BV - May 2015 Yr 2 Issue 6 E
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Dr. Ambedkar’s Ideology: Religion, Nationalism and Indian Constitution<br />
Ram Puniyani<br />
In order to gain larger legitimacy, RSS has<br />
been making claims of sorts. One of that<br />
which was made few months back was that<br />
Gandhi was impressed by functioning of RSS.<br />
Now on the heels of that comes another<br />
distortion that Ambedkar believed in Sangh<br />
religion is not Sanatan (eternal)...the second<br />
purpose of the book is to draw the attention<br />
of Hindu masses to the devices of Brahmins<br />
and make them think for themselves how<br />
they have been deceived and misguided by<br />
Brahmins" (from Introduction of the book).<br />
ideology (Feb 15, <strong>2015</strong>). This was stated by<br />
Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS)<br />
Sarsanghchalak, Mohan Bhagwat. Recently<br />
on the occasion of Ambedkar’s 124 th<br />
anniversary many programs were held by<br />
RSS combine giving a pro-Hindutva tilt to<br />
presentation of Ambedkar.<br />
There cannot be bigger contrasts between the<br />
ideology of Ambedkar and RSS. Ambedkar<br />
was for Indian Nationalism, Secularism and<br />
social justice while the RSS ideology is based<br />
on two major pillars. One is the Brahmanic<br />
interpretation of Hinduism and second is the<br />
concept of Hindu nationalism, Hindu<br />
Rashtra.<br />
Where does Ambedkar stand as for as<br />
ideology of Hinduism is concerned? He called<br />
Hinduism as Brahminic theology. We also<br />
understand that Brahmanism has been the<br />
dominant tendency within Hinduism. He<br />
realized that this prevalent version of<br />
Hinduism is essentially a caste system, which<br />
is the biggest tormentor of untouchablesdalits.<br />
Initially he tried to break the shackles<br />
of caste system from within the fold of<br />
Hinduism. He led the Chavadar Talab<br />
movement (right to access to public drinking<br />
water for dalits), Kalaram Mandir agitation<br />
(movement for access to temples). He also<br />
went on to burn Manu Smriti, the holy<br />
Brahmanic- Hindu text saying that it is a<br />
symbol of caste and gender hierarchy. His<br />
critique of Hinduism, Brahminism was<br />
scathing and in due course he came to the<br />
conclusion that he will give up Hinduism. In<br />
his book ‘Riddles of Hinduism’ published by<br />
Govt. of Maharashtra, India (1987) he<br />
elaborates his understanding about<br />
Hinduism i.e. its Brahmanical version.<br />
Introducing his book he writes, "The book is<br />
an exposition of the beliefs propounded by<br />
what might be called Brahminic theology...I<br />
want to make people aware that Hindu<br />
Ambedkar had started moving away from<br />
Hinduism in 1935 itself when he had publicly<br />
declared that he was not going to die as a<br />
Hindu. In 1936, he had attended the Sikh<br />
Missionary Conference as he had toyed for<br />
some time with the idea of embracing<br />
Sikhism. In 1936, Ambedkar also wrote and<br />
published Annihilation of Caste, his<br />
undelivered presidential address to the Jat-<br />
Pat-Todak Mandal Conference at Lahore. At<br />
the end of his written address, Ambedkar<br />
reiterated his resolve to give up Hinduism.<br />
(http://bihar.humanists.net/B.R.Ambedkar.<br />
htm)<br />
He said “I have decided for myself. My<br />
conversion is sure as anything. My<br />
conversion is not for any material gain. There<br />
is nothing which I cannot achieve by<br />
remaining an Untouchable. My conversion is<br />
purely out of my spiritual attitude. The Hindu<br />
religion does not appeal to my conscience. It<br />
does not appeal to my self-respect. However,<br />
your conversion will be both for material as<br />
well as for spiritual gains. Some persons<br />
mock and laugh at the idea of conversion for<br />
material gain. I do not feel hesitant in calling<br />
such persons stupid.”<br />
(http://www.columbia.edu/itc/mealac/pritc<br />
hett/00ambedkar/txt_ambedkar_salvation.ht<br />
ml)<br />
Lord Ram is the major symbol of Cultural<br />
Nationalism propounded by RSS. Let's see<br />
what Ambedkar has to say about Lord Ram,<br />
"The life of Sita simply did not count. What<br />
counted was his own personal name and<br />
fame. He, of course, does not take the manly<br />
course of stopping this gossip, which as a<br />
king he could do and which as husband who<br />
was convinced of his wife’s innocence he was<br />
bound to it." And further, "For 12 years the<br />
boys lived in forest in Ashram of Valmiki not<br />
far from Ayodhya where Rama continued to<br />
rule. Never once in those 12 years this model<br />
● Year – 2 ● <strong>Issue</strong> – 6 ● <strong>May</strong> <strong>2015</strong> ● Buddhist Voice ● www.buddhistvoice.com ● Email: indian.buddhistvoice@gmail.com 34