- Page 1 and 2: APPLICATION COMPENDIUM [ ionkey/MS
- Page 3 and 4: THE iKey SEPARATION DEVICE The iKey
- Page 5 and 6: Table of Contents BIOANALYSIS An Im
- Page 7 and 8: BIOANALYSIS
- Page 9 and 10: E X P E R IM E N TA L Method condit
- Page 11 and 12: RESULTS AND DISCUSSION Mass spectro
- Page 13 and 14: Method optimization resulted in the
- Page 15 and 16: Bradykinin overspiked concentration
- Page 17 and 18: CONCLUSIONS Use of the ionKey/MS Sy
- Page 19 and 20: E X P E R IM E N TA L Sample prepra
- Page 21 and 22: RESULTS AND DISCUSSION Mass spectro
- Page 23 and 24: Enhanced sensitivity with the use o
- Page 25 and 26: Specificity vs. sensitivity Triple
- Page 27 and 28: CONCLUSIONS The combination of the
- Page 29 and 30: E X P E R IM E N TA L LC conditions
- Page 31 and 32: Figure 4. TargetLynx results for cl
- Page 33 and 34: Part III. Dual pump trap-and-elute
- Page 35 and 36: CONCLUSIONS High sensitivity is dem
- Page 37 and 38: A-3 Figure A-3. Trap value paramete
- Page 39 and 40: E X P E R IM E N TA L Sample prepra
- Page 41 and 42: Figure 2. ionKey/MS System: compris
- Page 43 and 44: Sample preparation Development of t
- Page 45 and 46: Phase II. Minimizing sample require
- Page 47 and 48: CONCLUSIONS The combination of the
- Page 49: E X P E R IM E N TA L Method condit
- Page 53 and 54: Sample preparation SPE was performe
- Page 55 and 56: 100 % 50 pg/mL 28256 MRM of 4 Chann
- Page 57 and 58: Reducing Sample Volume and Increasi
- Page 59 and 60: In an earlier publication, 1 we des
- Page 61 and 62: Chromatography Chromatographic sepa
- Page 63 and 64: Compound name: Humalog Correlation
- Page 65 and 66: Insulin variant Std curve range (pg
- Page 67 and 68: Robustness of the ionKey/MS System
- Page 69 and 70: RESULTS AND DISCUSSION Routine anal
- Page 71 and 72: Figure 4 illustrates the stability
- Page 73 and 74: CONCLUSIONS The performance of the
- Page 76 and 77: Ultrasensitive Quantification Assay
- Page 78 and 79: RESULTS AND DISCUSSION One of the f
- Page 80 and 81: The LLOQ of the OT assay was 10 pg/
- Page 82 and 83: The carryover of the assay was eval
- Page 84 and 85: High Sensitivity Intact Mass Analys
- Page 86 and 87: Figure 2 demonstrates a deconvolute
- Page 88 and 89: High Sensitivity Metabolite Screeni
- Page 90 and 91: RESULTS AND DISCUSSION The analysis
- Page 92: 02182015AD17 100 1: TOF MS ES- 178.
- Page 95: DEVELOPMENT OF A HIGH-SENSITIVITY M
- Page 98 and 99: E X P E R IM E N TA L LC conditions
- Page 100 and 101:
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION The analytic
- Page 102 and 103:
To further study the analytical sen
- Page 104 and 105:
CONCLUSIONS Use of an optimized SIS
- Page 106 and 107:
E X P E R IM E N TA L Method condit
- Page 108 and 109:
The lower limit of quantification (
- Page 110 and 111:
A Novel Strategy to Screen and Prof
- Page 112 and 113:
E X P E R IM E N TA L LC conditions
- Page 114 and 115:
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION In this feas
- Page 116 and 117:
However Figure 6 reveals using ion
- Page 118 and 119:
CONCLUSIONS ionKey/MS with ion mobi
- Page 120 and 121:
Screening methods are a practical a
- Page 122 and 123:
Chromatographic method Starting mas
- Page 124 and 125:
The characteristic imazalil isotope
- Page 126 and 127:
Reduction in matrix effects Typical
- Page 128 and 129:
iKey separation device UPLC S/N 216
- Page 130 and 131:
CONCLUSIONS Significant sensitivity
- Page 132 and 133:
In this application note, we explor
- Page 134 and 135:
Chromatographic method Starting mas
- Page 136 and 137:
A major point of discovery during t
- Page 138 and 139:
Using ionKey/MS in combination with
- Page 140 and 141:
ionKey/MS Ion Mobility: A New Appro
- Page 142 and 143:
E X P E R IM E N TA L LC conditions
- Page 144 and 145:
The true complexity of the profiled
- Page 146 and 147:
CONCLUSIONS UPLC and ionKey/MS ion
- Page 148 and 149:
E X P E R IM E N TA L UPLC conditio
- Page 150 and 151:
Sensitivity Improvement over 2.1 mm
- Page 152 and 153:
Peak repeatability and robustness M
- Page 154 and 155:
Using the Routine Separation Dimens
- Page 156 and 157:
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION ionKey/MS io
- Page 158 and 159:
Utilizing the extended functionalit
- Page 160 and 161:
CONCLUSIONS Using positive and nega
- Page 162:
FEMTOGRAM DETECTION OF 11-NOR-9-CAR
- Page 165 and 166:
Performing analysis of oral fluid s
- Page 168 and 169:
LIPIDOMICS, METABOLOMICS AND PROTEO
- Page 170 and 171:
E X P E R IM E N TA L LC conditions
- Page 172 and 173:
MRM transitions were inspected usin
- Page 174 and 175:
In Figure 4, the measured light-to-
- Page 176:
SINGULUS PULPITUM: MICROFLUIDICS CO
- Page 179 and 180:
E X P E R IM E N TA L LC conditions
- Page 181 and 182:
10 7 Dynamic range 10 6 Peak Area 1
- Page 184 and 185:
GENERAL
- Page 186 and 187:
100 Table 1. Peptide from P00924, Y
- Page 188 and 189:
THE SOLUTION The ionKey/MS System,
- Page 190 and 191:
The iKey Separation Device as a Mor
- Page 192:
The detector sensitivity is another
- Page 195 and 196:
ENHANCING MASS SPECTROMETRY SENSITI
- Page 197 and 198:
Concentration-sensitive behavior is
- Page 199 and 200:
References 1. G. Hopfgartner, K. Be
- Page 201 and 202:
INTRODUCTION Ion suppression is def
- Page 203 and 204:
For the model small molecule shown
- Page 205 and 206:
decrease in ion suppression. ionKey
- Page 207 and 208:
With a standard ESI, the high flow
- Page 209 and 210:
100 1: TOF MS ES- BPI 1.89e6 100 1:
- Page 211 and 212:
100 5.13 631.8 1: TOF MS ES+ 629.38
- Page 213 and 214:
JOURNAL OF APPLIED BIOANALYSIS, Oct
- Page 215 and 216:
ALELYUNAS YW J. APPL. BIOANAL Table
- Page 217 and 218:
ALELYUNAS YW J. APPL. BIOANAL Linea
- Page 219 and 220:
ALELYUNAS YW J. APPL. BIOANAL Figur
- Page 221 and 222:
NOTES 214
- Page 223:
NOTES 216