Efficiency in Banking: Empirical Evidence from the Savings ... - Ivie
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Hence, <strong>the</strong> FF is a semi-nonparametric approach used to tackle <strong>the</strong> problem aris<strong>in</strong>g<br />
when <strong>the</strong> true functional form of <strong>the</strong> relationship is unknown. As noted above, <strong>the</strong><br />
methodology was first proposed by Gallant (1981, 1982), and later discussed by Elbadawi,<br />
Gallant and Souza (1983), Chalfant and Gallant (1985), Eastwood and Gallant (1991),<br />
Gallant and Souza (1991). It has been applied to <strong>the</strong> analysis of bank cost efficiency by<br />
Spong et al. (1995), Mitchell and Onvural (1996) and Berger et al. (1997). Vennet (1998)<br />
estimates both <strong>the</strong> translog and FF cost function <strong>in</strong> his study of European universal and<br />
specialist banks but reports only <strong>the</strong> translog estimates because <strong>the</strong> results are similar.<br />
To calculate <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>efficiency measures, <strong>the</strong> FF form, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g a standard translog<br />
and all first, second and third-order trigonometric terms, as well as a two-component error<br />
structure is estimated us<strong>in</strong>g a maximum likelihood procedure. This is shown as:<br />
3<br />
∑[<br />
a<br />
i= 1<br />
i<br />
∑<br />
1 ⎡<br />
⎢<br />
2 ⎣<br />
cos (<br />
3<br />
i= 1<br />
3<br />
∑<br />
j= 1<br />
3<br />
∑<br />
i= 1<br />
3<br />
∑<br />
i= 1<br />
z<br />
) +<br />
i<br />
ln<br />
3<br />
∑<br />
j= 1<br />
3<br />
∑<br />
m= 1<br />
b<br />
δ<br />
ρ<br />
3<br />
∑[<br />
a<br />
k≥<br />
j,<br />
k≠i<br />
s<strong>in</strong> (<br />
i<br />
TC<br />
ij<br />
= α0+<br />
im<br />
lnQ<br />
lnQ<br />
z<br />
ijk<br />
i<br />
)<br />
i<br />
3<br />
∑<br />
lnQ +<br />
i<br />
3<br />
] +∑<br />
cos (<br />
i= 1<br />
i= 1<br />
z<br />
αilnQ+<br />
j<br />
lnPm+<br />
i<br />
+<br />
3<br />
∑<br />
l= 1<br />
3<br />
∑<br />
i= 1<br />
∑<br />
3<br />
∑[<br />
a<br />
j=<br />
1<br />
z<br />
j<br />
+<br />
i<br />
∑<br />
3<br />
3<br />
l= 1<br />
m= 1<br />
γ<br />
β<br />
ψ T lnQ +<br />
z<br />
i<br />
k<br />
ij<br />
) +<br />
lm<br />
l<br />
cos (<br />
b<br />
lnPl+<br />
t1T<br />
+<br />
lnP<br />
i<br />
ijk<br />
z<br />
l<br />
∑<br />
+<br />
s<strong>in</strong> (<br />
lnP<br />
3<br />
l= 1<br />
i<br />
θ lT<br />
lnP l+<br />
z<br />
z<br />
i<br />
) +<br />
j<br />
m<br />
+<br />
+ t11T<br />
z<br />
b<br />
j<br />
ij<br />
+<br />
2<br />
⎤<br />
⎥+<br />
⎦<br />
s<strong>in</strong> (<br />
z<br />
k<br />
)<br />
z<br />
i<br />
+<br />
] +<br />
(4)<br />
where<br />
lnTC = <strong>the</strong> natural logarithm of total costs (Operat<strong>in</strong>g and F<strong>in</strong>ancial cost);<br />
lnQ i = <strong>the</strong> natural logarithm of bank outputs (i.e. loans, securities, off-balance sheet<br />
items);<br />
ε<br />
z<br />
j<br />
)<br />
] +<br />
12