10.12.2015 Views

Green2009-herbivore monitoring

Green2009-herbivore monitoring.pdf

Green2009-herbivore monitoring.pdf

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

References<br />

Minimum Size for Inclusion<br />

A minimum size for inclusion is necessary, because many small individuals are cryptic in behaviour<br />

and colouration (Bellwood and Choat 1989), and specialized methods are required to census them<br />

(Green 1992, 1998). Observers are also likely to miss large individuals if they are searching for small<br />

ones (and vice versa).<br />

A minimum size of 10cm TL is often used for underwater visual census of herbivorous reef fishes,<br />

such as scarines (e.g. Hoey and Bellwood 2008). In this protocol we recommended using the same<br />

minimum size, but recognised that this would effectively exclude some of the smaller species of<br />

grazers/detritivores (Acanthurus nigrofuscus, A. triostegus, Zebrasoma scopas and Centropye<br />

species). Therefore, a minimum size of 5cm was recommended for those species. If observers<br />

cannot identify these small species, a minimum size of 10cm could be used for all species, although it<br />

is not recommended.<br />

Size Categories<br />

In this protocol, we recommended that fishes be assigned to size categories, given that most<br />

observers do not have the level of skill required to estimate size underwater at a high degree of<br />

accuracy (see Kulbicki et al 2005). We recommended using 2.5cm size categories for fishes less than<br />

10cm in size, and 5cm size categories for fishes 10cm or larger in size (i.e. 5 to

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!