straight l<strong>in</strong>e basis over itsuseful life, which is between five and a maximum of 20 years. Provision is made for any impairment. Goodwill aris<strong>in</strong>g on acquisitions prior to 1 April 1998 waswritten off immediately aga<strong>in</strong>st reserves. This goodwill had been elim<strong>in</strong>ated <strong>in</strong> l<strong>in</strong>e with <strong>the</strong> account<strong>in</strong>g policy <strong>in</strong> place at <strong>the</strong> time and will be charged orcredited <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> profit and loss account on <strong>the</strong> subsequent disposal of <strong>the</strong> bus<strong>in</strong>ess to which it related.Intangible fixed assetsThe cost of acquired <strong>in</strong>tangible fixed assets is <strong>the</strong>ir purchase cost, toge<strong>the</strong>r with any <strong>in</strong>cidental costs of acquisition.Amortisation is calculated so as to write off <strong>the</strong> cost of <strong>in</strong>tangible fixed assets on a straight l<strong>in</strong>e basis over <strong>the</strong> expected economic lives of <strong>the</strong> assets concerned.The pr<strong>in</strong>cipal annual rate used for <strong>the</strong> amortisation of licences, where acquired, is 20% per annum.Tangible fixed assetsTangible fixed assets are recorded at cost less accumulated depreciation and any provision for impairment. Where assets were vested <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> Group under a transferscheme, made pursuant to Section one of <strong>the</strong> Atomic Energy Authority Act 1995, <strong>the</strong> value at which <strong>the</strong> assets were vested is deemed to have been <strong>the</strong> historicalcost to <strong>the</strong> Group. In <strong>the</strong> case of assets constructed by <strong>the</strong> Group, directly attributable production overheads are <strong>in</strong>cluded <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> cost capitalised.Depreciation is calculated so as to write off <strong>the</strong> cost of tangible fixed assets, less <strong>the</strong>ir estimated residual values, on a straight l<strong>in</strong>e basis over <strong>the</strong> expected usefuleconomic lives of <strong>the</strong> assets concerned.The estimated useful lives for <strong>the</strong> ma<strong>in</strong> categories of fixed assets are as follows:Freehold build<strong>in</strong>gsup to 30 yearsPlant and equipment:– computers and vehicles up to 5 years– o<strong>the</strong>r plant and equipment 5 - 10 yearsAssets <strong>in</strong> course of construction not depreciatedFreehold landnot depreciatedLeasehold land and build<strong>in</strong>gs are amortised over <strong>the</strong> period of <strong>the</strong> lease. For assets held under f<strong>in</strong>ance leases <strong>the</strong> depreciation period is <strong>the</strong> shorter of <strong>the</strong> periodof <strong>the</strong> lease or <strong>the</strong> estimated useful economic life of <strong>the</strong> asset.Investments and jo<strong>in</strong>t venturesInvestments are stated at cost less any impairment <strong>in</strong> value. The Group’s share of its jo<strong>in</strong>t ventures’ turnover and profits less losses is <strong>in</strong>cluded <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong>Consolidated Profit and Loss Account. The Group’s share of jo<strong>in</strong>t ventures’ gross assets and liabilities is <strong>in</strong>cluded <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> Consolidated Balance Sheet.Stocks and work <strong>in</strong> progress (exclud<strong>in</strong>g long-term contract work <strong>in</strong> progress)Stocks are valued at <strong>the</strong> lower of cost and net realisable value. Where necessary, provision is made for obsolete, slow mov<strong>in</strong>g and defective stocks. Work <strong>in</strong>progress is valued at cost, less <strong>the</strong> cost of work <strong>in</strong>voiced on <strong>in</strong>complete contracts and less foreseeable losses. Cost comprises purchase cost plus production andrelated overheads.Long-term contractsTurnover on long-term contracts is recognised accord<strong>in</strong>g to <strong>the</strong> stage reached <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> contract by reference to <strong>the</strong> value of work completed. An appropriateestimate of <strong>the</strong> profit attributable to work completed is recognised once <strong>the</strong> outcome of <strong>the</strong> contract can be assessed with reasonable certa<strong>in</strong>ty. The amount bywhich <strong>the</strong> turnover exceeds payments on account is shown under debtors as amounts recoverable on contracts. The costs on long-term contracts not yet taken to<strong>the</strong> profit and loss account less related foreseeable losses and payments on account are shown <strong>in</strong> stocks as long-term contract work <strong>in</strong> progress balances.


54<strong>AEA</strong> TECHNOLOGY PLCAnnual report 2002Pr<strong>in</strong>cipal account<strong>in</strong>g policiesDecommission<strong>in</strong>g and waste managementProvision is made for <strong>the</strong> future costs aris<strong>in</strong>g from <strong>the</strong> clos<strong>in</strong>g down and decontam<strong>in</strong>ation of certa<strong>in</strong> experimental facilities and <strong>the</strong> management and f<strong>in</strong>al disposalof wastes where <strong>the</strong>se activities are a Group responsibility. These provisions are made for <strong>the</strong> full liability when operations commence and <strong>the</strong> facility becomescontam<strong>in</strong>ated. Many of <strong>the</strong> liabilities for which provision is be<strong>in</strong>g made will not crystallise for many years. The provisions are expressed at current price levels andare discounted at a real rate of <strong>in</strong>terest to take account of <strong>the</strong> delay <strong>in</strong> meet<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> expenditure. As expla<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>in</strong> note 25, liabilities <strong>in</strong>curred prior to 1 April 1996rema<strong>in</strong> with UK<strong>AEA</strong>.Deferred taxationDeferred taxation is recognised us<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>cremental liability method whereby deferred taxation is provided on a full provision basis, without discount<strong>in</strong>g, on alltim<strong>in</strong>g differences which have arisen but not reversed at <strong>the</strong> balance sheet date. As required by F<strong>in</strong>ancial Report<strong>in</strong>g Standard 19: Deferred Taxation no tim<strong>in</strong>gdifferences are recognised <strong>in</strong> respect of:i) fixed assets which are revalued without <strong>the</strong>re be<strong>in</strong>g any commitment to sell <strong>the</strong> asset;ii) ga<strong>in</strong>s on sale of assets which are rolled over <strong>in</strong>to replacement assets; andiii) remittance of subsidiary or jo<strong>in</strong>t venture earn<strong>in</strong>gs which would cause tax to be payable, but where no commitment has been made to <strong>the</strong> remittance of<strong>the</strong> earn<strong>in</strong>gs.The deferred taxation balance has been measured at <strong>the</strong> tax rate expected to apply when <strong>the</strong> tim<strong>in</strong>g differences reverse.Deferred tax assets are recognised to <strong>the</strong> extent that it is regarded as more likely than not that <strong>the</strong>y will be recovered.Derivative f<strong>in</strong>ancial <strong>in</strong>strumentsThe Group uses derivative f<strong>in</strong>ancial <strong>in</strong>struments to reduce exposure to foreign exchange risk and <strong>in</strong>terest movements. The Group does not hold or issue derivativef<strong>in</strong>ancial <strong>in</strong>struments for speculative purposes.For a forward foreign exchange contract to be treated as a h<strong>edge</strong>, <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>strument must be related to actual foreign currency assets or liabilities or to a probablecommitment. It must <strong>in</strong>volve <strong>the</strong> same currency or similar currencies as <strong>the</strong> h<strong>edge</strong>d item and must also reduce <strong>the</strong> risk of foreign currency exchange movementson <strong>the</strong> Group’s operations. Ga<strong>in</strong>s and losses aris<strong>in</strong>g on <strong>the</strong>se contracts are recognised <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> profit and loss account when <strong>the</strong> h<strong>edge</strong>d transaction is recognised.For an <strong>in</strong>terest rate swap to be treated as a h<strong>edge</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>strument must be related to actual assets or liabilities or a probable commitment and must change <strong>the</strong>nature of <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>terest rate by convert<strong>in</strong>g a fixed rate to a variable rate or vice versa. Interest differentials under <strong>the</strong>se swaps are recognised by adjust<strong>in</strong>g net<strong>in</strong>terest payable over <strong>the</strong> periods of <strong>the</strong> contracts.LeasesCosts <strong>in</strong> respect of operat<strong>in</strong>g leases are charged on a straight l<strong>in</strong>e basis over <strong>the</strong> lease term. Assets acquired under f<strong>in</strong>ance leases are capitalised and <strong>the</strong>outstand<strong>in</strong>g future lease obligations are shown <strong>in</strong> creditors.Employee share schemesThe cost of awards to employees that take <strong>the</strong> form of shares or rights to shares are recognised over <strong>the</strong> period of <strong>the</strong> employee’s related performance.The Company has applied <strong>the</strong> exemption <strong>in</strong> Urgent Issues Task Force Abstract 17: Employee Share Schemes for Inland Revenue approved SAYE schemes andequivalent overseas schemes. As a result no cost is recognised <strong>in</strong> respect of shares offered under <strong>the</strong>se schemes.Foreign currenciesAll transactions denom<strong>in</strong>ated <strong>in</strong> foreign currencies are translated <strong>in</strong>to sterl<strong>in</strong>g at <strong>the</strong> exchange rate rul<strong>in</strong>g on <strong>the</strong> date <strong>the</strong> transaction takes place or at <strong>the</strong>contracted rate if <strong>the</strong> transaction is covered by a forward exchange contract. Balances denom<strong>in</strong>ated <strong>in</strong> foreign currencies are translated <strong>in</strong>to sterl<strong>in</strong>g at <strong>the</strong>exchange rate rul<strong>in</strong>g at <strong>the</strong> balance sheet date or if appropriate at <strong>the</strong> forward contract rate. All foreign exchange differences are taken to <strong>the</strong> profit and lossaccount <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> period <strong>in</strong> which <strong>the</strong>y arise.Assets and liabilities of subsidiaries <strong>in</strong> foreign currencies are translated <strong>in</strong>to sterl<strong>in</strong>g at rates of exchange rul<strong>in</strong>g at <strong>the</strong> balance sheet date and <strong>the</strong> results offoreign subsidiaries are translated at <strong>the</strong> average rate of exchange for <strong>the</strong> year. Differences on exchange aris<strong>in</strong>g from <strong>the</strong> retranslation of <strong>the</strong> open<strong>in</strong>g net<strong>in</strong>vestment <strong>in</strong> subsidiary companies and from <strong>the</strong> translation of <strong>the</strong> results of those companies at average rate are taken to reserves, net of exchange differenceson related foreign currency borrow<strong>in</strong>gs, and are reported <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> Statement of Total Recognised Ga<strong>in</strong>s and Losses.


55<strong>AEA</strong> TECHNOLOGY PLCAnnual report 2002Notes to <strong>the</strong> f<strong>in</strong>ancial statements1 Prior year adjustmentsThe f<strong>in</strong>ancial statements have been prepared us<strong>in</strong>g account<strong>in</strong>g policies consistent with <strong>the</strong> Annual Report and Accountsfor <strong>the</strong> year ended 31 March 2001 o<strong>the</strong>r than changes necessary to implement <strong>the</strong> follow<strong>in</strong>g account<strong>in</strong>g standards whichare mandatory for <strong>the</strong> current year’s Annual Report and Accounts:– F<strong>in</strong>ancial Report<strong>in</strong>g Standard 17: Retirement Benefits (disclosure only)– F<strong>in</strong>ancial Report<strong>in</strong>g Standard 18: Account<strong>in</strong>g Policies, and– F<strong>in</strong>ancial Report<strong>in</strong>g Standard 19: Deferred Taxation.Follow<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> implementation of F<strong>in</strong>ancial Report<strong>in</strong>g Standard 18: Account<strong>in</strong>g Policies, all of <strong>the</strong> Group’s account<strong>in</strong>gpolicies have been reviewed for appropriateness. As a result of this review our policy on <strong>the</strong> recognition of <strong>in</strong>come onsoftware licenses on which <strong>AEA</strong> Technology will <strong>in</strong>cur future costs has been revised. In previous years <strong>the</strong> fullcontract value was recognised on sign<strong>in</strong>g a b<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>g contract and a provision made for future ma<strong>in</strong>tenance and supportcosts. Under <strong>the</strong> new policy <strong>the</strong> full contract value is spread over <strong>the</strong> period of <strong>the</strong> contract. The new policy aligns <strong>the</strong>recognition of turnover with <strong>the</strong> payment profile and <strong>the</strong> period over which <strong>the</strong> customer obta<strong>in</strong>s <strong>the</strong> benefit and <strong>AEA</strong>Technology satisfies its obligation under <strong>the</strong> contract. This is <strong>in</strong> l<strong>in</strong>e with <strong>the</strong> policies used by competitors and is amore conservative treatment for <strong>the</strong> recognition of turnover. Hence this new policy is considered more appropriate.This change <strong>in</strong> account<strong>in</strong>g policy decreased turnover to 31 March 2002 by £19.5 million and operat<strong>in</strong>g profit by£17.0 million and to 31 March 2001 turnover was reduced by £9.9 million and operat<strong>in</strong>g profit by £7.8 million.The implementation of F<strong>in</strong>ancial Report<strong>in</strong>g Standard 19: Deferred Taxation requires a full ra<strong>the</strong>r than partial provision fordeferred taxation. This has resulted <strong>in</strong> a deferred tax asset of £13.0 million be<strong>in</strong>g recognised at 31 March 2002(£0.1 million at 31 March 2001). The restatement of <strong>the</strong> prior year figures to reflect this change <strong>in</strong> account<strong>in</strong>g policyresulted <strong>in</strong> an <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> tax credit of £1.8 million to 31 March 2001.2 Geographical analysisTurnover can be analysed by geographical dest<strong>in</strong>ation as follows:Cont<strong>in</strong>u<strong>in</strong>g Discont<strong>in</strong>uedCont<strong>in</strong>u<strong>in</strong>g Discont<strong>in</strong>ued operations operations Totaloperations operations Total 2001 2001 20012002 2002 2002 restated restated restated£m £m £m £m £m £mGovernment 32.9 16.8 49.7 35.9 41.2 77.1Public sector 16.7 4.5 21.2 17.5 10.8 28.3Private sector 98.0 23.0 121.0 78.2 52.9 131.1Total UK 147.6 44.3 191.9 131.6 104.9 236.5Europe 34.1 9.0 43.1 32.3 13.3 45.6North America 51.4 16.5 67.9 37.8 16.2 54.0Rest of <strong>the</strong> World 18.7 12.8 31.5 18.8 13.9 32.7251.8 82.6 334.4 220.5 148.3 368.8Turnover can be analysed by geographical orig<strong>in</strong> as follows:Cont<strong>in</strong>u<strong>in</strong>g Discont<strong>in</strong>uedCont<strong>in</strong>u<strong>in</strong>g Discont<strong>in</strong>ued operations operations Totaloperations operations Total 2001 2001 20012002 2002 2002 restated restated restated£m £m £m £m £m £mUK 192.2 50.9 243.1 174.5 121.0 295.5Europe 21.6 2.3 23.9 14.9 1.7 16.6North America 31.1 29.0 60.1 27.2 24.8 52.0Rest of <strong>the</strong> World 6.9 0.4 7.3 3.9 0.8 4.7251.8 82.6 334.4 220.5 148.3 368.8The Group’s share of jo<strong>in</strong>t ventures’ turnover <strong>in</strong>creased turnover both to and from North America by £1.0 million(2001: £2.1 million) and to and from <strong>the</strong> Rest of <strong>the</strong> World by £2.0 million (2001: £2.5 million).


