17.06.2016 Views

ITUC GLOBAL RIGHTS INDEX

1RZ0UUH

1RZ0UUH

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

PART I //<br />

NOTEWORTHY<br />

DEVELOPMENTS<br />

Indonesia<br />

The number of violations of fundamental rights of workers has drastically increased<br />

since last year thus placing the country in category 5 as opposed to category<br />

4 last year. This is primarily linked to the harsh crackdown on minimum wage<br />

protests. For several decades Indonesia operated a comprehensive system of<br />

minimum wage fixing that proved to be compatible with strong economic growth,<br />

increased employment, high levels of investment and declining poverty. However,<br />

in October 2015, changes to the minimum wage fixing system were announced<br />

diminishing the participation of workers in consultations over minimum wages.<br />

Unions campaigned against these changes but were met with a brutal repression.<br />

Trade unions organised a lawful and peaceful protest in front of the Presidential<br />

Palace, which was attended by more than 35,000 workers. Despite its peaceful<br />

nature, police used water cannons and tear gas to disperse the protesters. Police<br />

also arrested 23 workers and detained them for 30 hours, accusing them of<br />

having provoked the demonstration. Shortly after the demonstrations, the branch<br />

office of KPBI (Komite Politik Buruh Indonesia) in North Jakarta was occupied by<br />

police, the central KSPI Office and all branch offices of the metalworkers’ federation<br />

Federasi Serikat Pekerja Metal Indonesia (FSPMI) were guarded by police and<br />

other authorities, and a trade unionist in East Java was beaten by police. Several<br />

union leaders also reported that their private cars had been damaged.<br />

Paraguay<br />

The government has consistently refused to register trade unions or at best has<br />

engaged in lengthy delays well in excess of the time limits established in its legislation<br />

– which has allowed employers ample opportunity to dismiss trade union<br />

leaders and activists. The effect has been to limit the growth of the trade union<br />

movement and to deprive workers a choice in their representative at work and in<br />

society. Union leaders and activists are frequent targets of anti-union discrimination,<br />

with little effective recourse in law. And, when trade unionists have protested<br />

these violations, they have been subject to violent retaliation by agents of the<br />

33 |

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!