01.11.2015 Views

GEORGE HUTCHINSON

orxwju5

orxwju5

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

I had wondered whether the discrepancy might be explained by clerical error. However, what I referred to as<br />

a speculative birthday line some time between early December and early March is very unlikely to have been in<br />

play for the purposes of this article. I am pleased to remove it from present calculations together with the George<br />

Hutchinson it attached to and who was born in Shadwell on 10 December 1859. 30<br />

We are left frustratingly, with a year of birth and chronological age as stated in the Australian documents<br />

which contradict and support one another simultaneously. Be that as it may, the gaol record refers to, and crossreferences,<br />

information verifiable in the shipping files and together they cast a consistent net around Hutchinson’s<br />

date of birth. Except for this dilemma, in all other details, it would seem clear they refer to the same man.<br />

A 29-year-old Englishman is recorded arriving in Australia on a ship from London within a year of Mary Kelly’s<br />

murder, a few months after Alice McKenzie’s. A spree of violent mayhem came to an end in the East End.<br />

The only Ripper-like murder after McKenzie’s was that of Francis Coles in 1891, but police were sure they<br />

had their man when they charged her partner James Sadler, even after the case fell apart. Whatever Sadler’s<br />

involvement if any, there were some decidedly non-Ripper facets to Coles’ injuries, particularly the lack of<br />

mutilations. Students of the case are broadly in agreement that Jack the Ripper was probably not involved. To all<br />

intent, his crimes came to a halt no later than July 1889, on the eve of George Hutchinson’s departure for New<br />

South Wales.<br />

It was ultimately in this colony, seven years after disembarking, where he found himself charged before a court<br />

with indecently assaulting two children. Though convicted of indecent exposure, the offences were particularly<br />

shocking according to media coverage.<br />

Physically, he fits Sarah Lewis’ description of witness George Hutchinson from 1888. It is not just Lewis’<br />

testimony that tallies. Various descriptions of Jack the Ripper match the newly gleaned information presented<br />

here, as the work done by the Scotland Yard team in 2006 attests.<br />

It is worth adding that the information from Bathurst gaol states he was carrying a few scars and injuries,<br />

recorded as identifying marks or special features: a broken nose, a broken little finger on his right hand, a broken<br />

right knee, and a scar on his left breast. His religion is given as Church Of England.<br />

There is more work to be done, for facts to be flushed out and nailed down, in turn building a platform for<br />

research to proceed. Until then, an otherwise interesting report like the following is limited in its value to<br />

spurring on further enquiry.<br />

It comes from the Sydney Morning Herald which carried in-depth coverage of an inquest into a corpse fished<br />

out of the Lachlan River near the now abandoned hamlet of Grudgery about 16 miles downstream from Forbes. In<br />

other contemporary Australian reports it was referred to as “The New South Wales Mystery”. 31 The news report is<br />

dated 29 October 1895.<br />

MYSTERIOUS MURDER NEAR GRUDGERY<br />

BY TELEGRAPH<br />

(FROM OUR CORRESPONDENT)<br />

FORBES, Monday.<br />

The Coroner, Mr Sowter, continued the inquest on the body of the man found in the Lachlan River at<br />

Grudgery on the 20th instant at the courthouse to-day. The evidence of Dr McDonnell, Government<br />

medical officer was all that was forthcoming. He had searched and examined the body thoroughly,<br />

besides taking a number of photos, which were produced and put in as evidence. The back of the skull<br />

was knocked in, as though by a hammer or tomahawk. Around the waist was a trouser strap, also a rope<br />

tightly knotted at the rear, and attached to which was 16 yards of No. 8 eight wire; also a bag with the<br />

bottom rotted out. The bag had evidently been fastened to the body, and is supposed to have contained<br />

weights for keeping the body underwater, but as soon as the bag rotted the weights were lost and the body<br />

rose to the surface. The body was in a frightfully decomposed state, the flesh having been stripped off<br />

the hands, shins, thighs, &c. The clothes were also perfectly rotten. Nothing was found on the deceased<br />

except a knife, tobacco, and matches in one of the waistcoat pockets. He appeared to have been a stout<br />

30 www.jtrforums.com/showthread.php?p=278839#post278839.<br />

31 The West Australian, Friday 1 November, 1895.<br />

Ripperologist 146 October 2015 12

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!