56<strong>AEA</strong> TECHNOLOGY PLCAnnual report 2002Notes to <strong>the</strong> f<strong>in</strong>ancial statements2 Geographical analysis (cont<strong>in</strong>ued)Operat<strong>in</strong>g (loss)/profit can be analysed by geographical orig<strong>in</strong> as follows:BeforeBefore exceptional Exceptionalexceptional Exceptional items items Totalitems items Total 2001 2001 20012002 2002 2002 restated restated restated£m £m £m £m £m £mUK (17.5) (21.0) (38.5) 10.5 (24.0) (13.5)Europe 1.7 – 1.7 0.7 – 0.7North America 4.4 (0.1) 4.3 (0.2) – (0.2)Rest of <strong>the</strong> World 1.8 – 1.8 1.0 – 1.0(9.6) (21.1) (30.7) 12.0 (24.0) (12.0)Included with<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> UK operat<strong>in</strong>g loss shown above is a loss of £6.5 million relat<strong>in</strong>g to discont<strong>in</strong>ued operations, Europeprofit £0.7 million, North America profit £5.4 million and Rest of <strong>the</strong> World profit £0.5 million (2001: UK profit£9.2 million, Europe profit £0.1 million, North America profit £1.4 million, Rest of World profit £0.2 million).The Group’s share of jo<strong>in</strong>t ventures’ operat<strong>in</strong>g profit <strong>in</strong>creased operat<strong>in</strong>g profit <strong>in</strong> North America by £0.2 million(2001: £0.1 million).Net operat<strong>in</strong>g assets can be analysed by geographical orig<strong>in</strong> as follows:20012002 restated£m £mUK 54.1 80.0Europe 4.9 5.1North America 2.6 5.0Rest of <strong>the</strong> World 2.5 1.964.1 92.0The Group’s share of jo<strong>in</strong>t ventures’ net operat<strong>in</strong>g assets <strong>in</strong>creased net operat<strong>in</strong>g assets <strong>in</strong> North America by nil(2001: £0.1 million) and <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> Rest of <strong>the</strong> World by £0.3 million (2001: £0.3 million).3 Segmental analysis by class of bus<strong>in</strong>essTotal Intersegmental ExternalTotal Intersegmental External turnover turnover turnoverturnover turnover turnover restated restated restated2002 2002 2002 2001 2001 2001TURNOVER: CLASS OF BUSINESS £m £m £m £m £m £mRail 75.8 (0.5) 75.3 65.3 (0.7) 64.6Environment 50.2 (0.8) 49.4 44.0 (3.3) 40.7Future Technologies 62.4 (1.0) 61.4 69.1 (1.8) 67.3Eng<strong>in</strong>eer<strong>in</strong>g Software 46.6 – 46.6 44.6 (0.1) 44.5Nuclear Technology 94.2 (1.3) 92.9 148.7 (3.7) 145.0Central items 8.8 – 8.8 6.7 – 6.7338.0 (3.6) 334.4 378.4 (9.6) 368.8The Group’s share of jo<strong>in</strong>t ventures’ turnover <strong>in</strong>creased turnover <strong>in</strong> Nuclear Technology by £3.0 million (2001: £4.6 million).


57<strong>AEA</strong> TECHNOLOGY PLCAnnual report 2002Notes to <strong>the</strong> f<strong>in</strong>ancial statements3 Segmental analysis by class of bus<strong>in</strong>ess (cont<strong>in</strong>ued)BeforeBefore exceptional Exceptionalexceptional Exceptional items items Totalitems items Total 2001 2001 20012002 2002 2002 restated restated restatedOPERATING PROFIT/(LOSS): CLASS OF BUSINESS £m £m £m £m £m £mRail 12.3 (0.5) 11.8 9.4 – 9.4Environment 7.9 (1.5) 6.4 6.9 (1.0) 5.9Future Technologies (11.0) (1.2) (12.2) (9.9) (10.7) (20.6)Eng<strong>in</strong>eer<strong>in</strong>g Software (1.4) (1.0) (2.4) – – –Nuclear Technology (4.0) (11.4) (15.4) 10.7 (10.3) 0.4Central items (13.4) (5.5) (18.9) (5.1) (2.0) (7.1)(9.6) (21.1) (30.7) 12.0 (24.0) (12.0)Profit on sale of bus<strong>in</strong>esses – 53.7 53.7 – – –Loss on term<strong>in</strong>ation of operations – (5.9) (5.9) – – –Income from o<strong>the</strong>r fixed asset <strong>in</strong>vestments – – – 0.3 – 0.3(Loss)/profit before <strong>in</strong>terest (9.6) 26.7 17.1 12.3 (24.0) (11.7)Net <strong>in</strong>terest payable (3.6) – (3.6) (5.5) – (5.5)(Loss)/profit before taxation (13.2) 26.7 13.5 6.8 (24.0) (17.2)The Group’s share of jo<strong>in</strong>t ventures’ operat<strong>in</strong>g profit reduced <strong>the</strong> operat<strong>in</strong>g loss <strong>in</strong> Nuclear Technology by £0.2 million(2001: £0.1 million).In previous years corporate overheads were all allocated proportionally to <strong>the</strong> bus<strong>in</strong>ess segments. As <strong>the</strong> bus<strong>in</strong>essesbecome more autonomous <strong>the</strong> directors consider that it is no longer appropriate to allocate all of <strong>the</strong>se costs. Corporateoverheads of £3.2 million (2001: £9.0 million) have been allocated based on <strong>the</strong> bus<strong>in</strong>esses’ use of operational capital.The segmental analysis has been restated with <strong>the</strong> rema<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g unallocated corporate overheads disclosed separately ascentral items.In addition, <strong>the</strong> bus<strong>in</strong>ess segment figures have been restated to reflect <strong>the</strong> organisational structure disclosed <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong>2001 Annual Report and Accounts.Turnover and operat<strong>in</strong>g profit/(loss) relat<strong>in</strong>g to discont<strong>in</strong>ued operations may be analysed by segment as follows:Operat<strong>in</strong>gOperat<strong>in</strong>g Turnover (loss)/profitTurnover profit/(loss) 2001 20012002 2002 restated restated£m £m £m £mRail 0.6 – 0.7 (0.4)Future Technologies 15.0 (1.3) 27.2 (8.0)Eng<strong>in</strong>eer<strong>in</strong>g Software 33.3 0.2 31.8 1.0Nuclear Technology 33.7 1.5 88.6 18.3Central items – (0.3) – –Total 82.6 0.1 148.3 10.9


58<strong>AEA</strong> TECHNOLOGY PLCAnnual report 2002Notes to <strong>the</strong> f<strong>in</strong>ancial statements3 Segmental analysis by class of bus<strong>in</strong>ess (cont<strong>in</strong>ued)Net operat<strong>in</strong>g assets/(liabilities) may be analysed by class of bus<strong>in</strong>ess as follows:TotalTotal 20012002 restatedNET OPERATING ASSETS/(LIABILITIES): CLASS OF BUSINESS £m £mRail 21.8 26.1Environment (0.9) 3.3Future Technologies 15.4 20.5Eng<strong>in</strong>eer<strong>in</strong>g Software 3.3 12.6Nuclear Technology 2.0 28.441.6 90.9Central net operat<strong>in</strong>g assets 22.5 1.1Net operat<strong>in</strong>g assets 64.1 92.0Net borrow<strong>in</strong>gs (15.4) (67.8)Net assets 48.7 24.2The Group’s share of jo<strong>in</strong>t ventures’ operat<strong>in</strong>g assets <strong>in</strong>creased operat<strong>in</strong>g assets <strong>in</strong> Nuclear Technology by £0.3 million(2001: £0.4 million).4 Exceptional operat<strong>in</strong>g chargesExceptional operat<strong>in</strong>g charges relat<strong>in</strong>g to <strong>the</strong> cont<strong>in</strong>u<strong>in</strong>g bus<strong>in</strong>ess streams comprise:(i)(ii)(iii)(iv)(v)£8.8 million for redundancies follow<strong>in</strong>g cont<strong>in</strong>u<strong>in</strong>g rationalisation of activities with<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> Group <strong>in</strong> l<strong>in</strong>e with <strong>the</strong>strategic review announced <strong>in</strong> November 2000 and a cost reduction and restructur<strong>in</strong>g exercise aris<strong>in</strong>g from this review;£1.8 million for redundancies follow<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> decision to cease QSA manufactur<strong>in</strong>g operations <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> UK;£3.5 million for redundancies and £0.9 million of o<strong>the</strong>r costs relat<strong>in</strong>g to <strong>the</strong> decision to exit from <strong>the</strong>Harwell B220 facilities;£5.2 million of additional decommission<strong>in</strong>g and waste costs identified follow<strong>in</strong>g a review of <strong>the</strong> B220 operationsand exit plans;£0.9 million of costs relat<strong>in</strong>g to <strong>the</strong> Offer Period.These exceptional operat<strong>in</strong>g charges can be analysed as follows:Redundancy Decommission<strong>in</strong>g O<strong>the</strong>r Total£m £m £m £mRail 0.5 – – 0.5Environment 1.5 – – 1.5Future Technologies 1.2 – – 1.2Eng<strong>in</strong>eer<strong>in</strong>g Software 1.0 – – 1.0Nuclear Technology 5.3 5.2 0.9 11.4Central items 4.6 – 0.9 5.514.1 5.2 1.8 21.1


59<strong>AEA</strong> TECHNOLOGY PLCAnnual report 2002Notes to <strong>the</strong> f<strong>in</strong>ancial statements5 Operat<strong>in</strong>g results of acquisitionsAcquisitions dur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> year had <strong>the</strong> effect of <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g turnover by £8.1 million and operat<strong>in</strong>g profit by nil anddecreas<strong>in</strong>g net operat<strong>in</strong>g assets by £3.3 million as detailed below:Netoperat<strong>in</strong>gOperat<strong>in</strong>g assets/Turnover profit (liabilities)£m £m £mRail 2.1 – 0.4Environment 6.0 – (3.7)Total 8.1 – (3.3)Acquisitions dur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> year had <strong>the</strong> follow<strong>in</strong>g impact on operat<strong>in</strong>g costs:Cost of sales 5.5Adm<strong>in</strong>istrative expenses 2.2Research and development 0.4Net o<strong>the</strong>r operat<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>come –6 Operat<strong>in</strong>g costsTotal2002£mBeforeBefore exceptional Exceptionalexceptional Exceptional items items Totalitems items Total 2001 2001 20012002 2002 2002 restated restated restated£m £m £m £m £m £mCost of sales (1) 214.2 5.5 219.7 254.4 15.1 269.5Adm<strong>in</strong>istrative expenses 116.3 15.6 131.9 88.1 8.9 97.0Research and development 13.1 – 13.1 11.6 – 11.6Net o<strong>the</strong>r operat<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>come (2.4) – (2.4) (1.8) – (1.8)(1) Includes £5.1 million research and development expenditure (2001: £3.1 million).8.1341.2 21.1 362.3 352.3 24.0 376.3Operat<strong>in</strong>g costs may be analysed between cont<strong>in</strong>u<strong>in</strong>g and discont<strong>in</strong>ued activities as follows:BeforeBefore exceptional Exceptionalexceptional Exceptional items items Totalitems items Total 2001 2001 20012002 2002 2002 restated restated restated£m £m £m £m £m £mCont<strong>in</strong>u<strong>in</strong>g activities:Cost of sales (1) 163.5 5.5 169.0 153.0 12.3 165.3Adm<strong>in</strong>istrative expenses 90.8 15.4 106.2 62.9 8.6 71.5Research and development 7.8 – 7.8 5.7 – 5.7Net o<strong>the</strong>r operat<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>come (2.4) – (2.4) (1.7) – (1.7)259.7 20.9 280.6 219.9 20.9 240.8Discont<strong>in</strong>ued activities:Cost of sales (2) 50.7 – 50.7 101.4 2.8 104.2Adm<strong>in</strong>istrative expenses 25.5 0.2 25.7 25.2 0.3 25.5Research and development 5.3 – 5.3 5.9 – 5.9Net o<strong>the</strong>r operat<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>come – – – (0.1) – (0.1)(1) Includes £1.2 million research and development expenditure (2001: £0.6 million).(2) Includes £3.9 million research and development expenditure (2001: £2.5 million).81.5 0.2 81.7 132.4 3.1 135.5Included with<strong>in</strong> net o<strong>the</strong>r operat<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>come of cont<strong>in</strong>u<strong>in</strong>g activities is £0.1 million (2001: £0.1 million) <strong>in</strong> respect ofgrants received by AGM Batteries Limited.


60<strong>AEA</strong> TECHNOLOGY PLCAnnual report 2002Notes to <strong>the</strong> f<strong>in</strong>ancial statements7 EmployeesBeforeBeforeexceptional Exceptional exceptional Exceptionalitems items Total items items Total2002 2002 2002 2001 2001 2001STAFF COSTS IN THE YEAR WERE £m £m £m £m £m £mWages and salaries 140.9 17.2 158.1 143.1 2.9 146.0Social security costs 12.3 – 12.3 12.2 – 12.2O<strong>the</strong>r pension costs (note 9) 6.3 – 6.3 6.4 0.2 6.6159.5 17.2 176.7 161.7 3.1 164.8An analysis of <strong>the</strong> average monthly number of employees based on full-time employment (<strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g Executive Directors)is set out below:GroupCompany2002 2001 2002 2001Number Number Number NumberManagerial and professional 2,445 3,318 1,670 2,614Support 845 619 438 350Technical 868 415 418 394Manufactur<strong>in</strong>g 77 197 22 –4,235 4,549 2,548 3,3588 Directors’ emolumentsDetailed disclosures of Directors’ <strong>in</strong>dividual remuneration and share options are given <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> Report on Directors’Remuneration on pages 38 to 43.2002 2001REMUNERATION PAYABLE TO DIRECTORS £000 £000Aggregate emoluments 1,632 1,389Retirement benefits accrued to <strong>the</strong> Chairman and three Directors under <strong>the</strong> Company’s def<strong>in</strong>ed benefits schemes. Prior to26 September 1996 retirement benefits accrued to <strong>the</strong> Chairman and one Director under UK<strong>AEA</strong>’s def<strong>in</strong>ed benefits scheme.2002 2001EMOLUMENTS PAYABLE TO THE HIGHEST PAID DIRECTOR £000 £000Aggregate emoluments 402 295Def<strong>in</strong>ed benefit scheme: accrued pension at <strong>the</strong> year end 92 78


