AP Calculus
Calculus_SF_Theorem
Calculus_SF_Theorem
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Special Focus: The Fundamental<br />
Theorem of <strong>Calculus</strong><br />
Now take the limit and use the Squeeze Theorem as before to obtain<br />
F<br />
lim ( x ) − F ( x − k ) f ( t)<br />
dt<br />
x−k<br />
= lim<br />
=<br />
+ k<br />
+ k<br />
k→0 k→0<br />
∫<br />
x<br />
f ( x).<br />
Putting the two results together shows that<br />
F x + h − F x<br />
F′ ( x) = lim ( ) ( ) = f ( x).<br />
h→0<br />
h<br />
The proof of the evaluation part of the Fundamental Theorem follows directly from<br />
the antiderivative part, although it is more symbolic than geometric, which can<br />
x<br />
make it less satisfying to students. We begin with the function F( x) = ∫ f ( t) dt,<br />
a<br />
which we just proved is an antiderivative for f, and notice that we have<br />
b<br />
a<br />
b<br />
F( b) − F( a) = ∫ f ( t) dt − f ( t) dt f ( t)<br />
dt<br />
a ∫ =<br />
a ∫ . Now we want to show that this<br />
a<br />
relationship is also true for any other antiderivative G(x) of f (so G′ ( x) = f ( x)). By the<br />
antiderivative part of the theorem, we know F′ ( x) = f ( x) = G′<br />
( x). Both F and G are<br />
continuous on [ a, b ] since they are differentiable, and so F( x) = G( x)<br />
+ C by a direct<br />
corollary of the Mean Value Theorem (functions with the same derivative differ by a<br />
constant). Now since F( b) − F( a) = ∫ f ( t)<br />
dt , and also<br />
b<br />
a<br />
( ) − ( + ) = − ,<br />
F( b) − F( a) = G( b) + C G( a) C G( b) G( a)<br />
b<br />
a<br />
we finally arrive at ∫ f ( t) dt = G( b) − G( a)<br />
as desired for any antiderivative of f.<br />
Stewart’s <strong>Calculus</strong>: Concepts and Contexts 1 is an example of one text that proves the<br />
evaluation part of the FTC before a formal discussion of the Fundamental Theorem.<br />
Since students easily grasp the procedural nature of this theorem, this approach is<br />
certainly valid. The proof of the antiderivative part of the Fundamental Theorem<br />
follows later in the text. In this case, the proof of the evaluation part starts by building<br />
a Riemann sum from F(b) – F(a) (recall in this exposition that F represents some<br />
unknown antiderivative of f and hence is continuous since it is differentiable). The proof<br />
then requires the clever addition of 0, many times. Whereas in the study of infinite<br />
1<br />
James Stewart, <strong>Calculus</strong>: Concepts and Contexts, 3 rd ed., Pacific Grove, California:Brooks/Cole, 2005.<br />
<strong>AP</strong>® <strong>Calculus</strong>: 2006–2007 Workshop Materials 101