Family Medicine

Recommendations

Info

World Book of Family Medicine – European Edition 2015 examined developed countries; in 2013 their life expectancy is still lower than the average of the 34 OECD countries (78.7 vs 80.1 years) and much lower than Italy, second-best within the whole evaluation (82.7 years). The infant mortality pattern has not changed, with Nordic countries experiencing the lowest rates (2/1000 live births) and around 4/1000 in the other Western European countries and 6.1/1000 in the USA. The reduction in infant mortality has been slower in the USA than in most other OECD countries, with socio-economic/ethnic inequalities playing a significant role. In 2002 the rates of some surgical elective procedures showed regional variations not consistent with any epidemiological pattern, but strongly correlated with the different method of payment of doctors and with the health systems’ organizational structure. This is still valid today. We addressed the question whether a GP is more effective and efficient when he/she is mainly a gate-keeper or a direct provider of services, even when these functions are compounded in the work of European GPs. The Total Health Expenditure was higher in countries without a gate-keeping GP and with direct access to the specialist (i.e. USA, Switzerland, France, Belgium…). The countries with gate-keepers (i.e. Italy, UK, Spain…) spent less and achieved better health results. Since 2002 the European economic situation has deteriorated and health expenditure has abruptly decreased in some countries (Greece), but the main findings seem still valid. If the main source of income and gratification comes from the direct provision of services, especially if highly technological, this could divert GPs from the fundamental role of gate-keeping. Under these circumstances, they must question the appropriateness of many prescriptions or suggestions coming from hospitals or university specialists. The gate-keeping task often makes the doctor-patient relationship problematic, especially if it has not been included in the education and training and is not seen as important or valued by the health system and community. The public should be educated on the value of the gate-keeping function and its ethical significance for a better use of available resources. The direct provision of additional services is usually linked to fee-for-service payments and where they are used the per-person total and public expenditures are higher than where capitation or salary are preferred. Doctors seem to provide the best rewarded services, even if they are aware of their questionable health value (3). The capitation payment should also be preserved for ethical reasons, being more suitable to comprehensive care, prevention included, according to the patient’s needs. It should evolve towards an age-weighted capitation formula with a progression by age, weighted more towards the elderly (and infants) than the young (4). It could be integrated by incentives based on results/levels-of-result, especially in crucial areas such as the anti-smoking and breast-feeding counselling in Italy. The General Medical Contract/GMS for GPs with its related Quality Outcome Framework/QOF, introduced in 2004 in the UK and continually readjusted, showed that the P4P was more expensive than expected because most GPs have reached the fixed goals, concentrating their efforts on the targeted areas only. Our model with a strongly age-weighted capitation is more comprehensive and should avoid the latter. The role of GPs is also preventative; increased financial reward for older patients should encourage every evidencebased preventative efforts to ensure a healthy old age for their patients, avoiding unnecessary diagnostics and treatment, recently defined as “quaternary prevention” (5). To sum up: “A system that pays for health and not for disease”. Comparing Insurance–based and NH services, the total health expenditures are obviously not contained by the former, and such systems are not able to contain the public expenditure, both in the non-profit version (“mutuel”, “Krankenkassen”…) and in the profit ones (private insurance companies) which also have the worst health outcomes. Take Home Messages National health services are still the more effective and efficient health systems Within them, GPs should have a strong role as gate-keeper GPs should be paid by a weighted capitation system, integrated by outcome-based incentives Fee-for-service payments and other systems paying for disease (disease management…) and for processes (pay-for-performance/P4P…) should be dismissed in favour of a system paying for health (and for a long healthy life of the citizens) 50
