IQ-Magazine-Issue-17
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
the quarterly debate: Devolution<br />
<strong>IQ</strong> debate<br />
The debate on whether or not to devolve central government powers to Norfolk,<br />
Suffolk and Cambridgeshire has been somewhat overshadowed by the EU<br />
Referendum. No doubt once all has been decided, attention will turn to what’s likely<br />
to be the next hot topic, devolution<br />
Lucy Nethsingha<br />
Leader of The Liberal Democrat Group<br />
Cambridgeshire County Council<br />
“In March this year the Chancellor announced a<br />
‘Devolution Deal for the East’ with an elected Mayor<br />
for East Anglia. This announcement followed weeks<br />
of crazy negotiations between council leaders.<br />
Unfortunately they failed to check that the proposals<br />
had any backing from their councils. Within weeks,<br />
the proposal had been thrown out by several councils.<br />
Negotiations are continuing to try to salvage some<br />
kind of deal, but is the deal worth saving?<br />
The Mayor would have sweeping powers to decide<br />
on planning matters. This would mean that one<br />
person (in reality a Conservative appointee, as with<br />
Police and Crime Commissioners) would decide on<br />
where thousands of new homes would be built.<br />
The document proposes setting up a new “combined<br />
authority” to keep a check on the sweeping powers<br />
given to the new Mayor, but in the initial document<br />
a 2/3 majority was needed to reject any of the<br />
Mayor’s proposals.<br />
This does not sound like devolving power to local<br />
people, but is locking the concerns of local people<br />
out of the planning process, while giving an easy<br />
“one-stop shop” for large developers.<br />
The proposals also introduce yet another layer of<br />
local government. In East Anglia we already have<br />
Parish, District and County Councils, so the idea of<br />
having yet another layer, a combined authority with<br />
a Mayor’s office on the top of the three layers we<br />
already have, seems crazy. Devolution should give<br />
power to our Councils to get on with the job; we<br />
don’t need a foreign Mayoral system to introduce yet<br />
more bureaucracy!”<br />
John Dugmore<br />
Chief Executive<br />
Suffolk Chamber of Commerce<br />
“We live in an era of important D-words: deficit,<br />
debt and now, devolution.<br />
Suffolk Chamber of Commerce is broadly supportive<br />
of the principles behind Government plans to give<br />
Cambridgeshire, Norfolk and Suffolk more control<br />
over business-critical issues such as infrastructure,<br />
investment and skills development.<br />
We think that would allow the private and public<br />
sectors, as well as local communities, to make<br />
better decisions and take speedier advantage of<br />
opportunities in the fast-moving national and<br />
international economic systems.<br />
However, we are keen to ensure that the voice of<br />
business is heard loud and clear both during the<br />
current consultation stage and if – or when – the<br />
new, devolved structures are in place. Any significant<br />
initiatives need to be evaluated against the expertise<br />
and needs of Suffolk’s wealth creators.<br />
The business community must be at the heart of the<br />
devolved entity and not kept at arm’s length or used<br />
as an occasional think tank.<br />
No matter how the devolved authority is organised,<br />
it will be trust, relationships and knowledge-sharing<br />
between those organisations involved that will help<br />
devolution realise its potential.<br />
Devolution should be all about another D-word –<br />
delivery – and that is what business is all about.”<br />
issue <strong>17</strong> | page 21