08.12.2012 Views

Vol 34 No 2 suppli final.pmd - IDA KERALA STATE ::. idakerala.com

Vol 34 No 2 suppli final.pmd - IDA KERALA STATE ::. idakerala.com

Vol 34 No 2 suppli final.pmd - IDA KERALA STATE ::. idakerala.com

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Efficacy of bioglass (HABG) grafting over non grafting on<br />

mandibular third molar extraction sites- A <strong>com</strong>parative study<br />

* Sajesh S., ** Manjunath Rai<br />

Reconstruction of <strong>com</strong>plex osseous defects in<br />

craniofacial region is challenging to the modern surgeon.<br />

An osseous defect in the craniofacial region may result<br />

from minor surgeries trauma infection congenital<br />

anomalies or due to oncological ablative surgeries.<br />

Development of predictable methods to reconstruct<br />

and methods to enhance bone regeneration is a priority<br />

for dental and medical specialties.<br />

Historical records from implantation of natural<br />

minerals and gem-stones goes far back to the period<br />

600-800 A.D, followed by ivory, inert metals, and bone<br />

products. 1 Bone grafting is used by many surgical<br />

specialists. Various materials are attempted by clinicians<br />

to replace the defects in orofacial region. Most of these<br />

bone replacement materials act as defect fillers or<br />

scaffolds and there by promotes regeneration.<br />

Autogenous bone graft has been used more frequently<br />

as it can be harvested easily and gives the best possible<br />

KDJ - <strong>Vol</strong>.<strong>34</strong>, <strong>No</strong>. 1 Supplement, March 2011<br />

Research<br />

Abstract<br />

Objectives: the purpose of this study was 1. To assess and evaluate the effectiveness of<br />

Chithra hydroxyapatite bioglass <strong>com</strong>posite granules (Chithra (HABG)) as a graft material in<br />

the healing of extraction sockets following third molar removal. 2. To analyze the effect of<br />

the material with regard to periodontal pocket depth and inflammation distal to second molar.<br />

3. To investigate the merit of the material with respect to its impact on the incidence of post<br />

operative <strong>com</strong>plications such as pain or dry socket and also to study the amount of osseous<br />

fill.<br />

Methods: In this study a total of 25 patients with bilateral mandibular 3 rd molar impactions<br />

were selected, age range at an averaging 18-30 years. Impacted tooth on the right side was<br />

denoted as site –A on which grafting of Chithra hydroxyapatite bioglass <strong>com</strong>posite granules<br />

(Chithra HABG) was performed following removal of that tooth, where as the left side was<br />

chosen as site B and it was allowed to heal without interposition of any graft material following<br />

surgery. All patients were evaluated on the 3 rd and 7 th post operative day, they were evaluated<br />

for the presence of any inflammation, periodontal pockets distal to mandibular second molars,<br />

pain; dry sockets or any other pathologies respectively. Radiographic assessment was made at<br />

intervals of 3 months, 6 months and 9 months using panoramic study to evaluate the amount<br />

of osseous fill at both the grafted and non grafted sites.<br />

Results: Periodontal pocket distal to second molar and inflammation was significantly<br />

less in the grafted site when <strong>com</strong>pared to that of the non grafted site. Incidence of postoperative<br />

pain was less in grafted site when <strong>com</strong>pared to the non grafted site. There was no dry socket<br />

at both grafted as well as on the non grafted site. Radiographic evaluation showed good<br />

osseous fill in both grafted as well as on the non grafted site. The tests used in this study were<br />

Kruskal-Wallis test, Mann Whitney u test, Wilcoxon signed-rank sum test.<br />

Conclusion: This study shows the treatment of extraction site with Chithra (HABG)<br />

significantly alter the periodontal probing depth, inflammation, less incidence of pain and also<br />

shows good osseous fill distal to second molar.<br />

functional and cosmetic results. Various other materials<br />

like xenografts and allografts gave been used to<br />

over<strong>com</strong>e the disadvantages of auto grafts, such as<br />

donor site morbidity, limited availability, 3 high incidence<br />

of resorption.<br />

Allografts are be<strong>com</strong>ing a more accepted form of<br />

bone grafts. The majority of large allografts assumes a<br />

near-normal / function in individuals who lack certain<br />

areas of the body that have been resected for oncologic<br />

problems or for other reasons. It is frequently possible<br />

for these areas to be replaced, and the patient can resume<br />

normal function. 2 The problems with allograft include<br />

premature resorption, delayed resorption, highly variable<br />

inductive properties and potential for disease<br />

transmission. Numerous materials have been invented<br />

and used in clinical practice which includes metals,<br />

polymers and ceramics.<br />

127

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!