Data file
Peer review in 2015 supplement
Peer review in 2015 supplement
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
6 e Locating reviewers<br />
6E<br />
Training<br />
Editors<br />
only<br />
Q60 How often do you find people to peer review manuscripts<br />
Q60<br />
for your journal via the following methods?<br />
How often do you find people to peer review manuscripts for your journal via the following methods?<br />
STM<br />
1 – never use this to 10 – use this every time<br />
Scientific, Technical and Medical Researchers<br />
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%<br />
I search Web of Science for<br />
researchers publishing in related fields<br />
[n = 397]<br />
I ask authors to suggest suitable<br />
reviewers when they submit their<br />
manuscripts<br />
[n = 394]<br />
14%<br />
13%<br />
6%<br />
12%<br />
13%<br />
17%<br />
14%<br />
13%<br />
8%<br />
8%<br />
12%<br />
10%<br />
6%<br />
6%<br />
9%<br />
15%<br />
14%<br />
Peer review: a global view<br />
Motivations, training and support in peer review<br />
For full survey demographics please see key survey data.<br />
I ask Editorial Board members to<br />
suggest experts in their fields [n =<br />
395]<br />
9%<br />
9%<br />
12%<br />
15%<br />
7%<br />
10%<br />
9%<br />
5%<br />
19%<br />
Further Reading<br />
Peer review in 2015 (white paper and key survey data)<br />
I use Editorial Board members as<br />
reviewers [n = 396]<br />
I contact authors who have submitted<br />
to the journal, but not reviewed [n =<br />
392]<br />
7% 7%<br />
6%<br />
11%<br />
13%<br />
12%<br />
14%<br />
9%<br />
9%<br />
10%<br />
13%<br />
11%<br />
7% 7%<br />
9%<br />
7%<br />
19%<br />
20%<br />
References and acknowledgements<br />
#tfpeerreview<br />
STM<br />
I ask colleagues to recommend early<br />
career academics they work with<br />
[n = 393]<br />
9%<br />
10%<br />
13%<br />
10%<br />
9%<br />
7%<br />
7%<br />
8%<br />
23%<br />
I use an online reviewer locator tool<br />
[n = 395]<br />
9%<br />
6%<br />
7%<br />
3%<br />
7%<br />
6%<br />
7%<br />
46%<br />
I publish a call for reviewers in the<br />
journal/on a society website or<br />
listserv<br />
[n = 395]<br />
10%<br />
63%<br />
10 - use this every time 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 - never use this<br />
28<br />
PEER REVIEW A GLOBAL VIEW