03.06.2016 Views

Download PDF - Ivie

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

individuals making choices (the consumers), and p : I × 2 C × Θ −→ [0, 1] the<br />

choice probability function, such that p(i|B,θ) is the probability of alternative<br />

i being selected given that the selection must be made from the choice<br />

set B ⊂ C and that the decision maker has characteristics θ ∈ Θ.<br />

For the case analysed, I is the set of indices for market places (establishments<br />

or firms locations), each of them with attributes Z that may include<br />

the spatial coordinates, the selling price, amenities offered, and other. Θ<br />

may specify demographic oreconomicvariablesoftheconsumers,orany<br />

otheraspectinfluencing tastes.<br />

The distribution of tastes in the population of decision-makers (consumers)<br />

is given by a probability measure µ(.|θ) inthespaceU(I) of utility<br />

functions with arguments in I, depending on their characteristics θ.<br />

The introduction of a supplementary random component in the utility<br />

function leads to the Random Utility Maximisation (RUM) paradigm, extensively<br />

studied again by McFadden (1977), which allows considering a population<br />

of consumers with both known and unmeasured covariates influencing<br />

their decision, and their distribution in a geographical space. The formal<br />

integration of all information elements may be provided by utility functions<br />

of the form<br />

U ≡ W + ε<br />

where W is the deterministic or systematic part of the utility and ε is a<br />

random term, capturing the uncertainty whose sources are the unobserved<br />

attributes of the alternative establishments, the unobserved individual characteristics<br />

(such as psychological factors), measurement errors (for example,<br />

of distances and transportation costs), and other.<br />

MacFadden demonstrates that a PCS is compatible with the RUM hypothesis<br />

(or can be generated from the RUM hypothesis) and a family of<br />

choice sets B ∈ B via the following mapping: p : I × 2 C × Θ −→ [0, 1]<br />

defined by<br />

<br />

<br />

p(i k |B,θ) =µ {U ∈ U(I) / U(i k )=maxU(i j )}, θ<br />

j<br />

for each B = {i 1 , ..., i n } ∈ C,and θ ∈ Θ.<br />

Finding econometrically feasible PCS consistent with RUM is done then<br />

by generating choice probabilities p from parametric families of probabilities<br />

7

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!