Skykomish Draft Final Report - Wild Fish Conservancy

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Figure 16. Relationship between adjusted relative fish density and habitat unit area for trout and steelhead in the <strong>Skykomish</strong> mainstem and side channels (pooled data from networks SCB and SCC) during summer 2004. 36
Figure 17. Relative fish densities for different habitat unit types in the <strong>Skykomish</strong> braided reach mainstem during summer 2004. Adjusted (“where present”) densities are presented for selected species as mean±S.E.M. with associated proportions of units with fish present and number of units sampled. Asterisks indicate significant differences in relative density at P
Page 1 and 2: Skykomish River Braided Reach Resto
Page 3 and 4: Trout in August and September 2004.
Page 5 and 6: foot; polarized sunglasses were wor
Page 7 and 8: Oncorhynchus mykiss; and mountain w
Page 9 and 10: and overall was comprised of three
Page 11 and 12: Burnett, 2001). Accordingly, the Sk
Page 13 and 14: Patterns of Salmon Spawning Activit
Page 15 and 16: Summary, continued Salmon spawning
Page 17 and 18: Jackson, C. (2005a). Email to E. Dr
Page 19 and 20: Figure Legends for maps on pages 19
Page 21 and 22: Figure 9 Representative Skykomish R
Page 23 and 24: Figure 10. Relationship between sno
Page 25 and 26: Figure 12 (legend on p. 33) 31
Page 27 and 28: Figure 12. Relative densities of al
Page 29: Figure 15. Comparison of adjusted r
Page 33 and 34: Figure 19 (legend on p. 40) 39
Page 35 and 36: Figure 21. Seasonal variation in Sk
Page 37 and 38: Figure 23. Diel variation in winter
Page 39: Figure 25. Salmon redd counts by ha

Skykomish Draft Final Report - Wild Fish Conservancy

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?