Green2009-herbivore monitoring
Green2009-herbivore monitoring.pdf
Green2009-herbivore monitoring.pdf
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Monitoring Functional Groups of Herbivorous Reef Fishes<br />
Pears 2003). This method is less precise than using a differential GPS, and the GPS should be used<br />
if possible.<br />
The optimal distance covered in each timed swim should be 400m to ensure enough distance is<br />
covered to encounter highly mobile species that tend to be rare, patchy or clumped in distribution<br />
(Choat and Pears 2003). If observers are consistently covering distances less than 400m in each<br />
timed swim (e.g. due to a large number of small and medium sized individuals that one observer has<br />
to count), the methods should be modified until an average distance of 400m per timed swim is<br />
attained. This can be achieved by either: 1) Increasing the duration of each swim from 20mins to 25<br />
or 30mins; 2) Reducing the transect width for small and medium sized individuals from 5m to 3m<br />
(1.5m either side of the observer); or 3) Changing the fish sizes that each observer has to count so that<br />
both observers are counting a similar number of individuals (e.g. by one observer counting small<br />
individuals only, and the other observer counting medium and large sized individuals). In that situation,<br />
transect widths for each size group (small, medium or large) remain the same.<br />
Combination of Belt Transects and Long Swims<br />
Belt transects should be used where a higher degree of precision is required or when <strong>monitoring</strong> for<br />
multiple objectives, and when time and conditions are suitable for laying tapes at each site. This method<br />
provides the most effective technique for <strong>monitoring</strong> most small (