REDEEMING THE RAINBOW

Recommendations

Info

Gay activists insist that all these problems are caused by society's negative attitudes, but the problemsare just as prevalent in extremely tolerant countries, such as the Netherlands and New Zealand.(10).5) “Gay marriage” should not be treated as a beneficial social structure. In addition to beingnon-procreative, homosexual relationships, unlike marriage relationships, are characterizedby instability / promiscuity rather than stability / fidelity.Promoters of "gay marriage" claim that same-sex relationships are just like marriages and thereforedeserve all the benefits of marriage, but research shows -- and activists admit -- that it is unrealistic toexpect male couples to be faithful.(11)6) Homosexual couples should not adopt children.Studies used to “prove” there are no differences between children raised by same-sex couples andthose raised by their biological married mother and father are, virtually without exception, internallyand externally invalid.(12) In many cases the authors have misreported their own findings. Given theextensive literature on the damage done to children through father or mother absence, it is deceitfulto suggest that purposely and premeditatedly depriving a child of a mother or a father will not haveconsequences for that child.(13)The material above is adapted from an article titled Facts, not flattery, about same-sex attraction, published at www.narth.com, andsigned by the following physicians, therapists and researchers:Dean Byrd, PhD, President elect of the National Association for Research & Therapy of Homosexuality(NARTH); Michelle A. Cretella, MD, Board of Directors, American College of Pediatricians; Joseph Nicolosi,PhD, President of NARTH; Richard Fitzgibbons, MD; Scientific Advisory Committee, NARTH; DaleO’Leary, author of The Gender Agenda, co-author of Homosexuality and Hope; George A. Rekers, PhD, DistinguishedProfessor of Neuropsychiatry & Behavioral Science Emeritus, University of South Carolina Schoolof Medicine; Robert Saxer, MD, President, Catholic Medical Association; Philip M. Sutton, PhD, ScientificAdvisory Committee, NARTH; Gerard van den Aardweg, PhD Netherlands, Scientific Advisory Committee,NARTH; Joseph Zanga, MD, FAAP, FCP, Past President, American College of Pediatricians.Notes(1) National Health and Social Life Survey (1994). In. E. O. Laumann, et al, The Social Organization of Sexuality:Sexual Practices in the United States, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, pp. 294-296); Nigel Dickson,C. Paul, P. Herbison, (2002). “Same-sex attraction in a birth cohort: prevalence and persistence in earlyadulthood,” Social Science & Medicine, 56, 1607-1615.(2) Jeffrey Satinover (2005), “The Trojan Couch: How the Mental Health Associations Misrepresent Science.”Narth.com.(3) Irving Bieber, et al. (1962). Homosexuality: A Psychoanalytic Study of Male Homosexuals, NY: Basic Books,276; Robert Spitzer, (2003). “Can some gay men and lesbians change their sexual orientation? 200 participantsreporting a change from homosexual to heterosexual orientation,” Archives of Sexual Behavior, 32 (5)403-417; Glenn Wyler (April, 2004). “Anything but Straight: A Book Review,” NARTH Bulletin, 32- 45.(4) Ariel Shidlo & Michael Schroeder, (2002). “Changing Sexual Orientation: A Consumer’s Report,” ProfessionalPsychology: Research and Practice, 33 (3), 249-259.(5) Robert George & David Tubbs, “Redefining Marriage Away,” City Journal, (Summer 2004). Quoting“Queer Liberalism?” (June 2000), American Political Science Review; James Nelson (1982). “Religious andmoral issues in working with homosexual clients,” in Gonsiorek (ed.), Homosexuality and Psychotherapy, NY:Redeeming the Rainbow 221
