Coal Kills
1TndvUf
1TndvUf
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Table 9: Anticipated health impacts of planned coal-fired TPPs and likely<br />
number of lives saved by operating a flue gas desulphurization unit at all<br />
the coal-fired TPPs in India<br />
Premature mortality<br />
under no FGD<br />
Lives saved under 60%-<br />
and 95%- FGD efficiency<br />
Monetary benefits<br />
under FGD (crores)<br />
Year 2017 112,500 – 126,000 39,000 – 63,000 7,800 – 12,600<br />
Year 2020 132,500 – 153,500 45,000 – 74,000 9,000 – 14,800<br />
Year 2025 164,000 – 197,500 54,500 – 90,500 10,900 – 18,100<br />
Year 2030 186,500 – 229,500 61,000 – 101,500 12,200 – 20,300<br />
Figure 11: Percentage change in the PM 2.5 concentrations upon implementation of FGD (with 95%<br />
efficiency) in all the proposed TPPs<br />
The co-benefits of a FGD system extend to other pollutants. For example, in the wet FGD process,<br />
the particulate matter is also trapped in the sorbents, resulting in further removal of the PM<br />
emissions. The FGD system is applied after the flue gas passes through an ESP, which is known to<br />
deliver up to 99% PM removal efficiency, which is further improved when the flue gas passes<br />
through a post-combustion FGD system. Given the volume of the coal consumed in India and the<br />
ash content, even a fraction of improvement in the PM removal efficiency will result in large<br />
benefits for ambient PM concentrations and health impacts.<br />
23 | <strong>Coal</strong>-fired TPPs in India