29.06.2016 Views

IQ-Magazine-Issue-17

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

the quarterly debate: Devolution<br />

<strong>IQ</strong> debate<br />

The debate on whether or not to devolve central government powers to Norfolk,<br />

Suffolk and Cambridgeshire has been somewhat overshadowed by the EU<br />

Referendum. No doubt once all has been decided, attention will turn to what’s likely<br />

to be the next hot topic, devolution<br />

Lucy Nethsingha<br />

Leader of The Liberal Democrat Group<br />

Cambridgeshire County Council<br />

“In March this year the Chancellor announced a<br />

‘Devolution Deal for the East’ with an elected Mayor<br />

for East Anglia. This announcement followed weeks<br />

of crazy negotiations between council leaders.<br />

Unfortunately they failed to check that the proposals<br />

had any backing from their councils. Within weeks,<br />

the proposal had been thrown out by several councils.<br />

Negotiations are continuing to try to salvage some<br />

kind of deal, but is the deal worth saving?<br />

The Mayor would have sweeping powers to decide<br />

on planning matters. This would mean that one<br />

person (in reality a Conservative appointee, as with<br />

Police and Crime Commissioners) would decide on<br />

where thousands of new homes would be built.<br />

The document proposes setting up a new “combined<br />

authority” to keep a check on the sweeping powers<br />

given to the new Mayor, but in the initial document<br />

a 2/3 majority was needed to reject any of the<br />

Mayor’s proposals.<br />

This does not sound like devolving power to local<br />

people, but is locking the concerns of local people<br />

out of the planning process, while giving an easy<br />

“one-stop shop” for large developers.<br />

The proposals also introduce yet another layer of<br />

local government. In East Anglia we already have<br />

Parish, District and County Councils, so the idea of<br />

having yet another layer, a combined authority with<br />

a Mayor’s office on the top of the three layers we<br />

already have, seems crazy. Devolution should give<br />

power to our Councils to get on with the job; we<br />

don’t need a foreign Mayoral system to introduce yet<br />

more bureaucracy!”<br />

John Dugmore<br />

Chief Executive<br />

Suffolk Chamber of Commerce<br />

“We live in an era of important D-words: deficit,<br />

debt and now, devolution.<br />

Suffolk Chamber of Commerce is broadly supportive<br />

of the principles behind Government plans to give<br />

Cambridgeshire, Norfolk and Suffolk more control<br />

over business-critical issues such as infrastructure,<br />

investment and skills development.<br />

We think that would allow the private and public<br />

sectors, as well as local communities, to make<br />

better decisions and take speedier advantage of<br />

opportunities in the fast-moving national and<br />

international economic systems.<br />

However, we are keen to ensure that the voice of<br />

business is heard loud and clear both during the<br />

current consultation stage and if – or when – the<br />

new, devolved structures are in place. Any significant<br />

initiatives need to be evaluated against the expertise<br />

and needs of Suffolk’s wealth creators.<br />

The business community must be at the heart of the<br />

devolved entity and not kept at arm’s length or used<br />

as an occasional think tank.<br />

No matter how the devolved authority is organised,<br />

it will be trust, relationships and knowledge-sharing<br />

between those organisations involved that will help<br />

devolution realise its potential.<br />

Devolution should be all about another D-word –<br />

delivery – and that is what business is all about.”<br />

issue <strong>17</strong> | page 21

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!