61<strong>AEA</strong> TECHNOLOGY PLCAnnual report 2002Notes to <strong>the</strong> f<strong>in</strong>ancial statements9 Pension costsThe Group operates a number of pension schemes around <strong>the</strong> world. The major schemes are of <strong>the</strong> def<strong>in</strong>ed benefit typeand <strong>the</strong> assets of <strong>the</strong> schemes are largely held <strong>in</strong> separate trustee adm<strong>in</strong>istered funds. The Group has cont<strong>in</strong>ued toaccount for pensions <strong>in</strong> accordance with Statement of Standard Account<strong>in</strong>g Practice 24: Account<strong>in</strong>g for Pensions Costsfor <strong>the</strong> current period. The additional disclosures required under <strong>the</strong> transitional rules of F<strong>in</strong>ancial Report<strong>in</strong>g Standard17: Retirement Benefits are also presented below.Pension arrangementsFollow<strong>in</strong>g privatisation, <strong>the</strong> Company set up a new funded def<strong>in</strong>ed benefits pension scheme (<strong>the</strong> <strong>AEA</strong> TechnologyPension Scheme) cover<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> Company’s employees. The Company scheme is an exempt approved occupational pensionscheme, is contracted out of <strong>the</strong> State Earn<strong>in</strong>gs Related Pension Scheme and provides f<strong>in</strong>al salary benefits. The schemecomprises three sections. Employees at <strong>the</strong> date of privatisation were eligible to transfer <strong>the</strong>ir accrued benefits from <strong>the</strong>pre-privatisation statutory def<strong>in</strong>ed benefit schemes <strong>in</strong>to <strong>the</strong> closed section of <strong>the</strong> Pension Scheme on a past servicereserve basis and <strong>the</strong> total amount transferred <strong>in</strong> to cover this liability was £147.5 million. Independent actuarial advice<strong>in</strong> respect of <strong>the</strong> likely costs of fund<strong>in</strong>g and operat<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> Pension Scheme estimates that <strong>the</strong> long-term cost will be at10.9% of pensionable pay. The open section is <strong>the</strong> arrangement for new recruits to <strong>the</strong> Company and some subsidiaries,but pre-privatisation employees were also able to jo<strong>in</strong>. The Senior Executive section is available to senior staff by<strong>in</strong>vitation only. The contributions payable were 10.9% for <strong>the</strong> year under review.The def<strong>in</strong>ed benefit scheme is valued regularly by <strong>in</strong>dependent actuaries. Follow<strong>in</strong>g a request from <strong>the</strong> trustees of <strong>the</strong>pension scheme <strong>the</strong> latest valuation of <strong>the</strong> Company scheme was carried out as at 31 March 2000 us<strong>in</strong>g a marketvaluation basis. In l<strong>in</strong>e with a general consensus with<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> pension <strong>in</strong>dustry <strong>the</strong> actuarial valuation method haschanged from a traditional actuarial approach to a market related approach where assets are valued at <strong>the</strong>ir marketvalue. This approach is easier to understand and does not artificially smooth results. However this approach does nothide <strong>the</strong> volatility <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> value of pension scheme assets and can result <strong>in</strong> successive valuations vary<strong>in</strong>g substantially.The move to this method of valuation was <strong>the</strong> first step <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> implementation of F<strong>in</strong>ancial Report<strong>in</strong>g Standard 17:Retirement Benefits.The ma<strong>in</strong> actuarial assumptions are:Investment return6.3% paSalary growth4.8% paPension <strong>in</strong>creases:– closed section 2.9% pa– open section 2.7% pa– executive section 2.8% paThe valuation used for account<strong>in</strong>g purposes differs from that used for fund<strong>in</strong>g purposes. To produce a more realisticactuarial valuation <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>vestment return was <strong>in</strong>creased by 0.5% to 6.3% for account<strong>in</strong>g purposes. The yield on longdatedgilts at <strong>the</strong> valuation date was 4.8%. Based on long term historical trends an equity risk premium of 3% couldbe expected. Therefore, an <strong>in</strong>vestment return of 6.3% is considered reasonably prudent.The market value of <strong>the</strong> Company scheme’s assets as at 31 March 2000 was £282.2 million. The results of <strong>the</strong> valuation<strong>in</strong>dicated that <strong>the</strong> actuarial value of <strong>the</strong> assets represents 116% of <strong>the</strong> actuarial value of <strong>the</strong> accrued liabilities.The Company also provides, on a def<strong>in</strong>ed contribution basis, an additional voluntary contribution scheme and a shift paypension plan. O<strong>the</strong>r def<strong>in</strong>ed contribution pension arrangements exist for some employees <strong>in</strong> subsidiaries.Employees who were formerly employees of BR Research Limited prior to <strong>the</strong>ir transfer <strong>in</strong>to <strong>AEA</strong> Technology on 1 April1997 are members of <strong>the</strong> <strong>AEA</strong> Technology Rail Shared Cost Section of <strong>the</strong> Railways Pension Scheme. Similarly employeeswho were formerly employees of TCI Limited prior to <strong>the</strong>ir transfer to <strong>AEA</strong> Technology on 1 April 1999 are members of<strong>the</strong> <strong>AEA</strong> Technology Rail (TCI) Shared Cost Section of <strong>the</strong> Railways Pension Scheme. Both of <strong>the</strong>se sections arecontracted out def<strong>in</strong>ed benefits pension schemes. Employees currently pay a contribution of 5% of pensionable pay and<strong>the</strong> employer pays a contribution of 7.5%.


62<strong>AEA</strong> TECHNOLOGY PLCAnnual report 2002Notes to <strong>the</strong> f<strong>in</strong>ancial statements9 Pension costs (cont<strong>in</strong>ued)Pension costsIt was agreed by <strong>the</strong> Company and UK<strong>AEA</strong> that no contributions would be made to <strong>the</strong> pre-privatised pension schemesfrom 1 April 1996 until privatisation. The holiday <strong>in</strong> Company pension scheme contributions ceased on 25 September1996 at which date <strong>the</strong> Company ceased to participate <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> schemes.The total pension cost for <strong>the</strong> Group was £6.3 million (2001: £6.6 million). The charge to <strong>the</strong> profit and loss accounthas been reduced by <strong>the</strong> effect of spread<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> provision built up dur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> contributions holiday discussed above,over <strong>the</strong> expected average service lives of <strong>the</strong> employees from 1 April 1996, and by <strong>the</strong> effect of spread<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> surpluson <strong>the</strong> Company scheme over <strong>the</strong> expected service lives of <strong>the</strong> employees from 1 April 2000.Included <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> Company balance sheet at 31 March 2002 is a provision of £3.4 million (2001: £3.7 million) <strong>in</strong> respectof pension costs. The provision comprises <strong>the</strong> excess of accumulated pension charges over <strong>the</strong> payment of contributionsto <strong>the</strong> Company pension scheme (2002: £1.5 million, 2001: £1.9 million) and <strong>the</strong> unfunded pension arrangements<strong>in</strong> respect of Directors (2002: £1.9 million, 2001: £1.6 million). Included <strong>in</strong> debtors is a pension prepayment of£14.9 million (2001: £11.0 million). £2.2 million (2001: £2.2 million) relates to <strong>the</strong> fund<strong>in</strong>g surplus <strong>in</strong> respect of <strong>the</strong><strong>AEA</strong> Technology Rail Shared Cost Section of <strong>the</strong> Railways Pension Scheme, £1.3 million (2001: £1.3 million) relates to<strong>the</strong> surplus on <strong>the</strong> <strong>AEA</strong> Technology Rail (TCI) Shared Cost Section of <strong>the</strong> Railways Pension Scheme and £11.4 million(2001: £7.5 million) relates to <strong>the</strong> surplus on <strong>the</strong> Company scheme.Contributions of £0.1 million (2001: £0.4 million) have been made <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> year <strong>in</strong> respect of def<strong>in</strong>ed contributionschemes operated by <strong>the</strong> Company and its UK and overseas subsidiaries.F<strong>in</strong>ancial Report<strong>in</strong>g Standard 17: Retirement Benefits (FRS 17) DisclosuresThe <strong>most</strong> recent actuarial valuations for <strong>the</strong> def<strong>in</strong>ed benefit schemes operated by <strong>the</strong> Group have been updated to31 March 2002 by <strong>in</strong>dependent actuaries. The dates of <strong>the</strong> <strong>most</strong> recent full actuarial valuations, <strong>the</strong> ma<strong>in</strong> f<strong>in</strong>ancialassumptions used to calculate <strong>the</strong> liabilities of <strong>the</strong> Group’s schemes as at 31 March 2002 under FRS 17, and <strong>the</strong>contribution rates for <strong>the</strong> current and follow<strong>in</strong>g year are as follows:Company<strong>AEA</strong>T Railscheme <strong>AEA</strong>T Rail (TCI) K<strong>in</strong>ectrics Inc QSA Inc QSA GmbHDate of <strong>most</strong> recent full actuarial valuation 31.3.00 31.8.00 31.8.00 1.1.01 31.3.01 31.3.02Ma<strong>in</strong> f<strong>in</strong>ancial assumptions:Rate of <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong> salaries 4.8% 4.0% 4.0% 3.5% 5.0% 4.0%Rate of <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong> pensions payment 2.8% 2.5% 2.5% – – 2.5%Rate of <strong>in</strong>crease of deferred pensions – 2.5% 2.5% – – –Discount rate of scheme liabilities 6.1% 5.75% 5.75% 7.0% 7.5% 7.0%Inflation rate 2.8% 2.5% 2.5% 2.5% 3.0% 2.5%Contribution rates:1 April 2001 – 31 March 2002 10.9% 7.5% 7.5% 13.38% 5.0% 6.5%1 April 2002 – 31 March 2003 13.1% 7.5% 7.5% 13.38% 5.0% 6.5%The expected rates of return on <strong>the</strong> assets of <strong>the</strong> def<strong>in</strong>ed benefit schemes operated by <strong>the</strong> Group as at 31 March 2002were as follows:Company<strong>AEA</strong>T Railscheme <strong>AEA</strong>T Rail (TCI) K<strong>in</strong>ectrics Inc QSA Inc QSA GmbH (1)Equities 8.2% 7.50% 7.50% 5.6% 9.0% n/aBonds 6.2% 5.25% 5.25% 5.6% 9.0% n/aProperty n/a 6.50% 6.50% n/a 9.0% n/aO<strong>the</strong>r 3.7% n/a n/a 5.6% 9.0% 9.4%(1) Unfunded scheme.


63<strong>AEA</strong> TECHNOLOGY PLCAnnual report 2002Notes to <strong>the</strong> f<strong>in</strong>ancial statements9 Pension costs (cont<strong>in</strong>ued)FRS 17 Disclosures (cont<strong>in</strong>ued)The market values of <strong>the</strong> assets of <strong>the</strong> def<strong>in</strong>ed benefit schemes operated by <strong>the</strong> Group as at 31 March 2002 are set outbelow toge<strong>the</strong>r with <strong>the</strong> present value of scheme liabilities calculated under <strong>the</strong> projected unit method, <strong>the</strong> relateddeferred taxation credit/(charge) and <strong>the</strong> result<strong>in</strong>g net pension (liability)/asset.Company <strong>AEA</strong>T Rail K<strong>in</strong>ectricsscheme <strong>AEA</strong>T Rail (TCI) Inc QSA Inc QSA GmbH (1) Total£m £m £m £m £m £m £mEquities 219.3 34.9 17.9 27.2 0.8 – 300.1Bonds 24.8 3.9 2.0 18.8 0.4 – 49.9Property – 2.2 1.2 – – – 3.4O<strong>the</strong>r 5.6 0.1 – 2.6 0.5 1.8 10.6Market value of scheme assets 249.7 41.1 21.1 48.6 1.7 1.8 364.0Present value of scheme liabilities (304.1) (37.7) (19.6) (44.2) (2.7) (1.8) (410.1)Scheme (deficit)/surplus (54.4) 3.4 1.5 4.4 (1.0) – (46.1)Deferred taxation 16.3 (1.0) (0.5) – – – 14.8Net pension (liability)/asset (38.1) 2.4 1.0 4.4 (1.0) – (31.3)(1) Unfunded scheme.If <strong>the</strong> above amounts had been recognised <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> f<strong>in</strong>ancial statements, <strong>the</strong> Group’s net assets and profit and loss reserveat 31 March 2002 would have been reported as follows:As at31 March2002£mNet assets exclud<strong>in</strong>g pension liability and SSAP 24 balances 38.4Net pension liability (31.3)Net assets <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g pension liability 7.1Profit and loss reserve exclud<strong>in</strong>g pension reserve and SSAP 24 balances 19.6Pension reserve (31.3)Profit and loss reserve (11.7)10 Profit/(loss) on ord<strong>in</strong>ary activities before taxationProfit/(loss) on ord<strong>in</strong>ary activities before taxation is stated after charg<strong>in</strong>g/(credit<strong>in</strong>g):BeforeBeforeexceptional Exceptional exceptional Exceptionalitems items Total items items Total2002 2002 2002 2001 2001 2001£m £m £m £m £m £mLoss on disposal of plant and equipment 0.1 – 0.1 0.2 – 0.2(Profit) on disposal of subsidiaries/bus<strong>in</strong>esses – (53.7) (53.7) (1.1) – (1.1)Auditors’ remuneration (1)Audit fees (Company £0.3 million 0.4 – 0.4 0.4 – 0.42001: £0.2 million)Non audit fees (2) 0.6 0.4 1.0 0.2 – 0.2Hire of plant and equipment – operat<strong>in</strong>g leases 5.2 – 5.2 4.3 – 4.3Hire of o<strong>the</strong>r assets – operat<strong>in</strong>g leases 10.6 – 10.6 9.1 – 9.1Depreciation/amortisation charge for <strong>the</strong> year:Intangible fixed assets 0.1 – 0.1 0.1 – 0.1Goodwill 1.9 – 1.9 1.6 – 1.6Tangible fixed assets 7.4 – 7.4 8.1 – 8.1Impairment of tangible fixed assets 0.2 0.5 0.7 0.2 5.9 6.1Research and development 18.2 – 18.2 14.7 – 14.7(1) In addition to amounts charged to operat<strong>in</strong>g profit noted above, PricewaterhouseCoopers received nil (2001: £0.1 million) for o<strong>the</strong>r services, f<strong>in</strong>ancial adviceand assistance <strong>in</strong> respect of acquisitions which have been capitalised.(2) Relates to £0.1 million (2001: £0.2 million) paid for taxation services, £0.5 million (2001: nil) for f<strong>in</strong>ancial advice and assistance <strong>in</strong> respect of acquisitionsand disposals and £0.4 million (2001: nil) for consultancy services.


65<strong>AEA</strong> TECHNOLOGY PLCAnnual report 2002Notes to <strong>the</strong> f<strong>in</strong>ancial statements14 TaxationBeforeBefore exceptional Exceptionalexceptional Exceptional items items Totalitems items Total 2001 2001 20012002 2002 2002 restated restated restatedTAXATION ON PROFIT/(LOSS) ON ORDINARY ACTIVITIES £m £m £m £m £m £mUK Corporation tax at 30% (2001: 30%)Current – – – 2.3 (4.8) (2.5)Deferred taxation (5.0) (7.7) (12.7) (2.2) – (2.2)Overseas deferred taxation (0.2) – (0.2) – – –Overseas taxation 3.8 – 3.8 2.6 – 2.6Under/(over) provision <strong>in</strong> respectof prior years – current 0.3 – 0.3 (3.3) – (3.3)(1.1) (7.7) (8.8) (0.6) (4.8) (5.4)Share of jo<strong>in</strong>t ventures taxation – – – – – –(1.1) (7.7) (8.8) (0.6) (4.8) (5.4)The table below reconciles <strong>the</strong> UK standard rate of Corporation tax of 30% on profit/(loss) on ord<strong>in</strong>ary activities beforetaxation to <strong>the</strong> Group’s taxation charge:BeforeBefore exceptional Exceptionalexceptional Exceptional items items Totalitems items Total 2001 2001 20012002 2002 2002 restated restated restated£m £m £m £m £m £m(Loss)/profit on ord<strong>in</strong>ary activities before taxation (13.2) 26.7 13.5 6.8 (24.0) (17.2)Expected taxation charge at UK Corporationtax rate of 30% (2001: 30%) (3.9) 8.0 4.1 2.0 (7.2) (5.2)Income not taxable – (18.3) (18.3) (0.1) – (0.1)Expenses not deductable for tax purposes 1.8 2.6 4.4 1.3 2.4 3.7Utilisation of tax losses 0.1 – 0.1 – – –Net effect of higher and lower taxrates on overseas earn<strong>in</strong>gs 0.6 – 0.6 (0.5) – (0.5)Under/(over) provision <strong>in</strong> respect of prior years 0.3 – 0.3 (3.3) – (3.3)Tax on profit/(loss) on ord<strong>in</strong>ary activities (1.1) (7.7) (8.8) (0.6) (4.8) (5.4)15 Profit/(loss) for <strong>the</strong> f<strong>in</strong>ancial yearAs permitted by section 230 of <strong>the</strong> Companies Act 1985, <strong>the</strong> parent Company’s profit and loss account has not been<strong>in</strong>cluded <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> f<strong>in</strong>ancial statements. The result for <strong>the</strong> f<strong>in</strong>ancial year of <strong>the</strong> parent Company after exceptional operat<strong>in</strong>gcharges of £19.8 million (2001: £22.7 million) and net exceptional profits on disposals and term<strong>in</strong>ation of operations of£53.0 million (2001: nil) was a profit of £19.5 million (2001: loss £10.5 million).16 Dividends2002 2001DIVIDENDS ON EQUITY SHARES £m £mOrd<strong>in</strong>ary – Interim paid of 3.8p per share (2001: 3.8p per share) 3.4 3.4Ord<strong>in</strong>ary – F<strong>in</strong>al proposed of nil (2001: 7.3p per share) - 6.53.4 9.9


