10.04.2016 Views

Development of Hinduism

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

2. DATES OF VEDAS<br />

http://www.sacred-texts.com/hin/index.htm<br />

The Vedas<br />

There are four Vedas, the Rig Veda, Sama Veda, Yajur Veda and Atharva Veda. The Vedas are<br />

the primary texts <strong>of</strong> <strong>Hinduism</strong>. They also had a vast influence on Buddhism, Jainism, and<br />

Sikhism. The Rig Veda, the oldest <strong>of</strong> the four Vedas, was composed about 1500 B.C., and<br />

codified about 600 B.C. It is unknown when it was finally comitted to writing, but this probably<br />

was at some point after 300 B.C.<br />

“Based on internal evidence (philological and linguistic), the Rigveda was composed roughly<br />

between 1700–1100 BCE (the early Vedic period) in the Punjab (Sapta Sindhu) region <strong>of</strong> the<br />

Indian subcontinent.” Notice that it is talking about supposed composition based on internal<br />

references. Evidently if something is referred to in the content to have happened, it must have<br />

happened before the composition. How long after the event is not really possible to say. It is<br />

supposed to be transmitted orally without any change from 1700 to 200 BC over a period <strong>of</strong><br />

1500 years, orally, by word <strong>of</strong> mouth! At the same time we have traditions which says that<br />

most <strong>of</strong> the other parts <strong>of</strong> Vedas has disappeared. Yet we are told that what survived survived<br />

without distortion or error!! It certainly belies “self evident means <strong>of</strong> knowledge.”<br />

Yet it has been written down. The reason?<br />

http://www.gurjari.net/ico/Mystica/html/veda.htm<br />

”It is believed that the Vedas were orally revealed by Brahma to certain sages, who heard them<br />

and passed them down in an oral tradition. They were not written down; in fact this was<br />

prohibited. The Mahabharata denounces it and Kumarila Bhatta held that by reading the Vedas,<br />

their spiritual significance was nullified. As a result <strong>of</strong> this, <strong>of</strong> the 100,000 verses that is believed<br />

to have existed in the Dvapara Yuga, most were either lost or altered by the beginning <strong>of</strong><br />

the Kali Yuga. “<br />

So it did undergo alteration and loss. If writing down was the solution to avoid that why was it<br />

not done earlier? If Kumarila Bhatta was right, did it nullify the spiritual significance <strong>of</strong> the Vedas<br />

now? The reason for writing down has to be obtained for reasons other than what the sages<br />

are ready to give. The nomadic people whose oral tradition was this veda did not have<br />

any knowledge <strong>of</strong> writing. Even today we have large number <strong>of</strong> dialects which do not have<br />

any scripts.<br />

http://www.sanskrit.nic.in/ABOUTSANSKRIT1.htm<br />

”Although twenty one recensions <strong>of</strong> Rig-Veda have been mentioned yet only five are more<br />

popular – Shakala, Vashkala, Ashvalayana, Sankhyayana and Mandukayana. Out <strong>of</strong> these five<br />

also, only Shakala is available.”<br />

Strangley enough some zealots do quote the Rig Veda to show the existence <strong>of</strong> writing. But all<br />

those that refer writing are from Mandala I and X which were written in Sanskrit and dated in<br />

the post-Chrsitian period. Here is an example for it<br />

32

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!