Data file

6 r Training
Q42 If you were asked to peer review a paper tomorrow – how
confident would you feel about Training undertaking the review?
6R
Reviewers
only
6 r
6R
Training
6R
Training
Q43 Thinking back to the first paper you peer reviewed – how did
this opportunity arise?
Q43
Q43
Thinking
Thinking
back
back
to
to
the
the
first
first
paper
paper
you
you
peer
peer
reviewed
reviewed –
how
how
did
did
this
this
opportunity
opportunity
arise?
arise?
Reviewers
Reviewers
only
only
Q42
If you were asked to peer review a paper tomorrow – how confident would you feel about undertaking the
review?
Humanities
Humanities
and
and
Social
Social
Science
Science
Researchers
Researchers
[n
[n =
2,469]
2,469]
1 – not at all confident to 10 – very confident
46%
46%
HSS
STM
6R
Reviewers
Training
only
Humanities and Social Science Researchers
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
When you are asked to peer review a
Q42 If you were asked to peer review a paper tomorrow – how confident would you feel about undertaking the
paper - how confident do you feel
review?
16% 21% 30% 19% 7%
about undertaking the review?
[n = 2,459]
1 – not at all confident to 10 – very confident
10 - very confident 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 - not at all confident
Humanities and Social Science Researchers
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
When you are asked to peer Scientific, review a Technical and Medical Researchers
paper - how confident do you feel 0% 16% 20% 21% 40% 30% 60% 19% 80% 7% 100%
about undertaking the review?
When you are [n asked = 2,459] to peer review a
paper - how confident do you feel
17% 20% 27% 19% 7%
about 10 - undertaking very confident the review? 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 - not at all confident
[n = 1,501]
10 - very confident 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 - not at all confident
When you are asked to peer review a
paper - how confident do you feel
about undertaking the review?
[n = 1,501]
Scientific, Technical and Medical Researchers
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
17% 20% 27% 19% 7%
I
was
was
approached
approached
by
by
the
the
Editor/Editorial
Editor/Editorial
Board
Board
member,
member,
who
who I
don't
don't
know
know
21%
21%
19%
19%
5%
5%
I
was
was
approached
approached
by
by
the
the
Editor/Editorial
Editor/Editorial
Board
Board
member,
member,
who
who I
know
know
My
My
supervisor
supervisor
I
added
added
my
my
name
name
and
and
invited/recommended
invited/recommended
details
details
to
to a
list
list
of
of
me
me
potential
potential
reviewers
reviewers
for
for
the
the
journal
journal
Scientific,
Scientific,
Technical
Technical
and
and
Medical
Medical
Researchers
Researchers
[n
[n =
1,509]
1,509]
46%
46%
25%
25%
12%
12%
6%
6%
8%
8%
Other
Other
11%
11%
HSS STM
10 - very confident 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 - not at all confident
I
was
was
approached
approached
by
by My
My
supervisor
supervisor
I was
was
approached
approached
by
by
the
the
Editor/Editorial
Editor/Editorial
invited/recommended
invited/recommended
the
the
Editor/Editorial
Editor/Editorial
Board
Board
member,
member,
who
who
I
me
me
Board
Board
member,
member,
who
who
I
don't
don't
know
know
know
know
I added
added
my
my
name
name
and
and
details
details
to
to
a list
list
of
of
potential
potential
reviewers
reviewers
for
for
the
the
journal
journal
Other
Other
18
PEER REVIEW A GLOBAL VIEW
The
The
following
following
options
options
were
were
selected
selected
by
by
fewer
fewer
than
than
5%
5%
of
of
respondents
respondents
and
and
have
have
been
been
included
included
in
in
“Other”
“Other”
above:
above:
HSS STM
HSS STM
The author mentioned me as suitable reviewer 1% 5%
The author mentioned me as a suitable reviewer 1% 5%
The society associated with the journal offers members the chance to review 1% 2%
The society associated with the journal offers members the chance to review 1% 2%
I contacted the Editor/Editorial Board member and asked to be added to the reviewer list 1% 1%
TRAINING 19