06.12.2012 Views

UV/H2O2 Treatment an Essential Barrier in a - PWN Technologies

UV/H2O2 Treatment an Essential Barrier in a - PWN Technologies

UV/H2O2 Treatment an Essential Barrier in a - PWN Technologies

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Full Scale <strong>UV</strong>/<strong>H2O2</strong> Installation<br />

Upon start up of the retrofitted pl<strong>an</strong>t Andijk, a site accept<strong>an</strong>ce test was performed. For operat<strong>in</strong>g purposes, the<br />

<strong>UV</strong>/<strong>H2O2</strong> <strong>in</strong>stallation is equipped with a control-unit, calculat<strong>in</strong>g the atraz<strong>in</strong>e degradation capacity under actual<br />

process conditions. Both for the ‘<strong>in</strong>stallation software’ as for the ‘k<strong>in</strong>etic model prediction’, the presented<br />

predictions were based on the actual water characteristics.<br />

For test<strong>in</strong>g purposes, one of the three full scale <strong>UV</strong>/<strong>H2O2</strong> production l<strong>in</strong>es was isolated <strong>an</strong>d spiked with atraz<strong>in</strong>e <strong>an</strong>d<br />

bromacil (~3 �g/L). Figure 12 presents the measured atraz<strong>in</strong>e degradation (experimental data) together with the<br />

predicted degradation (k<strong>in</strong>etic model prediction <strong>an</strong>d the on l<strong>in</strong>e atraz<strong>in</strong>e destruction calculation).<br />

120<br />

100<br />

degradation [%] 80<br />

60<br />

40<br />

20<br />

0<br />

0.56 0.42<br />

energy <strong>in</strong>put [kWh/m 3 ]<br />

© Bram J. Martijn, Peer C. Kamp, Joop C. Kruithof<br />

model prediction<br />

on l<strong>in</strong>e calculation<br />

experimental data<br />

Figure 12: Degradation of atraz<strong>in</strong>e for two electrical energies <strong>an</strong>d 6 mg/L <strong>H2O2</strong> (full scale data)<br />

Process parameter electrical energy was set at two levels, 0.42 kWh/m 3 <strong>an</strong>d st<strong>an</strong>dard process condition 0.56 kWh/m 3 .<br />

It was found that with<strong>in</strong> accept<strong>an</strong>ce limits the measured degradation of atraz<strong>in</strong>e was predicted by the <strong>in</strong>stallation<br />

software. Furthermore, good agreement was found between the model calculations <strong>an</strong>d the measured atraz<strong>in</strong>e<br />

degradation <strong>in</strong> the full scale <strong>in</strong>stallation.<br />

Collimated beam <strong>an</strong>d pilot work showed that atraz<strong>in</strong>e is degraded predom<strong>in</strong><strong>an</strong>tly by photolysis while bromacil is<br />

more susceptible to hydroxyl radical oxidation. These characteristics have been taken <strong>in</strong>to account <strong>in</strong> the developed<br />

k<strong>in</strong>etic models. Figure 13 presents the agreement between the predicted degradation of bromacil <strong>in</strong> the full scale<br />

<strong>UV</strong>/<strong>H2O2</strong> <strong>in</strong>stallation <strong>an</strong>d the measured degradation dur<strong>in</strong>g the site accept<strong>an</strong>ce test.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!