Statutory Report
1sxlyXm
1sxlyXm
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
8.19<br />
Upon Police Officer 18 taking over the investigation he made an<br />
immediate policy decision stating ‘family liaison to remain the<br />
responsibility of the previous FLO’, he provided rationale: ‘this officer has<br />
already had some contact with the families in previous meetings and<br />
should remain given the other significant personnel changes in the<br />
investigation’.<br />
8.20<br />
Police Officer 18 acknowledged the need for police senior command and<br />
himself to meet with the families and survivors and provide them with an<br />
update on the police investigation. As a result I am aware that together<br />
with Police Officer 19 a meeting was held on 26 July 2005. During this<br />
meeting it was disclosed that there were ongoing DNA forensic tests but<br />
that these and other enquiries had been delayed due to the loss of<br />
trained and experienced detectives arising from the Patten<br />
recommendations. The victims and survivors did not accept this position<br />
and considered the remarks of Police Officer 19 to be insensitive.<br />
8.21<br />
My investigators interviewed Police Officer 19, who was clear in his view<br />
that he had not meant to be insensitive but needed to inform the<br />
interested parties that he had personal concerns in respect of the<br />
resourcing of murder enquiries at that particular time. He supported his<br />
position by referring to the fact that the Policing Board was also<br />
concerned and had questioned the Chief Constable in relation to his<br />
resourcing of all murder enquiries. I understand why the victims and<br />
survivors considered Police Officer 19’s comments to be insensitive.<br />
8.22<br />
At the meeting with the families Police Officer 18 was aware that there<br />
was a positive DNA link in respect of a suspect, who had not previously<br />
been identified in the investigation. The arrest of this individual did not<br />
take place until 2008 due to the itinerant lifestyle of the suspect and he<br />
was subsequently eliminated from the enquiry as a suspect. Whilst the<br />
delay was for an extended period, I accept that locating suspects can be<br />
a painstaking and lengthy procedure.<br />
Page 132 of157