GEORGE HUTCHINSON
orxwju5
orxwju5
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
I had wondered whether the discrepancy might be explained by clerical error. However, what I referred to as<br />
a speculative birthday line some time between early December and early March is very unlikely to have been in<br />
play for the purposes of this article. I am pleased to remove it from present calculations together with the George<br />
Hutchinson it attached to and who was born in Shadwell on 10 December 1859. 30<br />
We are left frustratingly, with a year of birth and chronological age as stated in the Australian documents<br />
which contradict and support one another simultaneously. Be that as it may, the gaol record refers to, and crossreferences,<br />
information verifiable in the shipping files and together they cast a consistent net around Hutchinson’s<br />
date of birth. Except for this dilemma, in all other details, it would seem clear they refer to the same man.<br />
A 29-year-old Englishman is recorded arriving in Australia on a ship from London within a year of Mary Kelly’s<br />
murder, a few months after Alice McKenzie’s. A spree of violent mayhem came to an end in the East End.<br />
The only Ripper-like murder after McKenzie’s was that of Francis Coles in 1891, but police were sure they<br />
had their man when they charged her partner James Sadler, even after the case fell apart. Whatever Sadler’s<br />
involvement if any, there were some decidedly non-Ripper facets to Coles’ injuries, particularly the lack of<br />
mutilations. Students of the case are broadly in agreement that Jack the Ripper was probably not involved. To all<br />
intent, his crimes came to a halt no later than July 1889, on the eve of George Hutchinson’s departure for New<br />
South Wales.<br />
It was ultimately in this colony, seven years after disembarking, where he found himself charged before a court<br />
with indecently assaulting two children. Though convicted of indecent exposure, the offences were particularly<br />
shocking according to media coverage.<br />
Physically, he fits Sarah Lewis’ description of witness George Hutchinson from 1888. It is not just Lewis’<br />
testimony that tallies. Various descriptions of Jack the Ripper match the newly gleaned information presented<br />
here, as the work done by the Scotland Yard team in 2006 attests.<br />
It is worth adding that the information from Bathurst gaol states he was carrying a few scars and injuries,<br />
recorded as identifying marks or special features: a broken nose, a broken little finger on his right hand, a broken<br />
right knee, and a scar on his left breast. His religion is given as Church Of England.<br />
There is more work to be done, for facts to be flushed out and nailed down, in turn building a platform for<br />
research to proceed. Until then, an otherwise interesting report like the following is limited in its value to<br />
spurring on further enquiry.<br />
It comes from the Sydney Morning Herald which carried in-depth coverage of an inquest into a corpse fished<br />
out of the Lachlan River near the now abandoned hamlet of Grudgery about 16 miles downstream from Forbes. In<br />
other contemporary Australian reports it was referred to as “The New South Wales Mystery”. 31 The news report is<br />
dated 29 October 1895.<br />
MYSTERIOUS MURDER NEAR GRUDGERY<br />
BY TELEGRAPH<br />
(FROM OUR CORRESPONDENT)<br />
FORBES, Monday.<br />
The Coroner, Mr Sowter, continued the inquest on the body of the man found in the Lachlan River at<br />
Grudgery on the 20th instant at the courthouse to-day. The evidence of Dr McDonnell, Government<br />
medical officer was all that was forthcoming. He had searched and examined the body thoroughly,<br />
besides taking a number of photos, which were produced and put in as evidence. The back of the skull<br />
was knocked in, as though by a hammer or tomahawk. Around the waist was a trouser strap, also a rope<br />
tightly knotted at the rear, and attached to which was 16 yards of No. 8 eight wire; also a bag with the<br />
bottom rotted out. The bag had evidently been fastened to the body, and is supposed to have contained<br />
weights for keeping the body underwater, but as soon as the bag rotted the weights were lost and the body<br />
rose to the surface. The body was in a frightfully decomposed state, the flesh having been stripped off<br />
the hands, shins, thighs, &c. The clothes were also perfectly rotten. Nothing was found on the deceased<br />
except a knife, tobacco, and matches in one of the waistcoat pockets. He appeared to have been a stout<br />
30 www.jtrforums.com/showthread.php?p=278839#post278839.<br />
31 The West Australian, Friday 1 November, 1895.<br />
Ripperologist 146 October 2015 12