Download PDF - Ivie
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
individuals making choices (the consumers), and p : I × 2 C × Θ −→ [0, 1] the<br />
choice probability function, such that p(i|B,θ) is the probability of alternative<br />
i being selected given that the selection must be made from the choice<br />
set B ⊂ C and that the decision maker has characteristics θ ∈ Θ.<br />
For the case analysed, I is the set of indices for market places (establishments<br />
or firms locations), each of them with attributes Z that may include<br />
the spatial coordinates, the selling price, amenities offered, and other. Θ<br />
may specify demographic oreconomicvariablesoftheconsumers,orany<br />
otheraspectinfluencing tastes.<br />
The distribution of tastes in the population of decision-makers (consumers)<br />
is given by a probability measure µ(.|θ) inthespaceU(I) of utility<br />
functions with arguments in I, depending on their characteristics θ.<br />
The introduction of a supplementary random component in the utility<br />
function leads to the Random Utility Maximisation (RUM) paradigm, extensively<br />
studied again by McFadden (1977), which allows considering a population<br />
of consumers with both known and unmeasured covariates influencing<br />
their decision, and their distribution in a geographical space. The formal<br />
integration of all information elements may be provided by utility functions<br />
of the form<br />
U ≡ W + ε<br />
where W is the deterministic or systematic part of the utility and ε is a<br />
random term, capturing the uncertainty whose sources are the unobserved<br />
attributes of the alternative establishments, the unobserved individual characteristics<br />
(such as psychological factors), measurement errors (for example,<br />
of distances and transportation costs), and other.<br />
MacFadden demonstrates that a PCS is compatible with the RUM hypothesis<br />
(or can be generated from the RUM hypothesis) and a family of<br />
choice sets B ∈ B via the following mapping: p : I × 2 C × Θ −→ [0, 1]<br />
defined by<br />
<br />
<br />
p(i k |B,θ) =µ {U ∈ U(I) / U(i k )=maxU(i j )}, θ<br />
j<br />
for each B = {i 1 , ..., i n } ∈ C,and θ ∈ Θ.<br />
Finding econometrically feasible PCS consistent with RUM is done then<br />
by generating choice probabilities p from parametric families of probabilities<br />
7