10.12.2015 Views

Green2009-herbivore monitoring

Green2009-herbivore monitoring.pdf

Green2009-herbivore monitoring.pdf

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Herbivorous Coral Reef Fishes<br />

to which territorial pomacentrids rely on an invertebrate component in their diet is also unclear (Choat<br />

1991).<br />

ONTOGENETIC CHANGES IN FEEDING MODES<br />

Most reef fishes go through a planktonic larval stage (Leis and Rennis 1983), and little is known about<br />

their feeding modes while they are in the plankton (Leis 1991). However, most are presumed to feed<br />

on other plankton (Choat 1991).<br />

Once they settle onto the reef, the majority of herbivorous species become <strong>herbivore</strong>s and stay that<br />

way throughout their lives, including most acanthurids, blenniids and siganids (reviewed by Bellwood<br />

1988 and Choat 1991). Similarly, the pomacanthid Centropyge bicolor appears to be an omnivore<br />

throughout its benthic life (Bellwood 1988).<br />

Others change feeding modes at different stages of their life history (ontogeny) after they have settled<br />

onto the reef. Some species of unicornfishes commence benthic life as <strong>herbivore</strong>s then feed on open<br />

water plankton as adults (Naso annulatus, N. brevirostris, N. maculatus, N. mcdadei and N. vlamingii:<br />

Choat 1991, Choat and Clements 1998, Choat et al 2002). For these species, ontogenetic change in<br />

diet tends to occur by at least 20cm standard length (SL).<br />

In contrast, parrotfishes pass through a period of carnivory during their early post-settlement phase<br />

(Bellwood 1988), before progressively changing to <strong>herbivore</strong>s within the first few weeks of benthic life<br />

(by 32mm SL: Bellwood 1988). Similarly, herbivorous pomacentrids undergo ontogenetic changes in<br />

diet from an omnivorous to a predominantly herbivorous diet (reviewed in Bellwood 1988).<br />

These differences may be explained by phylogeny (Choat 1991). Acanthuroid fishes (including<br />

acanthurids and siganids) settle at relatively large sizes with well-developed sensory, locomotor, and<br />

alimentary systems (Leis and Rennis 1983), and can function as <strong>herbivore</strong>s (Choat 1991). Labroids<br />

generally, and scarines in particular, settle at smaller sizes (Leis and Rennis 1983). Herbivory in<br />

scarines is based on the development of specialized mouthparts (the pharyngeal mill), associated<br />

musculature and the alimentary tract (reviewed in Choat 1991). The functioning of the mill may be<br />

size dependent, working efficiently only when individuals reach a certain size or mass. Therefore,<br />

scarines may feed on copepods while they are small (Bellwood 1988), because their particular mode<br />

of feeding has a size threshold. Similarly, Lassuy (1984) suggested that the inclusion of crustaceans<br />

in the diet of small juveniles of the herbivorous pomacentrid Stegastes lividus may be a result of<br />

limited digestive capabilities of these individuals.<br />

22

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!