19.09.2015 Views

AP Calculus

Calculus_SF_Theorem

Calculus_SF_Theorem

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Special Focus: The Fundamental<br />

Theorem of <strong>Calculus</strong><br />

Now take the limit and use the Squeeze Theorem as before to obtain<br />

F<br />

lim ( x ) − F ( x − k ) f ( t)<br />

dt<br />

x−k<br />

= lim<br />

=<br />

+ k<br />

+ k<br />

k→0 k→0<br />

∫<br />

x<br />

f ( x).<br />

Putting the two results together shows that<br />

F x + h − F x<br />

F′ ( x) = lim ( ) ( ) = f ( x).<br />

h→0<br />

h<br />

The proof of the evaluation part of the Fundamental Theorem follows directly from<br />

the antiderivative part, although it is more symbolic than geometric, which can<br />

x<br />

make it less satisfying to students. We begin with the function F( x) = ∫ f ( t) dt,<br />

a<br />

which we just proved is an antiderivative for f, and notice that we have<br />

b<br />

a<br />

b<br />

F( b) − F( a) = ∫ f ( t) dt − f ( t) dt f ( t)<br />

dt<br />

a ∫ =<br />

a ∫ . Now we want to show that this<br />

a<br />

relationship is also true for any other antiderivative G(x) of f (so G′ ( x) = f ( x)). By the<br />

antiderivative part of the theorem, we know F′ ( x) = f ( x) = G′<br />

( x). Both F and G are<br />

continuous on [ a, b ] since they are differentiable, and so F( x) = G( x)<br />

+ C by a direct<br />

corollary of the Mean Value Theorem (functions with the same derivative differ by a<br />

constant). Now since F( b) − F( a) = ∫ f ( t)<br />

dt , and also<br />

b<br />

a<br />

( ) − ( + ) = − ,<br />

F( b) − F( a) = G( b) + C G( a) C G( b) G( a)<br />

b<br />

a<br />

we finally arrive at ∫ f ( t) dt = G( b) − G( a)<br />

as desired for any antiderivative of f.<br />

Stewart’s <strong>Calculus</strong>: Concepts and Contexts 1 is an example of one text that proves the<br />

evaluation part of the FTC before a formal discussion of the Fundamental Theorem.<br />

Since students easily grasp the procedural nature of this theorem, this approach is<br />

certainly valid. The proof of the antiderivative part of the Fundamental Theorem<br />

follows later in the text. In this case, the proof of the evaluation part starts by building<br />

a Riemann sum from F(b) – F(a) (recall in this exposition that F represents some<br />

unknown antiderivative of f and hence is continuous since it is differentiable). The proof<br />

then requires the clever addition of 0, many times. Whereas in the study of infinite<br />

1<br />

James Stewart, <strong>Calculus</strong>: Concepts and Contexts, 3 rd ed., Pacific Grove, California:Brooks/Cole, 2005.<br />

<strong>AP</strong>® <strong>Calculus</strong>: 2006–2007 Workshop Materials 101

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!