REDEEMING THE RAINBOW

Because if I’m right, that means the “gay agenda” is to stop everyone from following the Bibleregarding sexual matters. It is, after all, their stated goal to “stamp out homophobia.” No morereligious freedom. It’s also to suppress scientific research that has reached conclusions they don’tlike, especially if it helps people to change their homosexual orientation back to a heterosexual one(ask the doctors and scientists at NARTH.com what they’ve had to endure). If it discourageshomosexuality, even by implication, it’s homophobic and can’t be used.There’s a queer reasoning behind all of this. Homosexuals call me names like bigot and homophobe,condemn my religion, mock my rational conclusions about social issues, impugn my motives, displayintense hostility toward my actions, and curse my very existence, all under the justification that I’ma “hater.” But if I’m a “hater” for civilly opposing what they do, why aren’t they haters for uncivillyopposing what I do? Such a double standard, in the context of a public debate on “civil rights,” is notjust hypocritical, it is surreal.I admit I have some hate. I hate watching people kill themselves with preventable diseases like AIDS.I hate seeing children being steered toward unhealthy lifestyles. I hate having my pro-family viewsdistorted by dishonest journalists, politicians and academics. And I hate seeing my God being treatedlike a homophobe for what He teaches in His Bible.So if you’re not going to stop calling me a “hater” for wanting homosexuals to be saved and healed,or for opposing their political agenda, let’s at least see a little more of that famous “American senseof fair play” in the public debate on this issue. Hatred of “haters” is hateful too.Redeeming the Rainbow 154