Original Abstract World Book of Family Medicine – European Edition 2015 http://www.woncaeurope.org/content/419-international-comparison-role-general-practitioner-gp-different-countries-and-its References 1. http://www.oecd.org/els/health-systems/Health-at-a-Glance-2013.pdf 2. http://www.euro.who.int/en/about-us/partners/observatory 3. Brotons C, Bjorkelund C, Bulc M et al. Prevention and health promotion in clinical practice: the views of general practitioners in Europe. Prev Med 2005; 40: 595–601. 4. Donzelli A, Carelli F, Ronchi L et al. A Reform of Rewarding Systems of the Providers and Other Players in Health Care Arena: a Structural Way to Prevent Overdiagnosis and Disease Mongering. Response July, 5, 2012 to: Moynihan R, Doust J, and Henry D. Preventing overdiagnosis: how to stop harming the healthy. BMJ 2012; 344:19-23 5. Kuehlein T, Sghedoni D, Visentin G et al., Quaternary Prevention: a task of the General Practitioner - Primary Care 2010;10: Nr. 18 (translated also in German, Italian, French, Spanish, Portuguese and Croatian) http://www.primary-care.ch/docs/primarycare/archiv/de/2010/2010-18/2010-18-368_ELPS_engl.pdf 51
Page 1 and 2: The World Book of Family Medicine -
Page 3 and 4: World Book of Family Medicine - Eur
Page 17 and 18: The WP workshops on Ethics describe
Page 45 and 46: References: World Book of Family Me
Page 49: World Book of Family Medicine - Eur
Page 81 and 82: Original abstract World Book of Fam
Page 93 and 94: Original Abstract World Book of Fam
Page 101 and 102:
World Book of Family Medicine - Eur
Page 103 and 104:
Page 105 and 106:
Page 107 and 108:
References World Book of Family Med
Page 109 and 110:
Page 111 and 112:
Page 113 and 114:
Page 115 and 116:
Page 117 and 118:
Page 119 and 120:
Page 121 and 122:
Page 123 and 124:
Original Abstract World Book of Fam
Page 125 and 126:
Page 127 and 128:
Page 129 and 130:
Page 131 and 132:
Page 133 and 134:
Page 135 and 136:
Page 137 and 138:
Page 139 and 140:
Page 141 and 142:
Page 143 and 144:
Page 145 and 146:
Page 147 and 148:
Page 149 and 150:
Page 151 and 152:
Page 153 and 154:
Page 155 and 156:
Page 157 and 158:
Page 159 and 160:
Page 161 and 162:
Page 163 and 164:
Page 165 and 166:
Page 167 and 168:
Page 169 and 170:
Page 171 and 172:
Page 173 and 174:
Page 175 and 176:
Page 177 and 178:
Page 179 and 180:
Page 181 and 182:
Page 183 and 184:
Page 185 and 186:
Page 187 and 188:
Page 189 and 190:
Page 191 and 192:
Page 193 and 194:
Original abstract World Book of Fam
Page 195 and 196:
Page 197 and 198:
Page 199 and 200:
Page 201 and 202:
Page 203 and 204:
Take home messages World Book of
Page 205 and 206:
Page 207 and 208:
Page 209 and 210:
Page 211 and 212:
Page 213 and 214:
Page 215 and 216:
Page 217 and 218:
Page 219 and 220:
Page 221 and 222:
Page 223 and 224:
Page 225 and 226:
Page 227 and 228:
Page 229 and 230:
Page 231 and 232:
Page 233 and 234:
Page 235 and 236:
Page 237 and 238:
Page 239 and 240:
Page 241 and 242:
Page 243 and 244:
Page 245 and 246:
Page 247 and 248:
Page 249 and 250:
Page 251 and 252:
Page 253 and 254:
Page 255 and 256:
Page 257 and 258:
Page 259 and 260:
Page 261 and 262:
Page 263 and 264:
Page 265 and 266:
Page 267 and 268:
Page 269 and 270:
Page 271 and 272:
Page 273 and 274:
Page 275 and 276:
Page 277 and 278:
Page 279 and 280:
Page 281 and 282:
Page 283 and 284:
Page 285 and 286:
Page 287 and 288:
Quaternary Prevention rubric (www.p
Page 289 and 290:
Page 291 and 292:
Page 293 and 294:
Page 295 and 296:
Page 297 and 298:
Page 299 and 300:
Page 301 and 302:
Page 303 and 304:
Page 305 and 306:
Page 307 and 308:
Page 309 and 310:
Page 311 and 312:
Page 313 and 314:
show all

Family Medicine

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?