(IEA Energy Papers 2011_05) Matthias Finkenrath-Cost and Performance of Carbon Dioxide Capture from Power Generation (IEA Energy Papers)-OECD Publishing (2011)
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
<strong>Cost</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Performance</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Carbon</strong> <strong>Dioxide</strong> <strong>Capture</strong> <strong>from</strong> <strong>Power</strong> <strong>Generation</strong> ©<strong>OECD</strong>/<strong>IEA</strong> <strong>2011</strong><br />
Page | 14<br />
Though it is <strong>of</strong>ten not explicitly stated, the group <strong>of</strong> analysed studies generally assumes that CO 2<br />
capture <strong>and</strong> compression is integrated into a new power plant <strong>and</strong> benefits <strong>from</strong> at least a<br />
minimum infrastructure, which is typical for an industrial site. This includes availability <strong>of</strong><br />
engineering <strong>and</strong> local human resources, equipment, utility <strong>and</strong> fuel supply, access to the power<br />
grid <strong>and</strong> appropriate options for transporting <strong>and</strong> storing separated CO 2 . In addition, for such<br />
new‐build, brown‐field installations, the study assumes full flexibility in terms <strong>of</strong> plant integration<br />
<strong>and</strong> optimisation.<br />
This working paper does not analyse the impact <strong>of</strong> retr<strong>of</strong>itting CO 2 capture to existing power<br />
plants. Incremental costs <strong>of</strong> adding CO 2 capture to those plants could be higher than the<br />
incremental costs shown in the reviewed studies, since these existing plants were designed with<br />
no considerations for future CO 2 capture.