Haworth Press, 173.(6) Gary Remafedi, et al (1991). “Risk factors for attempted suicide in gay and bisexual youth,” Pediatrics.87 (6), 869-875.(7) US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (2004). HIV Testing Survey 2002, Special SurveillanceReport Number 1: 1-26.(8) David Fergusson, L. Horwood & A. Beautrais, (1999). “Is sexual orientation related to mental healthproblems and suicidality in young people?” Archives of General Psychiatry. 56 (10), 876-888; Richard Herrell,et al (1999). “A co-twin control study in adult Men: Sexual orientation and suicidality.” Archives of GeneralPsychiatry, 56 (10), 867- 874; Susan Cochran & Vickie Mays (2000). “Lifetime prevalence of suicide symptomsand affective disorders among men reporting same-sex sexual partners: Results from NHANES III,”American Journal of Public Health, Vol. 90, (4) , 573-578; Theo Sandfort, et al (2001). “Same-sex Sexual Behaviorand Psychiatric Disorders: Findings from the Netherlands Mental Health Survey and Incidence Study(Nemesis).” Archives of General Psychiatry, 58, 85-91.(9) Greenwood, G., et al. (2002). Battering Victimization Among a Probability-Based Sample of Men WhoHave Sex With Men, Amer. J. Pub Health, 92 (12), 1964-69; Lisa Walder-Haugrad, Linda Vaden Gratch, &Brian Magruder (1997), “Victimization and Perpetration Rates of Violence in Gay and Lesbian Relationships:Gender Issues Explored”, Violence and Victims, 12, 173-184.(10) Sandfort (ibid); Fergusson. (ibid).(11) Kenneth Zucker & Susan Bradley (1995). Gender Identity Disorder and Psychosexual Problems in Children andAdolescents, NY: Guilford,(12) Robert Lerner & Althea Nagai (2001). No Basis: What the studies don't tell us about same-sex parenting,Washington, DC: Marriage Law Project.(13) George A. Rekers (2005). “An Empirically Supported Rational Basis for Prohibiting Adoption FosterParenting and Contested Child Custody by Any Person Residing in a Household that Includes a Homosexually-BehavingMember,” St. Thomas Law Review, 18 (2), 325-424.Redeeming the Rainbow 222
Page 1 and 2:
REDEEMINGTHERAINBOWA Christian Resp
Page 3 and 4:
Dedication:This book is dedicated t
Page 5 and 6:
Parent/Child: The Natural Extension
Page 7 and 8:
ForewordA Word About SinI believe t
Page 9 and 10:
IntroductionWhy the Homosexual Agen
Page 11 and 12:
Why should the “gay” agenda con
Page 13 and 14:
CHAPTER 1: PRO-FAMILY ANSWERS TO Co
Page 15 and 16:
Q6. What causes homosexuality?A6. I
Page 17 and 18:
specifically prohibits such discrim
Page 19 and 20:
Q25. How does the “gay” movemen
Page 21 and 22:
CHAPTER 2 UNDERSTANDING HOMOSEXUALI
Page 23 and 24:
states, “There shall be no whore
Page 25 and 26:
Methodius, bishop of Olympus and Pa
Page 27 and 28:
There is not a single source in all
Page 29 and 30:
Chapter 3: The Homosexual War Again
Page 31 and 32:
in an effort to divide and conquer.
Page 33 and 34:
up primarily of two types of people
Page 35 and 36:
uilding in the “mainline” relig
Page 37 and 38:
one example in the Evangelical Luth
Page 39 and 40:
abbis never associated homosexualit
Page 41 and 42:
If “gay” theology fosters moral
Page 43 and 44:
anity Today, June 12, 2000).The pre
Page 45 and 46:
logical presuppositions about sexua
Page 47 and 48:
SECTION TWO:THE CHRISTIAN RESPONSEA
Page 49 and 50:
always lose, step backward a few pa
Page 51 and 52:
and other wrong-thinking pagans to
Page 53 and 54:
healthy and abnormal is unhealthy.
Page 55 and 56:
percent more likely at some point i
Page 57 and 58:
of a homosexual lifestyle as an adu
Page 59 and 60:
entered into, is a choice made by t
Page 61 and 62:
ual. The woman so completely reject
Page 63 and 64:
homosexuals,“ and I believe they
Page 65 and 66:
WOMENExtreme Masculinity-----------
Page 67 and 68:
“Kinsey’s not-very-secret inten
Page 69 and 70:
interview, “[we wanted to] keep t
Page 71 and 72:
stronger and more intrusive to comp
Page 73 and 74:
homosexuality to schoolchildren thr
Page 75 and 76:
the GLA’s job, he set into motion
Page 77 and 78:
October 26, 2007. “UK Christian C
Page 79 and 80:
don’t want co-existence, they wan
Page 81 and 82:
Having a relatively small number of
Page 83 and 84:
pro-family advocates begin to think
Page 85 and 86:
1. The natural family, consisting o
Page 87 and 88:
2. Men and women are psychologicall
