Technical Assistance - TAU - National Treasury
Technical Assistance - TAU - National Treasury
Technical Assistance - TAU - National Treasury
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Case Studies of The <strong>National</strong> <strong>Treasury</strong>’s <strong>Technical</strong> <strong>Assistance</strong> Unit 21<br />
Solly Maluleke, Assistant Director for Sustainable Food Production of the NSNP, commented:<br />
“The programme is aimed at eradicating hunger as a barrier to learning in the schools. Many<br />
children suffer the side effects of malnutrition, such as poor vision. Through the NSNP, these kinds<br />
of issues, as well as nutritional deficiencies are addressed.”<br />
The programme provides a healthy, well-balanced meal to the children, in line with the menu<br />
options as set out by the Department of Health (DoH). The learners should be fed before 10am<br />
on designated days. One of the limitations of the programme is that it serves meals on school<br />
days only and not on weekends or during the school holidays.<br />
Discussion<br />
In 2002, resulting from a cabinet decision, the PSNP was transferred from the DoH to the<br />
Department of Education (DoE). The DoE was given the responsibility to continue with the<br />
operations and implementation of the programme, while the DoH held the responsibility<br />
of monitoring the nutritional standards of the programme. This process entailed shifting<br />
the function from DoH to DoE. The function shift process involved shifting personnel, assets<br />
and funds from one department to the other. According to the cabinet memo, the shift was<br />
expected to be complete and fully functional within the DoE by 1 April 2004.<br />
The <strong>National</strong> <strong>Treasury</strong>’s Directorate: Social Services within the Public Finance Division,<br />
requested that the <strong>TAU</strong> support this process, especially the DoE, in order to prepare for a full<br />
implementation of the programme within the department. The <strong>TAU</strong> team supported this<br />
process in the following three ways:<br />
• The <strong>TAU</strong> supported the DoE and DoH in the shifting of the function. The focus was on<br />
working with the Department of Public Service and Administration (DPSA) and the<br />
<strong>National</strong> <strong>Treasury</strong><br />
• Budget Office. DPSA was expected to shift the personnel from the DoH to DoE, whilst the<br />
• <strong>National</strong> <strong>Treasury</strong> was expected to shift the fund allocation from the DoH’s budget to<br />
the DoE’s budget. The funds were provided through a funding instrument, namely, a<br />
conditional grant.<br />
• The <strong>TAU</strong> supported the DoE to meet the conditions set by the funding instrument, namely,<br />
the conditional grants. The focus was on supporting provinces to develop business plans<br />
for the programme, in order to guide the implementation, monitoring and reporting on<br />
the programme progress across all nine provinces. Each province was expected to present<br />
a business plan for the programme, which is one of the programme’s funding conditions.<br />
TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE | A Vehicle For Improving Government’s Performance