66<strong>AEA</strong> TECHNOLOGY PLCAnnual report 2002Notes to <strong>the</strong> f<strong>in</strong>ancial statements17 Earn<strong>in</strong>gs per shareEarn<strong>in</strong>gs per share is calculated for both <strong>the</strong> current and previous years us<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> profit/(loss) for <strong>the</strong> year. The earn<strong>in</strong>gsper share calculation is based on 88.7 million shares (2001: 88.5 million shares), be<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> weighted average number oford<strong>in</strong>ary shares <strong>in</strong> issue for <strong>the</strong> year.The adjusted earn<strong>in</strong>gs per share is based on <strong>the</strong> profit/(loss) for <strong>the</strong> year before <strong>the</strong> amortisation of goodwill andexceptional items.20012002 restated£m £mProfit/(loss) for <strong>the</strong> f<strong>in</strong>ancial year 22.4 (11.4)Amortisation of goodwill 1.9 1.6Exceptional operat<strong>in</strong>g charges (note 4) 21.1 24.0Profit on sale of bus<strong>in</strong>esses (note 32) (53.7) –Loss on term<strong>in</strong>ation of operations (note 11) 5.9 –Tax on exceptional items (note 14) (7.7) (4.8)Adjusted (loss)/profit (10.1) 9.4A reconciliation of earn<strong>in</strong>gs per share with <strong>the</strong> Institute of Investment Management and Research (IIMR) earn<strong>in</strong>gs pershare is as follows:BeforeBefore exceptional Exceptionalexceptional Exceptional items items Totalitems items Total 2001 2001 20012002 2002 2002 restated restated restated£m £m £m £m £m £m(Loss)/profit for <strong>the</strong> f<strong>in</strong>ancial year (12.0) 34.4 22.4 7.8 (19.2) (11.4)Impairment of tangible fixed assets 0.2 0.5 0.7 0.2 5.9 6.1Loss on sale of tangible fixed assets 0.1 – 0.1 0.2 – 0.2Profit on sale of subsidiaries/bus<strong>in</strong>esses – (53.7) (53.7) (1.1) – (1.1)Loss on term<strong>in</strong>ation of operations – 5.9 5.9 – – –Amortisation of goodwill 1.9 – 1.9 1.6 – 1.6IIMR adjusted (loss)/profit (9.8) (12.9) (22.7) 8.7 (13.3) (4.6)Diluted earn<strong>in</strong>gs per share is based on <strong>the</strong> profit/(loss) for <strong>the</strong> year and 89.1 million shares (2001: 89.1 million shares).The number of shares is equal to <strong>the</strong> weighted average number of ord<strong>in</strong>ary shares <strong>in</strong> issue adjusted to assume conversionof all dilutive potential ord<strong>in</strong>ary shares. The Company has only one category of dilutive potential ord<strong>in</strong>ary shares: thoseshare options granted to employees where <strong>the</strong> exercise price is less than <strong>the</strong> average market price of <strong>the</strong> Company’sord<strong>in</strong>ary shares dur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> year.Earn<strong>in</strong>gs per share based onBeforeBefore exceptional Exceptionalexceptional Exceptional items items Totalitems items Total 2001 2001 20012002 2002 2002 restated restated restatedprofit/(loss) for <strong>the</strong> f<strong>in</strong>ancial year (13.5)p 38.8p 25.3p 8.8p (21.7)p (12.9)pAdjusted earn<strong>in</strong>gs per sharebased on adjusted (loss)/profit (11.4)p – (11.4)p 10.6p – 10.6pIIMR earn<strong>in</strong>gs per share basedon IIMR adjusted (loss)/profit (11.1)p (14.5)p (25.6)p 9.8p (15.0)p (5.2)pDiluted earn<strong>in</strong>gs per share (13.5)p 38.6p 25.1p 8.8p (21.7)p (12.9)p


67<strong>AEA</strong> TECHNOLOGY PLCAnnual report 2002Notes to <strong>the</strong> f<strong>in</strong>ancial statements18 Intangible fixed assetsGoodwill Licences O<strong>the</strong>r TotalGROUP £m £m £m £mCostAt 1 April 2001 28.4 0.7 0.1 29.2Currency translation differences – 0.1 – 0.1Additions – – – –Additions <strong>in</strong> relation to acquisitions (note 31) 6.6 – – 6.6At 31 March 2002 35.0 0.8 0.1 35.9Accumulated amortisationAt 1 April 2001 3.6 0.3 0.1 4.0Currency translation differences (0.2) 0.1 – (0.1)Charge for year 1.9 0.1 – 2.0At 31 March 2002 5.3 0.5 0.1 5.9Net book value at 31 March 2002 29.7 0.3 – 30.0Net book value at 31 March 2001 24.8 0.4 – 25.2In accordance with <strong>the</strong> Group’s account<strong>in</strong>g policy, costs <strong>in</strong> respect of <strong>in</strong>ternally developed <strong>in</strong>tellectual property rightsand patents are written off to <strong>the</strong> profit and loss account as <strong>in</strong>curred.The goodwill aris<strong>in</strong>g on acquisitions post <strong>the</strong> implementation of F<strong>in</strong>ancial Report<strong>in</strong>g Standard 10: Goodwill and IntangibleFixed Assets is be<strong>in</strong>g amortised on a straight l<strong>in</strong>e basis over five to 20 years. This is <strong>the</strong> period over which <strong>the</strong> Directorsestimate that <strong>the</strong> value of <strong>the</strong> underly<strong>in</strong>g bus<strong>in</strong>esses is expected to exceed <strong>the</strong> value of <strong>the</strong> underly<strong>in</strong>g assets.O<strong>the</strong>r<strong>in</strong>tangiblesCOMPANY £mCost at 1 April 2001 and at 31 March 2002 0.1Amortisation at 1 April 2001 and 31 March 2002 0.1Net book value at 31 March 2001 and 31 March 2002 –19 Tangible fixed assetsFreeholdAssets <strong>in</strong>land and Leasehold Plant and course ofbuild<strong>in</strong>gs improvements equipment construction TotalGROUP £m £m £m £m £mCost or valuationAt 1 April 2001 1.2 13.7 64.1 8.1 87.1Currency translation differences – – (0.1) – (0.1)Additions – 0.3 5.0 3.2 8.5Acquisitions – 0.1 3.2 0.1 3.4Disposals (1.2) (3.0) (13.5) – (17.7)Transfers 0.6 0.2 4.8 (5.6) –At 31 March 2002 0.6 11.3 63.5 5.8 81.2Accumulated depreciationAt 1 April 2001 0.1 4.5 33.9 – 38.5Charge for year 0.1 1.0 6.3 – 7.4Disposals (0.1) (1.4) (10.3) – (11.8)At 31 March 2002 0.1 4.1 29.9 – 34.1Provision for impairmentAt 1 April 2001 0.1 0.6 5.2 2.7 8.6Impairment losses – 0.2 0.5 – 0.7Disposals (0.1) (0.3) (1.3) – (1.7)Transfers – – 1.5 (1.5) –At 31 March 2002 – 0.5 5.9 1.2 7.6Net book value at 31 March 2002 0.5 6.7 27.7 4.6 39.5Net book value at 31 March 2001 1.0 8.6 25.0 5.4 40.0


68<strong>AEA</strong> TECHNOLOGY PLCAnnual report 2002Notes to <strong>the</strong> f<strong>in</strong>ancial statements19 Tangible fixed assets (cont<strong>in</strong>ued)Group (cont<strong>in</strong>ued)Depreciation has not been charged on freehold land, which is stated at its cost of £0.1 million (2001: £0.3 million).Included with<strong>in</strong> plant and equipment are assets held under f<strong>in</strong>ance leases with a net book value of £0.2 million(2001: £0.5 million) and a depreciation charge for <strong>the</strong> year of £0.1 million (2001: £0.2 million).The freehold land and build<strong>in</strong>gs at Horsham, which ERG Environmental Resource Group occupied, were disposed of dur<strong>in</strong>g<strong>the</strong> year ended 31 March 2002. As at 31 March 2002 no assets were held at a valuation.FreeholdAssets <strong>in</strong>land and Leasehold Plant and course ofbuild<strong>in</strong>gs improvements equipment construction TotalCOMPANY £m £m £m £m £mCostAt 1 April 2001 0.1 12.3 40.1 7.3 59.8Additions – 0.1 0.9 3.1 4.1Disposals (0.4) (2.8) (16.4) – (19.6)Transfers 0.6 0.2 4.4 (5.2) –At 31 March 2002 0.3 9.8 29.0 5.2 44.3Accumulated depreciationAt 1 April 2001 – 3.4 21.3 – 24.7Charge for year – 0.8 2.9 – 3.7Disposals – (1.0) (10.4) – (11.4)At 31 March 2002 – 3.2 13.8 – 17.0Provision for impairmentAt 1 April 2001 0.1 0.6 5.2 2.7 8.6Impairment losses – 0.2 0.5 – 0.7Disposals (0.1) (0.3) (1.6) – (2.0)Transfers – – 1.5 (1.5) –At 31 March 2002 – 0.5 5.6 1.2 7.3Net book value at 31 March 2002 0.3 6.1 9.6 4.0 20.0Net book value at 31 March 2001 – 8.3 13.6 4.6 26.5Included with<strong>in</strong> plant and equipment are assets held under f<strong>in</strong>ance leases with a net book value of £0.1 million(2001: nil) and a depreciation charge for <strong>the</strong> year of nil (2001: nil).Property clawbackArrangements have been put <strong>in</strong> place to entitle <strong>the</strong> Secretary of State for Trade and Industry to a proportion of anyproperty ga<strong>in</strong>s accru<strong>in</strong>g to <strong>the</strong> Company as a result of disposals or events treated as disposals for clawback purposesafter 1 September 1996 but on or before 31 August 2008. The Clawback Debenture applies <strong>the</strong>se clawback arrangementsto <strong>the</strong> Company’s freehold land and build<strong>in</strong>gs at Risley and to leases vested <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> Company by <strong>the</strong> Transfer Schemewhere <strong>the</strong> landlord is not UK<strong>AEA</strong>. These rema<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g Risley properties were disposed of dur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> year ended 31 March2000. Clawback payments are to be made annually by reference to ga<strong>in</strong>s aris<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> each year commenc<strong>in</strong>g 1 September<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> clawback period.


69<strong>AEA</strong> TECHNOLOGY PLCAnnual report 2002Notes to <strong>the</strong> f<strong>in</strong>ancial statements20 Fixed asset <strong>in</strong>vestmentsO<strong>the</strong>r<strong>in</strong>vestmentsGROUP £mCost and net book valueAt 1 April 2001 2.8Additions 0.1At 31 March 2002 2.9Included with<strong>in</strong> fixed asset <strong>in</strong>vestments is an <strong>in</strong>vestment of £8,000 <strong>in</strong> Sprue Aegis plc which was admitted to OFEX <strong>in</strong>June 2001. The aggregate market value of this <strong>in</strong>vestment at <strong>the</strong> mid-price quoted on 31 March 2002 was £154,000.SubsidiaryJo<strong>in</strong>tundertak<strong>in</strong>gs ventures O<strong>the</strong>rShares Loans shares <strong>in</strong>vestments TotalCOMPANY £m £m £m £m £mCostAt 1 April 2001 116.8 14.5 0.3 2.8 134.4Additions 11.3 11.4 – 0.1 22.8Disposals – – – (0.4) (0.4)Repayments – (0.9) – – (0.9)At 31 March 2002 128.1 25.0 0.3 2.5 155.9ProvisionAt 1 April 2001 1.8 – – – 1.8Provision <strong>in</strong> year 5.9 – – – 5.9At 31 March 2002 7.7 – – – 7.7Net book value at 31 March 2002 120.4 25.0 0.3 2.5 148.2Net book value at 31 March 2001 115.0 14.5 0.3 2.8 132.6


70<strong>AEA</strong> TECHNOLOGY PLCAnnual report 2002Notes to <strong>the</strong> f<strong>in</strong>ancial statements20 Fixed asset <strong>in</strong>vestments (cont<strong>in</strong>ued)Pr<strong>in</strong>cipal subsidiary undertak<strong>in</strong>gs as at 31 March 2002:Proportion ofnom<strong>in</strong>al value ofCountry of Description of issued shares heldName <strong>in</strong>corporation shares held by <strong>the</strong> Group Nature of bus<strong>in</strong>ess<strong>AEA</strong> Technology Rail BV The Ne<strong>the</strong>rlands DFL 1,000 shares 100% (1) Consultancy to rail marketnCode International Limited England and Wales Ord<strong>in</strong>ary £1 shares 100% Eng<strong>in</strong>eer<strong>in</strong>g softwareSoMat Corporation Inc USA Common Stock 100% (1) Data acquisition systemsERSA Sarl France Ord<strong>in</strong>ary shares 100% Rail eng<strong>in</strong>eer<strong>in</strong>g softwareFleet Software Limited England and Wales Ord<strong>in</strong>ary £1 shares 100% (1) Fleet ma<strong>in</strong>tenance softwarePreference £1 shares 100%K<strong>in</strong>ectrics Inc Canada Common Stock 100% (1) Energy and environmenttechnologies and consult<strong>in</strong>gERG Environmental Resource Group plc England and Wales Ord<strong>in</strong>ary £1 shares 100% Environmental eng<strong>in</strong>eers and consultantsForensic Alliance Limited England and Wales Ord<strong>in</strong>ary £1 shares 55% Forensic science services<strong>AEA</strong> Technology Battery England and Wales Ord<strong>in</strong>ary £1 shares 100% Specialist battery pack manufacturerSystems Limited ‘A’ Ord<strong>in</strong>ary £1 shares 100%AGM Batteries Limited England and Wales ‘A’ Ord<strong>in</strong>ary £1 shares 60.5% Specialist battery cell manufacturerAccentus plc England and Wales Ord<strong>in</strong>ary £1 shares 100% Intellectual property<strong>AEA</strong> Technology Eng<strong>in</strong>eer<strong>in</strong>g Common stock with Nuclear eng<strong>in</strong>eer<strong>in</strong>g services & USServices Inc USA no par value 100% (1) Government utilities contractor<strong>AEA</strong> Technology Limited Hong Kong, Ch<strong>in</strong>a Ord<strong>in</strong>ary HK$ 1 shares 100% Quality and Safety Assurance<strong>AEA</strong> Technology QSA GmbH Germany 50,000 DM 100% Quality and Safety Assurance<strong>AEA</strong> Technology QSA Inc USA Common stock 100% (1) Quality and Safety AssuranceShenzhen CIC-<strong>AEA</strong> TechnologyManufactur<strong>in</strong>g Co Limited Ch<strong>in</strong>a Ord<strong>in</strong>ary 51% (1) Quality and Safety AssuranceHyprotech Limited Canada Class A Common shares 100% (1) Process <strong>in</strong>dustry softwareHyprotech Inc USA Common stock 100% (1) Eng<strong>in</strong>eer<strong>in</strong>g softwareHyprotech Europe SL Spa<strong>in</strong> Ord<strong>in</strong>ary 1,000 PSTA shares 100% (1) Eng<strong>in</strong>eer<strong>in</strong>g softwareHyprotech Japan Limited Japan Yen 50,000 100% Eng<strong>in</strong>eer<strong>in</strong>g softwareEA Systems Inc USA Common stock 100% (1) Plant design systems and consultancy<strong>AEA</strong> Technology Eng<strong>in</strong>eer<strong>in</strong>gSoftware Inc USA $1 common stock 100% (1) Eng<strong>in</strong>eer<strong>in</strong>g software<strong>AEA</strong> Technology Eng<strong>in</strong>eer<strong>in</strong>gSoftware Limited Canada Common shares 100% (1) Eng<strong>in</strong>eer<strong>in</strong>g software<strong>AEA</strong> Technology Eng<strong>in</strong>eer<strong>in</strong>gSoftware Limited England and Wales Ord<strong>in</strong>ary £1 shares 100% Eng<strong>in</strong>eer<strong>in</strong>g software<strong>AEA</strong> Technology GmbH Germany 50,000 DM 100% Eng<strong>in</strong>eer<strong>in</strong>g software and consultancy<strong>AEA</strong> Technology Sarl France Ord<strong>in</strong>ary 100% Eng<strong>in</strong>eer<strong>in</strong>g software<strong>AEA</strong> Technology Inc USA $1 common stock 100% Hold<strong>in</strong>g company(1) Held by a subsidiary of <strong>AEA</strong> Technology plc.The <strong>in</strong>formation above relates to those subsidiary undertak<strong>in</strong>gs which pr<strong>in</strong>cipally affected <strong>the</strong> results or f<strong>in</strong>ancial position of <strong>the</strong> Group.


