Fleeing Persecution Asylum Claims in the UK on Religious Freedom
1PiV8gJ
1PiV8gJ
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
<strong>on</strong> Human Rights <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g> 1950. The UN Human Rights Committee (HRC) has published an <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>terpretati<strong>on</strong><br />
of <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> provisi<strong>on</strong>s of <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> article, referred to as General Comment 22. The word<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g of 'religi<strong>on</strong> or<br />
belief' covers all religious beliefs as well as a<str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>istic and humanist beliefs and <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> right to hold no<br />
religi<strong>on</strong> or belief. When understood <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g> l<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>e with subsequent legal provisi<strong>on</strong>s and <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> General<br />
Comment, <strong>Freedom</strong> of Religi<strong>on</strong> or Belief <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>cludes:<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<strong>Freedom</strong> of thought, c<strong>on</strong>science and religi<strong>on</strong><br />
<strong>Freedom</strong> to change religi<strong>on</strong> or belief, <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>clud<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g freedom to not believe <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g> any<br />
religi<strong>on</strong> or beliefs<br />
<strong>Freedom</strong> to manifest religi<strong>on</strong> or belief <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g> teach<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g, practice, worship and<br />
observance, al<strong>on</strong>e or <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g> community with o<str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>rs and <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g> public<br />
<strong>Freedom</strong> from coerci<strong>on</strong> that impair <strong>on</strong>e's freedom to have or adopt a religi<strong>on</strong> or<br />
belief of choice.<br />
<strong>Freedom</strong> to <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>struct <strong>on</strong>e's children accord<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g to <strong>on</strong>e's religi<strong>on</strong> or belief.<br />
The Universal Declarati<strong>on</strong> of Human Rights, as a mere declarati<strong>on</strong> of <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> UN General Assembly, is<br />
not b<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>d<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g <strong>on</strong> states <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g> and of itself. S<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>ce 1948, however, most if not all of it has been recognised<br />
as reflect<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g customary <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>ternati<strong>on</strong>al law, which is b<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>d<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g <strong>on</strong> all states apart from persistent<br />
objectors, someth<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g not applicable <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> cases under c<strong>on</strong>siderati<strong>on</strong> here. Evidence of <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />
customary status of Article 18 can be found <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> fact that it has been transposed, with some<br />
modificati<strong>on</strong>, <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>to <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> Internati<strong>on</strong>al Covenant <strong>on</strong> Civil and Political Rights of 1966. While not <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />
case under <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> UDHR, Article 18 of <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> ICCPR is <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g> part an absolute right with respect to which<br />
derogati<strong>on</strong> under Article 4 ICCPR is not possible: <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> c<strong>on</strong>cept of derogati<strong>on</strong> is not directly<br />
applicable to <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> UDHR, but <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> customary understand<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g of freedom of religi<strong>on</strong>, c<strong>on</strong>science,<br />
thought and belief may <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>corporate this restricti<strong>on</strong> with <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> corresp<strong>on</strong>d<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g limitati<strong>on</strong>s <strong>on</strong><br />
manifestati<strong>on</strong> set out <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g> Article 18.3 ICCPR, particularly <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> light of <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> general c<strong>on</strong>siderati<strong>on</strong>s<br />
set out <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g> Article 29.2 UDHR. No state, <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>refore, should impose limitati<strong>on</strong>s <strong>on</strong> belief or n<strong>on</strong>-belief,<br />
and <strong>on</strong>ly restricti<strong>on</strong>s set out <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g> law that are reas<strong>on</strong>able and proporti<strong>on</strong>ate should be permitted <strong>on</strong><br />
manifestati<strong>on</strong>.<br />
The Reality of Violati<strong>on</strong>s of <strong>Freedom</strong> of Religi<strong>on</strong> or Belief <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g> Today's World<br />
Sadly, even though <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>ternati<strong>on</strong>al law offers a robust basis for <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> protecti<strong>on</strong> of <strong>Freedom</strong> of Religi<strong>on</strong><br />
or Belief, denial of this right and religious persecuti<strong>on</strong> of <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>dividuals and communities is <strong>on</strong>e of <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />
most widespread forms of human rights abuses <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> world today. Individuals suffer such abuses<br />
ei<str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>r directly from states or from wider society. The Pew Forum's study <strong>on</strong> religious restricti<strong>on</strong>s<br />
<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g> 198 countries and territories shows that overall restricti<strong>on</strong>s <strong>on</strong> religious freedom (result<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g from<br />
government policies or from hostile acts by private <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>dividuals, organizati<strong>on</strong>s and social groups)<br />
are high or very high <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g> 39% of countries surveyed. S<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>ce some of <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>se countries such as Ch<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>a and<br />
India also have <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> world's largest populati<strong>on</strong>s, more than 5.5 billi<strong>on</strong> people - roughly 77% of <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />
world's populati<strong>on</strong> - live under such c<strong>on</strong>diti<strong>on</strong>s. 8<br />
The day to day experience of pers<strong>on</strong>s liv<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>se c<strong>on</strong>diti<strong>on</strong>s <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>cludes a wide range of abuses<br />
from <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> denial of educati<strong>on</strong>, equality before <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> law, access to health, jobs, and hous<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g, to direct<br />
physical abuse and <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>timidati<strong>on</strong> from state security officials, impris<strong>on</strong>ment, and <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g> some cases<br />
official executi<strong>on</strong>. The Pew Forum’s studies also highlight that persecuti<strong>on</strong> not <strong>on</strong>ly arises from<br />
government restricti<strong>on</strong>s but also from social hostilities which may <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>volve deeply-engra<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>ed<br />
8<br />
Pew Research Centre, (26 February 2015) ‘Latest Trends <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>Religious</strong> Restricti<strong>on</strong>s and Hostilities’, p.4. Available<br />
[Onl<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>e] from: http://www.pewforum.org/files/2015/02/Restricti<strong>on</strong>s2015_fullReport.pdf<br />
11