14.11.2015 Views

BV - May 2015 Yr 2 Issue 6 E

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Worship. But the Anglo-Burmese War and<br />

several foreign interventions did not allow<br />

completion of the project. In year 1890-92,<br />

Edwin Arnold, author of the Buddha<br />

Romance :The Light of Asia, appealed to the<br />

British-Indian Government to hand over the<br />

temple to the Buddhists, and even went to<br />

Japan to plead for diplomatic support to this<br />

demand. However, the court case was<br />

ultimately lost. Subsequently, the<br />

negotiations dragged on, involving Swami<br />

Vivekananda (1901) and Hindu Mahasabha<br />

leader Bhai Parmanand (1935) among<br />

others.<br />

In 1922, the Indian National Congress had<br />

appointed a committee headed by Dr<br />

Rajendra Prasad to examine the issue related<br />

to the management of the Bodh Gaya Temple,<br />

who had recommended a joint management<br />

of the Temple by both the Hindus and the<br />

Buddhists as a compromise proposal which<br />

gives both Hindus and Buddhists the right to<br />

worship and an equal representation in the<br />

management committee.<br />

After independence, in order to take care of<br />

management of Bodh Gaya Temple and its<br />

properties, the Legislature of the State of<br />

Bihar enacted the Bodh Gaya Temple Act<br />

(BGT Act), 1949, which came into force on<br />

July 6, 1949. It was just after the<br />

independence of India and Buddhism was not<br />

having significant presence in India due<br />

historical reasons. The BGT Act was amended<br />

by the Adaptation of Law Order, 1950, dated<br />

February 8, 1955. Since then, this Act has<br />

been governing the cultural, spiritual and<br />

financial affairs of one of the most sacred<br />

shrines of world without passing the<br />

Constitutional scrutiny of secularism, nondiscrimination<br />

and the fundamental right of<br />

freedom of religion.<br />

The most important governing section under<br />

BGT Act is Section 3, which empowers the<br />

State Government to constitute a ninemember<br />

temple management committee,<br />

consisting of a Chairman, and four Buddhists<br />

and four Hindus, including the Mahanth of<br />

Bodh Gaya. It imposes the condition that the<br />

Mahanth must be a Hindu. In the event that<br />

the Mahanth is unable to fulfill his duties,<br />

only another Hindu member can replace him.<br />

The act gives hereditary membership to<br />

Saivite Mahant and his successors in Bodh<br />

Gaya Temple Management Committee. It is<br />

very painful to note that the Mahabodhi<br />

Temple has been under virtual control of<br />

Hindus for centuries now.<br />

In July 2013, the Bihar Government has<br />

amended the Bodh Gaya Temple Act of 1949,<br />

allowing for a non-Hindu to head the temple<br />

committee. As per Section 3 (3) of the Act, the<br />

District Magistrate (DM) is the ex-officio<br />

chairman of the temple committee and has to<br />

be a Hindu. If the DM is a non-Hindu, the Act<br />

requires the government to nominate a Hindu<br />

as Chairman of the committee for the period<br />

during which the DM is a non-Hindu. As per<br />

the Bodh Gaya Temple (Amendment) Bill,<br />

2013, it is provided now that a Non-Hindu<br />

can be a chairman of the committee on<br />

pretext that the DM is a representative of the<br />

government’s secular credentials. Practically,<br />

it is very rare to have Buddhist DM in Bihar<br />

State and therefore Bodh Gaya Temple<br />

(Amendment) Bill, 2013, becomes just a<br />

political gimmick and does not make any<br />

change in the management of the temple. The<br />

Buddhist, over six decades, has been<br />

demanding to amend the Bodh Gaya Temple<br />

Act of 1949, allowing Buddhist to be majority<br />

on the committee so that the management of<br />

the temple can be with the Buddhist in<br />

similar lines with other shrines in the<br />

country which are managed and controlled by<br />

the members of the respective religion. A<br />

petition seeking transfer of exclusive rights to<br />

the Buddhist from the State Government has<br />

been admitted by Supreme Court in 2012,<br />

which is still pending. State Government of<br />

Bihar has always taken a stand that there is<br />

no need to alter it as long as the temple<br />

management is properly handled by the<br />

committee comprising four members each of<br />

Hindu and Buddhist communities.<br />

Of Course the Buddhist from all over the<br />

world knows that the temple is not managed<br />

as it should have been and it is of utmost<br />

importance to have complete control with the<br />

Buddhist so that it can be managed in<br />

● Year – 2 ● <strong>Issue</strong> – 6 ● <strong>May</strong> <strong>2015</strong> ● Buddhist Voice ● www.buddhistvoice.com ● Email: indian.buddhistvoice@gmail.com 4

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!