14.11.2015 Views

BV - May 2015 Yr 2 Issue 6 E

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Dr. Ambedkar’s Ideology: Religion, Nationalism and Indian Constitution<br />

Ram Puniyani<br />

In order to gain larger legitimacy, RSS has<br />

been making claims of sorts. One of that<br />

which was made few months back was that<br />

Gandhi was impressed by functioning of RSS.<br />

Now on the heels of that comes another<br />

distortion that Ambedkar believed in Sangh<br />

religion is not Sanatan (eternal)...the second<br />

purpose of the book is to draw the attention<br />

of Hindu masses to the devices of Brahmins<br />

and make them think for themselves how<br />

they have been deceived and misguided by<br />

Brahmins" (from Introduction of the book).<br />

ideology (Feb 15, <strong>2015</strong>). This was stated by<br />

Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS)<br />

Sarsanghchalak, Mohan Bhagwat. Recently<br />

on the occasion of Ambedkar’s 124 th<br />

anniversary many programs were held by<br />

RSS combine giving a pro-Hindutva tilt to<br />

presentation of Ambedkar.<br />

There cannot be bigger contrasts between the<br />

ideology of Ambedkar and RSS. Ambedkar<br />

was for Indian Nationalism, Secularism and<br />

social justice while the RSS ideology is based<br />

on two major pillars. One is the Brahmanic<br />

interpretation of Hinduism and second is the<br />

concept of Hindu nationalism, Hindu<br />

Rashtra.<br />

Where does Ambedkar stand as for as<br />

ideology of Hinduism is concerned? He called<br />

Hinduism as Brahminic theology. We also<br />

understand that Brahmanism has been the<br />

dominant tendency within Hinduism. He<br />

realized that this prevalent version of<br />

Hinduism is essentially a caste system, which<br />

is the biggest tormentor of untouchablesdalits.<br />

Initially he tried to break the shackles<br />

of caste system from within the fold of<br />

Hinduism. He led the Chavadar Talab<br />

movement (right to access to public drinking<br />

water for dalits), Kalaram Mandir agitation<br />

(movement for access to temples). He also<br />

went on to burn Manu Smriti, the holy<br />

Brahmanic- Hindu text saying that it is a<br />

symbol of caste and gender hierarchy. His<br />

critique of Hinduism, Brahminism was<br />

scathing and in due course he came to the<br />

conclusion that he will give up Hinduism. In<br />

his book ‘Riddles of Hinduism’ published by<br />

Govt. of Maharashtra, India (1987) he<br />

elaborates his understanding about<br />

Hinduism i.e. its Brahmanical version.<br />

Introducing his book he writes, "The book is<br />

an exposition of the beliefs propounded by<br />

what might be called Brahminic theology...I<br />

want to make people aware that Hindu<br />

Ambedkar had started moving away from<br />

Hinduism in 1935 itself when he had publicly<br />

declared that he was not going to die as a<br />

Hindu. In 1936, he had attended the Sikh<br />

Missionary Conference as he had toyed for<br />

some time with the idea of embracing<br />

Sikhism. In 1936, Ambedkar also wrote and<br />

published Annihilation of Caste, his<br />

undelivered presidential address to the Jat-<br />

Pat-Todak Mandal Conference at Lahore. At<br />

the end of his written address, Ambedkar<br />

reiterated his resolve to give up Hinduism.<br />

(http://bihar.humanists.net/B.R.Ambedkar.<br />

htm)<br />

He said “I have decided for myself. My<br />

conversion is sure as anything. My<br />

conversion is not for any material gain. There<br />

is nothing which I cannot achieve by<br />

remaining an Untouchable. My conversion is<br />

purely out of my spiritual attitude. The Hindu<br />

religion does not appeal to my conscience. It<br />

does not appeal to my self-respect. However,<br />

your conversion will be both for material as<br />

well as for spiritual gains. Some persons<br />

mock and laugh at the idea of conversion for<br />

material gain. I do not feel hesitant in calling<br />

such persons stupid.”<br />

(http://www.columbia.edu/itc/mealac/pritc<br />

hett/00ambedkar/txt_ambedkar_salvation.ht<br />

ml)<br />

Lord Ram is the major symbol of Cultural<br />

Nationalism propounded by RSS. Let's see<br />

what Ambedkar has to say about Lord Ram,<br />

"The life of Sita simply did not count. What<br />

counted was his own personal name and<br />

fame. He, of course, does not take the manly<br />

course of stopping this gossip, which as a<br />

king he could do and which as husband who<br />

was convinced of his wife’s innocence he was<br />

bound to it." And further, "For 12 years the<br />

boys lived in forest in Ashram of Valmiki not<br />

far from Ayodhya where Rama continued to<br />

rule. Never once in those 12 years this model<br />

● Year – 2 ● <strong>Issue</strong> – 6 ● <strong>May</strong> <strong>2015</strong> ● Buddhist Voice ● www.buddhistvoice.com ● Email: indian.buddhistvoice@gmail.com 34

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!