71<strong>AEA</strong> TECHNOLOGY PLCAnnual report 2002Notes to <strong>the</strong> f<strong>in</strong>ancial statements20 Fixed asset <strong>in</strong>vestments (cont<strong>in</strong>ued)In addition to those listed above, <strong>the</strong> Group has o<strong>the</strong>r subsidiary undertak<strong>in</strong>gs which operate <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> UK, <strong>the</strong> US,Canada, Spa<strong>in</strong>, Japan, Hungary, Thailand, Malaysia and India. All subsidiaries are <strong>in</strong>cluded <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> consolidated accounts.All subsidiaries have an account<strong>in</strong>g year end of 31 March except K<strong>in</strong>ectrics Inc, which was acquired <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> year, where<strong>the</strong> year end is 31 December.Jo<strong>in</strong>t ventures as at 31 March 2002Proportion ofnom<strong>in</strong>al valueof issued sharesheld by <strong>the</strong>Country of Description of Group and Account<strong>in</strong>g Nature ofName <strong>in</strong>corporation shares held Company year end bus<strong>in</strong>essSummit <strong>AEA</strong> Corporation Japan Yen 50,000 50% 31 March Nuclear servicesSpectrum n/a n/a n/a 31 March Rail ma<strong>in</strong>tenancesoftware21 Stocks and work <strong>in</strong> progressGroupCompany2001 20012002 restated 2002 restated£m £m £m £mRaw materials and consumables 9.5 8.3 1.4 3.2Work <strong>in</strong> progress 9.7 12.8 6.4 12.419.2 21.1 7.8 15.622 DebtorsGroupCompany2001 20012002 restated 2002 restated£m £m £m £mAmounts fall<strong>in</strong>g due after more than one year:O<strong>the</strong>r debtors 0.1 0.4 0.1 0.4Amounts due <strong>in</strong> respect of decommission<strong>in</strong>g andwaste management (note 25) 0.9 0.8 0.9 0.8Accrued <strong>in</strong>come 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1Pension prepayment (1) 13.6 8.8 11.2 6.7Deferred tax (note 25) 13.0 – 13.8 –27.7 10.1 26.1 8.0Amounts fall<strong>in</strong>g due with<strong>in</strong> one year:Trade debtors 88.9 87.4 38.6 55.1Amounts recoverable on long-term contracts 10.5 17.6 8.0 15.1Amounts owed by group undertak<strong>in</strong>gs – – 6.6 26.3Amounts owed by jo<strong>in</strong>t ventures 0.8 1.5 0.8 1.5Corporation tax recoverable 7.0 7.6 2.6 3.1O<strong>the</strong>r debtors 6.3 3.6 2.9 1.3Prepayments and accrued <strong>in</strong>come 11.6 13.4 6.3 10.1Deferred tax (note 25) – 0.1 – 1.0125.1 131.2 65.8 113.5Total debtors 152.8 141.3 91.9 121.5(1) As part of <strong>the</strong> adjustments to arrive at fair value <strong>in</strong> relation to <strong>the</strong> acquisition of BR Research Limited <strong>in</strong> 1997, a sum of £2.2 million (2001: £2.2 million) hasbeen <strong>in</strong>cluded on <strong>the</strong> balance sheet (£2.1 million debtors due after more than one year and £0.1 million debtors due with<strong>in</strong> one year), represent<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong>fund<strong>in</strong>g surplus <strong>in</strong> respect of <strong>the</strong> <strong>AEA</strong> Technology Rail Shared Cost Section of <strong>the</strong> Railways Pension Scheme at <strong>the</strong> date of acquisition. This surplus cont<strong>in</strong>uesto be amortised. The rema<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g £12.7 million relates to a surplus on <strong>the</strong> <strong>AEA</strong> Technology plc scheme of £11.4 million (2001: £7.5 million) of which£1.2 million is due with<strong>in</strong> one year, and a surplus on <strong>the</strong> <strong>AEA</strong> Technology Rail (TCI) Shared Cost Section of <strong>the</strong> Railways Pension Scheme of £1.3 million(2001: £1.3 million).


72<strong>AEA</strong> TECHNOLOGY PLCAnnual report 2002Notes to <strong>the</strong> f<strong>in</strong>ancial statements23 Creditors: amounts fall<strong>in</strong>g due with<strong>in</strong> one yearGroupCompany2001 20012002 restated 2002 restated£m £m £m £mLoans and overdrafts 7.4 48.1 5.6 46.0Payments received on account 47.1 36.1 12.8 17.9Trade creditors 27.6 27.7 18.0 19.5Amounts owed to group undertak<strong>in</strong>gs – – 2.7 5.3Taxation and social security 6.8 12.3 5.1 10.0O<strong>the</strong>r creditors 5.1 5.4 1.7 3.4Accruals 45.6 21.7 31.9 15.9F<strong>in</strong>ance lease creditors 0.1 0.2 – –Dividend payable – 6.5 – 6.5139.7 158.0 77.8 124.5Of <strong>the</strong> Group and Company bank loans and overdrafts £5.6 million is a cash advance, repayable on demand, from our<strong>in</strong>vestment <strong>in</strong> Hunt<strong>in</strong>g BRAE. Of <strong>the</strong> £5.6 million, £4.5 million bears no <strong>in</strong>terest and £1.1 million bears <strong>in</strong>terest at 6.0%.The rema<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g Group balance of £1.8 million relates to subsidiaries’ overdrafts.24 Creditors: amounts fall<strong>in</strong>g due after more than one yearGroupCompany2002 2001 2002 2001BORROWINGS £m £m £m £mBank loans 46.6 46.6 46.6 46.6Debenture loan – – 2.0 2.0F<strong>in</strong>ance lease creditors 0.2 0.1 0.1 –46.8 46.7 48.7 48.6The debenture loan is repayable to a subsidiary and does not bear <strong>in</strong>terest. Of <strong>the</strong> Group and Company bank loans,£46.6 million is repayable <strong>in</strong> 3.5 years and of this £30.4 million bears <strong>in</strong>terest at 7.3%, £7.0 million at 6.66% and£9.2 million at LIBOR plus 0.75%.The maturity of obligations under f<strong>in</strong>ance leases is as follows:GroupCompany2002 2001 2002 2001£m £m £m £mWith<strong>in</strong> one year 0.1 0.2 – –In <strong>the</strong> first to second years 0.1 0.1 – –In <strong>the</strong> second to fifth years 0.1 – 0.1 –0.3 0.3 0.1 –GroupCompany2002 2001 2002 2001OTHER CREDITORS £m £m £m £mRepayable as follows:– between one and two years 0.4 0.2 0.1 0.1– two to five years 0.5 0.3 – –– after five years 1.0 0.9 – –1.9 1.4 0.1 0.1


73<strong>AEA</strong> TECHNOLOGY PLCAnnual report 2002Notes to <strong>the</strong> f<strong>in</strong>ancial statements25 Provisions for liabilities and chargesDecommission<strong>in</strong>g Pensionsand waste and similarAcquisitions management obligations O<strong>the</strong>r TotalGROUP £m £m £m £m £mAt 1 April 2001 (restated) 1.6 6.9 5.8 13.4 27.7Currency translation differences – – 0.1 – 0.1Acquisitions – – 5.6 1.1 6.7Disposals – – – (0.4) (0.4)Charge for <strong>the</strong> year – 6.5 – 15.7 22.2Contributions paid to <strong>the</strong> Group pension schemes – – 8.9 – 8.9Utilised <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> year (1.0) (0.7) (8.3) (8.1) (18.1)Released <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> year – – – (0.6) (0.6)At 31 March 2002 0.6 12.7 12.1 21.1 46.5Decommission<strong>in</strong>g Pensionsand waste and similarAcquisitions management obligations O<strong>the</strong>r TotalCOMPANY £m £m £m £m £mAt 1 April 2001 (restated) 1.1 3.4 3.7 11.6 19.8Disposals – – – (0.4) (0.4)Charge for <strong>the</strong> year – 6.5 – 14.4 20.9Contributions paid to <strong>the</strong> Company pension schemes – – 7.8 – 7.8Utilised <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> year (0.8) (0.5) (8.1) (5.1) (14.5)Released <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> year – – – (0.5) (0.5)At 31 March 2002 0.3 9.4 3.4 20.0 33.1AcquisitionsThese provisions relate to QSA and cover <strong>the</strong> cost of relocat<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> operations to <strong>AEA</strong> Technology sites. They will beutilised over <strong>the</strong> next year.Decommission<strong>in</strong>g and waste managementOn 31 March 1996, certa<strong>in</strong> properties, rights and liabilities of UK<strong>AEA</strong> were vested <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> Company <strong>in</strong> accordance with atransfer scheme made pursuant to section 1 of <strong>the</strong> Atomic Energy Authority Act 1995.A supplemental agreement entered <strong>in</strong>to pursuant to <strong>the</strong> Transfer Scheme provides that liabilities for decommission<strong>in</strong>gany nuclear facility <strong>in</strong> existence as at 31 March 1996 and for any waste transferred to UK<strong>AEA</strong> (“<strong>the</strong> Authority”) fordisposal prior to 31 March 1996 are to rema<strong>in</strong> with <strong>the</strong> Authority. The Group is liable for certa<strong>in</strong> decommission<strong>in</strong>g ando<strong>the</strong>r clean up costs at 31 March 1995 and will receive fund<strong>in</strong>g from <strong>the</strong> Authority for <strong>the</strong>se costs. This fund<strong>in</strong>g isrecognised <strong>in</strong> debtors (note 22). All new or <strong>in</strong>cremental decommission<strong>in</strong>g, waste management and clean up liabilitiesaris<strong>in</strong>g after 1 April 1996 will be assumed by <strong>the</strong> Group except for certa<strong>in</strong> liabilities which have been transferred to orassumed by third parties.Provisions for <strong>the</strong>se costs are made <strong>in</strong> full once <strong>the</strong> facility becomes contam<strong>in</strong>ated and are calculated on <strong>the</strong> latest technicalassessments of <strong>the</strong> processes and methods likely to be used <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> future and represent estimates derived from a comb<strong>in</strong>ationof <strong>the</strong> technical knowl<strong>edge</strong> available, exist<strong>in</strong>g legislation and regulations and commercial agreements. The estimates arereviewed annually and changes to <strong>the</strong> provisions that are required, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g price level changes, are accounted for <strong>in</strong><strong>the</strong> year <strong>in</strong> which <strong>the</strong>y arise, toge<strong>the</strong>r with <strong>the</strong> notional <strong>in</strong>terest on provisions which have been discounted.The utilisation of <strong>the</strong>se provisions is uncerta<strong>in</strong> and costs will be <strong>in</strong>curred when <strong>the</strong> facilities are decommissioned and <strong>the</strong>waste disposed of. It is currently anticipated that utilisation will occur between 2002 and 2036. Of this provision £6.2 millionrelates to <strong>the</strong> B220 facilities, <strong>the</strong>se costs will be <strong>in</strong>curred over <strong>the</strong> next two years as <strong>the</strong> bus<strong>in</strong>ess exits <strong>the</strong> premises.Pensions and similar obligationsThe breakdown of <strong>the</strong> Company pension provision is given <strong>in</strong> note 9. Part of this provision will be utilised over <strong>the</strong>average service lives of employees and <strong>the</strong> rema<strong>in</strong>der once <strong>the</strong> Executive Directors retire.


74<strong>AEA</strong> TECHNOLOGY PLCAnnual report 2002Notes to <strong>the</strong> f<strong>in</strong>ancial statements25 Provisions for liabilities and charges (cont<strong>in</strong>ued)Pensions and similar obligations (cont<strong>in</strong>ued)The Group provision also <strong>in</strong>cludes pension provisions relat<strong>in</strong>g to <strong>the</strong> QSA and K<strong>in</strong>ectrics Inc acquisitions. The QSAprovision arose from follow<strong>in</strong>g Statement of Standard Account<strong>in</strong>g Practice 24: Account<strong>in</strong>g for Pension Costs and will beutilised over <strong>the</strong> average service lives of <strong>the</strong> employees <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> QSA group undertak<strong>in</strong>gs. The K<strong>in</strong>ectrics Inc provision isfor <strong>the</strong> unfunded supplementary pension and o<strong>the</strong>r post retirement benefits.O<strong>the</strong>rIncluded <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r provisions are exceptional redundancy provisions (Company £7.5 million, Group £7.8 million),vacant property provisions (Company and Group £2.6 million) and provisions for closure costs (Company £1.0 million,Group £1.3 million). These provisions will be utilised dur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> next one to four years.The rema<strong>in</strong>der of o<strong>the</strong>r provisions pr<strong>in</strong>cipally comprise projected losses or commitments on long-term contracts(Company £6.9 million, Group £7.1 million) and build<strong>in</strong>g lease related provisions such as dilapidations and wear andtear provisions (Company and Group £1.0 million) and provisions for leases on vacant properties (Company £0.2 millionand Group £0.5 million). These will be utilised when <strong>the</strong> costs are <strong>in</strong>curred on <strong>the</strong> long-term contracts, as lease paymentsare made on <strong>the</strong> vacant properties and as dilapidation repairs are carried out. As <strong>the</strong> provisions for losses on long-termcontracts and for wear and tear are utilised <strong>the</strong>se are likely to be replaced with provisions on o<strong>the</strong>r long-term contractsand new wear and tear provisions.Deferred taxationThe amounts of deferred taxation accounted for <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> f<strong>in</strong>ancial statements are as follows:TaxAccelerated lossescapital carriedallowances forward Provisions O<strong>the</strong>r TotalGROUP £m £m £m £m £mAt 1 April 2001 (restated) (3.5) – 4.3 (0.7) 0.1Credited to profit and loss account 0.7 10.2 1.9 0.1 12.9At 31 March 2002 (2.8) 10.2 6.2 (0.6) 13.02002THE NET DEFERRED TAX ASSET IS DISCLOSED AS FOLLOWS: £mDebtors – amounts fall<strong>in</strong>g due after more than one year (note 22) 13.0TaxAccelerated lossescapital carriedallowances forward Provisions TotalCOMPANY £m £m £m £mAt 1 April 2001 (restated) (2.7) – 3.7 1.0Credited to profit and loss account 0.8 9.5 2.5 12.8At 31 March 2002 (1.9) 9.5 6.2 13.8The company made a loss before exceptional items <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> current year and has recognised a deferred taxation asset of£13.8 million. Based on current budgets and a three year strategic plan adequate profits will be made <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> future torecover this asset.Deferred taxation has not been provided on reta<strong>in</strong>ed overseas earn<strong>in</strong>gs because dividends will only be remitted to <strong>the</strong>UK if <strong>the</strong>re is no fur<strong>the</strong>r taxation liability.


