07.07.2016 Views

Data file

Peer review in 2015 supplement

Peer review in 2015 supplement

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

6 e Locating reviewers<br />

6E<br />

Training<br />

Editors<br />

only<br />

Q60 How often do you find people to peer review manuscripts<br />

Q60<br />

for your journal via the following methods?<br />

How often do you find people to peer review manuscripts for your journal via the following methods?<br />

STM<br />

1 – never use this to 10 – use this every time<br />

Scientific, Technical and Medical Researchers<br />

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%<br />

I search Web of Science for<br />

researchers publishing in related fields<br />

[n = 397]<br />

I ask authors to suggest suitable<br />

reviewers when they submit their<br />

manuscripts<br />

[n = 394]<br />

14%<br />

13%<br />

6%<br />

12%<br />

13%<br />

17%<br />

14%<br />

13%<br />

8%<br />

8%<br />

12%<br />

10%<br />

6%<br />

6%<br />

9%<br />

15%<br />

14%<br />

Peer review: a global view<br />

Motivations, training and support in peer review<br />

For full survey demographics please see key survey data.<br />

I ask Editorial Board members to<br />

suggest experts in their fields [n =<br />

395]<br />

9%<br />

9%<br />

12%<br />

15%<br />

7%<br />

10%<br />

9%<br />

5%<br />

19%<br />

Further Reading<br />

Peer review in 2015 (white paper and key survey data)<br />

I use Editorial Board members as<br />

reviewers [n = 396]<br />

I contact authors who have submitted<br />

to the journal, but not reviewed [n =<br />

392]<br />

7% 7%<br />

6%<br />

11%<br />

13%<br />

12%<br />

14%<br />

9%<br />

9%<br />

10%<br />

13%<br />

11%<br />

7% 7%<br />

9%<br />

7%<br />

19%<br />

20%<br />

References and acknowledgements<br />

#tfpeerreview<br />

STM<br />

I ask colleagues to recommend early<br />

career academics they work with<br />

[n = 393]<br />

9%<br />

10%<br />

13%<br />

10%<br />

9%<br />

7%<br />

7%<br />

8%<br />

23%<br />

I use an online reviewer locator tool<br />

[n = 395]<br />

9%<br />

6%<br />

7%<br />

3%<br />

7%<br />

6%<br />

7%<br />

46%<br />

I publish a call for reviewers in the<br />

journal/on a society website or<br />

listserv<br />

[n = 395]<br />

10%<br />

63%<br />

10 - use this every time 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 - never use this<br />

28<br />

PEER REVIEW A GLOBAL VIEW

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!