Page 89 and 90:
Task sharing is seen by the child a
Page 91 and 92:
counterpart as self-control is incr
Page 93 and 94:
CHAPTER SEVEN: THE PRO-FAMILY ARGUM
Page 95 and 96:
ad results.Surprisingly, the other
Page 97 and 98:
The Natural Family, Marriage and Fa
Page 99 and 100:
irths, of single-parent households,
Page 101 and 102:
children born from these relationsh
Page 103 and 104:
ConclusionThe preceding argument ca
Page 105 and 106:
Agenda? What “Gay” Agenda?One e
Page 107 and 108:
associated with male and female hom
Page 109 and 110:
the property and this is his sole r
Page 111 and 112:
controlled religious denomination s
Page 113 and 114:
to add the qualifier “rational”
Page 115 and 116:
validity upon the theory of sexual
Page 117 and 118:
You: “Now we’re back where we s
Page 119 and 120:
Hope for Pro-Family AdvocatesI will
Page 121 and 122:
The Triangle of Tolerance“Gay”
Page 123 and 124:
Chapter 9: Not A Theocracy:A Christ
Page 125 and 126:
Christian conservatives and humanis
Page 127 and 128:
deploy the members of your team, se
Page 129 and 130:
parade organizers to exclude those
Page 131 and 132:
Sixth: Train Youth as MissionariesO
Page 133 and 134:
The Pro-Family AgendaOur agenda is
Page 135 and 136:
To reiterate, each member of the te
Page 137 and 138:
“Gay” employee groups work cont
Page 139 and 140:
The Government TeamGoal: the promot
Page 141 and 142:
egarding spending money on election
Page 143 and 144:
Chapter 11: Christianizing the Soci
Page 145 and 146:
The Realm of CompromiseThis is not
Page 147 and 148:
library.2) Gather documentation for
Page 149 and 150:
including apologetics, critical thi
Page 151 and 152:
1) Start a school-oriented prayer g
Page 153 and 154:
Action ChecklistA. Form an Intra-Di
Page 155 and 156:
a working paper for projects undert
Page 157 and 158:
SECTION FOUR:RESOURCESRedeeming the
Page 159 and 160:
Is Hating “Haters” Hateful?Hate
Page 161 and 162:
Requiem for the Magna CartaOne of t
Page 163 and 164:
Masculine ChristianityScripture tea
Page 165 and 166:
Matthew Shepard: The Horst Wessel o
Page 167 and 168:
A Letter to the Lithuanian People (
Page 169 and 170:
Riga Declaration on Religious Freed
Page 171 and 172:
their manifestation does not distur
Page 173 and 174:
THE DANGER OF “SAFE SCHOOLS”Lik
Page 175 and 176: This is not to deny the "scientific
Page 177 and 178: In contrast, civility, a component
Page 179 and 180: YOUTH SUICIDE USED AS “GAY” REC
Page 181 and 182: 2. Learn Your DutyThe church has fo
Page 183 and 184: The church has a harder job teachin
Page 185 and 186: Europe and Russia are suffering cal
Page 187 and 188: Model “Family First” Ordinance
Page 189 and 190: Model “Dale Clause” to Protect
Page 191 and 192: IntroductionHonoring diversity is t
Page 193 and 194: ONE WAY OF LOOKING AT YOU: AS A MEM
Page 195 and 196: Looking at You as an IndividualObvi
Page 197 and 198: following ways of reacting:1) Peopl
Page 199 and 200: If I respect you as a person with a
Page 201 and 202: The Quality: What It Is1. Trustwort
Page 203 and 204: Common Sense Can Help Us Find Commo
Page 205 and 206: Model Student Opt-Out NoticeTo the
Page 207 and 208: THE HOMOSEXUAL MANIFESTOBy Michael
Page 209 and 210: The 1972 Gay Rights PlatformPlatfor
Page 211 and 212: Repeal of Department of Defense dir
Page 213 and 214: The Overhauling of Straight America
Page 215 and 216: A media campaign to promote the Gay
Page 217 and 218: shows. Daytime talk shows also rema
Page 219 and 220: 573)Sexual Sadism - the intentional
Page 221 and 222: Why Government Should Actively Prom
Page 223 and 224: 19. Government should adopt a polic
Page 225: Fact Sheet on Same Sex Attraction a
Page 229 and 230: criticizing them.)Kinsey has been d
Page 231 and 232: Documentation in Support of the Ass
Page 233 and 234: uled that because same-sex marriage
Page 235 and 236: Adoption of children to homosexual
Page 237: A Missionary to the Pro-Family Move
show all

REDEEMING THE RAINBOW

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?