75<strong>AEA</strong> TECHNOLOGY PLCAnnual report 2002Notes to <strong>the</strong> f<strong>in</strong>ancial statements26 Called up share capital2002 2001£m £mAuthorised120 million ord<strong>in</strong>ary shares of 10p each 12.0 12.01 special rights redeemable preference share of £1 – –12.0 12.0Allotted, called up and fully paid89,264,839 ord<strong>in</strong>ary shares of 10p each (2001: 88,633,107 ord<strong>in</strong>ary shares of 10p each) 8.9 8.98.9 8.9Changes <strong>in</strong> share capital631,732 shares were issued <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> year for total consideration of £1.6 million to meet commitments under <strong>the</strong>Company’s employee share schemes.27 ReservesProfitShareand losspremiumaccountGROUP £m £mAt 1 April 2001 (restated) 8.4 6.6Issue of share capital (note 26) 1.5 (0.1)Goodwill written back to profit on disposal (note 32) – 4.3Currency translation difference on foreign currency net <strong>in</strong>vestments – 0.1Profit for <strong>the</strong> year – 19.0At 31 March 2002 9.9 29.9Net cumulative goodwill of £71.3 million (2001: £75.6 million) has been elim<strong>in</strong>ated aga<strong>in</strong>st reserves on acquisitionsmade prior to 1 April 1998.ProfitShare Merger O<strong>the</strong>r and losspremium reserve reserve accountCOMPANY £m £m £m £mAt 1 April 2001 (restated) 8.4 25.0 49.1 20.4Issue of share capital (note 26) 1.5 – – (0.1)Profit for <strong>the</strong> year – – – 16.1At 31 March 2002 9.9 25.0 49.1 36.4Under <strong>the</strong> terms of <strong>the</strong> Atomic Energy Authority Act 1995, <strong>the</strong> O<strong>the</strong>r Reserve is deemed to be distributable to <strong>the</strong> extentthat it was not capitalised after 31 March 1996.28 Equity m<strong>in</strong>ority <strong>in</strong>terests2002GROUP £mAt 1 April 2001 0.3Acquisition 0.1Dividends paid (0.3)Profit and loss account (0.1)At 31 March 2002 –


76<strong>AEA</strong> TECHNOLOGY PLCAnnual report 2002Notes to <strong>the</strong> f<strong>in</strong>ancial statements29 Reconciliation of net cash flow to movement <strong>in</strong> net debt2002 2001MOVEMENT IN NET DEBT IN THE YEAR £m £mIncrease <strong>in</strong> cash <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> year 11.9 15.5Cash flow from decrease/(<strong>in</strong>crease) <strong>in</strong> debt 41.2 (9.1)Change <strong>in</strong> net funds result<strong>in</strong>g from cash flow 53.1 6.4Loans acquired on acquisitions (0.7) (0.1)Exchange on loans – (0.8)Net (debt) at 1 April (67.8) (73.3)Net (debt) at 31 March (15.4) (67.8)AcquisitionsAt 1 April and At 31 March2001 Cash flow disposals Exchange 2002ANALYSIS OF NET DEBT £m £m £m £m £mCash <strong>in</strong> hand and at bank 27.2 11.7 – – 38.9Bank overdrafts (2.1) 0.2 – 0.1 (1.8)25.1 11.9 – 0.1 37.1Debt due after one year (46.7) – – (0.1) (46.8)Debt due with<strong>in</strong> one year (46.2) 41.2 (0.7) – (5.7)(67.8) 53.1 (0.7) – (15.4)30 Employee share schemesProfit shar<strong>in</strong>g share schemesThe Company established an Inland Revenue-approved scheme <strong>in</strong> 1996 under which any annual appropriations of sharesfor profit-shar<strong>in</strong>g have been made. The scheme operated through a trust deed and rules entered <strong>in</strong>to between <strong>the</strong> Companyand <strong>AEA</strong> Technology Trustee Limited. Similar schemes were set up for overseas employees, established by a trust deedand rules entered <strong>in</strong>to between <strong>the</strong> Company and Bacon & Woodrow Trust Company (CI) Limited <strong>in</strong> Guernsey.The last allocation of shares under <strong>the</strong> approved profit shar<strong>in</strong>g scheme, and its overseas equivalents, was <strong>in</strong> 1998 andshares allocated were <strong>the</strong>n transferred to beneficiaries on 20 August 2001.No fur<strong>the</strong>r allocations of shares will be made under <strong>the</strong> profit shar<strong>in</strong>g schemes.Sav<strong>in</strong>gs-related share option schemesThe Company has established an Inland Revenue-approved scheme, and equivalent schemes for overseas employees.These provide for Executive Directors and eligible employees of <strong>the</strong> Company and subsidiaries to enter <strong>in</strong>to a save-asyou-earncontract (“sav<strong>in</strong>gs contract”). Under this contract participants are granted an option to acquire shares at aprice which is fixed at <strong>the</strong> time <strong>the</strong> option was granted (or, for employees <strong>in</strong> some countries, a cash payment <strong>in</strong> lieu).Options may be exercised three or five years after sav<strong>in</strong>gs commence.Options under <strong>the</strong> Inland Revenue-approved scheme are awarded through a Qualify<strong>in</strong>g Employee Share Trust (QUEST),for which <strong>the</strong> trustee is <strong>AEA</strong> Technology Employee Share Trust Trustee Limited.


77<strong>AEA</strong> TECHNOLOGY PLCAnnual report 2002Notes to <strong>the</strong> f<strong>in</strong>ancial statements30 Employee share schemes (cont<strong>in</strong>ued)Sav<strong>in</strong>gs-related share option schemes (cont<strong>in</strong>ued)Outstand<strong>in</strong>g options granted for 10p ord<strong>in</strong>ary shares <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> Company under <strong>the</strong>se schemes are as follows:Number of Number of Subscriptionshares shares price perPeriod of option 2002 2001 share1 March 2001 to 31 August 2001 – 530,651 363p1 June 2001 to 30 November 2001 – 10,838 498p1 October 2001 to 31 March 2002 – 4,786 558p1 November 2001 to 30 April 2002 471,284 1,401,199 224p1 November 2001 to 30 April 2002 – 2,014 639p1 March 2002 to 31 August 2002 34,890 52,227 595p1 March 2003 to 31 August 2003 320,386 513,925 363p1 March 2004 to 31 August 2004 21,301 34,221 595p1 March 2003 to 31 August 2003 444,580 836,697 320p1 March 2005 to 31 August 2005 154,430 308,748 320p1 March 2004 to 31 August 2004 498,324 765,868 236p1 March 2006 to 31 August 2006 179,346 275,727 236p1 March 2005 to 31 August 2005 1,083,821 – 196p1 March 2007 to 31 August 2007 403,704 – 196p3,612,066 4,736,901Company share option plan (CSOP)In 1999 <strong>the</strong> Company established an Inland Revenue-approved CSOP and an unapproved CSOP for which all employees(exclud<strong>in</strong>g Executive Directors) were eligible at <strong>the</strong> discretion of <strong>the</strong> Company. In 2000 <strong>the</strong> Company, with shareholderapproval, amended <strong>the</strong> schemes and opened <strong>the</strong>m to Executive Directors. A fur<strong>the</strong>r award of options was made <strong>in</strong> 2001.Outstand<strong>in</strong>g options granted under <strong>the</strong>se schemes and <strong>the</strong>ir performance conditions are as follows:Option Outstand<strong>in</strong>g optionsScheme price at 31 March 2002 Performance condition Performance period1999 CSOP (1) 367.5p 261,216 Increase <strong>in</strong> share price 1 April 1999 to 31 March 20022000 CSOP (2) 397.5p 170,731 Growth <strong>in</strong> earn<strong>in</strong>gs per share equalsor exceeds 3% above RPI per annum 1 April 2000 to 31 March 20032001 CSOP (3) 296.5p 1,756,963 Growth <strong>in</strong> earn<strong>in</strong>gs per share equalsor exceeds 3% above RPI per annum 1 April 2001 to 31 March 2004(1) The performance condition was not met. As is permissable under <strong>the</strong> rules of <strong>the</strong> scheme <strong>the</strong> performance period has been moved to 1 April 2000 to 31 March 2003.(2) Awards to Executive Directors were made separately and are detailed <strong>in</strong> section 2 of <strong>the</strong> Report on Directors’ Remuneration.(3) Includes awards to Directors <strong>in</strong> post at award date. An award was made separately to David L<strong>in</strong>dsay follow<strong>in</strong>g his appo<strong>in</strong>tment. Details of Directors’ awards <strong>in</strong>section 2 of <strong>the</strong> Report on Directors Remuneration.


78<strong>AEA</strong> TECHNOLOGY PLCAnnual report 2002Notes to <strong>the</strong> f<strong>in</strong>ancial statements31 Acquisitions and goodwillAcquisitions completed dur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> year were as followsPercentageof shareName Date capital acquiredSoMat Corporation Inc 12 June 2001 100%ERSA Sarl 14 December 2001 100%K<strong>in</strong>ectrics Inc 1 January 2002 100%CSAT 1 January 2002 49%All acquisitions were accounted for us<strong>in</strong>g acquisition account<strong>in</strong>g. All goodwill aris<strong>in</strong>g on <strong>the</strong>se acquisitions is f<strong>in</strong>alisedand has been capitalised as an <strong>in</strong>tangible asset.SoMat Corporation IncThe assets and liabilities of SoMat Corporation Inc and its subsidiaries are set out below:Account<strong>in</strong>gpolicy Fair valueBook value alignment adjustments Fair value£m £m £m £mFixed assetsTangible fixed assets 0.2 (0.1) – 0.1Intangible fixed assets 0.1 (0.1) – –Current assetsStocks and work <strong>in</strong> progress 0.6 – (0.2) 0.4Debtors 0.5 – (0.1) 0.4Cash 0.1 – – 0.1Total assets 1.5 (0.2) (0.3) 1.0LiabilitiesCreditors (0.4) – (0.1) (0.5)Borrow<strong>in</strong>gs (0.7) – – (0.7)Provisions 0.1 (0.1) – –Net assets 0.5 (0.3) (0.4) (0.2)Goodwill 1.3Purchase consideration 1.1Satisfied byCash 0.7Deferred consideration 0.3Acquisition expenses 0.11.1Fair value adjustments have been made to write off obsolete stock and a specific bad debt and to recognise additionalaccruals. O<strong>the</strong>r adjustments were made to br<strong>in</strong>g account<strong>in</strong>g policies <strong>in</strong> l<strong>in</strong>e with those of <strong>the</strong> Group.Of <strong>the</strong> £0.3 million deferred consideration, £0.1 million is payable with<strong>in</strong> one year and £0.2 million with<strong>in</strong> two years.The deferred consideration has been discounted from <strong>the</strong> anticipated settlement dates at a rate equat<strong>in</strong>g to <strong>the</strong> Group’scost of borrow<strong>in</strong>g. The difference between this present value and <strong>the</strong> purchase amount will be accrued through notionalcharges to <strong>in</strong>terest payable <strong>in</strong> future periods.


79<strong>AEA</strong> TECHNOLOGY PLCAnnual report 2002Notes to <strong>the</strong> f<strong>in</strong>ancial statements31 Acquisitions and goodwill (cont<strong>in</strong>ued)K<strong>in</strong>ectrics IncThe assets and liabilities of K<strong>in</strong>ectrics Inc are set out below:Account<strong>in</strong>gpolicy Fair valueBook value alignment adjustments Fair value£m £m £m £mFixed assetsTangible fixed assets 3.3 – – 3.3Current assetsStocks and work <strong>in</strong> progress 0.5 – – 0.5Debtors 9.8 (2.8) (0.2) 6.8Cash 4.5 – – 4.5Total assets 18.1 (2.8) (0.2) 15.1LiabilitiesCreditors (7.6) – – (7.6)Provisions (6.2) – (0.5) (6.7)Net assets 4.3 (2.8) (0.7) 0.8Goodwill 4.5Purchase consideration 5.3Satisfied byCash 5.2Acquisition expenses 0.15.3Fair value adjustments have been made for additional bad debt provisions to reflect <strong>the</strong> amounts receivable,additional contract provisions to provide for forecast losses and additional provisions for property dilapidationsand decommission<strong>in</strong>g to reflect <strong>the</strong> full cost to <strong>the</strong> company.O<strong>the</strong>r acquisitionsThe assets and liabilities of o<strong>the</strong>r acquisitions are set out below:Account<strong>in</strong>gpolicy Fair valueBook value alignment adjustments Fair value£m £m £m £mCurrent assetsDebtors 0.3 – – 0.3Cash 0.3 – – 0.3Total assets 0.6 – – 0.6LiabilitiesCreditors (0.5) – – (0.5)Net assets 0.1 – – 0.1Goodwill 0.8Purchase consideration 0.9Satisfied byCash 0.8Acquisition expenses 0.10.9


80<strong>AEA</strong> TECHNOLOGY PLCAnnual report 2002Notes to <strong>the</strong> f<strong>in</strong>ancial statements31 Acquisitions and goodwill (cont<strong>in</strong>ued)Impact on cash flowsThe acquisition of SoMat Corporation Inc contributed a £0.8 million <strong>in</strong>flow to <strong>the</strong> Group’s operat<strong>in</strong>g and total cashflows. The acquisition of K<strong>in</strong>ectrics Inc contributed a £0.2 million outflow to <strong>the</strong> Group’s operat<strong>in</strong>g cash flow and£0.1 million to <strong>the</strong> outflow on capital expenditure. O<strong>the</strong>r acquisitions contributed a £0.1 million outflow to <strong>the</strong> Group’soperat<strong>in</strong>g and total cash flows.Adjustments to 2001 goodwillThe follow<strong>in</strong>g adjustment has been made to goodwill dur<strong>in</strong>g 2002 <strong>in</strong> relation to <strong>AEA</strong> Technology Rail BV (previously NSTO)which was acquired <strong>in</strong> August 2000. This adjustment relates to additional asset impairments and now f<strong>in</strong>alises <strong>the</strong>goodwill figure relat<strong>in</strong>g to this acquisition.Reduction <strong>in</strong> fair value of net assets acquired 0.1Increased goodwill 0.1Total£mGroupCompanyGOODWILL WRITTEN OFF AGAINST RESERVES £m £mAt 1 April 2001 75.6 7.1Goodwill on disposals (4.3) –At 31 March 2002 71.3 7.132 Sale of subsidiaries/bus<strong>in</strong>essesDisposals completed dur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> year were as follows:Percentage of shareName Date capital disposed ofIon Implantation (assets and trade) 22 May 2001 n/aBowsprit Contract<strong>in</strong>g Limited 2 July 2001 100%Nuclear Consult<strong>in</strong>g (assets and trade) 10 September 2001 n/aNuclear Eng<strong>in</strong>eer<strong>in</strong>g (assets and trade) 1 October 2001 n/aActivity Process Controls Limited 17 October 2001 100%Lancy Water / Process Plant (assets and trade) 24 January 2002 n/aTandem (assets and trade) 8 February 2002 n/aAnalytical Services Group Stage 2 (assets) 22 February 2002 n/aMembranes (assets and trade) 6 March 2002 n/aValue Realisation bus<strong>in</strong>ess streams (assets and trade) 31 March 2002 n/aThe net assets disposed of and <strong>the</strong> related sale proceeds were as follows:Nuclear NuclearConsult<strong>in</strong>g Eng<strong>in</strong>eer<strong>in</strong>g O<strong>the</strong>r TotalNET ASSETS DISPOSED OF £m £m £m £mTangible fixed assets 1.3 0.8 1.0 3.1Share of jo<strong>in</strong>t ventures’ net assets – 0.1 – 0.1Stocks and work <strong>in</strong> progress 2.6 4.7 0.6 7.9Debtors 0.3 7.0 1.2 8.5Creditors (3.3) (4.0) (1.0) (8.3)Provisions (0.1) (0.2) (0.5) (0.8)Goodwill – – 4.3 4.3Profit/(loss) on disposal 61.0 (1.9) (5.4) 53.7Net consideration on disposal 61.8 6.5 0.2 68.5Satisfied by:Net cash proceeds 61.8 6.5 0.2 68.5


