07.12.2012 Views

PhD thesis Title Page Final _Richard Juma - Victoria University ...

PhD thesis Title Page Final _Richard Juma - Victoria University ...

PhD thesis Title Page Final _Richard Juma - Victoria University ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

argument is supported by Pottier (1993) who observes that periodic or<br />

chronic food stress does not cause all members of a population to be<br />

similarly or equally affected. The dryland areas may share common<br />

characteristics and occupying populations may experience similar<br />

problems, but livelihood sustainability levels may differ greatly depending<br />

on the availability of socio-economic resources. It is argued here that for<br />

us to discuss the policy issues emanating from this study more<br />

meaningfully, we should not only address livelihood responses per se, but<br />

also the socio-economic factors which promote or impede local responses<br />

to drought and famine in the Turkana District. It is only with such<br />

knowledge that we can make intelligent and informed suggestions about<br />

what outsiders can do to help without undermining Turkana initiatives.<br />

The research undertaken in the preparation of this <strong>thesis</strong> was predicated<br />

on the idea that to make such a critical analysis and improve policy<br />

formulation, it was necessary to look at more than one community. The<br />

effects of the 2005-2006 droughts and famine were not the same in all<br />

areas of the Turkana District, but within the time and resource constraints<br />

placed on a <strong>PhD</strong> exercise, it was only possible to carry out research in two<br />

contrasting Turkana villages reportedly hardest hit by the 2005-2006<br />

drought and famine. The two sites, Morulem (rural) and Lokichar (urban)<br />

were selected with an understanding that the data collected would enable<br />

me to document the response differences to drought and famine followed<br />

by each community (see the location of the two study areas in Figure 1).<br />

Data were obtained through documentary review, in-depth key informant<br />

interviews, household survey and case histories. A random sampling<br />

method was used. In Morulem, I interviewed 45 household 23 heads and 5<br />

key informants while in Lokichar, I interviewed 35 household heads and 3<br />

key informants. The success of this is reported in chapters 3, 6 and 7.<br />

23 Refer to chapter 3 for a fuller discussion of the term ‘household’<br />

20

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!