23.02.2016 Views

European Aviation Environmental Report 2016

1nTl7nR

1nTl7nR

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

38 <strong>European</strong> <strong>Aviation</strong> <strong>Environmental</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>2016</strong><br />

characteristics with comparable behaviour to<br />

fossil fuel during the fuel combustion phase.<br />

Potential emissions savings from using biofuels<br />

may be as large as 80%, but depend highly<br />

on the feedstock type and the production<br />

processes. For biofuels originating from<br />

agricultural crops, special attention must be<br />

paid to the potential emissions generated by the<br />

direct or indirect land use conversion induced by<br />

the cultivation of the crops 19 . From this point of<br />

view and regarding possible risks of competition<br />

with food production, alternative fuels produced<br />

from wastes are of special interest.<br />

An additional benefit from the use of alternative<br />

fuels could be improved air quality. Depending<br />

on the type of production pathway, alternative<br />

fuels may contain no aromatics and sulphur,<br />

leading to a significant reduction of soot and<br />

sulphur oxides emissions when blended with<br />

conventional jet fuel.<br />

3.3 Market for sustainable<br />

alternative fuels<br />

In 2009 the <strong>European</strong> Commission initiated the<br />

SWAFEA study [37] to investigate the feasibility<br />

and impact of the use of alternative fuels in<br />

aviation to support future air transport policy<br />

discussions. The main recommendations<br />

covered various areas including economics,<br />

policy, sustainability, research and coordination.<br />

The output of this study fed into discussions<br />

with aircraft manufacturers, airline operators<br />

and <strong>European</strong> biofuel producers, and in<br />

2011 resulted in the launch of the ‘<strong>European</strong><br />

Advanced Biofuels Flightpath’ 20 [38]. This is an<br />

industry‐wide initiative to accelerate the market<br />

uptake of aviation biofuels in Europe. It provides<br />

a roadmap to achieve an annual production<br />

rate of 2.06 million tonnes of oil equivalent<br />

(2.06 Mtoe / 600 million gallons) of sustainably<br />

produced biofuel for civil aviation in Europe by<br />

the year 2020 21 .<br />

To support the emergence of sustainable<br />

aviation alternative fuels in Europe, aviation has<br />

also been included in the so‐called Renewable<br />

Energy Directive [39], which defines a mandatory<br />

target of 10% renewable energy content<br />

in transportation fuels by 2020 22 . <strong>Aviation</strong><br />

biofuels meeting the sustainability criteria of<br />

the Renewable Energy Directive are exempted<br />

from obligations under the EU ETS. Moreover,<br />

aviation fuels can contribute to the additional<br />

target set by the <strong>European</strong> Fuel Quality Directive<br />

[40] to cut the greenhouse gas intensity of<br />

transportation fossil fuels supplied in the EU by<br />

6% in 2020 compared to a 2010 baseline.<br />

Commercial facilities exist in Europe for<br />

hydroprocessing of vegetable oils and animal<br />

fats (HEFA/HVO), although these facilities are<br />

focused on diesel fuel production and are not<br />

specifically designed for jet fuel production.<br />

The potential use of green diesel would make<br />

existing production capacity available to aviation<br />

and lead to a biofuel with lower costs than HEFA/<br />

HVO, although use of green diesel in aviation<br />

would face competition with road transportation<br />

where conditions are more favorable to biofuels<br />

and incentives are already in place.<br />

Production costs for sustainable alternative<br />

aviation fuels are expected to decrease once<br />

experience is accrued, the production volume<br />

increases and more producers enter the<br />

market. Sustained access to low‐cost feedstocks<br />

is also considered necessary to become<br />

cost‐competitive with conventional kerosene. In<br />

addition, capital investment may be a significant<br />

hurdle for the development of the sustainable<br />

aviation fuel industry infrastructure, which can<br />

be quite different depending on the chosen<br />

production pathway.<br />

Due to the current price gap with conventional<br />

jet fuel, demand for sustainable alternative<br />

fuels has so far been limited to ad‐hoc airline<br />

demonstration flights and pilot phases of<br />

sustainable biofuel supply chains by biofuel<br />

producers [41]. Consequently, to date, there<br />

19 Indirect land conversion may occur due to the displacement of existing crops to produce biofuels.<br />

20 Biofuels are alternative fuels produced from biomass (e.g. feedstock, vegetable oils and animal fats, waste).<br />

21 In comparison, the US Farm to Fly initiatives aim at producing one billion gallons of sustainable jet fuel by 2018. Note<br />

the definition of sustainable biofuels is currently different in the EU and US regulatory frameworks.<br />

22 To date, Indonesia is the only country to have introduced a biojet fuel mandate. This starts at 2% in <strong>2016</strong> and rises to<br />

5% by 2025.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!