81<strong>AEA</strong> TECHNOLOGY PLCAnnual report 2002Notes to <strong>the</strong> f<strong>in</strong>ancial statements32 Sale of subsidiaries/bus<strong>in</strong>esses (cont<strong>in</strong>ued)The loss on disposal of <strong>the</strong> Nuclear Eng<strong>in</strong>eer<strong>in</strong>g bus<strong>in</strong>ess rema<strong>in</strong>s provisional as at 31 March 2002 subject to <strong>the</strong>settlement of <strong>the</strong> completion accounts relat<strong>in</strong>g to this transaction.The results of all disposals are <strong>in</strong>cluded <strong>in</strong> discont<strong>in</strong>ued activities. Turnover <strong>in</strong> respect of disposals was £46.5 million(2001: £109.6 million) and operat<strong>in</strong>g profit £0.6 million (2001: £14.0 million).Impact on cash flowsCompanies sold dur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> year contributed £5.1 million <strong>in</strong>flow to <strong>the</strong> Group’s operat<strong>in</strong>g cash flows and spent£0.1 million <strong>in</strong> respect of capital expenditure.33 Derivatives and o<strong>the</strong>r f<strong>in</strong>ancial <strong>in</strong>strumentsPages 24 and 25 of <strong>the</strong> F<strong>in</strong>ancial Review provide an explanation of <strong>the</strong> role that f<strong>in</strong>ancial <strong>in</strong>struments have had dur<strong>in</strong>g<strong>the</strong> year <strong>in</strong> creat<strong>in</strong>g or chang<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> risks <strong>the</strong> Group faces <strong>in</strong> its activities. The explanation summarises <strong>the</strong> objectivesand policies for hold<strong>in</strong>g or issu<strong>in</strong>g f<strong>in</strong>ancial <strong>in</strong>struments and similar contracts, and <strong>the</strong> strategies for achiev<strong>in</strong>g thoseobjectives that have been followed dur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> year.The numerical disclosures <strong>in</strong> this note deal with f<strong>in</strong>ancial assets and f<strong>in</strong>ancial liabilities as def<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>in</strong> F<strong>in</strong>ancial Report<strong>in</strong>gStandard 13: Derivatives and O<strong>the</strong>r F<strong>in</strong>ancial Instruments: Disclosures (FRS13). Certa<strong>in</strong> f<strong>in</strong>ancial assets and liabilitiessuch as <strong>in</strong>vestments <strong>in</strong> subsidiary and associated companies, obligations under employee share option plans andemployee share schemes, pension assets and rights and obligations aris<strong>in</strong>g under operat<strong>in</strong>g leases are excluded from <strong>the</strong>scope of <strong>the</strong>se disclosures. As permitted by FRS13, short-term debtors and creditors have been excluded from <strong>the</strong>disclosures, o<strong>the</strong>r than <strong>the</strong> currency disclosures.Interest rate profileAfter tak<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>to account <strong>in</strong>terest rate swaps and forward foreign currency contracts entered <strong>in</strong>to by <strong>the</strong> Group, <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>terestrate profile of <strong>the</strong> Group’s f<strong>in</strong>ancial liabilities at 31 March 2002 was as follows:Borrow<strong>in</strong>gson whichno <strong>in</strong>terest Fixed Float<strong>in</strong>gis paid rate rate TotalCURRENCY £m £m £m £mSterl<strong>in</strong>g 4.5 31.8 10.3 46.6US Dollar – 7.0 – 7.0O<strong>the</strong>r – – 0.7 0.7Total 4.5 38.8 11.0 54.3Included with<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> £31.8 million of sterl<strong>in</strong>g fixed rate loans is US$50 million which has been swapped <strong>in</strong>to sterl<strong>in</strong>g.The £10.3 million of sterl<strong>in</strong>g float<strong>in</strong>g rate loans <strong>in</strong>clude US$15 million swapped <strong>in</strong>to sterl<strong>in</strong>g.The profile at 31 March 2001 for comparison purposes was as follows:Borrow<strong>in</strong>gson whichno <strong>in</strong>terest Fixed Float<strong>in</strong>gis paid rate rate TotalCURRENCY £m £m £m £mSterl<strong>in</strong>g 4.5 30.7 51.9 87.1US Dollar – 7.0 – 7.0O<strong>the</strong>r – – 0.9 0.9Total 4.5 37.7 52.8 95.0The Group also has amounts payable <strong>in</strong> respect of deferred consideration of £0.3 million (2001: £0.2 million), additionalpension obligations for Directors due after one year of £2.5 million (2001: £2.0 million) provisions for onerous propertycontracts of £2.8 million (2001: £5.3 million) and redundancy costs due after one year of £5.0 million (2001: nil).These do not bear any <strong>in</strong>terest but <strong>the</strong> deferred consideration creditors are discounted and <strong>the</strong> unw<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>g of <strong>the</strong>discount is charged to <strong>in</strong>terest payable <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> profit and loss account. These amounts are all payable <strong>in</strong> sterl<strong>in</strong>g.


82<strong>AEA</strong> TECHNOLOGY PLCAnnual report 2002Notes to <strong>the</strong> f<strong>in</strong>ancial statements33 Derivatives and o<strong>the</strong>r f<strong>in</strong>ancial <strong>in</strong>struments (cont<strong>in</strong>ued)Interest rate profile (cont<strong>in</strong>ued)The <strong>in</strong>terest rate profile of <strong>the</strong> f<strong>in</strong>ancial assets of <strong>the</strong> Group as at 31 March was as follows:2002 2001ASSETS HELD AS PART OF THE FINANCING ARRANGEMENTS FOR THE GROUP £m £mSterl<strong>in</strong>g cash deposits 19.7 15.0US dollar cash deposits 7.2 6.3Canadian dollar cash deposits 7.6 0.4Euro and Euro equivalent cash deposits 2.7 4.2O<strong>the</strong>r cash deposits 1.7 1.3Total 38.9 27.2The cash deposits comprise cash at bank and on overnight deposits at <strong>the</strong> relevant LIBID rate (<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> case of sterl<strong>in</strong>gdeposits) or equivalent relevant rate for overseas deposits.The Group also has o<strong>the</strong>r debtors fall<strong>in</strong>g due after one year of £1.0 million (2001: £1.2 million) and accrued <strong>in</strong>come fall<strong>in</strong>gdue after one year of £0.1 million (2001: £0.1 million). These do not attract <strong>in</strong>terest but are discounted and <strong>the</strong> unw<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>gof <strong>the</strong> discount is credited to <strong>in</strong>terest receivable <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> profit and loss account.Fur<strong>the</strong>r analysis of <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>terest rate profile as 31 March is as follows:2002 Fixed rate 2001 Fixed rateWeightedWeightedaverageaverageWeighted period for Weighted period foraverage which rate average which rate<strong>in</strong>terest rate is fixed <strong>in</strong>terest rate is fixedCURRENCY % Years % YearsSterl<strong>in</strong>g 7.3 3.5 7.3 4.5US dollar 6.7 3.5 6.7 4.5O<strong>the</strong>r – – – –Total 7.2 3.5 7.2 4.5The float<strong>in</strong>g rate f<strong>in</strong>ancial liabilities comprise bank borrow<strong>in</strong>gs bear<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>terest rates fixed <strong>in</strong> advance, for periods rang<strong>in</strong>gfrom one to six months, by reference to <strong>the</strong> relevant LIBOR rate or equivalent relevant rate for overseas borrow<strong>in</strong>gs.Currency exposuresAs expla<strong>in</strong>ed on pages 24 and 25 of <strong>the</strong> F<strong>in</strong>ancial Review, <strong>the</strong> Group’s objectives <strong>in</strong> manag<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> currency exposuresaris<strong>in</strong>g from its net <strong>in</strong>vestment overseas (<strong>in</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r words, its structural currency exposures) are to ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong> a low cost ofborrow<strong>in</strong>gs and to reta<strong>in</strong> some potential for currency-related appreciation while partially hedg<strong>in</strong>g aga<strong>in</strong>st currencydepreciation. Ga<strong>in</strong>s and losses aris<strong>in</strong>g from <strong>the</strong>se structural currency exposures are recognised <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> Statement of TotalRecognised Ga<strong>in</strong>s and Losses.The table below shows <strong>the</strong> Group’s currency exposures; <strong>in</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r words, those transactional (or non-structural) exposuresthat give rise to <strong>the</strong> net currency ga<strong>in</strong>s and losses recognised <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> profit and loss account. Such exposures comprise<strong>the</strong> monetary assets and monetary liabilities of <strong>the</strong> Group that were not denom<strong>in</strong>ated <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> operat<strong>in</strong>g (or “functional”)currency of <strong>the</strong> operat<strong>in</strong>g unit <strong>in</strong>volved, o<strong>the</strong>r than certa<strong>in</strong> non-sterl<strong>in</strong>g borrow<strong>in</strong>gs treated as h<strong>edge</strong>s of net <strong>in</strong>vestments<strong>in</strong> overseas operations.


83<strong>AEA</strong> TECHNOLOGY PLCAnnual report 2002Notes to <strong>the</strong> f<strong>in</strong>ancial statements33 Derivatives and o<strong>the</strong>r f<strong>in</strong>ancial <strong>in</strong>struments (cont<strong>in</strong>ued)Currency exposures (cont<strong>in</strong>ued)As at 31 March 2002 <strong>the</strong>se exposures were as follows:Net foreign currency monetary assetsSterl<strong>in</strong>g US dollar Euro O<strong>the</strong>r TotalFUNCTIONAL CURRENCY OF GROUP OPERATION £m £m £m £m £mSterl<strong>in</strong>g – 4.0 2.9 1.1 8.0Canadian dollar – 0.4 – – 0.4O<strong>the</strong>r 0.1 – 0.2 – 0.3Total 0.1 4.4 3.1 1.1 8.7The restated exposures at 31 March 2001 for comparison purposes were as follows:Net foreign currency monetary assets/(liabilities)Sterl<strong>in</strong>g US dollar Euro O<strong>the</strong>r TotalFUNCTIONAL CURRENCY OF GROUP OPERATION £m £m £m £m £mSterl<strong>in</strong>g – 2.8 5.6 (3.6) 4.8Canadian dollar – 0.6 – – 0.6O<strong>the</strong>r 0.1 1.0 – 0.4 1.5Total 0.1 4.4 5.6 (3.2) 6.9The amounts shown <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> tables above take <strong>in</strong>to account <strong>the</strong> effect of any currency swaps, forward contracts and o<strong>the</strong>rderivatives entered <strong>in</strong>to to manage <strong>the</strong>se currency exposures.Maturity of f<strong>in</strong>ancial liabilitiesThe maturity profile of <strong>the</strong> Group’s f<strong>in</strong>ancial borrow<strong>in</strong>gs at 31 March was as follows:2002 2001£m £mIn one year or less 7.5 48.3In more than one year but not more than two years 0.1 0.1In more than two years but not more than five years 46.7 46.6Total 54.3 95.0The maturity profile of <strong>the</strong> Group’s f<strong>in</strong>ancial liabilities at 31 March was as follows:2002 2001£m £mIn one year or less 9.0 50.0In more than one year but not more than two years 6.3 1.2In more than two years but not more than five years 47.5 49.6In more than five years 2.1 1.7Total 64.9 102.5Borrow<strong>in</strong>g facilitiesThe Group had undrawn committed borrow<strong>in</strong>g facilities at 31 March, <strong>in</strong> respect of which all conditions precedent hadbeen met, as follows:2002 2001£m £mExpir<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> less than one year 25.0 20.0Total 25.0 20.0


84<strong>AEA</strong> TECHNOLOGY PLCAnnual report 2002Notes to <strong>the</strong> f<strong>in</strong>ancial statements33 Derivatives and o<strong>the</strong>r f<strong>in</strong>ancial <strong>in</strong>struments (cont<strong>in</strong>ued)Fair valuesSet out below is a comparison by category of book values and fair values of <strong>the</strong> Group’s f<strong>in</strong>ancial assets and liabilities at31 March:2002 2001Book value Fair valueBook value Fair value restated restated£m £m £m £mPrimary f<strong>in</strong>ancial <strong>in</strong>struments held or issued tof<strong>in</strong>ance <strong>the</strong> Group’s operationsShort-term f<strong>in</strong>ancial liabilities andcurrent proportion of long-term borrow<strong>in</strong>gs (7.5) (7.5) (48.3) (48.3)Long-term borrow<strong>in</strong>gs (46.8) (50.8) (46.7) (49.2)O<strong>the</strong>r f<strong>in</strong>ancial liabilities (10.6) (10.6) (7.5) (7.5)Cash deposits 38.9 38.9 27.2 27.2O<strong>the</strong>r f<strong>in</strong>ancial assets 1.1 1.1 1.3 1.3Derivative f<strong>in</strong>ancial <strong>in</strong>struments heldto manage <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>terest rate and currency profileInterest rate swaps – 6.6 – (0.6)Forward foreign currency contracts – – – (0.9)As at 31 March 2002 <strong>the</strong> Group also held open various currency swaps and forward contracts that <strong>the</strong> Group had takenout to h<strong>edge</strong> expected future foreign currency sales.The fair values of <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>terest rate swaps and forward foreign currency contracts with a carry<strong>in</strong>g amount of nil have beendeterm<strong>in</strong>ed by reference to prices available from <strong>the</strong> markets on which <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>struments <strong>in</strong>volved are traded. The fairvalue of short-term deposits, loans and overdrafts approximates to <strong>the</strong> carry<strong>in</strong>g amount because of <strong>the</strong> short maturity of<strong>the</strong>se <strong>in</strong>struments. All <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r fair values shown above have been calculated by discount<strong>in</strong>g cash flows at prevail<strong>in</strong>g<strong>in</strong>terest rates.Ga<strong>in</strong>s and losses on h<strong>edge</strong>sThe Group enters <strong>in</strong>to forward foreign currency contracts to elim<strong>in</strong>ate <strong>the</strong> currency exposures that arise on sales denom<strong>in</strong>ated<strong>in</strong> foreign currencies immediately those sales are transacted. It also uses <strong>in</strong>terest rate swaps to manage its <strong>in</strong>terest rateprofile. Us<strong>in</strong>g Statement of Standard Account<strong>in</strong>g Practice 20: Foreign Currency Translation, all h<strong>edge</strong>d transactions arerecorded at <strong>the</strong> h<strong>edge</strong>d rate so <strong>the</strong>re are no unrecognised foreign currency contracts and <strong>in</strong>terest rate swaps.


