21.09.2015 Views

physicochemical

Contents of 39(1 & 2) 2011 - acharya ng ranga agricultural university

Contents of 39(1 & 2) 2011 - acharya ng ranga agricultural university

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

SHIVANI et. al.<br />

of sprinkler were maintained for a period of 3-4 days<br />

after inoculation. Further, water spray technique was<br />

used to maintain high disease pressure during crop<br />

season. The water spray was discontinued after 21<br />

days and the disease observation were recorded<br />

when the disease severity was stabilized and there<br />

was no further increase in severity following 1-9 point<br />

scale (Shinde et al.,1994). Data obtained were<br />

statistically analysed using the chi-square test to<br />

ascertain goodness of fit of F2 generation for the<br />

inheritance of resistance and its gene action.<br />

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION<br />

The data on wilt incidence was recorded at<br />

the crop seedling, vegetative and flowering stages.<br />

The parents GMU 1946, GMU 2914-15 and GMU 1702<br />

showed < 10% wilting even at maturity stage during<br />

2005-06, 2006-07 and 2007-08. Hence they were<br />

considered as resistant. Among susceptible<br />

genotypes, Nira exhibited 100% mortality at seedling<br />

stage, while Manjira and Sagarmuthyalu exhibited 50-<br />

70% mortality during vegetative stage. The plants<br />

of parents and F 1<br />

s rated from 0.0 – 5.0 with most<br />

plants rating 1.0 or 3.0 on 1- 9 scale based on<br />

percentage of plants wilted. In F 2<br />

, plants with rating<br />

up to 3.0 were considered resistant to generate ratio.<br />

The plants rating from 5.0 to 9.0 were considered<br />

susceptible. The F 1<br />

’s of all the crosses in the present<br />

study were resistant indicating dominance of<br />

resistance in these genotypes. In F 2<br />

population of<br />

cross Nira and GMU 1946, of the total of 415 plants,<br />

253 were resistant and 162 were susceptible giving<br />

a good fit to ratio of 9:6:1(resistant, moderately<br />

susceptible and susceptible) indicating that<br />

resistance is governed by two additive genes in the<br />

resistant cultivar tested. However, GMU 2914-15 in<br />

crosses with Nira, Manjira and Sagarmuthyalu gave<br />

a total of 398,442 and 432 plants, respectively out of<br />

which 217 in cross Nira x GMU 2914-15, 254 in cross<br />

Manjira x GMU 2914-15 and 238 in cross<br />

Sagarmuthyalu x GMU 2914-15 were resistant and<br />

181in Nira x GMU 2914-15, 188 in Manjira x GMU<br />

2914-15 and 194 in Sagarmuthyalu x GMU 2914-15<br />

were susceptible. In these crosses, a ratio of 9:7<br />

was obtained indicating that the resistance in these<br />

parents is governed by two dominant genes with<br />

complimentary gene actions (Table 1). In the cross<br />

Nira x GMU 1702, the F2 plants segregated in the<br />

ratio of 13:3 indicating inhibitory type of gene action<br />

for the inheritance of Fusarium wilt.<br />

The present findings indicate that the<br />

Fusarium wilt resistance is simply inherited involving<br />

two dominant genes. The resistance can be<br />

transferred to susceptible varieties and will help in<br />

developing wilt resistant safflower varieties with good<br />

agronomic attributes for achieving the desirable<br />

improvement in the yield in safflower.<br />

Table 1. Fusarium wilt response of F 1<br />

and F 2<br />

plants of 3 susceptible safflower genotypes with<br />

resistant genotype GMU 1946<br />

Cross F 1<br />

reaction<br />

No. of F 2 plants<br />

Expected<br />

ratio<br />

X 2 value<br />

(p

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!