20.08.2015 Views

Amateur Hour Credibility Testing for Small Business Web Sites

Credibility Testing for Small Business Web Sites - Technical ...

Credibility Testing for Small Business Web Sites - Technical ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Applied Research<strong>Credibility</strong> <strong>Testing</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>Small</strong> <strong>Business</strong> <strong>Web</strong> <strong>Sites</strong>Figure 6a and 6b OAL Home Page and About Lark PageParticipants were asked to rate their interest in OAL based onviewing these two pages of the OAL <strong>Web</strong> site. The figure at leftgenerated little to no interest; the figure at right generated a flurry ofexcitement and interest.Not one focus group participant liked the prominentphoto on this page. In one woman’s words, “That doesnothing.” All recommended another store interior shotthat would showcase the ambiance of the store.Focus group participants were asked to rate theirinterest in OAL based on their exposure to the OALhome page (Figure 6a). Their rating was based on a scaleof 1 to 10 with 1 being “I have no interest in OAL” to10 being “I must visit OAL.” They were also asked torate their interest in OAL based on their exposure to theAbout Lark page (Figures 6a and 6b) using the same scale.Of the 34 participants, 27 expressed little or nointerest in the OAL retail site based on the home page(figure 6a). Their responses are reflected in the left-handcolumns of the graph (figure 7). Nearly all of the 18- to22-year-old participants said they would not click toanother page to learn more, nor would they visit thestore. Simply put, the home page (with its prominentgraphic and white space) did not translate to a credibleorganization with which they would want to engage. Afew of the older participants noted they’d be willing tolook at one more page be<strong>for</strong>e abandoning the site andthe organization. After viewing the About Lark page(Figure 6b), however, all 34 participants expressed morethan moderate interest in OAL as indicated by the righthandcolumns in the graph below (Figure 7).The key difference that led to such opposingcredibility judgments was the one prominent graphic.The single, prominent logo on the home page (which wasused to establish the brand identity) was not interpretedfavorably because it did not provide consumers clarityabout OAL and what it offered. The single, prominentstore interior shot, on the other hand, captured attentionand inspired <strong>Web</strong> visitors to want to learn more.Step 6: Determine ImprovementsBased on results of the study, a number of improvementswere identified that could be made to OAL’s <strong>Web</strong>site to improve the site’s prominent elements, yieldpositive interpretation of those elements, and, as aresult, improve the organization’s overall credibility.In determining the improvements, the limited staffand resources of OAL were considered—since thosefactors would influence whether the organization couldimplement and sustain the improvements.The screen captures that follow illustratethe improvements that were identified <strong>for</strong> (andsubsequently made to) www.gifstonalark.com based onthe credibility test.Improvement 1. Set ambiance and expectations.The home page of the site was revised to showcaseinterior images of the store as well as a few products(Figure 8).Figure 8. Intriguing New Home PageFigure 7Participants’ Interest in OAL Based on the OAL Home Page (Left,Blue) and the About Lark Page (Right, Red)The prominent elements of the new home page showcase product andambiance as well as the store’s support of student scholarships andever-changing product line.126 Technical Communication l Volume 60, Number 2, May 2013

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!