16.02.2016 Views

Summary

Yo4Ar

Yo4Ar

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

GENDER SUMMARY<br />

EDUCATION FOR ALL GLOBAL MONITORING REPORT 2015<br />

Learning assessments highlight gender differences<br />

in subject performance<br />

Regional and international learning assessments<br />

at primary and secondary level, including PISA,<br />

TIMSS, Southern and Eastern Africa Consortium<br />

for Monitoring Educational Quality (SACMEQ)<br />

and SERCE, indicate variation in subject-specific<br />

achievement by gender. Analysis presented in the<br />

2012 GMR, using data from various international<br />

and regional learning assessments surveys over<br />

the period 2005–2009, shows that girls overall<br />

performed better in reading, and boys performed<br />

better in mathematics in most countries, although<br />

the gap was narrowing. Performance in science was<br />

more varied, with no significant difference between<br />

boys and girls in many countries (UNESCO, 2012b).<br />

PISA surveys, which assess the performance of<br />

15-year-old students, show a widening gap in<br />

reading, with girls performing significantly better<br />

than boys in all locations surveyed (Figure 14a).<br />

A comparison of the subset of locations that took<br />

part in both the 2000 and 2012 surveys shows that<br />

the gender gap in reading widened in 11 countries,<br />

including Bulgaria, France, Iceland, Israel,<br />

Portugal and Romania, largely due to a decline in<br />

boys’ performance. Low-performing boys face a<br />

particularly large disadvantage, as they are heavily<br />

over-represented among those who failed to show<br />

basic levels of reading literacy (OECD, 2014a).<br />

The PISA results also show gender differences in<br />

mathematics, with boys performing better than<br />

girls in the majority of locations, although the<br />

gap has narrowed in several countries, including<br />

Montenegro, Norway and Slovakia (Figure 14b).<br />

In the 2012 PISA survey, girls in OECD countries<br />

underperformed boys by an average of 11<br />

points. The data show that girls were underrepresented<br />

among the highest achievers in most<br />

locations, a possible challenge to achieving equal<br />

participation in science, technology, engineering<br />

and mathematics occupations in the future<br />

(OECD, 2014a).<br />

In poorer settings, girls continue to face<br />

disadvantage in achievement<br />

In some poorer countries where girls have<br />

historically faced barriers to equal participation<br />

in education, they continue to face disadvantage<br />

in obtaining important foundation skills. Further<br />

analysis shows that gender disparities in learning<br />

can be underestimated when assessments only<br />

include children attending school. Analysis of the<br />

Annual Status of Education Report (ASER) 2014<br />

Survey in rural Pakistan assesses literacy and<br />

numeracy skills of both those children aged 5–16<br />

years who attend school and those who do not. It<br />

shows that gender gaps are small among schoolgoing<br />

grade 5 students, sometimes favouring girls.<br />

However, girls’ relative performance is worse among<br />

all the assessed children aged 10–12 years, whether<br />

they are in school or not, particularly in poorer, less<br />

developed provinces and territories. In Balochistan,<br />

the percentage of girls in grade 5 who can read a<br />

passage in Urdu, Sindhi or Pashto was, on average,<br />

almost the same as for boys in grade 5, but among<br />

all children aged 10–12 years, there was a gap of<br />

5 percentage points between girls and boys. In the<br />

Federally Administered Tribal Areas (FATA), the<br />

gap was 14 percentage points at the expense of<br />

girls (Figure 15).<br />

Girls may face disadvantage in national<br />

examinations<br />

Limited research suggests that in some poorer<br />

countries, girls face greater disadvantage in<br />

national examinations than boys, raising obstacles<br />

to their continued schooling. Even though girls<br />

in grade 6 scored higher than boys in the 2007<br />

SACMEQ III learning assessment, girls’ pass rates<br />

in national examinations in Kenya and Zimbabwe<br />

were significantly lower than boys (Mukhopondhyay<br />

et al., 2012). National examinations at the end of the<br />

primary cycle can form part of high-stakes selection<br />

processes in which failure to pass or perform well<br />

prevents transition to lower secondary. In Kenya<br />

and Malawi, performance in exams for primary<br />

school leaving certificates determines entry into<br />

state-funded secondary schools (Mukhopondhyay<br />

et al., 2012).<br />

Gender parity in literacy is poor<br />

Overall, nearly 781 million adults lacked basic<br />

literacy skills in 2012, of which nearly 64% were<br />

women, a percentage unchanged since 2000.<br />

Globally, the average adult illiteracy rate fell from<br />

24% to 18% between 1990 and 2000. Yet the pace<br />

of decline has slowed, and estimates suggest the<br />

rate has only fallen slightly to 16% in 2012 and is<br />

projected to be 14% by 2015. This represents a<br />

fall of only 23% in the number of illiterate adults<br />

20

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!