85<strong>AEA</strong> TECHNOLOGY PLCAnnual report 2002Notes to <strong>the</strong> f<strong>in</strong>ancial statements34 CommitmentsAnnual commitments under non-cancellable operat<strong>in</strong>g leases which expire as follows:Plant and equipment at 31 MarchGroupCompany2002 2001 2002 2001£m £m £m £mWith<strong>in</strong> one year 1.8 2.7 0.6 2.5In two to five years 2.4 3.2 1.6 2.5After more than five years 0.1 – – –4.3 5.9 2.2 5.0Land and build<strong>in</strong>gs at 31 MarchGroupCompany2002 2001 2002 2001£m £m £m £mWith<strong>in</strong> one year 1.4 2.4 0.3 1.2In two to five years 7.3 6.5 3.0 3.4After more than five years 4.3 2.6 2.9 1.113.0 11.5 6.2 5.7GroupCompany2002 2001 2002 2001CAPITAL COMMITMENTS £m £m £m £mFuture capital expenditure contracted but notprovided for <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> f<strong>in</strong>ancial statements:Group 3.8 1.4 2.6 1.435 Cont<strong>in</strong>gent liabilitiesThere is a cross guarantee <strong>in</strong> place <strong>in</strong> respect of overdrafts <strong>in</strong>cluded with<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> Lloyds TSB offset arrangement, of which<strong>AEA</strong> Technology plc and ten subsidiaries are a part. At 31 March 2002 <strong>the</strong> gross overdraft guaranteed by <strong>the</strong> companieswith<strong>in</strong> this set off arrangement was £27.4 million (2001: £20.5 million).<strong>AEA</strong> Technology plc also guarantees <strong>the</strong> credit facilities, overdraft facilities, BACS facilities and leas<strong>in</strong>g obligations forcerta<strong>in</strong> subsidiary companies. At 31 March 2002 <strong>the</strong>se guarantees totalled £9.9 million (2001: £8.8 million).The Group has cont<strong>in</strong>gent liabilities <strong>in</strong> respect of contracts entered <strong>in</strong>to <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> normal course of bus<strong>in</strong>ess and <strong>in</strong> respectof disposals of bus<strong>in</strong>esses and subsidiaries. It is not expected that <strong>the</strong>se will have a material effect on <strong>the</strong> f<strong>in</strong>ancialposition of <strong>the</strong> Group.36 Transactions with <strong>the</strong> Department of Trade and Industry ando<strong>the</strong>r government departmentsTurnover and cost of sales exclude reimbursements and <strong>the</strong> relat<strong>in</strong>g payments made <strong>in</strong> respect of certa<strong>in</strong> contractswith <strong>the</strong> Department of Trade and Industry and o<strong>the</strong>r government departments. Under <strong>the</strong> terms of <strong>the</strong>se agreements,<strong>the</strong> Group receives fund<strong>in</strong>g from <strong>the</strong> Department of Trade and Industry and o<strong>the</strong>r government departments <strong>in</strong> respectof certa<strong>in</strong> programmes and pays such moneys directly to third parties <strong>in</strong> connection with work carried out under<strong>the</strong>se programmes. The Group does not make any profit or loss directly from <strong>the</strong>se contract payments.The gross value of <strong>the</strong> payments made and received under <strong>the</strong>se programmes was £23.2 million (2001: £20.9 million).The cost of adm<strong>in</strong>ister<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> overall programmes and <strong>the</strong> relat<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>come received has been <strong>in</strong>cluded <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> profit andloss account.


86<strong>AEA</strong> TECHNOLOGY PLCAnnual report 2002Notes to <strong>the</strong> f<strong>in</strong>ancial statements37 Related party transactionsThe Group’s related parties, <strong>the</strong> nature of <strong>the</strong> relationship and <strong>the</strong> extent of transactions with <strong>the</strong>m, as def<strong>in</strong>ed byF<strong>in</strong>ancial Report<strong>in</strong>g Standard 8: Related Party Transactions are summarised below:2002 2001JOINT VENTURES AND ASSOCIATED UNDERTAKINGS £m £mSales to jo<strong>in</strong>t ventures and associated undertak<strong>in</strong>gs on normal trad<strong>in</strong>g terms 3.6 3.5Purchases from jo<strong>in</strong>t ventures and associated undertak<strong>in</strong>gs on normal trad<strong>in</strong>g terms 0.1 0.1Amounts due from jo<strong>in</strong>t ventures and associated undertak<strong>in</strong>gs 1.1 1.5Details of <strong>the</strong> Group’s pr<strong>in</strong>cipal jo<strong>in</strong>t ventures at 31 March 2002 are set out <strong>in</strong> note 20.Except for an agreement to purchase property jo<strong>in</strong>tly with an Executive Director, <strong>the</strong>re are no contracts of significancethat dur<strong>in</strong>g or at <strong>the</strong> end of <strong>the</strong> year to which <strong>the</strong> Company and its subsidiary undertak<strong>in</strong>gs were a party and <strong>in</strong> which anExecutive Director of <strong>the</strong> Company was materially <strong>in</strong>terested. This agreement <strong>in</strong>volved <strong>in</strong>vestment totall<strong>in</strong>g £75,000 <strong>in</strong>part-share of <strong>the</strong> property <strong>in</strong> which <strong>the</strong> relevant Director resides when required to be <strong>in</strong> London. See section 2 of <strong>the</strong>Report on Directors’ Remuneration on pages 38 to 43.38 Post balance sheet eventsOn 21 April 2002 <strong>the</strong> Group disposed of <strong>the</strong> assets and trade of <strong>the</strong> Imag<strong>in</strong>g Centre with<strong>in</strong> Future Technologies. Theproceeds on disposal were £40,000 giv<strong>in</strong>g rise to a loss of £20,000 to be recorded <strong>in</strong> 2003. Turnover of £0.2 million(2001: £0.3 million) and operat<strong>in</strong>g loss of £0.1 million (2001: profit £0.1 million) have been <strong>in</strong>cluded <strong>in</strong> discont<strong>in</strong>ued activities.On 31 May 2002 <strong>the</strong> Group disposed of <strong>the</strong> Hyprotech bus<strong>in</strong>ess with<strong>in</strong> Eng<strong>in</strong>eer<strong>in</strong>g Software. The proceeds on disposal were£67.5 million and <strong>the</strong> profit on disposal will be recorded <strong>in</strong> 2003. Turnover of £33.3 million (2001: £31.8 million) and operat<strong>in</strong>gprofit of 0.2 million (2001: £1.0 million) have been <strong>in</strong>cluded <strong>in</strong> discont<strong>in</strong>ued activities.


87<strong>AEA</strong> TECHNOLOGY PLCAnnual report 2002Five year summary20012002 restated 2000 (4) 1999 (4) 1998 (4)FOR THE FIVE YEARS ENDED 31 MARCH £m £m £m £m £mSales and resultsGroup and share of jo<strong>in</strong>t ventures’ turnover:Cont<strong>in</strong>u<strong>in</strong>g operations 249.8 218.0 362.5 354.4 305.8Discont<strong>in</strong>ued operations 81.6 146.2 – – –Share of jo<strong>in</strong>t ventures 3.0 4.6 3.5 3.4 2.6334.4 368.8 366.0 357.8 308.4Operat<strong>in</strong>g (loss)/profit:Cont<strong>in</strong>u<strong>in</strong>g operations (9.9) (1.9) 34.0 33.1 30.7Discont<strong>in</strong>ued operations 0.1 13.8 – – –Group operat<strong>in</strong>g (loss)/profit before exceptional items (9.8) 11.9 34.0 33.1 30.7Jo<strong>in</strong>t ventures 0.2 0.1 – (0.1) –Exceptional operat<strong>in</strong>g charges (21.1) (24.0) – – –Profit on sale of bus<strong>in</strong>esses 53.7 – – – –Loss on term<strong>in</strong>ation of operations (5.9) – – – –O<strong>the</strong>r <strong>in</strong>come and expenses (1) – 0.3 1.8 0.9 0.9Profit/(loss) on ord<strong>in</strong>ary activities before <strong>in</strong>terest 17.1 (11.7) 35.8 33.9 31.6Net <strong>in</strong>terest payable and similar charges (3.6) (5.5) (6.1) (5.2) (2.9)Profit/(loss) before taxation 13.5 (17.2) 29.7 28.7 28.7Taxation (1) 8.8 5.4 (8.9) (8.4) (8.8)Profit/(loss) after taxation 22.3 (11.8) 20.8 20.3 19.9M<strong>in</strong>ority <strong>in</strong>terests 0.1 0.4 0.2 0.2 –Dividends and appropriations (3.4) (9.9) (9.8) (9.0) (8.3)Reta<strong>in</strong>ed profit/(loss) 19.0 (21.3) 11.2 11.5 11.6Net assets employedFixed assets 72.7 68.4 76.4 91.3 62.3Net current assets 71.2 31.6 91.3 67.8 44.8143.9 100.0 167.7 159.1 107.1Borrow<strong>in</strong>gs (46.8) (46.7) (82.5) (77.4) (35.0)Provisions and creditors due after more than one year (48.4) (29.1) (19.9) (31.9) (32.1)Net assets 48.7 24.2 65.3 49.8 40.0RatiosOperat<strong>in</strong>g (loss)/profit as a % of turnover (2) (2.9)% 3.3% 9.3% 9.2% 10.0%Adjusted earn<strong>in</strong>gs per share (3) (11.4)p 10.6p 25.6p 24.7p 23.5pIIMR earn<strong>in</strong>gs per share (25.6)p (5.2)p 24.7p 23.5p 22.2p(1) Dividends receivable and taxation have been restated to reflect <strong>the</strong> removal of <strong>the</strong> associated tax credit as required by F<strong>in</strong>ancial Report<strong>in</strong>g Standard 16:Current Taxation.(2) Operat<strong>in</strong>g (loss)/profit before exceptional items as a percentage of turnover.(3) Adjusted earn<strong>in</strong>gs per share is after <strong>the</strong> write back of goodwill and exceptional items.(4) The figures for 1998, 1999 and 2000 have not been restated for <strong>the</strong> changes <strong>in</strong> account<strong>in</strong>g policy (see note 1) because it has not been practical to do so.


88<strong>AEA</strong> TECHNOLOGY PLCAnnual report 2002Shareholders’ <strong>in</strong>formationNumber of Percentage of Percentage ofSHARES AS AT 31 MARCH 2002 shareholders total shareholders ord<strong>in</strong>ary shares1-100 2,384 24 0.1101-1,000 5,306 53 2.91,001-5,000 1,757 18 4.05,001-50,000 322 3 5.050,001-100,000 50 1 4.0Over 100,000 104 1 84.09,923 100 100.0SHAREHOLDER CALENDARF<strong>in</strong>ancial year end31 MarchAnnual general meet<strong>in</strong>g 25 July 20022003 <strong>in</strong>terim results announcement December 20022003 <strong>in</strong>terim dividend payment 3 February 20032003 prelim<strong>in</strong>ary results announcement June 2003Shareholder contactIf you have any general comments or queries, you are welcome to write to Keith Russell, <strong>the</strong> Company Secretary, at 329,Harwell, Oxfordshire OX11 0QJ. If you have a query for a specific director, please write to <strong>the</strong>m at <strong>the</strong> same address.Registrar servicesIf you have an adm<strong>in</strong>istrative query about your sharehold<strong>in</strong>g (such as details of previous dividend payments, record<strong>in</strong>g achange of address, or report<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> loss of a share certificate), please direct <strong>the</strong>se to Lloyds TSB Registrars, ei<strong>the</strong>r <strong>in</strong>writ<strong>in</strong>g to <strong>the</strong>m at The Causeway, Worth<strong>in</strong>g, West Sussex BN99 6DA, or by telephon<strong>in</strong>g 0870 600 3970.You can now f<strong>in</strong>d a number of shareholder services on-l<strong>in</strong>e. The portfolio service from Lloyds TSB Registrars gives youaccess to more <strong>in</strong>formation on your <strong>in</strong>vestments <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g balance movements, <strong>in</strong>dicative share prices, and <strong>in</strong>formationon recent dividends. For more details on this and practical help on transferr<strong>in</strong>g shares or updat<strong>in</strong>g your details, pleasevisit www.shareview.co.uk. This also gives you <strong>the</strong> opportunity to register an <strong>in</strong>terest <strong>in</strong> receiv<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>formation from <strong>the</strong>Company electronically, should this option be offered at some stage.CRESTThe Company’s shares are available for electronic settlement by CREST. If you would like to f<strong>in</strong>d out more about <strong>the</strong>CREST settlement system, please contact Lloyds TSB Registrars for an <strong>in</strong>formation leaflet.Low cost share deal<strong>in</strong>g serviceOur brokers, Cazenove, offer a special postal deal<strong>in</strong>g service for buy<strong>in</strong>g and sell<strong>in</strong>g <strong>AEA</strong> Technology plc shares, where <strong>the</strong>commission is 1% on <strong>the</strong> first £5,000, 0.55% on <strong>the</strong> next £145,000 and 0.3% <strong>the</strong>reafter, with a £10 m<strong>in</strong>imum. You canget full details by contact<strong>in</strong>g: Cazenove, <strong>AEA</strong> Technology plc Share Deal<strong>in</strong>g Service, 12 Tokenhouse Yard, London EC2R7AN, telephone 020 7606 1768.


89<strong>AEA</strong> TECHNOLOGY PLCAnnual report 2002Shareholders’ <strong>in</strong>formationDividend Re<strong>in</strong>vestment Plan (DRIP)We offer a Dividend Re<strong>in</strong>vestment Plan which gives shareholders <strong>the</strong> opportunity to use <strong>the</strong> whole of <strong>the</strong>ir cashdividends to buy additional ord<strong>in</strong>ary shares <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> Company <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> market at competitive deal<strong>in</strong>g rates. Full detailscan be obta<strong>in</strong>ed by r<strong>in</strong>g<strong>in</strong>g Lloyds TSB Registrars on 0870 241 3018.The DRIP will not apply to <strong>the</strong> Special Dividend currently be<strong>in</strong>g proposed.Individual sav<strong>in</strong>gs account (ISA)We have a Company Sponsored ISA enabl<strong>in</strong>g shareholders to hold <strong>AEA</strong> Technology plc shares <strong>in</strong> a tax advantageousmanner. An ISA enables you to <strong>in</strong>vest without pay<strong>in</strong>g tax – no personal <strong>in</strong>come tax and no capital ga<strong>in</strong>s tax on any profitsshould you decide to sell some or all of your <strong>in</strong>vestment. You do not need to show details of your ISA on your tax return.For details, please contact Lloyds TSB Registrars ISA Team at <strong>the</strong> address given earlier or telephone 0870 242 4244.Registered office329 HarwellDidcotOxfordshireOX11 0QJCompany registrationRegistered <strong>in</strong> England and Wales No.3095862.<strong>AEA</strong> Technology’s <strong>in</strong>ternet address is:www.aeat.co.uk


90<strong>AEA</strong> TECHNOLOGY PLCAnnual report 2002AdvisersRegistrarsLloyds TSB RegistrarsThe CausewayWorth<strong>in</strong>gWest Sussex BN99 6DAPr<strong>in</strong>cipal bankersLloyds TSB plc6-8 EastcheapLondon EC3M 1LLSolicitorsEvershedsSenator House85 Queen Victoria StreetLondon EC4V 4JLBrokersCazenove & Co. Limited12 Tokenhouse YardLondon EC2R 7ANAuditorsPricewaterhouseCoopers1 Embankment PlaceLondon WC2N 6RHF<strong>in</strong>ancial AdvisersGreenhill & Co. International LLPRegent Gate56-58 Conduit StreetLondonW1S 2YZL<strong>in</strong>klaters & AllianceOne Silk StreetLondon EC2Y 8HQ

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!