EVIDENCE

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Appendix III FREEDOM OF INFORMATION REQUESTS 45 APPENDIX III: FREEDOM OF INFORMATION REQUESTS
We requested the following information from 24 UK ministerial departments and from two executive agencies (Public Health England and the Environment Agency) under the Freedom of Information Act 2000: 1 Details of all research studies commissioned by [the department/agency] between July 2013 and July 2015, including title, date the study was commissioned, who was commissioned to carry out the study, and when and where the results were published. 2 A summary of how many research studies were carried out or commissioned by [the department/ agency] between July 2013 and July 2015, and how many remain unpublished as of July 2015. 3 A statement of how complete [the department/agency]’s publicly available databases of research studies are, by summarizing the details of all research studies that have been commissioned but are not registered on the databases. For details of departmental responses see Table 1, p 14. APPENDIX III: FREEDOM OF INFORMATION REQUESTS 46
Page 1: MISSING EVIDENCE: An inquiry into t
Page 5 and 6: CONTENTS 1 Introduction 2 Summary 3
Page 7 and 8: SUMMARY No comprehensive account ex
Page 9 and 10: 1.1 It might have been thought that
Page 11 and 12: What constitutes government researc
Page 13 and 14: 2.16 An important value of external
Page 15 and 16: Rules governing the publication of
Page 17 and 18: What are the scale and significance
Page 19 and 20: Table 1: Details of responses to Fr
Page 21 and 22: 3.16 Implicit in attempts to contro
Page 23 and 24: Case study 1 THE EFFECTS OF MINIMUM
Page 25 and 26: Case study 3 THE HORSEMEAT SCANDAL
Page 27 and 28: Case study 5 INTERNATIONAL COMPARIS
Page 29 and 30: Case study 7 CHOOSING A GP AWAY FRO
Page 31 and 32: Case study 9 THE EFFECT OF FRACKING
Page 33 and 34: 3.30 It has also been suggested tha
Page 35 and 36: Section 4 REMEDIES AND RECOMMENDATI
Page 37 and 38: Ensuring the independent commission
Page 39 and 40: Allowing reanalysis of sensitive da
Page 41 and 42: Recommendation IV Routine publicati
Page 44 and 45: Appendix I INQUIRY METHODS AND CALL
Page 46 and 47: Appendix II LIST OF CONTRIBUTORS 41
Page 48 and 49: Dr Tim Leunig Sofia Lind Catherine
Page 52 and 53: Appendix IV BIBLIOGRAPHY 47 APPENDI
Page 54 and 55: Gallagher, E (2008). The Gallagher
Page 56 and 57: Portes, J (2012). British jobs and
Page 58: Sense about Science is an independe

EVIDENCE

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?