26.09.2015 Views

Building confidence in executing IT programs

1MvMFcE

1MvMFcE

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

EY has found that successful<br />

companies take the time<br />

to have effective pre-start<br />

reviews that assist <strong>in</strong><br />

determ<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g the degree of<br />

read<strong>in</strong>ess <strong>in</strong> these critical<br />

areas; whereas unsuccessful<br />

organizations tend to wait<br />

until the symptoms of<br />

unresolved risks and issues<br />

actually arise and then react<br />

by “firefight<strong>in</strong>g” with problem<br />

solv<strong>in</strong>g and m<strong>in</strong>imally effective<br />

decision-mak<strong>in</strong>g.<br />

Figure 2: <strong>IT</strong> program risk universe<br />

Vision and <strong>in</strong>itiation<br />

• Lack of management support for the<br />

program<br />

• Unresolved or uncerta<strong>in</strong> project vision or<br />

strategy<br />

• Poorly def<strong>in</strong>ed bus<strong>in</strong>ess objectives<br />

• Poorly def<strong>in</strong>ed project scope and<br />

requirements analysis<br />

• Inadequate assessment of bus<strong>in</strong>ess impact<br />

or priority<br />

• Poorly def<strong>in</strong>ed critical success factors and<br />

risk assessment<br />

• Lack of complexity measurement<br />

• Unclear governance and decision<br />

framework<br />

• Lack of communication and<br />

user-group <strong>in</strong>volvement<br />

Plann<strong>in</strong>g<br />

• Aggressive schedule commitments restrict<strong>in</strong>g<br />

proper plann<strong>in</strong>g phase<br />

• Inappropriate skills, resources and processes<br />

<strong>in</strong> place<br />

• Inadequate understand<strong>in</strong>g<br />

of complexities and account<strong>in</strong>g for factors<br />

necessary to succeed<br />

• Imbalance among time, cost, quality and<br />

benefit atta<strong>in</strong>ment<br />

• Ineffective prequalification process<br />

• Incomplete project charter<br />

• Poorly def<strong>in</strong>ed contractual terms and<br />

conditions<br />

• Lack of def<strong>in</strong>ition of appropriate performance<br />

metrics<br />

Measur<strong>in</strong>g and<br />

• Governance model fails to manage key project <strong>in</strong>ternal and<br />

external stakeholders<br />

• Ineffective project management systems<br />

• Ineffective project performance monitor<strong>in</strong>g and report<strong>in</strong>g<br />

• Lack of cont<strong>in</strong>uity <strong>in</strong> project staff<br />

• Ineffective communication with stakeholders<br />

• Lack of situational awareness<br />

6 | <strong>Build<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>confidence</strong> <strong>in</strong> execut<strong>in</strong>g <strong>IT</strong> <strong>programs</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!