04.05.2016 Views

MiFID II / MiFIR Transaction Reporting A Practical Guide

e5vYF-W

e5vYF-W

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Instruments covered<br />

The list of financial instruments covered has been extended<br />

to almost all instruments traded in European markets – with<br />

particular emphasis on the OTC derivatives market that was<br />

previously out of scope for <strong>MiFID</strong> I.<br />

The only financial instruments that still fall outside <strong>MiFIR</strong>’s<br />

scope are:<br />

In addition, <strong>MiFIR</strong> rules have been extended to include non-EUbased<br />

branches of EU firms. These branches will need to submit<br />

transaction reports to the firm’s home state authority.<br />

So the regulations will not only affect the majority of financial<br />

institutions within Europe – a great many outside Europe will be<br />

affected as well.<br />

+ Segregated collateral transfers in bilateral transactions<br />

(though the exact details of this are still being worked out)<br />

+Financing transactions already covered under the Securities<br />

Financing <strong>Transaction</strong> Regulation (SFTR)<br />

+ Give-ups or give-ins<br />

+The issuance, allotment, subscription or exercise of<br />

pre-emption rights<br />

Trading venues<br />

Under the new regulations, any instrument considered to be<br />

“liquid” must be traded on an approved venue, which can be a<br />

regulated market (RM), multilateral trading facility (MTF), or in the<br />

case of OTC transactions, an organised trading facility (OTF).<br />

There is ongoing debate and controversy as to what exactly<br />

constitutes whether an instrument is “liquid” or “illiquid”.<br />

Under <strong>MiFIR</strong>, all liquid instruments will have to be traded on an<br />

exchange, and will also be subject to far greater pre- and posttrade<br />

transparency requirements. Whether a particular product is<br />

classified as liquid or illiquid could therefore have a big effect on<br />

market making.<br />

The issue with making this distinction across so many different<br />

instruments is one of the main reasons why the <strong>MiFID</strong> <strong>II</strong> and<br />

<strong>MiFIR</strong> implementation date has been delayed twice from its<br />

original start date of January 2015.<br />

Data fields<br />

The number of data fields required on transaction reports is more<br />

than doubling from 24 to 65. In addition, many of the existing<br />

fields required by <strong>MiFID</strong> I will be amended to encompass more<br />

complexity and a greater breadth of instruments.<br />

There follows a summary of the reporting requirements, and<br />

some of the internal and third-party systems that firms will<br />

need to source the new data from.<br />

<strong>MiFID</strong> <strong>II</strong> / <strong>MiFIR</strong> <strong>Transaction</strong> <strong>Reporting</strong><br />

A <strong>Practical</strong> <strong>Guide</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!