You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
$300,000 and $2.5 million. By these estimates, 77% of Litigation PAEs settlements were valued below<br />
an approximate benchmark representing the nuisance value of litigation, while 78% of Portfolio PAE<br />
licenses were equal to or greater than the nuisance value of litigation benchmark.<br />
Royalties Paid by Different Licensees for Licenses to Identical <strong>Patent</strong>s Varied Widely<br />
Study PAEs reported receiving widely differing royalties from different licensees for the same set of<br />
patents. There are many potential explanations for why the royalties paid for identical patents varied<br />
across licensees. Some licensees may have had much higher demand for the patents than other licensees.<br />
A licensee with much higher sales of potentially infringing products would have been expected to pay<br />
more in a patent license than one with lower sales volumes. Because the majority of licenses reported<br />
lump-sum payments without breaking out the royalty rate and the base, it is possible that licensees paid<br />
similar royalty rates, but very different lump sums. Licensees may also have differed in bargaining<br />
sophistication: some licensees may have been more successful in obtaining a license at a lower royalty.<br />
In addition, licensees operating in different industries may have a different willingness to pay for<br />
identical patents.<br />
To measure how royalties paid by licensees to Study PAEs varied, the FTC analyzed the variation in<br />
royalties where a Study PAE licensed identical patents to a number of licensees. The FTC limited its<br />
analysis to instances in which at least ten licensees paid a non-zero royalty to a Study PAE for identical<br />
patents in order to have a reasonable sample size to measure dispersion for each unique collection of<br />
licensed patents. Moreover, to maintain the anonymity of the licensees and Study PAEs, the FTC scaled<br />
each royalty payment by the mean royalty paid for a license for that set of patents. 254 We then plotted the<br />
th th th th th 255<br />
10 , 25 , 50 (median), 75 , and 90 percentiles of the scaled royalty distribution separately for each<br />
unique set of licensed patents. The royalties paid by different licensees to license identical sets of patents<br />
varied dramatically, often by more than a factor of 20. For this reason, we plotted the data using a logscale<br />
for the y-axis; specifically, the unit distance between any two points on the y-axis corresponds to a<br />
254<br />
For example, if the licensee “Intrepid Manufacturing” paid $500,000 to license patents A, B and C from PAE 1, and if the<br />
mean price paid for a license to <strong>Patent</strong>s A, B, and C was $1,000,000, then the FTC would scale “Intrepid Manufacturing’s”<br />
license fee to be 0.5.<br />
255<br />
A percentile is defined as the number in a distribution that causes that percentage of observations to fall below that<br />
number. For example, if 10 is the 50 th percentile of a distribution, then 50% of the numbers in that distribution are less than<br />
10.<br />
92