Summary
Yo4Ar
Yo4Ar
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
GENDER SUMMARY<br />
EDUCATION FOR ALL GLOBAL MONITORING REPORT 2015<br />
Learning assessments highlight gender differences<br />
in subject performance<br />
Regional and international learning assessments<br />
at primary and secondary level, including PISA,<br />
TIMSS, Southern and Eastern Africa Consortium<br />
for Monitoring Educational Quality (SACMEQ)<br />
and SERCE, indicate variation in subject-specific<br />
achievement by gender. Analysis presented in the<br />
2012 GMR, using data from various international<br />
and regional learning assessments surveys over<br />
the period 2005–2009, shows that girls overall<br />
performed better in reading, and boys performed<br />
better in mathematics in most countries, although<br />
the gap was narrowing. Performance in science was<br />
more varied, with no significant difference between<br />
boys and girls in many countries (UNESCO, 2012b).<br />
PISA surveys, which assess the performance of<br />
15-year-old students, show a widening gap in<br />
reading, with girls performing significantly better<br />
than boys in all locations surveyed (Figure 14a).<br />
A comparison of the subset of locations that took<br />
part in both the 2000 and 2012 surveys shows that<br />
the gender gap in reading widened in 11 countries,<br />
including Bulgaria, France, Iceland, Israel,<br />
Portugal and Romania, largely due to a decline in<br />
boys’ performance. Low-performing boys face a<br />
particularly large disadvantage, as they are heavily<br />
over-represented among those who failed to show<br />
basic levels of reading literacy (OECD, 2014a).<br />
The PISA results also show gender differences in<br />
mathematics, with boys performing better than<br />
girls in the majority of locations, although the<br />
gap has narrowed in several countries, including<br />
Montenegro, Norway and Slovakia (Figure 14b).<br />
In the 2012 PISA survey, girls in OECD countries<br />
underperformed boys by an average of 11<br />
points. The data show that girls were underrepresented<br />
among the highest achievers in most<br />
locations, a possible challenge to achieving equal<br />
participation in science, technology, engineering<br />
and mathematics occupations in the future<br />
(OECD, 2014a).<br />
In poorer settings, girls continue to face<br />
disadvantage in achievement<br />
In some poorer countries where girls have<br />
historically faced barriers to equal participation<br />
in education, they continue to face disadvantage<br />
in obtaining important foundation skills. Further<br />
analysis shows that gender disparities in learning<br />
can be underestimated when assessments only<br />
include children attending school. Analysis of the<br />
Annual Status of Education Report (ASER) 2014<br />
Survey in rural Pakistan assesses literacy and<br />
numeracy skills of both those children aged 5–16<br />
years who attend school and those who do not. It<br />
shows that gender gaps are small among schoolgoing<br />
grade 5 students, sometimes favouring girls.<br />
However, girls’ relative performance is worse among<br />
all the assessed children aged 10–12 years, whether<br />
they are in school or not, particularly in poorer, less<br />
developed provinces and territories. In Balochistan,<br />
the percentage of girls in grade 5 who can read a<br />
passage in Urdu, Sindhi or Pashto was, on average,<br />
almost the same as for boys in grade 5, but among<br />
all children aged 10–12 years, there was a gap of<br />
5 percentage points between girls and boys. In the<br />
Federally Administered Tribal Areas (FATA), the<br />
gap was 14 percentage points at the expense of<br />
girls (Figure 15).<br />
Girls may face disadvantage in national<br />
examinations<br />
Limited research suggests that in some poorer<br />
countries, girls face greater disadvantage in<br />
national examinations than boys, raising obstacles<br />
to their continued schooling. Even though girls<br />
in grade 6 scored higher than boys in the 2007<br />
SACMEQ III learning assessment, girls’ pass rates<br />
in national examinations in Kenya and Zimbabwe<br />
were significantly lower than boys (Mukhopondhyay<br />
et al., 2012). National examinations at the end of the<br />
primary cycle can form part of high-stakes selection<br />
processes in which failure to pass or perform well<br />
prevents transition to lower secondary. In Kenya<br />
and Malawi, performance in exams for primary<br />
school leaving certificates determines entry into<br />
state-funded secondary schools (Mukhopondhyay<br />
et al., 2012).<br />
Gender parity in literacy is poor<br />
Overall, nearly 781 million adults lacked basic<br />
literacy skills in 2012, of which nearly 64% were<br />
women, a percentage unchanged since 2000.<br />
Globally, the average adult illiteracy rate fell from<br />
24% to 18% between 1990 and 2000. Yet the pace<br />
of decline has slowed, and estimates suggest the<br />
rate has only fallen slightly to 16% in 2012 and is<br />
projected to be 14% by 2015. This represents a<br />
fall of only 23% in the number of illiterate adults<br />
20