15.02.2016 Views

A-HRC-13-42

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

A/<strong>HRC</strong>/<strong>13</strong>/<strong>42</strong><br />

page 40<br />

Turkish Cypriots were declared inadmissible in 2002. 144 In the cases of Cyprus v. Turkey 145 and<br />

Varnava v. Turkey, 146 the Court found continuing violations of European Convention articles 2, 3<br />

and 5 with regard to Greek Cypriot missing persons.<br />

C. The United Nations and regional responses towards the<br />

outlawing of the practice of secret detention<br />

87. The United Nations has paid increasing attention to the issue of secret detention and its<br />

relation to enforced disappearances since 1978, in the context of denunciations by numerous<br />

non-governmental organizations and widespread concerns with human rights situations in Chile,<br />

Cyprus and Argentina. The Inter-American Commission on Human Rights was one of the first<br />

international human rights bodies to respond to the phenomenon of enforced disappearances and<br />

secret detentions during the 1970s, both in general terms and with regard to specific cases in<br />

Chile since the military coup d’état of 11 September 1973. 147<br />

88. In 1978, the General Assembly, deeply concerned by reports from various parts of the<br />

world relating to enforced or involuntary disappearances of persons as a result of excesses on the<br />

part of law enforcement or security authorities or similar organizations, adopted a resolution<br />

dealing specifically with disappeared persons and requested the Commission on Human Rights<br />

to make appropriate recommendations. 148 On 6 March 1979, the Commission established a<br />

mandate for experts to study the question of the fate of missing and disappeared persons in Chile.<br />

In his report, Felix Ermacora, the expert in charge of the study, proposed, inter alia, a number of<br />

preventive measures, such as the prohibition of secret places of detention, the maintenance of a<br />

central register of arrest and detention, the right of civilian judges to visit all places of<br />

detention. 149<br />

89. Subsequently, the Economic and Social Council, in its resolution 1979/38, requested the<br />

Commission on Human Rights to consider, as a matter of priority, the question of disappeared<br />

144<br />

European Court of Human Rights, Lütfi Celul Karabardak and others v. Cyprus, application<br />

no. 76575/01, and Baybora and Others v. Cyprus, application no. 77116/01, admissibility<br />

decisions of 22 October 2002.<br />

145 European Court of Human Rights, Cyprus v. Turkey, application 25781/94, judgement of 10<br />

May 2001.<br />

146<br />

European Court of Human Rights, Varnava v. Cyprus, applications nos. 16064/90, 16065/90,<br />

16066/90, 16068/90, 16069/90, 16070/90, 16071/90, 16072/90 and 16073/90, judgement of<br />

18 September 2009.<br />

147 Wilder Tayler, “Background to the elaboration of the draft international convention for the<br />

protection of all persons from forced disappearance”, ICJ Review No. 62-63, September 2001, p.<br />

63.<br />

148<br />

General Assembly resolution 33/173.<br />

149<br />

A/34/583/Add.1, paras. 193-197.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!