08.09.2016 Views

CARLO MATTOGNO · THE REAL CASE AUSCHWITZ

22-trcfa

22-trcfa

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>CARLO</strong> <strong>MATTOGNO</strong> <strong>·</strong> <strong>THE</strong> <strong>REAL</strong> <strong>CASE</strong> FOR <strong>AUSCHWITZ</strong> 163<br />

tight, 4 doors (two per room) and 6 windows (3 per room), one being<br />

INSIDE the corridor giving access to the chambers, unlike the<br />

five others that are on the outside). The victims would take the route:<br />

gas chamber 1 OR gas chamber 2, corridor, vestibule, morgue [central<br />

room] and furnace room. This sequence is linear, thus LOGI-<br />

CAL.<br />

In industrial terms, 2 manufacturing units [gas chambers 1 and<br />

2] alternately supply a product [corpses] to be held in a store<br />

[morgue] while waiting to be consumed [in the cremation furnaces].<br />

In human terms, people walk in on their own two feet at the western<br />

end of Krematorium IV and go out in the form of smoke from the<br />

chimneys at the eastern end.<br />

The position of the two gas chambers and their corridor, at the<br />

western end, permits natural ventilation without danger to the people<br />

working in the morgue or the furnace room. But the building has<br />

no undressing room. The victims have to get undressed outside. The<br />

Bauleitung could alleviate this problem by erecting a ‘stable type’<br />

hut for this purpose on the other side of the ‘Ringstraße/ring road,’<br />

just opposite Kr IV.” (Pressac’s emph.)<br />

But in this context, the two gas chambers could just as easily be disinfestation<br />

chambers without anything else having to be changed, because<br />

their homicidal character does not result from any such indication.<br />

Pressac himself, on the other hand, calls attention to an incongruous<br />

aspect of the matter which renders his hypothesis not very convincing:<br />

the absence of an undressing room. It is quite true, obviously, that<br />

ZBL could have remedied this inconvenience by placing an undressing<br />

barrack in front of the crematorium, but it is a fact that such a barrack<br />

does not appear on the Birkenau map drawn on February 17, 1943<br />

(Pressac 1989, p. 220), one month after the alleged decision to install<br />

two gas chambers in Crematorium IV. Such a decision would have to be<br />

the basis for the order of January 18 concerning the construction of 4<br />

gas-tight doors, because otherwise this order would have no basis.<br />

5.4. Crematoria IV & V: Second Operating Concept<br />

Let us look at Pressac’s second hypothesis (1989, pp. pp. 447f.):<br />

“Second design: based on the letter of 31st March 1943 and the<br />

testimony of S. Dragon with the creation of a gas-tight unit comprising<br />

the two gas chambers and the corridor. Three doors and six or

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!